# Starbucks share price today (Starbucks Corporation, SBUX)

> Starbucks Corporation's balance sheet is under water: its net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a high-risk situation: shareholders can be wiped out by new shares or a restructuring before the business recovers. SBUX · Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sbux

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Business trend: Turning around, from fewer quarters than usual
- Price: $104.77 (+29.6% in a year)
- P/E: 47.4×, over 4.6 years
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $9.3 B (−1.4% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): $1.0 B (+87.2% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 12.9% (+3.4 points on a year ago)
- ROE: −23%, FY25
- ROIC: 14.9%, against a 8.3% cost of capital: +6.6 points

The main question: the share price moved +29.6% in a year while yearly earnings per share moved −50.8%. The difference came from the market paying a higher multiple. ## What is the Starbucks share price today? Starbucks Corporation's share price was $104.77 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been rising for 3 weeks. That is 4.8% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $84 and $108, and at that close it sat 87% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 1 week in a row. Over the last 10 years the share price moved +85% while the S&P 500 moved +255%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Starbucks pay? Starbucks Corporation paid $2.48 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.62 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $104.77 that is a yield of 2.37%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast. ## Which stock lists is Starbucks on? Starbucks is on 2 of our US lists: Nasdaq 100 companies and S&P 500 companies. - [Nasdaq 100 companies](https://www.sectoralpha.in/nasdaq-100-stocks)
- [S&P 500 companies](https://www.sectoralpha.in/sp-500-stocks)

## Is Starbucks profitable? Starbucks Corporation earned $1.0 B of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +87.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $1.9 B. Over 4 years profit has grown −18.5% a year on average. That is 11.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $558 M. For the full year, FY25 profit was $1.9 B (−50.6% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed −1.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved +3.4 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −6.9% and revenue +4.6%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth. ## How much revenue does Starbucks make, and is it growing? Starbucks Corporation reported $9.3 B of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, −1.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown 6.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $37.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $38.3 B. FY25 revenue was $37.2 B, +2.8% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +4.6% on average, against 6.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +4.5%, against +2.5% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew −24.7%, against −30.2% a year (accelerating). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Starbucks keep? Starbucks Corporation's operating margin was 12.9% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 3.4 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 9.9% and 16.2%. The latest quarter is within that range. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +3.4 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +1.8 points. So the gain came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales. ## Is Starbucks' profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 173% of Starbucks Corporation's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $4.7 B of operating cash against $1.9 B of profit. After $2.3 B of spending on assets, $2.4 B was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Starbucks' cash go? Starbucks Corporation does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $7.4 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 6.6% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $7.4 B over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Starbucks' P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Starbucks Corporation's P/E is 47.4×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −50.8% while the price moved +29.6%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +0.7% a year; about −21.5% a year came from earnings growth and about +22.2 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Starbucks business getting better or worse? Starbucks Corporation's business is turning around. Profit growth has swung from −52.2% at its low to −24.7%, rising from a low 1 quarters ago. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps. Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it. The return-on-capital line is not shown: net worth is negative, so a return on capital means nothing. The balance sheet is in distress, and this reading uses the growth lines alone. This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution. ## How much does Starbucks earn on its capital? Starbucks Corporation earned a ROE of −23% in FY25. That is up from a low of −79% in FY21. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 6.6 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 5.0% net margin and 1.16× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 5.0% net margin × 1.16× asset turnover × −3.96× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ −23.0% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 14.9% − 8.3% = +6.6 percentage points. The 8.3% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value. The 14.9% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 12.4%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method. ## Does Starbucks have too much debt? Starbucks Corporation's net worth is negative: it owes more than it owns, so a debt-to-equity ratio means nothing here. Year by year, that ratio went from −4.44 in FY21 to −3.29 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money. ## What is the Starbucks shareholding pattern? 3.8% of Starbucks Corporation's tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 4.7 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Starbucks from balance-sheet trouble? For Starbucks Corporation, the Z-score is 3.10. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.10 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here. ## How does Starbucks rank in its industry? 53.5 out of 100, rank 10 of 29 in Restaurants, with 81% of the evidence available. Starbucks Corporation scores 53.5 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Restaurants, ranking 10. A strong business with a high valuation: it would need rising earnings, or a lower multiple, to score better on value. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 21.2 + 18.6 + 3.9 + 9.8 = 53.5. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Starbucks compared with? Starbucks ranks 10 of 29 Restaurants companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 53.5 out of 100. 1. [Brinker International, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eat) EAT · quiet · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 69.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.3/35 · Revenue 7.9% · Profit 27.1% · Operating margin change 0.9 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.3/25 · ROCE 29.3% · Operating margin 11.3% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.0/20 · P/E 15× · PEG 0.48 · 65% evidence Relative strength 12.5/20 · Lead over its industry 13% · Lead over S&P 500 17.1% · 1 year 102.1% · 100% evidence · 8 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.3 + 18.3 + 15 + 12.5 = 69.1 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 2. [Yum! Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yum) YUM · turning · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 69.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.1/35 · Revenue 10.3% · Profit 54.8% · Operating margin change -0.8 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 21.3/25 · ROCE 64.6% · Operating margin 32.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.8/20 · P/E 19.9× · PEG 0.35 · 65% evidence Relative strength 8.8/20 · Lead over its industry -5.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.8% · 1 year 5.3% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.1 + 21.3 + 14.8 + 8.8 = 69 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 3. [Wingstop Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/wing) WING · turning · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 60.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.7/35 · Revenue 7.9% · Profit -32.6% · Operating margin change 3 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 21.0/25 · ROCE 35.3% · Operating margin 29.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.5/20 · P/E 39× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 7.5/20 · Lead over its industry -17.7% · Lead over S&P 500 -15.9% · 1 year -32.2% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.7 + 21 + 9.5 + 7.5 = 60.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 4. [The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cake) CAKE · leader · Evidence leans up · 66% evidence 59.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.8/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 2 points · 39% evidence Capital efficiency 11.0/25 · ROCE 9.4% · Operating margin 7.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.7/20 · P/E 22.1× · PEG 0.31 · 65% evidence Relative strength 13.6/20 · Lead over its industry 36% · Lead over S&P 500 41.6% · 1 year 132.3% · 100% evidence · 12 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.8 + 11 + 14.7 + 13.6 = 59.1 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. [Restaurant Brands International Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/qsr) QSR · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 58.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.6/35 · Revenue 6.5% · Profit 41.5% · Operating margin change 0.9 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 15.3/25 · ROCE 11.5% · Operating margin 27.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.5/20 · P/E 19.8× · PEG 0.49 · 65% evidence Relative strength 5.7/20 · Lead over its industry -7% · Lead over S&P 500 -3.6% · 1 year 9.7% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.6 + 15.3 + 14.5 + 5.7 = 58.1 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 6. [Yum China Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yumc) YUMC · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 57.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.4/35 · Revenue 8.8% · Profit 6.1% · Operating margin change 0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 16.3/25 · ROCE 16.8% · Operating margin 11.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.9/20 · P/E 14.4× · PEG 1.12 · 65% evidence Relative strength 7.2/20 · Lead over its industry -6.4% · Lead over S&P 500 -3.4% · 1 year 9.8% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.4 + 16.3 + 12.9 + 7.2 = 57.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 7. [Darden Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dri) DRI · turning · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 56.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.0/35 · Revenue 8.1% · Profit 7.5% · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 15.3/25 · ROCE 16% · Operating margin 9.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.6/20 · P/E 20.7× · PEG 2.15 · 65% evidence Relative strength 11.6/20 · Lead over its industry -0.3% · Lead over S&P 500 3.1% · 1 year 23.2% · 100% evidence · 6 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21 + 15.3 + 8.6 + 11.6 = 56.5 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 8. [Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/arco) ARCO · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 55.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.6/35 · Revenue 10.8% · Profit 96.9% · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.3/25 · ROCE 13.2% · Operating margin 5.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 16.3/20 · P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.17 · 65% evidence Relative strength 1.6/20 · Lead over its industry -22% · Lead over S&P 500 -19.3% · 1 year -3.5% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.6 + 13.3 + 16.3 + 1.6 = 55.8 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -22% and the one-year return is -3.5%. 9. [El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/loco) LOCO · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 54.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.8/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 45% evidence Capital efficiency 12.0/25 · ROCE 9% · Operating margin 9.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.9/20 · P/E 15× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 12.7/20 · Lead over its industry 5.5% · Lead over S&P 500 9.6% · 1 year 48.8% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18.8 + 12 + 10.9 + 12.7 = 54.4 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 10. Starbucks Corporation this page SBUX · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 53.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.2/35 · Revenue 4.5% · Profit -24.7% · Operating margin change 3.4 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.6/25 · ROCE 21.6% · Operating margin 12.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 3.9/20 · P/E 60.1× · PEG 5.07 · 65% evidence Relative strength 9.8/20 · Lead over its industry -1% · Lead over S&P 500 2.5% · 1 year 22.4% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.2 + 18.6 + 3.9 + 9.8 = 53.5 · What this means: A strong business with a high valuation: it would need rising earnings, or a lower multiple, to score better on value. 11. [Cannae Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cnne) CNNE · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 50.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [Bloomin' Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/blmn) BLMN · quiet · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 50.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fwrg) FWRG · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 49.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [Texas Roadhouse, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/txrh) TXRH · quiet · Evidence leans down · 66% evidence 49.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. [McDonald's Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mcd) MCD · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 46.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
16. [Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cmg) CMG · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 46.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [BJ's Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bjri) BJRI · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 46.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. [Dine Brands Global, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/din) DIN · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 45.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [Sweetgreen, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sg) SG · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 45.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. [Super Hi International Holding Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hdl) HDL · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 43.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cbrl) CBRL · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 39.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [Biglari Holdings Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bh) BH · basing · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 39.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. [Dutch Bros Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bros) BROS · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 38.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
24. [The Wendy's Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/wen) WEN · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 38.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
25. [Shake Shack Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/shak) SHAK · losing its lead · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 37.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
26. [CAVA Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cava) CAVA · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 36.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
27. [Domino's Pizza, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dpz) DPZ · quiet · Most evidence points down · 85% evidence 33.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
28. [Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/brcb) BRCB · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 33.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
29. [Papa John's International, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/pzza) PZZA · basing · Most evidence points down · 81% evidence 32.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Restaurants](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/restaurants), all 29 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Starbucks in size? Starbucks is the 2nd largest of 36 Restaurants companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: McDonald's Corporation. Just below it: Yum! Brands, Inc., Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Restaurant Brands International Inc., Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc. ### Restaurants companies close in size

1. [McDonald's Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mcd) $186.1 billion
2. Starbucks Corporation $119.4 billion
3. [Yum! Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yum) $42.8 billion
4. [Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cmg) $42.1 billion
5. [Restaurant Brands International Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/qsr) $33.5 billion
6. [Darden Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dri) $24.8 billion
7. [Yum China Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yumc) $16.3 billion

[All 36 Restaurants companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/restaurants#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Marathon Petroleum Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mpc) $120.9 billion · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
2. [Bank of Montreal](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bmo) $120.5 billion · Banks - Diversified
3. Starbucks Corporation $119 billion
4. [BP p.l.c.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bp) $118.2 billion · Oil & Gas Integrated
5. [Automatic Data Processing, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/adp) $117.9 billion · Software - Application

## What else do people ask about Starbucks? ### What were Starbucks's latest quarterly results? Starbucks Corporation reported revenue of $9.3 B and net profit of $1.0 B for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue fell 1.4% and profit rose 87.2% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $0.91. The operating margin was 12.9%, 3.4 percentage points higher than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Starbucks's market cap? Starbucks Corporation's market capitalisation is $119 B at a stock price of $104.77. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Starbucks performing? Starbucks Corporation's share price has been rising for 3 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue fell 1.4% and profit rose 87.2% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, for 1 week running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Starbucks's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Starbucks Corporation's stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $104.77, and it has been rising for 3 weeks. Nobody can reliably say which way a price will move, and this site does not try (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Starbucks in its business cycle? Starbucks Corporation's FY25 operating margin was 9.9%, against a 5-year range of 9.9% to 16.2%: the low end of its own range, which is often where recoveries start. The latest quarter was 12.9%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Starbucks story? The main question: the share price moved +29.6% in a year while yearly earnings per share moved −50.8%. The difference came from the market paying a higher multiple. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Starbucks a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Starbucks Corporation's balance sheet is under water: its net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a high-risk situation: shareholders can be wiped out by new shares or a restructuring before the business recovers. The main open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive net worth before new shares or a restructuring get there first. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). ## Lists

- Nasdaq 100 companies: https://www.sectoralpha.in/nasdaq-100-stocks
- S&P 500 companies: https://www.sectoralpha.in/sp-500-stocks

This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.