Specialty Chemicals: Linde plc owns the largest revenue base; Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Specialty Chemicals moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 12% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 19% on average over the last four reported quarters.
BASING · +2 joined~Moving with the index15 of 47 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Specialty Chemicals, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyMixedHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together15 of 47 stocks moving
Fresh5 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +4 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large2/10+1
Mid7/16+1
Small6/210
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 47 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Specialty Chemicals outperforming S&P 500?
Specialty Chemicals has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 3.4%. 12 of 28 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Calumet, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +46.7%.
-3.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+11.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
12/28Stocks leading S&P 500
9/28Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Specialty Chemicals has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 3.4% over 13 weeks. 12 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 9 of 28 beat the sector itself. Linde plc leads with revenue of $34,655 million, based on 24 of 29 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Specialty Chemicals sector outperforming S&P 500?
Specialty Chemicals has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 3.4% over 13 weeks. 12 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 9 of 28 beat the sector itself.
Which Specialty Chemicals company is largest by revenue?
Linde plc leads with revenue of $34,655 million, based on 24 of 29 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Specialty Chemicals company is growing fastest?
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 23.2%, across 24 of 29 comparable companies.
Which Specialty Chemicals company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Sensient Technologies Corporation ranks first at 62.3/100 with 58.7% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Specialty Chemicals company reports the most CAPEX?
Linde plc reports the largest latest CAPEX at $1,342 million, with 29 of 29 companies comparable.
Which Specialty Chemicals company has the least gross debt?
WD-40 Company has the lowest comparable gross debt at $111 million. Linde plc has the highest at $26,317 million.
Which Specialty Chemicals company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Cabot Corporation has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.18, among 15 of 29 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Specialty Chemicals comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
29
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$694.7B
Linde plc
Revenue growing
13/24
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
12/28
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Sensient Technologies Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 58.7% evidence confidence.
Cabot Corporation looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Cabot Corporation has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -9.1% and the one-year return is 86.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -21.9% and the one-year return is -32.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12.0/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.5 pp
39% evidence
12.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 8.1% · debt/equity 1.42×
80% evidence
9.8/20Valuation
P/E 32.6× · PEG —
15% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Linde plc has the highest Revenue among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at $34,655 million. LyondellBasell Industries N.V. is next at $29,673 million. Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 23.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 24 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Linde plc is the scale leader at $34,655 million, 16.8% ahead of LyondellBasell Industries N.V.. Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s growth is 23.2% from a $706 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderLinde plc · $34,655 million
Gap16.8% versus #2 · LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage24/29 companies · 530 observations
Investor read: Linde plc is the scale benchmark; Perimeter Solutions, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Linde plc's growth falls below Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Linde plc LIN$34.7B
2LyondellBasell Industries N.V. LYB$29.7B
3The Sherwin-Williams Company SHW$23.9B
4Ecolab Inc. ECL$16.5B
5PPG Industries, Inc. PPG$16.1B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Perimeter Solutions, Inc. PRM23%
2Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM18%
3Element Solutions Inc ESI13%
4Hawkins, Inc. HWKN11%
5Balchem Corporation BCPC9.6%
Revenue · company comparison
24/29 level · 24/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at 58%. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. is next at 41%. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +103.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Perimeter Solutions, Inc. leads opm at 58%; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. leads margin change at +103.5 percentage points.
LeaderPerimeter Solutions, Inc. · 58%
Gap41.5% versus #2 · Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/29 companies · 530 observations
Investor read: Perimeter Solutions, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Perimeter Solutions, Inc. PRM58%
2Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM41%
3Linde plc LIN28%
4Ingevity Corporation NGVT27%
5Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD24%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD+103.5 pp
2International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. IFF+41.8 pp
3Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM+17.4 pp
4Albemarle Corporation ALB+14.5 pp
5Avient Corporation AVNT+11.2 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
29/29 level · 29/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Linde plc has the highest Net profit among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at $7,099 million. The Sherwin-Williams Company is next at $2,762 million. H.B. Fuller Company has the highest Profit growth at 80.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 24 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Linde plc leads with $7,099 million of TTM profit, 157% above The Sherwin-Williams Company. H.B. Fuller Company shows 80.6% growth from a $186 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderLinde plc · $7,099 million
Gap157% versus #2 · The Sherwin-Williams Company
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage24/29 companies · 530 observations
Investor read: Linde plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Linde plc LIN$7.1B
2The Sherwin-Williams Company SHW$2.8B
3Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD$2.2B
4Ecolab Inc. ECL$2.1B
5PPG Industries, Inc. PPG$1.6B
Profit growthfastest growers
1H.B. Fuller Company FUL81%
2Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM48%
3DuPont de Nemours, Inc. DD41%
4PPG Industries, Inc. PPG19%
5Balchem Corporation BCPC15%
Net profit · company comparison
24/29 level · 17/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Linde plc has the highest CAPEX among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at $1,342 million. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. is next at $1,108 million. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 34.9%, so level and change sit with different companies. 29 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Linde plc reports $1,342 million of CAPEX; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. has the highest covered intensity at 34.9%. Coverage is only 29 of 29 companies and 531 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderLinde plc · $1,342 million
Gap21.1% versus #2 · Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/29 companies · 531 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Linde plc LIN$1.3B
2Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD$1.1B
3Ecolab Inc. ECL$349M
4LyondellBasell Industries N.V. LYB$269M
5Westlake Corporation WLK$209M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD35%
2Linde plc LIN15%
3Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM10%
4Ecolab Inc. ECL8.6%
5Westlake Corporation WLK7.9%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
29/29 level · 29/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
WD-40 Company has the lowest Gross debt among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at $111 million. Balchem Corporation is next at $185 million. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at $52 million. 29 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: WD-40 Company has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $52 million and gross debt of $111 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderWD-40 Company · $111 million
Gap40% versus #2 · Balchem Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/29 companies · 532 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1WD-40 Company WDFC$111M
2Balchem Corporation BCPC$185M
3Hawkins, Inc. HWKN$261M
4Sensient Technologies Corporation SXT$764M
5Quaker Chemical Corporation KWR$897M
Net debtlowest net debt
1WD-40 Company WDFC$52M
2Balchem Corporation BCPC$112M
3Hawkins, Inc. HWKN$257M
4Quaker Chemical Corporation KWR$727M
5Sensient Technologies Corporation SXT$733M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
29/29 level · 29/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
WD-40 Company has the highest ROCE among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at 10.8%. Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc. is next at 8.1%. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +9.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 29 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: WD-40 Company leads ROCE at 10.8%, 2.7 percentage points above Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +9.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderWD-40 Company · 10.8%
Gap33.3% versus #2 · Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/29 companies · 531 observations
Investor read: WD-40 Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1WD-40 Company WDFC11%
2Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc. SOLS8.1%
3Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM6.3%
4NewMarket Corporation NEU4.8%
5RPM International Inc. RPM4.8%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. APD+9.2 pp
2International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. IFF+4.8 pp
3Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM+3.5 pp
4WD-40 Company WDFC+3.0 pp
5Avient Corporation AVNT+1.9 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
29/29 level · 29/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cabot Corporation has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at 0.18×. Eastman Chemical Company is next at 0.28×. Ingevity Corporation has the lowest P/E at 13.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cabot Corporation has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.18×, 35.7% below Eastman Chemical Company. Only 15 of 29 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderCabot Corporation · 0.18×
Gap35.7% versus #2 · Eastman Chemical Company
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/29 companies · 117 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Cabot Corporation CBT0.2
2Eastman Chemical Company EMN0.3
3PPG Industries, Inc. PPG0.3
4Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. AXTA0.3
5H.B. Fuller Company FUL0.5
P/Elowest P/E
1Ingevity Corporation NGVT13.9
2Cabot Corporation CBT14.2
3NewMarket Corporation NEU14.6
4PPG Industries, Inc. PPG15.2
5Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. AXTA16.2
Valuation · company comparison
15/29 level · 29/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 22 companies with a series here. The remaining 10 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cabot Corporation has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies compared here, at 6.91×. Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. is next at 8.46×. Westlake Corporation has the lowest P/BV at 0.88×, so level and change sit with different companies. 29 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Cabot Corporation leads ev/ebitda at 6.91×; Westlake Corporation leads p/bv at 0.88×.
LeaderCabot Corporation · 6.91×
Gap18.3% versus #2 · Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/29 companies · 497 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Cabot Corporation CBT6.9
2Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. AXTA8.5
3H.B. Fuller Company FUL9.6
4Avient Corporation AVNT9.9
5Ingevity Corporation NGVT10.2
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Westlake Corporation WLK0.9
2International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. IFF1.3
3DuPont de Nemours, Inc. DD1.3
4Avient Corporation AVNT1.4
5Ashland Inc. ASH1.4
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
29/29 level · 28/29 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Calumet, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Specialty Chemicals at +167.4%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +50.2%. 12 of 28 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Specialty Chemicals comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 29 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 29 companies in the canonical Specialty Chemicals membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 29 Specialty Chemicals companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
These 18 answers restate the Specialty Chemicals comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 29 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Specialty Chemicals company is the biggest?
Linde plc is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $34,655 million, ahead of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. at $29,673 million. That covers 24 of 29 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Specialty Chemicals company is growing fastest?
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the fastest revenue growth at 23.2% year on year, across 24 of 29 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Specialty Chemicals company has the best profit margins?
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 58%, from 29 of 29 comparable companies. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +103.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Specialty Chemicals company makes the most profit?
Linde plc earns the most, at $7,099 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 24 of 29 comparable companies. H.B. Fuller Company has the fastest profit growth at 80.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Specialty Chemicals company earns the highest return on capital?
WD-40 Company leads on return on capital employed at 10.8%, across 29 of 29 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Specialty Chemicals stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Cabot Corporation screens cheapest at 0.18×. Only 15 of 29 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Specialty Chemicals company has the strongest balance sheet?
WD-40 Company carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $111 million, from 29 of 29 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Specialty Chemicals company is investing most in new capacity?
Linde plc reports the largest capital spending at $1,342 million, across 29 of 29 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Specialty Chemicals sector beating the market?
Specialty Chemicals has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks and 3.4% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 12 of 28 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Specialty Chemicals stock has the strongest price momentum?
Calumet, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Specialty Chemicals company scores highest for research priority?
Sensient Technologies Corporation scores 62.3 out of 100 with 58.7% evidence confidence, from 20.4 points on growth and earnings, 14.3 on capital efficiency, 9.6 on valuation and 18 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Specialty Chemicals companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 29 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Specialty Chemicals sector?
The 29 Specialty Chemicals companies on this page carry $694,705 million of combined market value. Linde plc is the largest at $236,343 million, about 34% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Specialty Chemicals sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 29 Specialty Chemicals companies on this page is 30.7×, measured on the 29 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Specialty Chemicals sector performing?
12 of the 28 covered Specialty Chemicals companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 11.7% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Specialty Chemicals stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 29 listed Specialty Chemicals companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.