# Acushnet Holdings share price today (Acushnet Holdings Corp., GOLF)

> Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s results are improving, and its P/E is near the top of its own history, higher than 82% of past readings. GOLF · Consumer Discretionary · Leisure · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/golf

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Business trend: Slowing from a peak, from the last 12 quarters
- Price: $87.41 (+13.0% in a year)
- P/E: 23.9× (higher than 82% of the last 4.6 years)
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $820 M (+13.8% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): $125 M (+65.2% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 16.0% (flat on a year ago)
- ROE: 24%, FY25
- ROIC: 12.3%, against a 7.8% cost of capital: +4.5 points

The main question: results are strong, and the P/E is higher than 82% of its own history. ## What is the Acushnet Holdings share price today? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s share price was $87.41 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 14 weeks. That is 7.2% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $79 and $118, and at that close it sat 21% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 12 weeks running. Over the last 10 years the share price moved +391% while the S&P 500 moved +262%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 14 August 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Acushnet Holdings pay? Acushnet Holdings Corp. paid $0.98 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.26 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $87.41 that is a yield of 1.12%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast. ## Which stock lists is Acushnet Holdings on? Acushnet Holdings is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Acushnet Holdings profitable? Acushnet Holdings Corp. earned $125 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +65.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was $189 M. Over 4 years profit has grown 1.3% a year on average. That is 15.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $75.6 M. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making. For the full year, FY25 profit was $189 M (−12.0% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +13.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +11.1% and revenue +8.5%. Profit and revenue are moving at about the same pace. ## How much revenue does Acushnet Holdings make, and is it growing? Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported $820 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +13.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 5th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 4.5% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $2.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $2.7 B. FY25 revenue was $2.6 B, +4.1% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +8.5% on average, against 4.5% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +8.8%, against +6.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew −4.4%, against +7.7% a year (rolling over). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Acushnet Holdings keep? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s operating margin was 16.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, about the same as the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 11.8% and 13.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period. In the latest quarter it moved +0.0 percentage points on the same quarter a year ago. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −0.3 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged. ## Is Acushnet Holdings' profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 135% of Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $194 M of operating cash against $189 M of profit. After $74.3 M of spending on assets, $120 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Acushnet Holdings' cash go? Acushnet Holdings Corp. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $224 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 2.9% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $224 M over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Acushnet Holdings' P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s P/E is 23.9×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 82% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 21.2×, over 4.6 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −7.7% while the price moved +13.0%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +16.6% a year; about +3.6% a year came from earnings growth and about +13.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Acushnet Holdings business getting better or worse? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s business is slowing from a peak. Profit and EPS growth have slowed sharply (profit growth from +30.2% at its peak to −4.4% now), while ROCE is still 17.3%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures. Why it matters: slowing from a peak is where good stories often end quietly. ## How much does Acushnet Holdings earn on its capital? Acushnet Holdings Corp. earned a ROE of 24% in FY25. That is up from a low of 17% in FY21. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 4.5 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 7.4% net margin and 1.09× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 7.4% net margin × 1.09× asset turnover × 2.98× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 24.0% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 12.3% − 7.8% = +4.5 percentage points. The 7.8% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Positive but thin: it creates value with little room for error. The 12.3% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 14.1%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method. ## Does Acushnet Holdings have too much debt? Acushnet Holdings Corp. has total debt of $1.1 B against shareholder equity of $926 M as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 1.17× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.34 in FY21 to 1.37 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Acushnet Holdings shareholding pattern? 9.2% of Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 7.0 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Acushnet Holdings from balance-sheet trouble? For Acushnet Holdings Corp., the Z-score is 3.85. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.85 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here. ## How does Acushnet Holdings rank in its industry? 47.3 out of 100, rank 15 of 23 in Leisure, with 81% of the evidence available. Acushnet Holdings Corp. scores 47.3 out of 100 against the 23 companies it is compared with in Leisure, ranking 15. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 12.6 + 16.9 + 12.2 + 5.6 = 47.3. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Acushnet Holdings compared with? Acushnet Holdings ranks 15 of 23 Leisure companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 47.3 out of 100. 1. [Hasbro, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/has) HAS · breaking out · Most evidence points up · 67% evidence 74.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 26.3/35 · Revenue 18.9% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 7.8 points · 71% evidence Capital efficiency 20.1/25 · ROCE 32.9% · Operating margin 32.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.3/20 · P/E 13× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 17.5/20 · Lead over its industry 23.7% · Lead over S&P 500 23.4% · 1 year 54.1% · 100% evidence · 9 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 26.3 + 20.1 + 10.3 + 17.5 = 74.2 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 2. [JAKKS Pacific, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jakk) JAKK · breaking out · Most evidence points up · 85% evidence 66.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.2/35 · Revenue 9.2% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change 0.8 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 9.7/25 · ROCE 7.4% · Operating margin 14.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.0/20 · P/E 11× · PEG 0.2 · 65% evidence Relative strength 18.8/20 · Lead over its industry 36.5% · Lead over S&P 500 36.6% · 1 year 88.6% · 100% evidence · 10 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.2 + 9.7 + 15 + 18.8 = 66.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 3. [Escalade, Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/esca) ESCA · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 64.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.3/35 · Revenue 1.7% · Profit 64.3% · Operating margin change 15.9 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 17.9/25 · ROCE 15.9% · Operating margin 20.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.5/20 · P/E 11.2× · PEG 1.16 · 65% evidence Relative strength 11.2/20 · Lead over its industry 13.1% · Lead over S&P 500 13% · 1 year 71.5% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.3 + 17.9 + 11.5 + 11.2 = 64.9 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 4. [Planet Fitness, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/plnt) PLNT · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 60.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.5/35 · Revenue 11.5% · Profit 25.9% · Operating margin change 0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.9/25 · ROCE 16.1% · Operating margin 33.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 13.5/20 · P/E 17.4× · PEG 0.55 · 65% evidence Relative strength 6.7/20 · Lead over its industry -25.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -26.6% · 1 year -48.3% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.5 + 18.9 + 13.5 + 6.7 = 60.6 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. [YETI Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yeti) YETI · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 59.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.7/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 8.2 points · 45% evidence Capital efficiency 20.8/25 · ROCE 26.3% · Operating margin 19.3% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.9/20 · P/E 21.1× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 6.9/20 · Lead over its industry -2.4% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.9% · 1 year 23.6% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.7 + 20.8 + 9.9 + 6.9 = 59.3 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 6. [Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lth) LTH · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 57.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.1/35 · Revenue 12.8% · Profit 83.2% · Operating margin change 1.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 11.8/25 · ROCE 6.9% · Operating margin 17.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.3/20 · P/E 21.9× · PEG 1.17 · 65% evidence Relative strength 14.0/20 · Lead over its industry 26% · Lead over S&P 500 26.2% · 1 year 74.6% · 100% evidence · 5 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.1 + 11.8 + 10.3 + 14 = 57.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 7. Clarus Corporation CLAR · leader · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 54.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.6/35 · Revenue -0.4% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 18.7 points · 62% evidence Capital efficiency 4.6/25 · ROCE -4.5% · Operating margin 5.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.0/20 · P/E -3.8× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 18.9/20 · Lead over its industry 30.1% · Lead over S&P 500 29.9% · 1 year 24% · 100% evidence · 10 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.6 + 4.6 + 11 + 18.9 = 54.1 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 8. [OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/osw) OSW · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 52.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.0/35 · Revenue 9.8% · Profit 12.7% · Operating margin change 0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.2/25 · ROCE 14.3% · Operating margin 9.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 7.1/20 · P/E 35.4× · PEG 1.98 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.5/20 · Lead over its industry 22.2% · Lead over S&P 500 21.8% · 1 year 37.1% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16 + 13.2 + 7.1 + 16.5 = 52.8 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is 21.8%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 9. [American Outdoor Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/aout) AOUT · leader · Evidence leans up · 67% evidence 51.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.2/35 · Revenue -6.2% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 17.9 points · 71% evidence Capital efficiency 4.5/25 · ROCE -0.3% · Operating margin -5.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.2/20 · P/E -15.6× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 20.0/20 · Lead over its industry 56.4% · Lead over S&P 500 57.2% · 1 year 175.3% · 100% evidence · 11 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16.2 + 4.5 + 11.2 + 20 = 51.9 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is 57.2%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 10. [Johnson Outdoors Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jout) JOUT · quiet · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 51.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.9/35 · Revenue 17.4% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 1.2 points · 62% evidence Capital efficiency 8.8/25 · ROCE 3.4% · Operating margin 9.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.4/20 · P/E -56.1× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 8.7/20 · Lead over its industry -2.1% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.6% · 1 year 19.8% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.9 + 8.8 + 11.4 + 8.7 = 51.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 11. [Callaway Golf Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/caly) CALY · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 51.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [Funko, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fnko) FNKO · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 51.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [Amer Sports, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/as) AS · basing · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 49.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [Peloton Interactive, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/pton) PTON · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 47.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. Acushnet Holdings Corp. this page GOLF · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 47.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 12.6/35 · Revenue 8.8% · Profit -4.3% · Operating margin change 0 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 16.9/25 · ROCE 16.5% · Operating margin 16% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.2/20 · P/E 31.6× · PEG 0.85 · 65% evidence Relative strength 5.6/20 · Lead over its industry -9.3% · Lead over S&P 500 -9.9% · 1 year 9.7% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 12.6 + 16.9 + 12.2 + 5.6 = 47.3 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 16. Playboy, Inc. PLBY · turning · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 44.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [Tron Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/tron) TRON · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 41.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. [Mattel, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mat) MAT · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 41.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [Xponential Fitness, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/xpof) XPOF · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 41.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. [Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/luck) LUCK · quiet · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 34.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [United Parks & Resorts Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/prks) PRKS · basing · Most evidence points down · 81% evidence 33.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [Six Flags Entertainment Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fun) FUN · quiet · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 32.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. Here Group Limited HERE · Most evidence points down · 61% evidence 30.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Leisure](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/leisure), all 23 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Acushnet Holdings in size? Acushnet Holdings is the 4th largest of 20 Leisure companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: Amer Sports, Inc., Hasbro, Inc. and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. Just below it: Mattel, Inc., Planet Fitness, Inc. and YETI Holdings, Inc. ### Leisure companies close in size

1. [Amer Sports, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/as) $17.7 billion
2. [Hasbro, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/has) $16.5 billion
3. [Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lth) $10 billion
4. Acushnet Holdings Corp. $5.1 billion
5. [Mattel, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mat) $4.4 billion
6. [Planet Fitness, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/plnt) $4.2 billion
7. [YETI Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yeti) $3.3 billion

[All 20 Leisure companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/leisure#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Hafnia Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hafn) $5.2 billion · Marine Shipping
2. [Scholar Rock Holding Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/srrk) $5.2 billion · Biotechnology
3. Acushnet Holdings Corp. $5.2 billion
4. [BillionToOne, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/blln) $5.2 billion · Diagnostics & Research
5. [Blue Owl Capital Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/obdc) $5.2 billion · Asset Management

## What else do people ask about Acushnet Holdings? ### What were Acushnet Holdings's latest quarterly results? Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported revenue of $820 M and net profit of $125 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 13.8% and profit rose 65.2% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $2.08. The operating margin was 16.0%, 0.0 percentage points higher than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Acushnet Holdings's market cap? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s market capitalisation is $5.1 B at a stock price of $87.41. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Acushnet Holdings performing? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s share price has been moving sideways for 14 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 13.8% and profit rose 65.2% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, for 12 weeks running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Acushnet Holdings's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $87.41, and it has been moving sideways for 14 weeks. Its P/E of 23.9× is higher than 82% of its own last 5 years (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Acushnet Holdings's profit real cash? Yes, over the last 3 years, 135% of Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s reported profit came in as cash from operations. The latest year was lower at 103%, so the trend is worth watching. In FY25, operating cash was $194 M against reported profit of $189 M. Most of that cash then goes into building new capacity. These are yearly figures (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Acushnet Holdings in its business cycle? Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s FY25 operating margin was 12.0%, against a 5-year range of 11.8% to 13.0%: the low end of its own range, which is often where recoveries start. The latest quarter was 16.0%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Acushnet Holdings story? The main question: results are strong, and the P/E is higher than 82% of its own history. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Acushnet Holdings a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s results are improving, and its P/E is near the top of its own history, higher than 82% of past readings. The main open question: whether earnings grow enough to match the multiple. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.