Oil & Gas Equipment & Services: Baker Hughes Company owns the largest revenue base; Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Oil & Gas Equipment & Services moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 36% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 3% on average over the last four reported quarters.
ASLEEP · 1y +50.7%~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming6 of 38 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyNarrowHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together6 of 38 stocks moving
Fresh3 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +7 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large0/80
Mid5/13+2
Small1/17−1
Participation is spreading downward — the mid and small companies added more this month than the large ones did.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 38 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Oil & Gas Equipment & Services outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.8% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 15%. 17 of 28 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Oceaneering International, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +35.7%.
-15.0%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+38.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
17/28Stocks leading S&P 500
11/28Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.8% over 52 weeks and 15% over 13 weeks. 17 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 11 of 28 beat the sector itself. Baker Hughes Company leads with revenue of $27,893 million, based on 22 of 30 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.8% over 52 weeks and 15% over 13 weeks. 17 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 11 of 28 beat the sector itself.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is largest by revenue?
Baker Hughes Company leads with revenue of $27,893 million, based on 22 of 30 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is growing fastest?
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 86.5%, across 22 of 30 comparable companies.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
TechnipFMC plc ranks first at 68.6/100 with 82% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company reports the most CAPEX?
NextDecade Corporation reports the largest latest CAPEX at $1,177 million, with 30 of 30 companies comparable.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the least gross debt?
Cactus, Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $55 million. Baker Hughes Company has the highest at $16,164 million.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.1, among 13 of 30 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$296.5B
SLB N.V.
Revenue growing
15/22
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
17/28
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
TechnipFMC plc has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 82% evidence confidence.
Tidewater Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Oceaneering International, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -22.1% and the one-year return is 57.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18.1/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
33% evidence
4.8/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -0.6% · debt/equity 4.01×
68% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
5.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -25.7% · RS bench -18.1% · 1Y -44.7%
100% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Baker Hughes Company has the highest Revenue among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $27,893 million. Tenaris S.A. is next at $12,159 million. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 86.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Baker Hughes Company is the scale leader at $27,893 million, 129.4% ahead of Tenaris S.A.. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s growth is 86.5% from a $692 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderBaker Hughes Company · $27,893 million
Gap129.4% versus #2 · Tenaris S.A.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage22/30 companies · 496 observations
Investor read: Baker Hughes Company is the scale benchmark; Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Baker Hughes Company's growth falls below Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Baker Hughes Company BKR$27.9B
2Tenaris S.A. TS$12.2B
3TechnipFMC plc FTI$10.2B
4NOV Inc. NOV$8.7B
5Enerflex Ltd. EFXT$2.6B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI87%
2LandBridge Company LLC LB55%
3RPC, Inc. RES28%
4Innovex International, Inc. INVX26%
5Archrock, Inc. AROC23%
Revenue · company comparison
22/30 level · 22/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
LandBridge Company LLC has the highest OPM among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 57.2%. EagleRock Land, LLC is next at 40.9%. EagleRock Land, LLC has the highest Margin change at +18.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 14 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: LandBridge Company LLC leads opm at 57.2%; EagleRock Land, LLC leads margin change at +18.2 percentage points.
LeaderLandBridge Company LLC · 57.2%
Gap39.9% versus #2 · EagleRock Land, LLC
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/30 companies · 496 observations
Investor read: LandBridge Company LLC sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1LandBridge Company LLC LB57%
2EagleRock Land, LLC EROK41%
3Archrock, Inc. AROC34%
4Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS31%
5USA Compression Partners, LP USAC28%
Margin changefastest expanders
1EagleRock Land, LLC EROK+18.2 pp
2Baker Hughes Company BKR+11.1 pp
3Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI+8.3 pp
4Halliburton Company HAL+4.6 pp
5Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS+3.8 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
29/30 level · 29/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Baker Hughes Company has the highest Net profit among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $3,153 million. Tenaris S.A. is next at $2,020 million. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Baker Hughes Company leads with $3,153 million of TTM profit, 56.1% above Tenaris S.A.. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (120% uncapped) growth from a $77 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderBaker Hughes Company · $3,153 million
Gap56.1% versus #2 · Tenaris S.A.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/30 companies · 515 observations
Investor read: Baker Hughes Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Baker Hughes Company BKR$3.2B
2Tenaris S.A. TS$2.0B
3TechnipFMC plc FTI$1.0B
4Archrock, Inc. AROC$325M
5Tidewater Inc. TDW$297M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI100%
2Tidewater Inc. TDW70%
3Archrock, Inc. AROC60%
4Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC46%
5USA Compression Partners, LP USAC34%
Net profit · company comparison
23/30 level · 19/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
NextDecade Corporation has the highest CAPEX among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $1,177 million. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is next at $343 million. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 175%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its CAPEX series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: NextDecade Corporation reports $1,177 million of CAPEX; Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the highest covered intensity at 175%. Coverage is only 30 of 30 companies and 509 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderNextDecade Corporation · $1,177 million
Gap243.1% versus #2 · Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage30/30 companies · 509 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1NextDecade Corporation NEXT$1.2B
2Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI$343M
3SLB N.V. SLB$343M
4Baker Hughes Company BKR$336M
5Halliburton Company HAL$235M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI175%
2WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC WBI55%
3Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS34%
4Archrock, Inc. AROC30%
5Select Water Solutions, Inc. WTTR21%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
30/30 level · 29/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cactus, Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $55 million. RPC, Inc. is next at $75 million. Tenaris S.A. has the lowest Net debt at $678 million net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Tenaris S.A. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $678 million net cash and gross debt of $474 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderCactus, Inc. · $55 million
Gap26.7% versus #2 · RPC, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 521 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Cactus, Inc. WHD$55M
2RPC, Inc. RES$75M
3Innovex International, Inc. INVX$76M
4Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO$172M
5ProPetro Holding Corp. PUMP$187M
Net debtlowest net debt
1Tenaris S.A. TS$-678M
2Cactus, Inc. WHD$-237M
3RPC, Inc. RES$-126M
4Innovex International, Inc. INVX$-125M
5Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO$1M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Halliburton Company has the highest ROCE among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 24.2%. EagleRock Land, LLC is next at 7.2%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +20.5 percentage points. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Halliburton Company leads ROCE at 24.2%, 17 percentage points above EagleRock Land, LLC. Halliburton Company has the strongest latest improvement at +20.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderHalliburton Company · 24.2%
Gap236.1% versus #2 · EagleRock Land, LLC
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 520 observations
Investor read: Halliburton Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Halliburton Company HAL24%
2EagleRock Land, LLC EROK7.2%
3TechnipFMC plc FTI7.0%
4Oceaneering International, Inc. OII4.9%
5Baker Hughes Company BKR4.3%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Halliburton Company HAL+20.5 pp
2Baker Hughes Company BKR+1.8 pp
3TechnipFMC plc FTI+1.7 pp
4National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR+1.1 pp
5NextDecade Corporation NEXT+0.4 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
30/30 level · 29/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 0.1×. Bristow Group Inc. is next at 0.24×. Oceaneering International, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 11.6×, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.1×, 58.3% below Bristow Group Inc.. Only 13 of 30 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderInnovex International, Inc. · 0.1×
Gap58.3% versus #2 · Bristow Group Inc.
Persistence0/7 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/30 companies · 55 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Innovex International, Inc. INVX0.1
2Bristow Group Inc. VTOL0.2
3Archrock, Inc. AROC0.3
4National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR0.4
5Tidewater Inc. TDW0.4
P/Elowest P/E
1Oceaneering International, Inc. OII11.6
2Bristow Group Inc. VTOL12.2
3Tidewater Inc. TDW14.0
4Tenaris S.A. TS15.2
5Weatherford International plc WFRD16.1
Valuation · company comparison
13/30 level · 28/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
SLB N.V. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 4.06×. Halliburton Company is next at 4.61×. Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. has the lowest P/BV at 0.93×, so level and change sit with different companies. 28 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: SLB N.V. leads ev/ebitda at 4.06×; Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. leads p/bv at 0.93×.
LeaderSLB N.V. · 4.06×
Gap11.9% versus #2 · Halliburton Company
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage28/30 companies · 450 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1SLB N.V. SLB4.1
2Halliburton Company HAL4.6
3Enerflex Ltd. EFXT6.8
4Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. HLX6.8
5Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC7.1
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. HLX0.9
2NOV Inc. NOV1.1
3Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO1.3
4Bristow Group Inc. VTOL1.3
5Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. AESI1.4
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
28/30 level · 28/30 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services at +299.2%. Oceaneering International, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +43.9%. 17 of 28 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 30 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 30 companies in the canonical Oil & Gas Equipment & Services membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is the biggest?
Baker Hughes Company is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $27,893 million, ahead of Tenaris S.A. at $12,159 million. That covers 22 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is growing fastest?
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest revenue growth at 86.5% year on year, across 22 of 30 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the best profit margins?
LandBridge Company LLC has the highest operating margin at 57.2%, from 29 of 30 comparable companies. EagleRock Land, LLC shows the biggest recent improvement, at +18.2 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company makes the most profit?
Baker Hughes Company earns the most, at $3,153 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 23 of 30 comparable companies. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company earns the highest return on capital?
Halliburton Company leads on return on capital employed at 24.2%, across 30 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Innovex International, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.1×. Only 13 of 30 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the strongest balance sheet?
Cactus, Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $55 million, from 30 of 30 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is investing most in new capacity?
NextDecade Corporation reports the largest capital spending at $1,177 million, across 30 of 30 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector beating the market?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.8% over the last 52 weeks and 15% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 17 of 28 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stock has the strongest price momentum?
Oceaneering International, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company scores highest for research priority?
TechnipFMC plc scores 68.6 out of 100 with 82% evidence confidence, from 23.5 points on growth and earnings, 14.5 on capital efficiency, 13.1 on valuation and 17.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector?
The 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies on this page carry $296,502 million of combined market value. SLB N.V. is the largest at $74,170 million, about 25% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies on this page is 33×, measured on the 28 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector performing?
17 of the 28 covered Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 38.8% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 30 listed Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.