# Hayward Holdings share price today (Hayward Holdings, Inc., HAYW)

> Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s earnings have grown faster than its share price. Earnings per share grew +25.9% in a year while the price moved −2.8%. HAYW · Industrials · Electrical Equipment & Parts · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hayw

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Business trend: Mixed, from the last 12 quarters
- Price: $16.50 (−2.8% in a year)
- P/E: 21.4× (lower than 66% of the last 4.6 years)
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $318 M (+6.3% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): $45.6 M (+1.8% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 24.1% (−0.2 points on a year ago)
- ROE: 10%, FY25
- ROIC: 9.9%, against a 9.4% cost of capital: +0.5 points

The main question: yearly earnings per share moved +25.9% while the share price moved −2.8%. ## What is the Hayward Holdings share price today? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s share price was $16.50 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been stalling near its high for 2 weeks. That is 13.4% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $11 and $17, and at that close it sat 92% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 2 weeks in a row. Over the last 5.6 years the share price moved −3% while the S&P 500 moved +94%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Hayward Holdings pay? Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays no dividend. In the last 12 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes. ## Which stock lists is Hayward Holdings on? Hayward Holdings is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Hayward Holdings profitable? Hayward Holdings, Inc. earned $45.6 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +1.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 11th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $152 M. Over 4 years profit has grown 11.7% a year on average. That is 14.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $44.8 M. For the full year, FY25 profit was $152 M (+27.7% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +6.3% on a year earlier and the margin moved −0.2 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +33.9% and revenue +8.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra dollar of revenue adds more to profit. ## How much revenue does Hayward Holdings make, and is it growing? Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported $318 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +6.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 11th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown −5.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.2 B. FY25 revenue was $1.1 B, +6.7% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +8.0% on average, against −5.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +7.8%, against +8.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +23.8%, against +33.7% a year (rolling over). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Hayward Holdings keep? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s operating margin was 24.1% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 0.2 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 19.0% and 23.8%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −0.2 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −0.5 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged. ## Is Hayward Holdings' profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 186% of Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $256 M of operating cash against $152 M of profit. After $32.4 M of spending on assets, $224 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Hayward Holdings' cash go? Hayward Holdings, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $83.7 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 2.5% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $83.7 M over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Hayward Holdings' P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s P/E is 21.4×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 34% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 25.0×, over 4.6 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +25.9% while the price moved −2.8%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +14.0% a year; about +35.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −21.7 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Hayward Holdings business getting better or worse? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s business is giving mixed signals. Growth is slowing from a very fast pace: profit growth has eased from +47.1% at its peak to +23.8%, but the business is still expanding, with ROCE steady at 8.9%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures. Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label. ## How much does Hayward Holdings earn on its capital? Hayward Holdings, Inc. earned a ROE of 10% in FY25. That is up from a low of 6% in FY23. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 0.5 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 13.5% net margin and 0.36× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 13.5% net margin × 0.36× asset turnover × 1.98× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 9.6% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 9.9% − 9.4% = +0.5 percentage points. The 9.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Positive but thin: it creates value with little room for error. The 9.9% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 8.7%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method. ## Does Hayward Holdings have too much debt? Hayward Holdings, Inc. has total debt of $1.0 B against shareholder equity of $1.6 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.63× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.77 in FY21 to 0.64 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Hayward Holdings shareholding pattern? 5.1% of Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 2.6 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Hayward Holdings from balance-sheet trouble? For Hayward Holdings, Inc., the Z-score is 2.63. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the grey area between the two. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.63 is in the grey area, neither clearly safe nor clearly in trouble. ## How does Hayward Holdings rank in its industry? 64.8 out of 100, rank 3 of 30 in Electrical Equipment & Parts, with 81% of the evidence available. Hayward Holdings, Inc. scores 64.8 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Electrical Equipment & Parts, ranking 3. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 18.4 + 14.6 + 13.2 + 18.6 = 64.8. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Hayward Holdings compared with? Hayward Holdings ranks 3 of 30 Electrical Equipment & Parts companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 64.8 out of 100. 1. [Acuity Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ayi) AYI · basing · Most evidence points up · 85% evidence 73.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.1/35 · Revenue 6.8% · Profit 34% · Operating margin change 3.6 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 18.5/25 · ROCE 18.3% · Operating margin 16.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.8/20 · P/E 18.6× · PEG 0.51 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.7/20 · Lead over its industry 16.4% · Lead over S&P 500 -1.2% · 1 year -8.1% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.1 + 18.5 + 14.8 + 16.7 = 73.1 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 2. [Vertiv Holdings Co](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/vrt) VRT · quiet · Most evidence points up · 71% evidence 69.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 26.4/35 · Revenue 26.2% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change 3.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 20.4/25 · ROCE 26.5% · Operating margin 20.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.0/20 · P/E 74.3× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 13.8/20 · Lead over its industry 8% · Lead over S&P 500 -10% · 1 year 31.2% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 26.4 + 20.4 + 9 + 13.8 = 69.6 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 3. Hayward Holdings, Inc. this page HAYW · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 64.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.4/35 · Revenue 7.6% · Profit 22.9% · Operating margin change -0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 14.6/25 · ROCE 8.8% · Operating margin 24.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 13.2/20 · P/E 22.2× · PEG 0.8 · 65% evidence Relative strength 18.6/20 · Lead over its industry 24.4% · Lead over S&P 500 5.2% · 1 year 3.8% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18.4 + 14.6 + 13.2 + 18.6 = 64.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 4. [Bloom Energy Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/be) BE · losing its lead · Evidence leans up · 67% evidence 64.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 26.1/35 · Revenue 100% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change 17 points · 71% evidence Capital efficiency 13.2/25 · ROCE 11.3% · Operating margin 18.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.7/20 · P/E 157.4× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 16.7/20 · Lead over its industry 25.7% · Lead over S&P 500 4.7% · 1 year 58.3% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 26.1 + 13.2 + 8.7 + 16.7 = 64.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. ESP · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 62.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.7/35 · Revenue 2.3% · Profit 22.2% · Operating margin change -1.6 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 19.3/25 · ROCE 19.1% · Operating margin 25.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.6/20 · P/E 17× · PEG 0.58 · 65% evidence Relative strength 11.5/20 · Lead over its industry 3.6% · Lead over S&P 500 -13% · 1 year 38% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16.7 + 19.3 + 14.6 + 11.5 = 62.1 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 6. [EnerSys](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ens) ENS · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 60.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.5/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 2.1 points · 45% evidence Capital efficiency 17.3/25 · ROCE 15.8% · Operating margin 14% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.2/20 · P/E 21.4× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 13.1/20 · Lead over its industry 4.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -12.3% · 1 year 27.3% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.5 + 17.3 + 10.2 + 13.1 = 60.1 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 7. [Kimball Electronics, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ke) KE · losing its lead · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 58.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.5/35 · Revenue -3.6% · Profit 70.6% · Operating margin change -0.4 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 10.6/25 · ROCE 7.5% · Operating margin 4.2% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.0/20 · P/E 22× · PEG 0.46 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.1/20 · Lead over its industry 14.4% · Lead over S&P 500 -3.1% · 1 year -1.9% · 100% evidence · 4 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16.5 + 10.6 + 15 + 16.1 = 58.2 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is -3.1%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 8. [Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/aeis) AEIS · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 56.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 27.1/35 · Revenue 24.5% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change 7.8 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.8/25 · ROCE 10.4% · Operating margin 17% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.2/20 · P/E 64.6× · PEG 1 · 65% evidence Relative strength 4.2/20 · Lead over its industry -6% · Lead over S&P 500 -21.5% · 1 year 9.9% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 27.1 + 13.8 + 11.2 + 4.2 = 56.3 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -6% and the one-year return is 9.9%. 9. [nVent Electric plc](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nvt) NVT · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 53.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.0/35 · Revenue 46.2% · Profit 1.9% · Operating margin change 2.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 17.2/25 · ROCE 13.6% · Operating margin 18.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 5.0/20 · P/E 45.8× · PEG 4.29 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.6/20 · Lead over its industry 8% · Lead over S&P 500 -9.4% · 1 year 16.4% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21 + 17.2 + 5 + 10.6 = 53.8 · What this means: A strong business with a high valuation: it would need rising earnings, or a lower multiple, to score better on value. 10. [Preformed Line Products Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/plpc) PLPC · losing its lead · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 52.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.4/35 · Revenue 16.9% · Profit 2.3% · Operating margin change 3.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 15.2/25 · ROCE 11.8% · Operating margin 13.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.2/20 · P/E 46.6× · PEG 1.94 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.2/20 · Lead over its industry 12% · Lead over S&P 500 -5.9% · 1 year 48.6% · 100% evidence · 8 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.2 + 8.2 + 10.2 = 52 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 11. [Energizer Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/enr) ENR · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 50.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [Hubbell Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hubb) HUBB · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 49.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [GrafTech International Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eaf) EAF · turning · Evidence leans down · 67% evidence 47.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [Amprius Technologies, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ampx) AMPX · quiet · Evidence leans down · 61% evidence 46.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. [Powell Industries, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/powl) POWL · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 43.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
16. [Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eose) EOSE · quiet · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 43.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [Ballard Power Systems Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bldp) BLDP · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 50% evidence 40.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. [Plug Power Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/plug) PLUG · quiet · Evidence leans down · 61% evidence 40.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [Enovix Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/envx) ENVX · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 39.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. [Atkore Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/atkr) ATKR · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 39.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [Electrovaya Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/elva) ELVA · quiet · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 38.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [ADS-TEC Energy PLC](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/adse) ADSE · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 35.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. [FuelCell Energy, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fcel) FCEL · quiet · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 34.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
24. [T1 Energy Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/te) TE · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 33.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
25. [Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fps) FPS · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 44% evidence 58.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
26. MSAV Holdings Ltd MSAV · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 11% evidence 57.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
27. [Arxis, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/arxs) ARXS · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 28% evidence 41.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
28. [X-Energy, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/xe) XE · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 26% evidence 39.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
29. Lightbridge Corporation LTBR · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 47% evidence 38.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
30. Factorial Energy Inc. FAC · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 21% evidence 38.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Electrical Equipment & Parts](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/electrical-equipment-parts), all 30 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Hayward Holdings in size? Hayward Holdings is the 12th largest of 27 Electrical Equipment & Parts companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: EnerSys, Powell Industries, Inc. and X-Energy, Inc. Just below it: Atkore Inc., Plug Power Inc. and Energizer Holdings, Inc. ### Electrical Equipment & Parts companies close in size

1. [EnerSys](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ens) $6.1 billion
2. [Powell Industries, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/powl) $6 billion
3. [X-Energy, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/xe) $4.5 billion
4. Hayward Holdings, Inc. $3.4 billion
5. [Atkore Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/atkr) $3.2 billion
6. [Plug Power Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/plug) $2 billion
7. [Energizer Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/enr) $1.6 billion

[All 27 Electrical Equipment & Parts companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/electrical-equipment-parts#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Highwoods Properties, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hiw) $3.5 billion · REIT - Office
2. [Curbline Properties Corp.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/curb) $3.5 billion · REIT - Retail
3. Hayward Holdings, Inc. $3.5 billion
4. [Appian Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/appn) $3.5 billion · Software - Infrastructure
5. [Miami International Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/miax) $3.5 billion · Capital Markets

## What else do people ask about Hayward Holdings? ### What were Hayward Holdings's latest quarterly results? Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $318 M and net profit of $45.6 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 6.3% and profit rose 1.8% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $0.21. The operating margin was 24.1%, 0.2 percentage points lower than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Hayward Holdings's market cap? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $3.4 B at a stock price of $16.50. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Hayward Holdings performing? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s share price has been stalling near its high for 2 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 6.3% and profit rose 1.8% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, for 2 weeks running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Hayward Holdings's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $16.50, and it has been stalling near its high for 2 weeks. Its P/E of 21.4× is higher than 34% of its own last 5 years (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Hayward Holdings in its business cycle? Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 21.1%, against a 5-year range of 19.0% to 23.8%: the middle of its own range, neither a peak nor a low. The latest quarter was 24.1%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Hayward Holdings story? The main question: yearly earnings per share moved +25.9% while the share price moved −2.8%. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Hayward Holdings a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s earnings have grown faster than its share price. Earnings per share grew +25.9% in a year while the price moved −2.8%. The main open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already grown. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.