Avalon Technologies Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Avalon Technologies Ltd trades at ₹1,965, in a confirmed uptrend and 25 weeks into that stage. That is +52.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹803 to ₹1,965. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 32 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 25 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,965 it trades +52.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹803–₹1,965).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.3 years the stock moved +394% while the NIFTY 500 moved +58% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 32 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Story check

Avalon Technologies Ltd's story is not scored yet against the markers our research file set on 17 May 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: MID_CONTRACTION.

Our read, 17 May 2026. An EMS operator executing a high-value pivot — box-build mix, semiconductor equipment, and India-US dual-shore create a compounding revenue engine targeting Rs 3,200 Cr by FY29.

What is proven. An EMS operator executing a high-value pivot — box-build mix, semiconductor equipment, and India-US dual-shore create a compounding revenue engine targeting Rs 3,200 Cr by FY29.

What is not proven yet. Two Tijori-flagged cross-call inconsistencies: Chennai Phase 2 silently dropped after 5+ months; FY27 guidance (24-27%) below CMD's own 'that number and more' signal — pattern of optimistic signalling followed by conservative formal guidance.

The test written in advance. Management Guidance Credibility — Selective Communication — Management Guidance Credibility — Selective Communication Q2 FY27 concall: does FY27 revenue track above the 27% ceiling? Does Chennai Phase 2 get explicitly addressed? by the next result.

The test written in advance. US Manufacturing Break-Even Slippage (3rd timeline push possible) — US Manufacturing Break-Even Slippage (3rd timeline push possible) Q1 FY27 US quarterly loss: must be ≤Rs 4 Cr to be on track for H2 break-even by the next result.

The test written in advance. Promoter Stake Reduction (50.98% → 44.42% over 8 quarters) — Promoter Stake Reduction (50.98% → 44.42% over 8 quarters) Quarterly shareholding data: promoter below 44% would be concerning; continued DII absorption offsets somewhat by the next result.

Lever 1 · Operating leverage — BUILDING. India manufacturing at 16.7% EBITDA, 12.2% PAT margin; US losses narrowing from Rs 14 Cr/quarter to Rs 5 Cr in Q4 FY26 — H2 FY27 break-even unlocks ~Rs 25 Cr annual PAT uplift at consolidated level. What proves it keeps working: Operating Leverage Inflection (India + US convergence). It stops working if Q2 FY27 concall: does FY27 revenue track above the 27% ceiling? Does Chennai Phase 2 get explicitly addressed?

Lever 6 · Order-book wins — BUILDING. Order book grew 24.7% YoY to Rs 2,196 Cr on a 14-month execution basis; additional Rs 1,245 Cr in 14-36 month contracts covers FY27-28 revenue certainty at 24-27% growth guide. What proves it keeps working: Order Book / Contract Wins (Rs 2,196 Cr + Rs 1,245 Cr long-term). It stops working if Q2 FY27 concall: does FY27 revenue track above the 27% ceiling? Does Chennai Phase 2 get explicitly addressed?

Lever 2 · Value-added mix — BUILDING. Box builds as % of revenue grew from 44% four years ago to 56% in Q4 FY26 — higher-value complex assemblies with deeper customer integration, higher switching costs, and structurally better margins. What proves it keeps working: Value-Added Product Mix Shift (box-build 44% → 56%). It stops working if Q2 FY27 concall: does FY27 revenue track above the 27% ceiling? Does Chennai Phase 2 get explicitly addressed?

Lever 14 · A bigger market to sell into — BUILDING. Industrial segment (34% of revenue) grew 65% in FY26 — Fortune 100 customer base with 5-10 year program lifecycles; new entries into advanced metal cockpit assemblies and landing gear components expanding addressable market. What proves it keeps working: Industrial Segment Compounding (65% YoY, 34% of FY26 revenue). It stops working if Q2 FY27 concall: does FY27 revenue track above the 27% ceiling? Does Chennai Phase 2 get explicitly addressed?

Sources: our stock research file (17 May 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 26 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Avalon Technologies Ltd reported ₹484 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +49.8% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 6 years it has compounded at 16.5% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,603 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,764 Cr.

Why this happened. The order book provides revenue visibility that most EMS players cannot demonstrate. Rs 2,196 Cr on 14-month execution implies ~Rs 1,883 Cr executable in FY27 from existing orders alone — FY27 guide of 24-27% growth (implying ~Rs 1,987-2,036 Cr) requires only modest new order conversion. The Rs 1,245 Cr long-term layer stretches execution visibility into FY28. Total committed revenue >Rs 3,200 Cr already in the order pipeline matches the FY29 doubling target. Diversification by vertical (Industrial 34%, Mobility 28%, Clean Energy 20%, Communications 8%) and geography (India domestic, US, SEA, Europe) reduces concentration risk substantially.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,603 Cr (+46.0% on the year), capping 6 years at 16.5% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹484 Cr, +49.8% year on year — the 8th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +44.3% growth against the decade's 16.5% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +44.4% over the last 4 quarters against +45.7%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +69.6% vs +165.6%/yr — rolling over.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Avalon Technologies Ltd's operating margin is 12.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +3.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0% to 12.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Why this happened. The operating leverage thesis has two legs. India is already at mature EMS profitability (16.7% EBITDA) and is growing 33% YoY — every incremental rupee drops at high incremental margins as fixed costs are absorbed. The US leg is converging: losses narrowed from Rs 14 Cr/quarter peak to Rs 5 Cr in Q4 FY26, with H2 FY27 break-even as management guidance. Break-even alone adds ~Rs 20-28 Cr annualised PAT (12-16% uplift on FY26 PAT). EBITDA grew 51% in FY26 on revenue +46% — the leverage coefficient is positive and strengthening. FY26 EBITDA margin 10.8% will push toward 13-15% as US normalises.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 12.0%, +3.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0%–12.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −0.9 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Avalon Technologies Ltd earned ₹35.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +150.0% year on year. It is the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹113 Cr. The 6-year compound rate is 45.3%. That is 7.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹14.0 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹35.0 Cr, +150.0% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹113 Cr (+79.4%), and the 6-year compound rate is 45.3%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +49.8% and the margin +3.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +76.3% vs revenue +44.3%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 49% of Avalon Technologies Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹57.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹113 Cr of profit. After ₹55.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹2.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹57.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹113 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹2.0 Cr after ₹55.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 49% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at 49%: the cash cycle stretched 49 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 49 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Avalon Technologies Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 160 days in FY26, up from 111 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹159 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,603 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹4.4 Cr, so roughly ₹703 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 87 days, inventory at 161 days — roughly 5.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 160 days, looser than FY21's 111.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 161 days to sell; customers pay about 87 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 87 days — netting out to the 160-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,603 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹4.4 Cr — so the 160-day loop keeps roughly ₹703 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹159 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹86.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹24.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Avalon Technologies Ltd earns a ROCE of 20% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 6% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +6.2 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 7.0% net margin on 1.27× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 20%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 7.0% net margin × 1.27× asset turns × 1.75× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 15.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 18.2% − 12.0% = a +6.2 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Avalon Technologies Ltd carries total debt of ₹213 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹722 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.30 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 3.66 in FY22 to 0.30 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹213 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹722 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.30. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 3.66 (FY22) to 0.30 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 6.5 points of Avalon Technologies Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 44.4% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +5.3 points over the same window, to 7.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −6.5 points over 8 quarters to 44.4%; Foreign institutions: +5.3 points over 8 quarters to 7.8%; Domestic institutions: +1.5 points over 8 quarters to 24.7%.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−6.5 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+5.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Avalon Technologies Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Avalon Technologies Ltd trades at 98.3× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (66th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 80.6×, measured across 3.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 98.3× is mid-range by its own standards (66th percentile), against a long-run median of 80.6× measured over 3.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +76.4% against a +119.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +50.7%/yr price move, ~−80.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+131.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Avalon Technologies Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +200.0% at its peak to +69.6% but is still expanding, ROCE lifting at 23.3%. The read is built from 11 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

4-Factor Sector Score

74.9/100 — rank 1 of 9 in Consumer Electronics - EMS · 100% evidence confidence

Avalon Technologies Ltd scores 74.9 out of 100 against the 9 companies it is compared with in Consumer Electronics - EMS, ranking 1. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 32.2 + 16.2 + 9.5 + 17 = 74.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Said versus delivered

What Avalon Technologies Ltd's management promised, set against what actually arrived — 4 tracked promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

Chennai Phase 2 Brownfield Expansion Milestone Silently Dropped · 7 May 2026. In the Nov 2025 call, management made a specific, time-bound commitment to complete Phase 2 of the Chennai brownfield expansion by the end of Q3 FY26 (December 2025). The Feb 2026 call, held after this deadline had passed, contained no confirmation of completion, and neither does the May 2026 call - now more than five months beyond the committed date. An infrastructure milestone publicly committed with a specific quarter-end deadline disappearing from two consecutive calls without any acknowledgment, update, or explanation of delay is a credibility concern that investors tracking capacity readiness would need addressed.

🚨 US Operations Profitability Reversal · 5 February 2026. In February 2025, management highlighted that US losses had reduced to Rs 3.4 crores and guided for positive profitability within 12-18 months. In direct contradiction, the February 2026 call reveals that losses have widened significantly to Rs 7-9 crores per quarter, and the timeline for profitability has been pushed out to the next fiscal year. Earlier call (Feb 2025): “Reporting a net loss of approximately Rs. 3.4 crores... I think in the next 12 months to 18 months, you could possibly see some positive numbers out of there.” Later call (Feb 2026): “US manufacturing... had PAT losses of around 7 crores. In the last couple of quarters, it was approximately 9 crores each quarter... We believe next year... we will move toward a better profit profile.”

Material Disconnect in Revenue Guidance · 5 February 2026. Management guided for conservative 18-20% revenue growth for FY26 during the May 2025 call, citing policy uncertainty and a measured outlook. By February 2026, they had to revise this guidance upward to 40% after realizing a 48.7% growth rate, indicating a significant lack of visibility in their initial budgeting versus the actual demand environment. Earlier call (May 2025): “We are approaching FY26 with measured optimism... we are guiding for a revenue growth of 18% to 20% for FY26.” Later call (Feb 2026): “Revenue for the nine months of FY26... representing a year-on-year growth of 48.7%... we are revising our FY26 revenue growth guidance upward to around 40%.”

FY26 Revenue Guidance Baseline Change · 6 November 2025. In the May 2025 call, management initiated FY26 revenue growth guidance at 18-20%, adopting a measured outlook. In the November 2025 call, they revised this guidance up to 28-30%, but stated this was an increase from an "earlier" baseline of 23-25%, a figure which was not provided in the prior calls and misrepresents the original 18-20% guidance. Earlier call (May 2025): “we are approaching FY26 with measured optimism, mindful of the macroeconomic environment influenced by policy decisions, we are guiding for a revenue growth of 18% to 20% for FY26.” Later call (Nov 2025): “Accordingly, we are revising our full year revenue growth guidance upwards to 28-30% from the earlier 23-25%.”

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Frequently asked questions