Oil & Gas Midstream: Energy Transfer LP owns the largest revenue base; Cmb.Tech NV has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Oil & Gas Midstream moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 17% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 3% on average over the last four reported quarters.
BASING · +9 joined~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming10 of 47 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
Oil & Gas Midstream, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyNarrowHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together10 of 47 stocks moving
Fresh10 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +3 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large0/100
Mid5/16+5
Small5/21+4
Participation is spreading downward — the mid and small companies added more this month than the large ones did.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 47 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Oil & Gas Midstream outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Midstream has outperformed S&P 500 by 13.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 0.3%. 26 of 29 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. International Seaways, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +25.9%.
-0.3%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+13.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
26/29Stocks leading S&P 500
9/29Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Oil & Gas Midstream has outperformed S&P 500 by 13.6% over 52 weeks and 0.3% over 13 weeks. 26 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 9 of 29 beat the sector itself. Energy Transfer LP leads with revenue of $92,287 million, based on 28 of 30 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Oil & Gas Midstream sector outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Midstream has outperformed S&P 500 by 13.6% over 52 weeks and 0.3% over 13 weeks. 26 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 9 of 29 beat the sector itself.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company is largest by revenue?
Energy Transfer LP leads with revenue of $92,287 million, based on 28 of 30 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company is growing fastest?
Cmb.Tech NV has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 28 of 30 comparable companies.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
International Seaways, Inc. ranks first at 76.4/100 with 82% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company reports the most CAPEX?
Venture Global, Inc. reports the largest latest CAPEX at $3,181 million, with 30 of 30 companies comparable.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company has the least gross debt?
Scorpio Tankers Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $581 million. Enbridge Inc. has the highest at $109,525 million.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company has the lowest comparable PEG?
International Seaways, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.09, among 25 of 30 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Oil & Gas Midstream comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$959.3B
Enbridge Inc.
Revenue growing
22/28
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
26/29
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
International Seaways, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 82% evidence confidence.
Western Midstream Partners, LP looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Western Midstream Partners, LP has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8% and the one-year return is 20.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18.4/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp
10% evidence
11.8/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 6.8% · debt/equity 1.85×
80% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Energy Transfer LP has the highest Revenue among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at $92,287 million. Enbridge Inc. is next at $69,049 million. Cmb.Tech NV has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Energy Transfer LP is the scale leader at $92,287 million, 33.7% ahead of Enbridge Inc.. Cmb.Tech NV's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 108.7% from a $1,951 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderEnergy Transfer LP · $92,287 million
Gap33.7% versus #2 · Enbridge Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage28/30 companies · 538 observations
Investor read: Energy Transfer LP is the scale benchmark; Cmb.Tech NV is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Energy Transfer LP's growth falls below Cmb.Tech NV's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Energy Transfer LP ET$92.3B
2Enbridge Inc. ENB$69.0B
3Enterprise Products Partners L.P. EPD$51.6B
4Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. PAA$45.3B
5Plains GP Holdings, L.P. PAGP$45.3B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Cmb.Tech NV CMBT100%
2Venture Global, Inc. VG100%
3Viper Energy, Inc. VNOM84%
4Golar LNG Limited GLNG82%
5ONEOK, Inc. OKE41%
Revenue · company comparison
28/30 level · 28/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
International Seaways, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at 89.9%. Cmb.Tech NV is next at 84.6%. Golar LNG Limited has the highest Margin change at +76.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: International Seaways, Inc. leads opm at 89.9%; Golar LNG Limited leads margin change at +76.5 percentage points.
LeaderInternational Seaways, Inc. · 89.9%
Gap6.3% versus #2 · Cmb.Tech NV
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 538 observations
Investor read: International Seaways, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1International Seaways, Inc. INSW90%
2Cmb.Tech NV CMBT85%
3Frontline plc FRO82%
4Golar LNG Limited GLNG82%
5Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG70%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Golar LNG Limited GLNG+76.5 pp
2Frontline plc FRO+60.1 pp
3International Seaways, Inc. INSW+57.6 pp
4Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG+42.0 pp
5Cmb.Tech NV CMBT+40.9 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Enbridge Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at $7,077 million. Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is next at $5,966 million. Frontline plc has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Enbridge Inc. leads with $7,077 million of TTM profit, 18.6% above Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. Frontline plc shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (160.1% uncapped) growth from a $905 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderEnbridge Inc. · $7,077 million
Gap18.6% versus #2 · Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage28/30 companies · 538 observations
Investor read: Enbridge Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Enbridge Inc. ENB$7.1B
2Enterprise Products Partners L.P. EPD$6.0B
3Energy Transfer LP ET$6.0B
4MPLX LP MPLX$4.7B
5TC Energy Corporation TRP$4.1B
Profit growthfastest growers
1Frontline plc FRO100%
2Golar LNG Limited GLNG100%
3Kinetik Holdings Inc. KNTK100%
4Venture Global, Inc. VG82%
5International Seaways, Inc. INSW69%
Net profit · company comparison
28/30 level · 27/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Venture Global, Inc. has the highest CAPEX among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at $3,181 million. Enbridge Inc. is next at $2,439 million. Golar LNG Limited has the highest CAPEX intensity at 108.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Venture Global, Inc. reports $3,181 million of CAPEX; Golar LNG Limited has the highest covered intensity at 108.7%. Coverage is only 30 of 30 companies and 535 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderVenture Global, Inc. · $3,181 million
Gap30.4% versus #2 · Enbridge Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 535 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Venture Global, Inc. VG$3.2B
2Enbridge Inc. ENB$2.4B
3Energy Transfer LP ET$1.9B
4The Williams Companies, Inc. WMB$1.4B
5TC Energy Corporation TRP$1.1B
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Golar LNG Limited GLNG109%
2Venture Global, Inc. VG69%
3Frontline plc FRO45%
4The Williams Companies, Inc. WMB45%
5Cmb.Tech NV CMBT35%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Scorpio Tankers Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at $581 million. International Seaways, Inc. is next at $610 million. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at $403 million net cash. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Scorpio Tankers Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $403 million net cash and gross debt of $581 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderScorpio Tankers Inc. · $581 million
Gap4.8% versus #2 · International Seaways, Inc.
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 537 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG$581M
2International Seaways, Inc. INSW$610M
3BW LPG Limited BWLP$898M
4Excelerate Energy, Inc. EE$1.4B
5Viper Energy, Inc. VNOM$1.6B
Net debtlowest net debt
1Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG$-403M
2International Seaways, Inc. INSW$233M
3BW LPG Limited BWLP$612M
4Excelerate Energy, Inc. EE$873M
5Viper Energy, Inc. VNOM$1.6B
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
International Seaways, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at 11.2%. Frontline plc is next at 10.8%. Frontline plc has the highest ROCE change at +9.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: International Seaways, Inc. leads ROCE at 11.2%, 0.4 percentage points above Frontline plc. Frontline plc has the strongest latest improvement at +9.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderInternational Seaways, Inc. · 11.2%
Gap3.7% versus #2 · Frontline plc
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 537 observations
Investor read: International Seaways, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1International Seaways, Inc. INSW11%
2Frontline plc FRO11%
3BW LPG Limited BWLP8.0%
4SunocoCorp LLC SUNC6.8%
5Cmb.Tech NV CMBT5.8%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Frontline plc FRO+9.2 pp
2International Seaways, Inc. INSW+8.7 pp
3BW LPG Limited BWLP+7.1 pp
4Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG+4.0 pp
5Cmb.Tech NV CMBT+3.8 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
30/30 level · 29/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
International Seaways, Inc. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at 0.09×. Scorpio Tankers Inc. is next at 0.12×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 6.64×. 25 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: International Seaways, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.09×, 25% below Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Only 25 of 30 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderInternational Seaways, Inc. · 0.09×
Gap25% versus #2 · Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage25/30 companies · 116 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1International Seaways, Inc. INSW0.1
2Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG0.1
3Venture Global, Inc. VG0.1
4Western Midstream Partners, LP WES0.2
5Frontline plc FRO0.2
P/Elowest P/E
1International Seaways, Inc. INSW6.6
2BW LPG Limited BWLP7.3
3Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG7.3
4Cmb.Tech NV CMBT7.9
5Frontline plc FRO8.6
Valuation · company comparison
25/30 level · 29/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Scorpio Tankers Inc. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies compared here, at 6.23×. BW LPG Limited is next at 6.45×. Kinder Morgan, Inc. has the lowest P/BV at 1.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 29 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Scorpio Tankers Inc. leads ev/ebitda at 6.23×; Kinder Morgan, Inc. leads p/bv at 1.1×.
LeaderScorpio Tankers Inc. · 6.23×
Gap3.4% versus #2 · BW LPG Limited
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/30 companies · 517 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG6.2
2BW LPG Limited BWLP6.5
3Hess Midstream LP HESM6.9
4Excelerate Energy, Inc. EE8.3
5International Seaways, Inc. INSW8.4
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Kinder Morgan, Inc. KMI1.1
2Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG1.1
3Cmb.Tech NV CMBT1.3
4BW LPG Limited BWLP1.4
5Excelerate Energy, Inc. EE1.6
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
29/30 level · 28/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
International Seaways, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Oil & Gas Midstream at +132.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +37.4%. 26 of 29 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Oil & Gas Midstream comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 30 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 30 companies in the canonical Oil & Gas Midstream membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
These 18 answers restate the Oil & Gas Midstream comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company is the biggest?
Energy Transfer LP is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $92,287 million, ahead of Enbridge Inc. at $69,049 million. That covers 28 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company is growing fastest?
Cmb.Tech NV has the fastest revenue growth at 100% year on year, across 28 of 30 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company has the best profit margins?
International Seaways, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 89.9%, from 30 of 30 comparable companies. Golar LNG Limited shows the biggest recent improvement, at +76.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company makes the most profit?
Enbridge Inc. earns the most, at $7,077 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 28 of 30 comparable companies. Frontline plc has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company earns the highest return on capital?
International Seaways, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 11.2%, across 30 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — International Seaways, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.09×. Only 25 of 30 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company has the strongest balance sheet?
Scorpio Tankers Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $581 million, from 30 of 30 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company is investing most in new capacity?
Venture Global, Inc. reports the largest capital spending at $3,181 million, across 30 of 30 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Oil & Gas Midstream sector beating the market?
Oil & Gas Midstream has outperformed S&P 500 by 13.6% over the last 52 weeks and 0.3% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 26 of 29 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream stock has the strongest price momentum?
International Seaways, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Oil & Gas Midstream company scores highest for research priority?
International Seaways, Inc. scores 76.4 out of 100 with 82% evidence confidence, from 27.3 points on growth and earnings, 17.8 on capital efficiency, 16.5 on valuation and 14.8 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Oil & Gas Midstream companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 5 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Oil & Gas Midstream sector?
The 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies on this page carry $959,275 million of combined market value. Enbridge Inc. is the largest at $121,007 million, about 13% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Oil & Gas Midstream sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 30 Oil & Gas Midstream companies on this page is 17.5×, measured on the 29 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Oil & Gas Midstream sector performing?
26 of the 29 covered Oil & Gas Midstream companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 13.6% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Oil & Gas Midstream stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 30 listed Oil & Gas Midstream companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.