# Cushman & Wakefield Limited share price today (Cushman & Wakefield Limited, CWK)

> Cushman & Wakefield Limited's results are improving, and its P/E is near the top of its own history, higher than 83% of past readings. CWK · Real Estate · Real Estate Services · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cwk

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Business trend: Getting worse, from the last 12 quarters
- Price: $13.62 (−13.2% in a year)
- P/E: 45.8× (higher than 83% of the last 4.6 years)
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $2.8 B (+11.2% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): $52.7 M (−8.0% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 4.9% (flat on a year ago)
- ROE: 5%, FY25
- ROIC: 7.2%, against a 8.9% cost of capital: −1.7 points

The main question: results are strong, and the P/E is higher than 83% of its own history. ## What is the Cushman & Wakefield Limited share price today? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's share price was $13.62 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been stalling near its high for 1 week. That is 2.0% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $11 and $17, and at that close it sat 39% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 1 week in a row. Over the last 8.3 years the share price moved −27% while the S&P 500 moved +166%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Cushman & Wakefield Limited pay? Cushman & Wakefield Limited pays no dividend. In the last 12 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes. ## Which stock lists is Cushman & Wakefield Limited on? Cushman & Wakefield Limited is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Cushman & Wakefield Limited profitable? Cushman & Wakefield Limited earned $52.7 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, −8.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was $88.2 M. Over 4 years profit has grown −22.9% a year on average. That is 1.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $57.3 M. 4 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making. For the full year, FY25 profit was $88.2 M (−32.8% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +11.2% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −209.6% and revenue +11.1%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth. ## How much revenue does Cushman & Wakefield Limited make, and is it growing? Cushman & Wakefield Limited reported $2.8 B of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +11.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 8th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 2.3% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $10.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $10.8 B. FY25 revenue was $10.3 B, +8.9% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +11.1% on average, against 2.3% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +11.0%, against +7.8% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew −66.4%, against +83.1% a year (rolling over). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Cushman & Wakefield Limited keep? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's operating margin was 4.9% in the Jun 2026 quarter, about the same as the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 2.9% and 5.8%. The latest quarter is within that range. In the latest quarter it moved +0.0 percentage points on the same quarter a year ago. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −0.3 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged. ## Is Cushman & Wakefield Limited's profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 144% of Cushman & Wakefield Limited's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $340 M of operating cash against $88.2 M of profit. After $47.4 M of spending on assets, $293 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Cushman & Wakefield Limited's cash go? Cushman & Wakefield Limited does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $139 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.5% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $139 M over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Cushman & Wakefield Limited's P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's P/E is 45.8×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 83% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 24.2×, over 4.6 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −32.1% while the price moved −13.2%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +18.1% a year; about −3.9% a year came from earnings growth and about +22.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Cushman & Wakefield Limited business getting better or worse? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's business is getting worse. Profit and EPS growth are shrinking: profit growth is −66.4% in the latest quarter, against +1227.9% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE steady at 9.2%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures. Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind. ## How much does Cushman & Wakefield Limited earn on its capital? Cushman & Wakefield Limited earned a ROE of 5% in FY25. That is up from a low of −2% in FY23. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 1.7 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 0.9% net margin and 1.34× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 0.9% net margin × 1.34× asset turnover × 3.93× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 4.7% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 7.2% − 8.9% = −1.7 percentage points. The 8.9% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve. ## Does Cushman & Wakefield Limited have too much debt? Cushman & Wakefield Limited has total debt of $3.0 B against shareholder equity of $2.0 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 1.50× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 2.66 in FY21 to 1.58 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Cushman & Wakefield Limited shareholding pattern? 6.9% of Cushman & Wakefield Limited's tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 5.9 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Cushman & Wakefield Limited from balance-sheet trouble? For Cushman & Wakefield Limited, the Z-score is 1.88. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the grey area between the two. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.88 is in the grey area, neither clearly safe nor clearly in trouble. ## How does Cushman & Wakefield Limited rank in its industry? 50.8 out of 100, rank 8 of 27 in Real Estate Services, with 71% of the evidence available. Cushman & Wakefield Limited scores 50.8 out of 100 against the 27 companies it is compared with in Real Estate Services, ranking 8. Relative strength against the index is -6.8%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 15.8 + 12.5 + 9 + 13.5 = 50.8. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Cushman & Wakefield Limited compared with? Cushman & Wakefield Limited ranks 8 of 27 Real Estate Services companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 50.8 out of 100. 1. Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. CHCI · breaking out · Sector-leading setup · 81% evidence 81.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 25.8/35 · Revenue 37.5% · Profit 66.7% · Operating margin change 15.7 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 20.0/25 · ROCE 19.2% · Operating margin 29.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.9/20 · P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.12 · 65% evidence Relative strength 19.6/20 · Lead over its industry 31.6% · Lead over S&P 500 19.1% · 1 year 23.1% · 100% evidence · 11 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 25.8 + 20 + 15.9 + 19.6 = 81.3 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 2. [Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jll) JLL · turning · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 73.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 25.4/35 · Revenue 11.2% · Profit 77.6% · Operating margin change 1.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 15.8/25 · ROCE 12.8% · Operating margin 4.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.1/20 · P/E 14.4× · PEG 0.44 · 65% evidence Relative strength 17.6/20 · Lead over its industry 22.2% · Lead over S&P 500 9.2% · 1 year 25% · 100% evidence · 6 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 25.4 + 15.8 + 15.1 + 17.6 = 73.9 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 3. [IHS Holding Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ihs) IHS · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 62.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 17.4/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change -17.6 points · 39% evidence Capital efficiency 18.9/25 · ROCE 22.6% · Operating margin 20.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.4/20 · P/E 14.8× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 15.3/20 · Lead over its industry 11.2% · Lead over S&P 500 -0.1% · 1 year 27.7% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 17.4 + 18.9 + 10.4 + 15.3 = 62 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 4. [Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/tci) TCI · breaking out · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 55% evidence 57.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 14.4/35 · Revenue 4.2% · Profit 14.3% · Operating margin change -11.4 points · 40% evidence Capital efficiency 11.1/25 · ROCE n/a · Operating margin -18.2% · 30% evidence Valuation 12.9/20 · P/E 32.2× · PEG 0.52 · 65% evidence Relative strength 18.7/20 · Lead over its industry 21.6% · Lead over S&P 500 8.2% · 1 year 6.6% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 14.4 + 11.1 + 12.9 + 18.7 = 57.1 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 5. [The RMR Group Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/rmr) RMR · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 55.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.0/35 · Revenue 13.8% · Profit 0% · Operating margin change -6.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 17.7/25 · ROCE 11.4% · Operating margin 20.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 13.9/20 · P/E 18.3× · PEG 0.48 · 65% evidence Relative strength 6.2/20 · Lead over its industry -0.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -10.8% · 1 year 4.8% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18 + 17.7 + 13.9 + 6.2 = 55.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 6. [Newmark Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nmrk) NMRK · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 52.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.9/35 · Revenue 20.8% · Profit 97.3% · Operating margin change -0.7 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 12.0/25 · ROCE 7.4% · Operating margin 4.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.6/20 · P/E 18.1× · PEG 0.86 · 65% evidence Relative strength 3.5/20 · Lead over its industry -16.2% · Lead over S&P 500 -25.6% · 1 year -31.6% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.9 + 12 + 12.6 + 3.5 = 52 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -16.2% and the one-year return is -31.6%. 7. [Marcus & Millichap, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mmi) MMI · basing · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 51.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.4/35 · Revenue 11.8% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 6.4 points · 62% evidence Capital efficiency 8.1/25 · ROCE 1.4% · Operating margin 1.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.9/20 · P/E 82.1× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 11.9/20 · Lead over its industry 5.6% · Lead over S&P 500 -5.4% · 1 year -3% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.4 + 8.1 + 8.9 + 11.9 = 51.3 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 8. Cushman & Wakefield Limited this page CWK · turning · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 50.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 15.8/35 · Revenue 11% · Profit -66.5% · Operating margin change 0 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 12.5/25 · ROCE 9.3% · Operating margin 4.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.0/20 · P/E 45.4× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 13.5/20 · Lead over its industry 4.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -6.8% · 1 year -13.4% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 15.8 + 12.5 + 9 + 13.5 = 50.8 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is -6.8%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 9. [FirstService Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fsv) FSV · turning · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 50.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 15.2/35 · Revenue 3.7% · Profit 6.5% · Operating margin change -0.4 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 14.8/25 · ROCE 9.8% · Operating margin 7.3% · 76% evidence Valuation 4.7/20 · P/E 38.3× · PEG 4.63 · 65% evidence Relative strength 15.6/20 · Lead over its industry 9.6% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.4% · 1 year -1.7% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 15.2 + 14.8 + 4.7 + 15.6 = 50.3 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is -2.4%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 10. [CBRE Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cbre) CBRE · basing · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 47.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.3/35 · Revenue 14.5% · Profit 12.5% · Operating margin change -1 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 12.2/25 · ROCE 5.9% · Operating margin 3.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.8/20 · P/E 26.9× · PEG 1.76 · 65% evidence Relative strength 9.9/20 · Lead over its industry -0.1% · Lead over S&P 500 -11.2% · 1 year -11.2% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16.3 + 12.2 + 8.8 + 9.9 = 47.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 11. [Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/seg) SEG · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 53% evidence 45.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [Colliers International Group Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cigi) CIGI · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 45.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [Compass, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/comp) COMP · quiet · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 44.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [CoStar Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/csgp) CSGP · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 42.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. [The Real Brokerage Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/reax) REAX · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 41.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
16. [RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/rmax) RMAX · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 40.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [AGNT, Inc](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/agnt) AGNT · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 40.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. [FRP Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/frph) FRPH · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 52% evidence 36.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mlp) MLP · quiet · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 34.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. Douglas Elliman Inc. DOUG · basing · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 33.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [Opendoor Technologies Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/open) OPEN · basing · Most evidence points down · 64% evidence 22.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [American Realty Investors, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/arl) ARL · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 45% evidence 55.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership NEN · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 32% evidence 46.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
24. Rafael Holdings, Inc. RFL · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 15% evidence 43.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
25. Star Holdings STHO · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 44% evidence 40.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
26. [Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hbnb) HBNB · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 39% evidence 40.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
27. Seritage Growth Properties SRG · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 25% evidence 39.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Real Estate Services](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/real-estate-services), all 27 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Cushman & Wakefield Limited in size? Cushman & Wakefield Limited is the 8th largest of 24 Real Estate Services companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: Compass, Inc., FirstService Corporation and Colliers International Group Inc. Just below it: Newmark Group, Inc., IHS Holding and Opendoor Technologies Inc. ### Real Estate Services companies close in size

1. [Compass, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/comp) $7.1 billion
2. [FirstService Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fsv) $6.2 billion
3. [Colliers International Group Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cigi) $5.3 billion
4. Cushman & Wakefield Limited $3.2 billion
5. [Newmark Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nmrk) $2.9 billion
6. [IHS Holding Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ihs) $2.8 billion
7. [Opendoor Technologies Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/open) $1.7 billion

[All 24 Real Estate Services companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/real-estate-services#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Community Financial System, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cbu) $3.4 billion · Banks - Regional
2. [National Health Investors, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nhi) $3.4 billion · REIT - Healthcare Facilities
3. Cushman & Wakefield Limited $3.4 billion
4. [Chesapeake Utilities Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cpk) $3.4 billion · Utilities - Regulated Gas
5. [Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/vtmx) $3.4 billion · Real Estate - Development

## What else do people ask about Cushman & Wakefield Limited? ### What were Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited's latest quarterly results? Cushman & Wakefield Limited reported revenue of $2.8 B and net profit of $52.7 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 11.2% and profit fell 8.0% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $0.22. The operating margin was 4.9%, 0.0 percentage points higher than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited's market cap? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's market capitalisation is $3.2 B at a stock price of $13.62. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited performing? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's share price has been stalling near its high for 1 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 11.2% and profit fell 8.0% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, for 1 week running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Cushman & Wakefield Limited's stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $13.62, and it has been stalling near its high for 1 weeks. Its P/E of 45.8× is higher than 83% of its own last 5 years (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited in its business cycle? Cushman & Wakefield Limited's FY25 operating margin was 4.5%, against a 5-year range of 2.9% to 5.8%: the middle of its own range, neither a peak nor a low. The latest quarter was 4.9%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited story? The main question: results are strong, and the P/E is higher than 83% of its own history. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Cushman & Wakefield Limited Limited a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Cushman & Wakefield Limited's results are improving, and its P/E is near the top of its own history, higher than 83% of past readings. The main open question: whether earnings grow enough to match the multiple. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.