Is the Uranium sector outperforming S&P 500?
Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over 52 weeks and 32.8% over 13 weeks. 0 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 11 beat the sector itself.
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Uranium Stocks
Uranium: Cameco Corporation owns the largest revenue base; enCore Energy Corp. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Uranium moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 94% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 23% on average over the last four reported quarters.
ASLEEP · 1y −2.1%~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming0 of 10 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
RS — · 0/10 >200d (+0) · 0/10 lead (+0) · EPS 5/10↑
Uranium, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Uranium outperforming S&P 500?
Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 32.8%. 0 of 11 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. IsoEnergy Ltd. is the strongest against the sector itself at +18.2%.
-32.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-7.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
0/11Stocks leading S&P 500
5/11Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over 52 weeks and 32.8% over 13 weeks. 0 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 11 beat the sector itself. Cameco Corporation leads with revenue of $3,538 million, based on 7 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Uranium company is largest by revenue?
Cameco Corporation leads with revenue of $3,538 million, based on 7 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Uranium company is growing fastest?
enCore Energy Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 53.6%, across 5 of 13 comparable companies.
Which Uranium company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Cameco Corporation ranks first at 55.4/100 with 82% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Uranium company reports the most CAPEX?
Cameco Corporation reports the largest latest CAPEX at $78 million, with 10 of 13 companies comparable.
Which Uranium company has the least gross debt?
Deep Fission, Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $0 million. Centrus Energy Corp. has the highest at $1,179 million.
Which Uranium company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.26, among 2 of 13 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Uranium comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
13
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$61.2B
Cameco Corporation
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
0/11
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Cameco Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 82% evidence confidence.
NexGen Energy Ltd. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
1. Cameco Corporation · CCJ
55.4/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 82% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 16.1 + 5.6 + 13.9 = 55.4
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19.8/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 7.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4.1 pp
83% evidence
16.1/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 1.8% · debt/equity 0.14×
80% evidence
5.6/20Valuation
P/E 101.3× · PEG 2.64
65% evidence
13.9/20Relative strength
RS sector 10% · RS bench -18.1% · 1Y 19.2%
100% evidence
2. NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
54.8/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 52% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 11.2 + 10.6 + 16.6 = 54.8
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16.4/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
33% evidence
11.2/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -1.5% · debt/equity 0.42×
68% evidence
10.6/20Valuation
P/E 40.1× · PEG —
15% evidence
16.6/20Relative strength
RS sector 14.8% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y 41.7%
100% evidence
3. Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
53.7/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 51% evidence
Exact sum: 20.9 + 15.8 + 8.9 + 8.1 = 53.7
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20.9/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change 43717.6 pp
39% evidence
15.8/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 0.9% · debt/equity 0×
80% evidence
8.9/20Valuation
P/E 157.3× · PEG —
15% evidence
8.1/20Relative strength
RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -28.4% · 1Y 10.8%
70% evidence
4. IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
52.8/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 54% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 13.4 + 11.1 + 15.3 = 52.8
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13.0/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT -225% · OPM change —
57% evidence
13.4/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -1.4% · debt/equity 0.01×
68% evidence
11.1/20Valuation
P/E 31.7× · PEG —
15% evidence
15.3/20Relative strength
RS sector 18.2% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y 48.7%
70% evidence
5. enCore Energy Corp. · EU
52.6/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 56% evidence
Exact sum: 24.9 + 14.7 + 10 + 3 = 52.6
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24.9/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 53.6% · PAT — · OPM change 140.1 pp
62% evidence
14.7/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 3% · debt/equity 0.41×
80% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
3.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -36.8% · RS bench -53.5% · 1Y -54.7%
70% evidence
6. Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
45.4/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 65% evidence
Exact sum: 23.3 + 8.8 + 11.5 + 1.8 = 45.4
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -14.3% and the one-year return is 28%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
23.3/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 21.4% · PAT — · OPM change 107.8 pp
62% evidence
8.8/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -1.7% · debt/equity 0.93×
80% evidence
11.5/20Valuation
P/E 11.6× · PEG —
15% evidence
1.8/20Relative strength
RS sector -14.3% · RS bench -37.2% · 1Y 28%
100% evidence
7. Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
40.0/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 82% evidence
Exact sum: 7.5 + 10.9 + 12 + 9.6 = 40
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue -4% · PAT -43% · OPM change -27 pp
83% evidence
10.9/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 0.1% · debt/equity 1.52×
80% evidence
12.0/20Valuation
P/E 57.5× · PEG 1.26
65% evidence
9.6/20Relative strength
RS sector -8.6% · RS bench -32.5% · 1Y -18.6%
100% evidence
8. Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
38.7/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 62% evidence
Exact sum: 8.6 + 6.5 + 10.2 + 13.4 = 38.7
Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -17.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8.6/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -3004.9 pp
62% evidence
6.5/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -3.5% · debt/equity 2.81×
68% evidence
10.2/20Valuation
P/E 45.7× · PEG —
15% evidence
13.4/20Relative strength
RS sector 11.2% · RS bench -17.4% · 1Y 34.8%
100% evidence
9. Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
37.4/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 54% evidence
Exact sum: 14.2 + 11.2 + 8.5 + 3.5 = 37.4
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14.2/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -109.3 pp
32% evidence
11.2/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -3.2% · debt/equity 0×
80% evidence
8.5/20Valuation
P/E 595× · PEG —
15% evidence
3.5/20Relative strength
RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -32.9% · 1Y 8.9%
100% evidence
10. Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
50.4/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 29% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 10.3 + 10 + 10 = 50.4
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20.1/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
33% evidence
10.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -47% · debt/equity 0×
68% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
11. Nuclea Energy Inc. · NCLA
46.2/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 9% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 8.7 + 10 + 10 = 46.2
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
0% evidence
8.7/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -58.4% · debt/equity —
34% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
12. Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
42.2/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 48% evidence
Exact sum: 15.8 + 6.3 + 10 + 10.1 = 42.2
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15.8/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -68.1 pp
39% evidence
6.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -9.7% · debt/equity 0.83×
80% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
10.1/20Relative strength
RS sector 0.2% · RS bench -25.5% · 1Y 4.3%
70% evidence
13. Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
37.4/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 35% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 10.1 + 10 + 3.9 = 37.4
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13.4/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
24% evidence
10.1/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -259.2% · debt/equity 0×
51% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
3.9/20Relative strength
RS sector -35.4% · RS bench -51.8% · 1Y -55.2%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Cameco Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $3,538 million. Centrus Energy Corp. is next at $453 million. enCore Energy Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at 53.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation is the scale leader at $3,538 million, 681% ahead of Centrus Energy Corp.. enCore Energy Corp.'s growth is 53.6% from a $43 million base, with 12 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCameco Corporation · $3,538 million
Gap681% versus #2 · Centrus Energy Corp.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/13 companies · 126 observations
Investor read: Cameco Corporation is the scale benchmark; enCore Energy Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Cameco Corporation's growth falls below enCore Energy Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Cameco Corporation CCJ$3.5B
2Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$453M
3Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU$85M
4Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY$55M
5enCore Energy Corp. EU$43M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1enCore Energy Corp. EU54%
2Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU21%
3Cameco Corporation CCJ7.5%
4Denison Mines Corp. DNN0.0%
5Centrus Energy Corp. LEU-4.0%
Revenue · company comparison
7/13 level · 5/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | $845M | 7.1% | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | $77M | 5.5% | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | $36M | 112% | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | $20M | -60% | Jun 2026 |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | $18M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | $17M | -100% | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | $4M | -57% | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | $1M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
$361M
$465M
$398M
$558M
$389M
$524M
$687M
$482M
$575M
$844M
$634M
$598M
$721M
$1.2B
$789M
$877M
$615M
$1.2B
$845M
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
$91M
$89M
$35M
$99M
$33M
$126M
$67M
$98M
$51M
$104M
$44M
$189M
$58M
$152M
$73M
$155M
$75M
$146M
$77M
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
$10M
$3M
$4M
$7M
$3M
$3M
$-1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$7M
$4M
$0M
$30M
$5M
$9M
$-4M
$18M
$4M
$9M
$12M
$18M
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
$1M
—
$3M
$6M
$3M
$0M
$20M
$7M
$11M
$0M
$25M
$9M
$4M
$40M
$17M
$4M
$18M
$27M
$36M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
$0M
$16M
—
$0M
—
$19M
$6M
$0M
$6M
$5M
—
$5M
$6M
$23M
—
$10M
$6M
$10M
$4M
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
$13M
$10M
$0M
$57M
$48M
$20M
$39M
$0M
$0M
—
$0M
$17M
$50M
—
$0M
—
$20M
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$14M
—
$15M
$15M
$12M
—
$11M
$0M
$5M
$33M
$0M
$17M
—
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
55%
7.8%
13%
73%
-14%
48%
61%
-7.7%
24%
25%
40%
24%
47%
-15%
1.5%
7.1%
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
—
—
60%
-64%
42%
91%
-1.0%
55%
-17%
-34%
93%
14%
46%
66%
-18%
29%
-4.0%
5.5%
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
—
—
40%
-70%
0.0%
-125%
-86%
-67%
-67%
—
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-29%
125%
—
-40%
-20%
0.0%
—
0.0%
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
—
—
—
200%
—
567%
17%
267%
—
25%
29%
-64%
—
-32%
-56%
350%
-33%
112%
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
—
—
—
—
19%
—
—
—
-74%
—
—
0.0%
360%
—
100%
0.0%
-57%
—
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
—
—
269%
100%
—
-100%
-100%
—
-100%
—
—
—
—
—
-60%
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-14%
—
-27%
-100%
-58%
—
-100%
—
—
02 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
enCore Energy Corp. has the highest OPM among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 54.4%. Cameco Corporation is next at 19.4%. Uranium Royalty Corp. has the highest Margin change at +43717.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: enCore Energy Corp. leads opm at 54.4%; Uranium Royalty Corp. leads margin change at +43717.6 percentage points.
LeaderenCore Energy Corp. · 54.4%
Gap180.4% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/13 companies · 101 observations
Investor read: enCore Energy Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1enCore Energy Corp. EU54%
2Cameco Corporation CCJ19%
3Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY18%
4Centrus Energy Corp. LEU1.0%
5Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU-47%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY+43,717.6 pp
2enCore Energy Corp. EU+140.1 pp
3Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU+107.8 pp
4Cameco Corporation CCJ−4.1 pp
5Centrus Energy Corp. LEU−27.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
7/13 level · 8/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | 54% | +140.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | 19% | −4.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | 18% | +43,717.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | 1.0% | −27.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | -47% | +107.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | -117% | −109.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | -464% | −3,004.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | -517% | −68.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
-18%
-0.5%
1.7%
15%
-4.4%
-11%
14%
7.3%
24%
2.1%
20%
17%
14%
15%
24%
19%
15%
14%
19%
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
42%
24%
-9.6%
45%
-39%
25%
12%
15%
-5.7%
32%
-24%
11%
-13%
30%
28%
22%
-22%
8.8%
1.0%
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
-383%
-343%
—
-217%
-496%
-535%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
399%
—
-464%
—
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-89%
-165%
—
-40%
-432%
-188%
6.7%
-86%
-526%
-158%
-136%
54%
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
-393%
—
-38%
28%
-90%
—
42%
-19%
27%
—
46%
29%
-35%
-12%
-155%
-207%
-44%
-3.0%
-47%
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
-30%
—
—
—
-26%
-48%
—
-181%
-154%
—
-245%
-185%
-104%
—
-151%
-313%
-172%
-517%
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
-37%
-37%
—
6.3%
11%
-17%
9.4%
—
—
—
—
-77%
-7.3%
—
—
—
-117%
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11%
—
7.8%
29%
25%
—
1.1%
—
-21%
9.2%
—
18%
—
Margin change · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
+25.7 pp
+13.6 pp
−10.7 pp
+12.1 pp
−7.8 pp
+28.0 pp
+13.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+9.7 pp
−9.7 pp
+13.2 pp
+3.5 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.9 pp
−4.1 pp
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
—
—
+33.0 pp
−80.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+22.0 pp
−30.4 pp
+32.9 pp
+6.7 pp
−36.7 pp
−3.4 pp
−7.5 pp
−1.8 pp
+52.3 pp
+10.5 pp
−9.0 pp
−20.9 pp
−27.0 pp
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
—
—
−174.2 pp
−112.5 pp
−192.1 pp
+3,746.8 pp
−2,012.0 pp
−9,588.3 pp
−4,822.3 pp
−3,445.9 pp
+959.1 pp
+6,347.6 pp
+3,594.5 pp
+1,601.0 pp
+2,405.9 pp
+3,272.1 pp
−209.1 pp
−3,004.9 pp
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−342.5 pp
−22.7 pp
+2,884.9 pp
−45.3 pp
−94.3 pp
+29.3 pp
−142.6 pp
+140.1 pp
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
—
—
+480.3 pp
+303.1 pp
—
+80.5 pp
−47.6 pp
+116.2 pp
+332.2 pp
+3.4 pp
+48.6 pp
−61.7 pp
+1,199.9 pp
−200.5 pp
−235.8 pp
−8.8 pp
+8.7 pp
+107.8 pp
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
—
—
+38,927.8 pp
—
+4.4 pp
—
+3,957.9 pp
—
−128.8 pp
—
+22,654.8 pp
−4.7 pp
+50.4 pp
—
+94.1 pp
−127.9 pp
−68.1 pp
—
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
—
—
+48.0 pp
+20.0 pp
+11,837.6 pp
−10,548.0 pp
−10,458.0 pp
—
—
+10,464.4 pp
+10,440.1 pp
—
—
—
−109.3 pp
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+13.6 pp
—
−6.7 pp
−43,729.0 pp
−45.4 pp
—
−7,864.5 pp
+43,717.6 pp
—
03 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Cameco Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $651 million. Centrus Energy Corp. is next at $61 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation leads with $651 million of TTM profit, 10.7× the profit of Centrus Energy Corp.. Cameco Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (162.5% uncapped) growth from a $651 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderCameco Corporation · $651 million
Gap10.7× versus #2 · Centrus Energy Corp.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/13 companies · 216 observations
Investor read: Cameco Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Cameco Corporation CCJ$651M
2Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$61M
3Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY$5M
4Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL · older report$-5M
5IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU$-10M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Cameco Corporation CCJ100%
2Centrus Energy Corp. LEU-43%
3IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU-225%
Net profit · company comparison
12/13 level · 3/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | $131M | 87% | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | $10M | -63% | Mar 2026 |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | $3M | -2,300% | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | $2M | -117% | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | $-2M | -140% | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | $-2M | — | Dec 2025 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | $-11M | -400% | Mar 2026 |
| Deep Fission, Inc. FISN | $-21M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | $-29M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | $-52M | -600% | Jun 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | $-115M | -186% | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | $-156M | -1,390% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
$-72M
$11M
$40M
$84M
$-20M
$-15M
$119M
$14M
$148M
$80M
$-7M
$36M
$7M
$135M
$70M
$321M
$0M
$199M
$131M
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
$42M
$116M
$0M
$37M
$-6M
$21M
$7M
$13M
$8M
$56M
$-6M
$31M
$-5M
$54M
$27M
$29M
$4M
$18M
$10M
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$-2M
$-2M
$-3M
$0M
$-40M
$-13M
$-21M
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
$33M
$-3M
$43M
$-16M
$-6M
$-6M
$-3M
$0M
$58M
$35M
$-20M
$-16M
$-26M
$-30M
$-44M
$12M
$-135M
$-51M
$-115M
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-2M
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
$-3M
$-2M
$-4M
$-2M
$-5M
$0M
$-7M
$-6M
$4M
$-3M
$-8M
$-24M
$-18M
$1M
$-25M
$-9M
$-6M
$-22M
$3M
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
$-2M
$4M
$-1M
$2M
$-3M
$-3M
$8M
$-1M
$3M
$-6M
$12M
$3M
$-1M
$-5M
$-26M
$-9M
$-8M
$-1M
$-11M
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
$-4M
$-6M
$-9M
$8M
$-11M
$5M
$-5M
$4M
$-22M
$5M
$-5M
$-6M
$4M
$5M
$5M
$-2M
$0M
$-6M
$-2M
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
$-20M
$232M
$30M
$18M
$-27M
$-24M
$-9M
$-17M
$-63M
$160M
$-34M
$13M
$10M
$-66M
$-51M
$-87M
$-129M
$-43M
$-156M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
$-9M
$0M
$-7M
$0M
$-5M
$-5M
$-1M
$-7M
$-17M
$-5M
$-19M
$-7M
$-8M
$-20M
$-11M
$-21M
$-27M
$-16M
$-29M
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
$-2M
$-2M
$-5M
$7M
$5M
$-4M
$11M
$-11M
$1M
$3M
$2M
$-20M
$-15M
$-20M
$-10M
$-30M
$-27M
$-10M
$-14M
$-52M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
$-1M
$-1M
$-2M
$-1M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$1M
$-1M
$3M
$4M
$6M
$-2M
$0M
$-2M
$-1M
$2M
$2M
$2M
—
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
—
—
-236%
198%
-83%
—
—
-106%
157%
-95%
69%
—
792%
-100%
47%
87%
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
—
—
208%
-114%
-82%
—
-65%
—
167%
-186%
138%
-163%
-3.6%
—
-6.5%
—
-67%
-63%
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
—
—
—
-118%
—
-107%
—
—
—
—
—
-145%
-186%
—
—
—
—
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-550%
—
—
—
—
-2,300%
—
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
—
—
—
—
-175%
—
-150%
—
—
50%
—
-133%
—
-317%
-400%
—
—
—
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-50%
—
0.0%
—
-250%
—
0.0%
—
—
-100%
-220%
-140%
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
—
—
—
—
-110%
-130%
-194%
—
—
—
—
—
-141%
—
-769%
-1,390%
—
—
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-257%
-80%
—
-82%
—
-1,600%
-767%
-600%
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
500%
—
-100%
-150%
-117%
—
—
—
—
04 · compare level, then change
Capacity Spending & Returns On It
Cameco Corporation has the highest CAPEX among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $78 million. NexGen Energy Ltd. is next at $29 million. Denison Mines Corp. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 1400%, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation reports $78 million of CAPEX; Denison Mines Corp. has the highest covered intensity at 1400%. Coverage is only 10 of 13 companies and 158 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderCameco Corporation · $78 million
Gap169% versus #2 · NexGen Energy Ltd.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/13 companies · 158 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Cameco Corporation CCJ$78M
2NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE$29M
3Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$23M
4Denison Mines Corp. DNN$14M
5Ur-Energy Inc. URG$12M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Denison Mines Corp. DNN1,400%
2Ur-Energy Inc. URG300%
3Centrus Energy Corp. LEU30%
4Cameco Corporation CCJ9.2%
5enCore Energy Corp. EU5.6%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
10/13 level · 6/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | CAPEX | CAPEX intensity | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | $78M | 9.2% | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | $29M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | $23M | 30% | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | $14M | 1,400% | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | $12M | 300% | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | $4M | 5.0% | Jun 2026 |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | $1M | 5.6% | Mar 2026 |
| Deep Fission, Inc. FISN | $0M | — | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | $0M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | $0M | — | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
CAPEX · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
$31M
$37M
$30M
$36M
$43M
$34M
$27M
$40M
$43M
$44M
$40M
$47M
$60M
$64M
$56M
$75M
$93M
$109M
$78M
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$4M
$4M
$10M
$23M
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
$0M
$1M
$3M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$6M
$5M
$8M
$31M
$14M
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$5M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$3M
$2M
$6M
$6M
$5M
$3M
$6M
$1M
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
$0M
$0M
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$4M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$0M
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$29M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$4M
$3M
$4M
$5M
$5M
$9M
$12M
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$4M
CAPEX intensity · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
8.6%
8.0%
7.5%
6.5%
11%
6.5%
3.9%
8.3%
7.5%
5.2%
6.3%
7.9%
8.3%
5.4%
7.1%
8.6%
15%
9.1%
9.2%
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
4.5%
0.5%
1.7%
0.7%
2.7%
2.6%
5.3%
6.8%
30%
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
0.0%
33%
75%
14%
67%
33%
—
100%
0.0%
200%
200%
100%
200%
200%
600%
500%
800%
3,100%
1,400%
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
71%
50%
—
6.7%
60%
22%
—
33%
125%
33%
50%
5.6%
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
6.3%
—
—
—
0.0%
17%
—
17%
0.0%
—
20%
67%
13%
—
50%
83%
90%
300%
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
0.0%
0.0%
—
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
—
—
—
—
5.9%
2.0%
—
—
—
5.0%
—
Annual capital allocation · 6-year view
12/13 capacity base · 13/13 OCF · 11/13 CAPEX · 13/13 FCF
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.4B
$3.3B
$3.3B
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
$5M
$6M
$7M
$9M
$30M
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
$254M
$254M
$255M
$260M
$317M
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
$1M
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
$138M
$148M
$219M
$296M
$310M
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
$0M
$0M
$146M
$334M
$382M
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
$0M
$0M
$15M
$16M
$16M
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
$7M
$5M
$5M
$5M
$8M
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
$56M
$56M
$56M
$67M
$94M
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
$71M
$202M
$585M
$578M
$777M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
Operating cash flow · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
$458M
$305M
$688M
$905M
$1.4B
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
$50M
$21M
$9M
$37M
$51M
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
$-3M
$-13M
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
$-21M
$-28M
$-31M
$-40M
$-68M
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
$-5M
$-20M
$-23M
$-45M
$-25M
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
$-58M
$-60M
$100M
$-48M
$-85M
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
$-3M
$-3M
$-6M
$-10M
$-13M
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
$-17M
$-20M
$-53M
$-24M
$-48M
Nuclea Energy Inc. · NCLA
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
$-12M
$-18M
$-17M
$-72M
$-43M
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
$-41M
$-53M
$73M
$-106M
$-64M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
$-14M
$-69M
$-11M
$-105M
$-22M
—
CAPEX · reported cash flow · fiscal-year history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
$99M
$143M
$154M
$212M
$333M
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
$1M
$1M
$2M
$4M
$20M
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
$1M
$7M
$3M
$8M
$50M
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
$0M
$1M
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
$0M
$1M
$8M
$11M
$20M
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
$0M
—
—
$1M
$0M
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
$1M
$0M
$6M
$2M
$1M
Nuclea Energy Inc. · NCLA
—
—
—
—
$0M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
$1M
$1M
$2M
$9M
$24M
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
$0M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$5M
Free cash flow · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
$360M
$161M
$535M
$694M
$1.1B
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
$49M
$20M
$8M
$33M
$31M
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
$-3M
$-13M
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
$-22M
$-35M
$-34M
$-48M
$-119M
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
$-4M
$-16M
$-23M
$-39M
$-33M
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
$-58M
$-60M
$100M
$-48M
$-85M
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
$-3M
$-3M
$-6M
$-11M
$-13M
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
$-18M
$-21M
$-59M
$-26M
$-48M
Nuclea Energy Inc. · NCLA
—
—
—
$0M
$0M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
$-13M
$-19M
$-19M
$-81M
$-67M
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
$-42M
$-54M
$72M
$-108M
$-70M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
$-14M
$-69M
$-11M
$-105M
$-22M
—
05 · compare level, then change
Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom
Deep Fission, Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $0 million. Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest Net debt at $689 million net cash, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Centrus Energy Corp. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $689 million net cash and gross debt of $1,179 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderDeep Fission, Inc. · $0 million
Gapnull versus #2 · Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/13 companies · 209 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Deep Fission, Inc. FISN$0M
2Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL · older report$0M
3Uranium Energy Corp. UEC$0M
4Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY$0M
5IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU$6M
Net debtlowest net debt
1Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$-689M
2Uranium Energy Corp. UEC$-488M
3NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE$-303M
4Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU$-234M
5IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU$-177M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
12/13 level · 12/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Gross debt | Net debt | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | $1.2B | $-689M | Mar 2026 |
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | $997M | $-113M | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | $730M | $169M | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | $715M | $-303M | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | $677M | $-234M | Mar 2026 |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | $82M | $2M | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | $69M | $-54M | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | $6M | $-177M | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | $0M | $-488M | Jun 2026 |
| Deep Fission, Inc. FISN | $0M | $-85M | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | $0M | $-139M | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | $0M | $-1M | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Gross debt · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
$996M
$996M
$996M
$997M
$997M
$997M
$997M
$997M
$998M
$1.8B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$996M
$996M
$996M
$996M
$997M
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
$108M
$130M
$137M
$151M
$148M
$151M
$172M
$173M
$170M
$173M
$170M
$172M
$171M
$545M
$458M
$430M
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$2M
—
—
$0M
$11M
$20M
$20M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$599M
$612M
$730M
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$0M
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$57M
$57M
$40M
$15M
$21M
$15M
$16M
$20M
$10M
$10M
$79M
$113M
$82M
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$676M
$677M
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
$22M
$25M
$32M
$22M
$30M
$27M
$31M
$26M
$46M
$38M
$40M
$43M
$38M
$31M
$17M
$16M
$6M
$6M
$6M
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
$77M
$75M
$93M
$65M
$77M
$82M
$79M
$81M
$191M
$160M
$178M
$466M
$431M
$457M
$425M
$489M
$593M
$587M
$715M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
$12M
$12M
$12M
$12M
$12M
$11M
$10M
$9M
$8M
$7M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$68M
$69M
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
$10M
$11M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
$6M
$6M
$13M
$13M
$15M
$16M
$16M
$10M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$19M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
—
Net debt · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
$-364M
$-336M
$-483M
$-429M
$-347M
$-1.3B
$-1.5B
$-1.5B
$-1.7B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$681M
$635M
$280M
$217M
$-218M
$-113M
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
$-63M
$-64M
$-32M
$35M
$16M
$-29M
$-17M
$-40M
$-13M
$-28M
$-39M
$-55M
$-23M
$-126M
$-195M
$-403M
$-418M
$-743M
$-689M
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
—
—
$0M
$4M
$15M
$15M
$-30M
$-24M
$-85M
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
$-77M
$-78M
$-84M
$-66M
$-65M
$-59M
$-67M
$-55M
$-84M
$-141M
$-142M
$-128M
$-116M
$-115M
$-91M
$-94M
$116M
$73M
$169M
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$-1M
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
$-9M
$-9M
$-26M
$-24M
$-16M
$-6M
$51M
$54M
$20M
$-3M
$-87M
$-37M
$-33M
$-44M
$-35M
$-28M
$-4M
$17M
$2M
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
$-100M
$-25M
$-106M
$-98M
$-89M
$-12M
$-103M
$-99M
$-124M
$-190M
$-195M
$-170M
$-148M
$-119M
$-163M
$-198M
$-235M
$-186M
$-234M
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
$-3M
$2M
$13M
$9M
$19M
$1M
$9M
$7M
$32M
$-16M
$-41M
$-24M
$-30M
$-21M
$-64M
$-109M
$-124M
$-110M
$-177M
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
$-161M
$-136M
$-103M
$-102M
$-70M
$-58M
$-62M
$-27M
$-187M
$-131M
$-205M
$-106M
$-107M
$-20M
$-10M
$117M
$287M
$-537M
$-303M
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
$-21M
$-34M
$-34M
$-31M
$-28M
$-22M
$-67M
$-59M
$-47M
$-53M
$-53M
$-60M
$-117M
$-75M
$-74M
$-56M
$-50M
$-56M
$-54M
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
$-34M
$-85M
$-23M
$-24M
$-33M
$-21M
$-33M
$-17M
$-46M
$-50M
$-82M
$-88M
$-156M
$-191M
$-62M
$-71M
$-149M
$-455M
$-486M
$-488M
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
$-54M
$-57M
$-32M
$-43M
$-36M
$-43M
$-49M
$-43M
$-47M
$-80M
$-11M
$-30M
$-13M
$-2M
$-17M
$-20M
$-49M
$-82M
$-139M
—
06 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
enCore Energy Corp. has the highest ROCE among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 3%. Cameco Corporation is next at 1.8%. Nuclea Energy Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +6646.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: enCore Energy Corp. leads ROCE at 3%, 1.2 percentage points above Cameco Corporation. Nuclea Energy Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +6646.1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderenCore Energy Corp. · 3%
Gap66.7% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 213 observations
Investor read: enCore Energy Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1enCore Energy Corp. EU3.0%
2Cameco Corporation CCJ1.8%
3Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY0.9%
4Centrus Energy Corp. LEU0.1%
5IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU-1.4%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Nuclea Energy Inc. NCLA+6,646.1 pp
2Deep Fission, Inc. FISN+24.2 pp
3enCore Energy Corp. EU+7.2 pp
4Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU+3.5 pp
5Ur-Energy Inc. URG+1.5 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
13/13 level · 13/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | 3.0% | +7.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | 1.8% | −0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | 0.9% | +1.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | 0.1% | −4.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | -1.4% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | -1.5% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | -1.7% | +3.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | -3.2% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | -3.5% | −4.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | -9.7% | +1.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Deep Fission, Inc. FISN | -47% | +24.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | -259% | −427.3 pp | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
-0.9%
0.0%
0.1%
1.2%
-0.2%
-0.8%
1.2%
0.5%
1.8%
0.2%
1.5%
1.2%
1.2%
2.1%
2.1%
1.9%
1.0%
1.9%
1.8%
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
25%
15%
-2.1%
23%
-6.9%
14%
3.4%
5.4%
-1.1%
11%
-3.5%
7.3%
-2.6%
8.4%
4.1%
6.0%
-1.8%
0.9%
0.1%
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
0.0%
0.0%
39%
34%
64%
29%
24%
22%
15%
-1.6%
26%
26%
584%
-62%
-71%
-0.5%
-59%
-63%
-47%
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
-9.4%
-2.8%
-13%
-3.1%
-3.0%
-3.2%
-4.3%
-4.2%
-14%
-9.7%
-1.7%
-2.8%
-4.2%
-3.1%
0.9%
2.3%
-0.6%
-2.9%
-3.5%
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
168%
—
-51%
-86%
-259%
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
-13%
-1.9%
-4.0%
-4.2%
-4.7%
0.0%
-3.3%
-2.7%
-2.8%
-5.0%
-3.5%
-8.0%
-5.9%
-0.1%
-4.2%
-6.2%
-4.8%
-4.3%
3.0%
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
-1.3%
0.0%
-0.5%
0.7%
-1.0%
-15%
2.5%
-0.4%
0.9%
-2.8%
3.0%
0.7%
-0.4%
-1.0%
-5.2%
-1.6%
-1.4%
-0.1%
-1.7%
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
-1.1%
-4.0%
-3.2%
-2.6%
-4.3%
-3.2%
-2.1%
-2.1%
-2.4%
-2.1%
-1.7%
-1.5%
-2.2%
-2.0%
-1.4%
-1.1%
-1.2%
-1.8%
-1.4%
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
-1.9%
-4.6%
-2.2%
-2.2%
-3.0%
-3.9%
-2.6%
-2.8%
-3.6%
-4.5%
-2.3%
-2.0%
-1.8%
-2.4%
-1.3%
-1.3%
-2.1%
-2.4%
-1.5%
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
-4.2%
-5.0%
-5.0%
-5.1%
-4.4%
13%
-2.5%
-7.5%
-9.2%
-7.6%
-13%
-8.5%
-7.6%
-16%
-11%
-11%
-11%
-8.6%
-9.7%
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
-3.1%
-2.6%
-1.5%
-3.7%
0.8%
1.0%
-0.7%
0.7%
-1.6%
-1.5%
-1.8%
-2.4%
-1.6%
-0.4%
-2.5%
-3.4%
-2.6%
-1.9%
-3.2%
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
-1.5%
-1.5%
-1.0%
-1.1%
-1.0%
-1.2%
-1.2%
0.9%
-0.9%
0.6%
2.1%
1.3%
-1.0%
0.0%
-0.6%
-0.3%
1.1%
-1.1%
0.9%
—
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
—
+0.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.6 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
—
—
—
−32.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+5.5 pp
−17.9 pp
+5.8 pp
−3.2 pp
−6.9 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.8 pp
+7.6 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.8 pp
−7.5 pp
−4.0 pp
—
Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN
—
—
—
—
+64.2 pp
+28.7 pp
−14.9 pp
−12.4 pp
−49.6 pp
−30.3 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+569.8 pp
−60.2 pp
−97.0 pp
−26.7 pp
−643.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+24.2 pp
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
—
—
—
—
+6.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+8.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−11.2 pp
−6.5 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+10.0 pp
+6.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+5.1 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.2 pp
−4.4 pp
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−427.3 pp
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
+8.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.9 pp
−5.0 pp
−0.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−3.1 pp
+4.9 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−4.2 pp
+7.2 pp
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
—
—
—
+0.3 pp
−15.1 pp
+3.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+12.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
−1.3 pp
+1.8 pp
−8.2 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+3.5 pp
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
—
—
—
−3.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
—
—
—
—
−1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
—
—
—
—
−0.2 pp
+17.9 pp
+2.5 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.8 pp
−20.5 pp
−10.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.6 pp
−8.5 pp
+1.3 pp
−2.6 pp
−3.6 pp
+7.5 pp
+1.5 pp
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
—
+3.9 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+4.4 pp
−2.4 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.1 pp
0.0 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.7 pp
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+3.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.6 pp
+2.1 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.5 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 1.26×. Cameco Corporation is next at 2.64×. Energy Fuels Inc. has the lowest P/E at 11.6×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.26×, 52.3% below Cameco Corporation. Only 2 of 13 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderCentrus Energy Corp. · 1.26×
Gap52.3% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/13 companies · 6 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Centrus Energy Corp. LEU1.3
2Cameco Corporation CCJ2.6
P/Elowest P/E
1Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU11.6
2IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU31.7
3NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE40.1
4Denison Mines Corp. DNN45.7
5Centrus Energy Corp. LEU57.5
Valuation · company comparison
2/13 level · 8/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Guarded PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | 2.6 | 101.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | 1.3 | 57.5 | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | — | 40.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | — | 595.0 | Jun 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | — | 11.6 | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | — | 45.7 | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | — | 31.7 | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | — | 157.3 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Guarded PEG · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.6
—
—
—
—
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
0.2
3.5
1.3
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
—
—
—
169.1
126.5
139.8
90.8
197.6
89.8
68.9
110.7
116.2
248.5
189.1
84.6
74.3
87.1
93.0
101.3
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
37.9
5.1
3.4
2.2
5.0
9.6
8.3
14.8
18.1
10.0
9.1
7.6
11.5
14.9
9.7
30.1
47.1
62.3
57.5
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
92.0
87.0
40.8
42.3
—
77.5
—
—
31.9
23.2
33.1
45.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
6.2
7.5
4.1
5.2
—
12.7
12.0
12.6
11.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
24.1
21.3
15.4
9.6
10.7
—
—
—
—
57.9
95.7
73.4
40.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
210.0
210.5
57.6
261.0
—
595.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
397.0
75.7
40.3
41.9
77.0
343.0
—
—
342.0
157.3
—
08 · compare level, then change
Enterprise Value & Book Value
Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 66.3×. Cameco Corporation is next at 73.3×. IsoEnergy Ltd. has the lowest P/BV at 1.8×, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Centrus Energy Corp. leads ev/ebitda at 66.3×; IsoEnergy Ltd. leads p/bv at 1.8×.
LeaderCentrus Energy Corp. · 66.3×
Gap9.5% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/13 companies · 53 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Centrus Energy Corp. LEU66.3
2Cameco Corporation CCJ73.3
3enCore Energy Corp. EU75.7
4Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU107.7
5Uranium Energy Corp. UEC121.1
P/BVlowest P/BV
1IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU1.8
2enCore Energy Corp. EU1.9
3Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY2.4
4Centrus Energy Corp. LEU4.4
5Uranium Energy Corp. UEC5.2
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
6/13 level · 11/13 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | EV/EBITDA | P/BV | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | 395.9 | 2.4 | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | 121.1 | 5.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | 107.7 | 6.2 | Mar 2026 |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | 75.7 | 1.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | 73.3 | 9.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | 66.3 | 4.4 | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | — | 6.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | — | 17.2 | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | — | 1.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | — | 7.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | — | 69.8 | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
76.2
196.2
168.0
45.6
52.6
62.5
43.8
66.6
53.0
51.7
53.1
51.6
51.3
41.5
30.5
46.3
54.5
59.8
73.3
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
6.3
8.5
6.4
3.5
10.2
6.4
5.9
9.6
14.8
13.9
15.4
13.0
19.2
16.8
9.6
28.6
56.7
67.1
66.3
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
254.0
75.7
—
—
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
—
—
—
—
—
—
166.2
573.1
168.7
—
110.6
72.3
107.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
121.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
89.5
50.4
61.3
89.1
—
—
689.5
—
395.9
—
P/BV · reported quarter history
Cameco Corporation · CCJ
2.3
2.3
3.0
2.2
3.0
2.3
2.6
3.0
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.7
4.5
5.0
4.0
6.5
7.5
7.9
9.3
—
Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU
-2.4
-5.1
-3.7
-3.8
-5.9
-6.4
-11.2
-15.6
-36.7
26.4
19.7
9.1
11.8
6.9
5.0
9.3
15.6
6.2
4.4
—
Denison Mines Corp. · DNN
3.8
3.6
3.7
2.4
3.0
2.9
2.7
3.1
3.6
3.2
3.8
4.0
3.8
4.1
3.2
4.2
8.5
8.9
17.2
—
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-177.7
-180.2
22.0
29.7
69.8
—
—
enCore Energy Corp. · EU
4.6
0.9
0.8
0.5
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.9
3.3
2.3
3.2
3.4
2.2
1.0
2.0
3.4
2.0
1.9
—
Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU
4.4
54.6
5.1
2.9
3.8
80.7
2.5
2.8
3.5
3.1
2.7
2.6
2.4
1.9
1.4
2.1
5.2
5.1
6.2
—
IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU
6.8
7.1
10.4
5.5
7.8
4.8
5.6
4.2
10.6
2.1
2.0
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.9
1.7
1.8
—
NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE
6.7
6.1
8.2
5.1
5.7
6.9
5.7
6.9
6.7
5.9
6.1
4.5
4.1
4.6
3.3
5.3
7.8
4.6
6.3
—
Ur-Energy Inc. · URG
6.8
3.8
5.4
3.5
3.7
4.1
2.9
3.1
5.6
5.6
5.9
4.5
2.8
3.2
2.0
3.8
7.4
6.8
7.1
—
Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC
—
4.5
2.6
3.9
3.7
2.7
2.4
1.6
2.2
3.4
4.0
3.5
3.1
3.8
3.5
2.6
4.0
5.6
6.0
5.2
Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY
2.7
3.9
2.7
2.5
2.2
1.8
2.1
1.6
1.7
1.9
2.1
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.5
1.1
1.6
2.9
2.4
—
09 · let price answer last
Market action
IsoEnergy Ltd. has the strongest one-year price move in Uranium at +48.7%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at -11.8%. 0 of 11 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Uranium comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 13 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 13 companies in the canonical Uranium membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
| Company | Market value | Price | Priced to | Latest fundamentals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco Corporation CCJ | $38.9B | $87.0 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE | $6.2B | $9.2 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Energy Corp. UEC | $4.7B | $9.4 | 2026-07-28 | Jun 2026 |
| Centrus Energy Corp. LEU | $3.3B | $170 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU | $2.8B | $11.3 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Denison Mines Corp. DNN | $2.5B | $2.8 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Deep Fission, Inc. FISN | $597M | $9.9 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU | $571M | $9.4 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Ur-Energy Inc. URG | $482M | $1.2 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY | $405M | $2.8 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Nuclea Energy Inc. NCLA | $354M | — | — | — |
| enCore Energy Corp. EU | $223M | $1.2 | 2026-07-28 | Mar 2026 |
| Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL | $161M | $5.4 | 2026-07-28 | Dec 2025 |
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Uranium companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers
Uranium company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the Uranium comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Uranium company is the biggest?
Cameco Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $3,538 million, ahead of Centrus Energy Corp. at $453 million. That covers 7 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Uranium company is growing fastest?
enCore Energy Corp. has the fastest revenue growth at 53.6% year on year, across 5 of 13 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Uranium company has the best profit margins?
enCore Energy Corp. has the highest operating margin at 54.4%, from 7 of 13 comparable companies. Uranium Royalty Corp. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +43717.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Uranium company makes the most profit?
Cameco Corporation earns the most, at $651 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 12 of 13 comparable companies. Cameco Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Uranium company earns the highest return on capital?
enCore Energy Corp. leads on return on capital employed at 3%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Uranium stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Centrus Energy Corp. screens cheapest at 1.26×. Only 2 of 13 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Uranium company has the strongest balance sheet?
Deep Fission, Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $0 million, from 12 of 13 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Uranium company is investing most in new capacity?
Cameco Corporation reports the largest capital spending at $78 million, across 10 of 13 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Uranium sector beating the market?
Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over the last 52 weeks and 32.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 0 of 11 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Uranium stock has the strongest price momentum?
IsoEnergy Ltd. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Uranium company scores highest for research priority?
Cameco Corporation scores 55.4 out of 100 with 82% evidence confidence, from 19.8 points on growth and earnings, 16.1 on capital efficiency, 5.6 on valuation and 13.9 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Uranium companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Uranium sector?
The 13 Uranium companies on this page carry $61,196 million of combined market value. Cameco Corporation is the largest at $38,902 million, about 64% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Uranium sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 13 Uranium companies on this page is 57.5×, measured on the 8 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Uranium sector performing?
0 of the 11 covered Uranium companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 7.4% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Uranium stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 13 listed Uranium companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.