Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-28
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Luxury Goods Stocks

Luxury Goods: Tapestry, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current growth.

The industry itself · before any single company

How has Luxury Goods moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 89% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 15% on average over the last four reported quarters.

TURNING · ahead 1w✓Price and the fundamentals both up3 of 7 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑1w · 4/7 >200d (+1) · 3/7 lead (+0) · EPS 6/7↑

200202620252024202320222021 419348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · up 42.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · down 6.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 45.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 54.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 58.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 31, against 100 at the start · down 55.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · down 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 28.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 63.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · up 69.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two84 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200202620252024202320222021 419348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 5 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · up 42.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 6.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · down 6.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · down 45.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 54.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 47, against 100 at the start · down 58.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 31, against 100 at the start · down 55.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · down 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 28.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 63.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · up 69.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 84, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two84No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Luxury Goods, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy MixedHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 7 stocks moving
Fresh1 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +12 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 1/2+1
Mid 0/2−1
Small 2/30

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Luxury Goods outperforming S&P 500?

Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 31.9% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 0.7%. 4 of 9 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Movado Group, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +40.5%.

-0.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+31.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
4/9Stocks leading S&P 500
3/9Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 31.9% over 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks. 4 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 9 beat the sector itself. Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $7,851 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Is the Luxury Goods sector outperforming S&P 500?

Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 31.9% over 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks. 4 of 9 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 9 beat the sector itself.

Which Luxury Goods company is largest by revenue?

Tapestry, Inc. leads with revenue of $7,851 million, based on 8 of 9 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Luxury Goods company is growing fastest?

LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 8 of 9 comparable companies.

Which Luxury Goods company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Envela Corporation ranks first at 79.3/100 with 76% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Luxury Goods company reports the most CAPEX?

Tapestry, Inc. reports the largest latest CAPEX at $37 million, with 9 of 9 companies comparable.

Which Luxury Goods company has the least gross debt?

Envela Corporation has the lowest comparable gross debt at $20 million. Tapestry, Inc. has the highest at $3,923 million.

Which Luxury Goods company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.04, among 3 of 9 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Luxury Goods comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
9
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$40.5B
Tapestry, Inc.
Revenue growing
6/8
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
4/9
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Envela Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 76% evidence confidence.
Signet Jewelers Limited looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Signet Jewelers Limited has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. Envela Corporation · ELA

79.3/100 · Favorable setup · 76% evidence

Exact sum: 30.3 + 18.6 + 14.5 + 15.9 = 79.3

Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.

30.3/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 54.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.9 pp

83% evidence

18.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 14.6% · debt/equity 0.26×

80% evidence

14.5/20Valuation

P/E 20.6× · PEG 0.49

65% evidence

15.9/20Relative strength

RS sector 34.1% · RS bench 35.8% · 1Y 289.6%

70% evidence

2. Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

72.2/100 · Favorable setup · 80% evidence

Exact sum: 23.9 + 16.3 + 15 + 17 = 72.2

Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.

23.9/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 4.4% · PAT 83.3% · OPM change 4.7 pp

95% evidence

16.3/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 1.1% · debt/equity 0.15×

80% evidence

15.0/20Valuation

P/E 19.5× · PEG 0.45

65% evidence

17.0/20Relative strength

RS sector 40.5% · RS bench 42.9% · 1Y 152%

70% evidence

3. Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

60.4/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 72% evidence

Exact sum: 20.7 + 13.6 + 9 + 17.1 = 60.4

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

20.7/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 14.1% · PAT -22.8% · OPM change 6.3 pp

83% evidence

13.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 8% · debt/equity 5.75×

80% evidence

9.0/20Valuation

P/E 44.5× · PEG —

15% evidence

17.1/20Relative strength

RS sector 6.6% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 41.9%

100% evidence

4. Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

50.0/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 86% evidence

Exact sum: 7.8 + 11.8 + 16.5 + 13.9 = 50

Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.

7.8/35Growth & earnings

Revenue -5.2% · PAT -63% · OPM change -0.7 pp

95% evidence

11.8/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 0.9% · debt/equity 0.65×

80% evidence

16.5/20Valuation

P/E 1.2× · PEG 0.04

65% evidence

13.9/20Relative strength

RS sector -1.3% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 30.2%

100% evidence

5. The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

47.8/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 56% evidence

Exact sum: 23.4 + 6.2 + 10 + 8.2 = 47.8

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

23.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 17.2% · PAT — · OPM change 6.8 pp

62% evidence

6.2/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -1.5% · debt/equity 6.99×

80% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E — · PEG —

0% evidence

8.2/20Relative strength

RS sector -4.3% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 127.7%

70% evidence

6. LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

42.2/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 59% evidence

Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.7 + 11 + 6.4 = 42.2

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

15.1/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp

62% evidence

9.7/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -3.2% · debt/equity 0.15×

80% evidence

11.0/20Valuation

P/E 1.9× · PEG —

15% evidence

6.4/20Relative strength

RS sector -9.3% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 11.7%

70% evidence

7. Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

36.2/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 65% evidence

Exact sum: 16 + 7.4 + 10.5 + 2.3 = 36.2

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

16.0/35Growth & earnings

Revenue -4.1% · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp

62% evidence

7.4/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -0.9% · debt/equity 16.91×

80% evidence

10.5/20Valuation

P/E 15.1× · PEG —

15% evidence

2.3/20Relative strength

RS sector -28.3% · RS bench -26.7% · 1Y -3.5%

100% evidence

8. Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

29.7/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 59% evidence

Exact sum: 10.4 + 7.8 + 8.5 + 3 = 29.7

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

10.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 5.7% · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp

62% evidence

7.8/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -6.2% · debt/equity 0.55×

80% evidence

8.5/20Valuation

P/E 70× · PEG —

15% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -41.8% · RS bench -40% · 1Y -26%

70% evidence

9. Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

38.2/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 26% evidence

Exact sum: 15.9 + 8.2 + 10 + 4.1 = 38.2

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

15.9/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —

9% evidence

8.2/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -143.7% · debt/equity —

34% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E — · PEG —

0% evidence

4.1/20Relative strength

RS sector -36.4% · RS bench -34.6% · 1Y -45.9%

70% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $7,851 million. Signet Jewelers Limited is next at $6,826 million. LuxExperience B.V. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 18 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale leader at $7,851 million, 15% ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited. LuxExperience B.V.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 172.4% from a $2,427 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · $7,851 million
Gap15% versus #2 · Signet Jewelers Limited
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 160 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. is the scale benchmark; LuxExperience B.V. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Tapestry, Inc.'s growth falls below LuxExperience B.V.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR$7.9B
2Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$6.8B
3Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$3.5B
4LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$2.4B
5The RealReal, Inc. REAL$723M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1LuxExperience B.V. LUXE100%
2Envela Corporation ELA54%
3The RealReal, Inc. REAL17%
4Tapestry, Inc. TPR14%
5Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT5.7%
Revenue · company comparison
8/9 level · 8/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$1.9B21%Mar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$1.6B0.8%Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$796M-3.8%Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$618M154%Mar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$190M19%Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$142M7.6%Jun 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$107M-32%Dec 2025
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$100M6.4%Mar 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$98M104%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$95M
$122M
$100M
$109M
$111M
$120M
$98M
$110M
$114M
$124M
$97M
$105M
$100M
$120M
$94M
$109M
$110M
$124M
$100M
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$1.3B
$1.6B
—
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
—
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$848M
$878M
$1.1B
$827M
$797M
$856M
$1.0B
$796M
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

$38M
$44M
$47M
$43M
$45M
$47M
$50M
$51M
$37M
$37M
$40M
$45M
$47M
$48M
$48M
$55M
$57M
$80M
$98M
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
$192M
—
$202M
—
$221M
—
$215M
—
$212M
—
$171M
—
$158M
—
$133M
—
$107M
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$158M
$188M
$170M
$175M
$176M
$190M
$199M
$203M
$187M
$197M
$234M
$223M
$202M
$223M
$243M
$588M
$574M
$647M
$618M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$174M
$218M
$206M
$163M
$183M
$211M
$187M
$145M
$160M
$188M
$171M
$134M
$159M
$181M
$181M
$132M
$162M
$186M
$192M
$142M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$1.8B
$1.5B
$2.8B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.6B
$2.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.4B
$3.2B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$2.8B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$2.3B
$1.6B

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.1B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.5B
—
$1.5B
$1.6B
$2.1B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.2B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.5B
$1.9B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$119M
$145M
$147M
$154M
$143M
$160M
$142M
$131M
$133M
$143M
$144M
$145M
$148M
$164M
$160M
$165M
$174M
$194M
$190M
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

—
—
—
18%
17%
-1.6%
-2.0%
0.9%
2.7%
3.3%
-1.0%
-4.6%
-12%
-3.2%
-3.1%
3.8%
10%
3.3%
6.4%
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

—
—
—
19%
4.6%
-12%
—
-11%
-9.6%
1.1%
—
-36%
-29%
-25%
-32%
-6.0%
-2.5%
-4.0%
-3.8%
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
—
—
26%
18%
6.8%
6.4%
19%
-18%
-21%
-20%
-12%
27%
30%
20%
22%
21%
67%
104%
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
—
—
73%
—
15%
—
6.4%
—
-4.1%
—
-20%
—
-25%
—
-22%
—
-32%
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
—
8.0%
11%
1.1%
17%
16%
6.3%
3.7%
18%
9.9%
8.0%
13%
3.9%
164%
184%
190%
154%
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
—
—
—
5.2%
-3.2%
-9.2%
-11%
-13%
-11%
-8.6%
-7.6%
-0.6%
-3.7%
5.9%
-1.5%
1.9%
2.8%
6.1%
7.6%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
—
—
—
-1.9%
2.9%
-5.2%
-9.3%
-8.0%
-12%
19%
-9.4%
-7.6%
-3.1%
-11%
2.1%
3.0%
3.2%
-17%
0.8%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
—
—
—
0.6%
1.8%
—
5.0%
-0.3%
38%
—
5.4%
-6.9%
5.3%
7.0%
8.3%
13%
14%
21%
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
—
—
47%
20%
10%
-3.4%
-15%
-7.0%
-11%
1.4%
11%
11%
15%
11%
14%
18%
18%
19%
—
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 22.3%. Envela Corporation is next at 11.4%. The RealReal, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +6.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads opm at 22.3%; The RealReal, Inc. leads margin change at +6.8 percentage points.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · 22.3%
Gap95.6% versus #2 · Envela Corporation
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 151 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR22%
2Envela Corporation ELA11%
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV4.9%
4Signet Jewelers Limited SIG2.4%
5The RealReal, Inc. REAL-1.2%
Margin changefastest expanders
1The RealReal, Inc. REAL+6.8 pp
2Tapestry, Inc. TPR+6.3 pp
3Envela Corporation ELA+4.9 pp
4Movado Group, Inc. MOV+4.7 pp
5Capri Holdings Limited CPRI+3.5 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
8/9 level · 8/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR22%+6.3 ppMar 2026
Envela Corporation ELA11%+4.9 ppMar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV4.9%+4.7 ppJun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG2.4%−0.7 ppJun 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL-1.2%+6.8 ppMar 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI-3.4%+3.5 ppMar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE-4.8%−2.6 ppMar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT-8.9%−5.1 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

10%
11%
5.3%
5.2%
5.7%
5.1%
-0.1%
1.2%
1.8%
1.0%
0.9%
1.1%
-1.1%
2.0%
-3.8%
-1.1%
-0.6%
0.0%
-8.9%
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

15%
21%
—
8.0%
17%
18%
—
-3.0%
6.5%
8.5%
2.9%
1.3%
-0.7%
2.4%
-6.9%
2.0%
-1.4%
4.5%
-3.4%
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

7.1%
6.4%
6.0%
9.4%
7.7%
7.8%
6.3%
4.0%
5.3%
4.3%
5.9%
4.2%
4.3%
3.9%
6.5%
5.9%
7.3%
9.4%
11%
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

-2.3%
4.9%
-1.2%
0.7%
-0.5%
1.8%
-3.2%
-1.3%
-7.2%
-2.4%
-0.9%
-0.7%
-15%
-1.1%
-2.2%
102%
-14%
-1.6%
-4.8%
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

14%
19%
19%
16%
17%
18%
14%
7.5%
6.0%
11%
7.9%
1.6%
1.9%
3.3%
5.1%
0.2%
2.5%
6.3%
7.2%
4.9%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

13%
7.0%
14%
0.0%
11%
3.1%
14%
6.1%
5.6%
1.0%
13%
3.3%
-6.8%
0.7%
24%
3.1%
0.2%
1.7%
14%
2.4%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

16%
20%
22%
12%
15%
17%
—
15%
17%
22%
14%
15%
17%
22%
16%
-34%
19%
29%
22%
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

-43%
-32%
-37%
-33%
-32%
-24%
-58%
-31%
-17%
-15%
-13%
-13%
-9.9%
-3.1%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.3%
3.2%
-1.2%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

—
—
—
−8.2 pp
−4.7 pp
−5.5 pp
−5.4 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−4.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−2.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−4.7 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−5.1 pp
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

—
—
—
−12.6 pp
+2.0 pp
−2.8 pp
—
−11.0 pp
−10.5 pp
−9.3 pp
—
+4.3 pp
−7.2 pp
−6.1 pp
−9.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.1 pp
+3.5 pp
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
—
—
+3.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.3 pp
−5.4 pp
−2.4 pp
−3.5 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+3.0 pp
+5.5 pp
+4.9 pp
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
—
+4.5 pp
+1.8 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−6.7 pp
−4.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.6 pp
−7.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−1.3 pp
+102.4 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.6 pp
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
—
—
—
+2.6 pp
−0.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−8.0 pp
−10.8 pp
−7.1 pp
−6.1 pp
−5.9 pp
−4.1 pp
−7.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+4.7 pp

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
—
—
—
−2.0 pp
−3.9 pp
−0.4 pp
+6.1 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−12.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+10.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+7.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−9.9 pp
−0.7 pp

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
—
—
—
−0.8 pp
−3.0 pp
—
+3.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+4.6 pp
—
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+2.2 pp
−48.7 pp
+2.6 pp
+6.2 pp
+6.3 pp
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
—
—
+28.8 pp
+11.1 pp
+8.0 pp
−20.3 pp
+1.7 pp
+15.0 pp
+9.1 pp
+45.1 pp
+18.3 pp
+7.0 pp
+11.6 pp
+4.5 pp
+7.0 pp
+5.6 pp
+6.3 pp
+6.8 pp
—
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $663 million. LuxExperience B.V. is next at $457 million. Envela Corporation has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 18 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. leads with $663 million of TTM profit, 45.1% above LuxExperience B.V.. Envela Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (162.5% uncapped) growth from a $21 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · $663 million
Gap45.1% versus #2 · LuxExperience B.V.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 160 observations

Investor read: Tapestry, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR$663M
2LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$457M
3Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$293M
4Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$80M
5Movado Group, Inc. MOV$33M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Envela Corporation ELA100%
2Movado Group, Inc. MOV83%
3Tapestry, Inc. TPR-23%
4Signet Jewelers Limited SIG-63%
Net profit · company comparison
8/9 level · 4/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$344M69%Mar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$39M-37%Mar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$32M-5.9%Jun 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$9M350%Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$7M600%Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$1M850%Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$-8M-133%Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$-31M-350%Mar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$-177M—Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$4M
$11M
$3M
$4M
$6M
$6M
$0M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$-1M
$3M
$-3M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-8M
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$200M
$323M
—
$81M
$203M
$224M
—
$-33M
$48M
$105M
$100M
$5M
$42M
$6M
$-579M
$56M
$-34M
$57M
$1M
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

$3M
$3M
$3M
$4M
$3M
$3M
$3M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$3M
$3M
$6M
$9M
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
$-8M
—
$-69M
—
$-171M
—
$-72M
—
$-74M
—
$-69M
—
$-120M
—
$-87M
—
$-177M
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$-7M
$2M
$-4M
$2M
$-4M
$0M
$-5M
$-5M
$-12M
$-6M
$-3M
$-4M
$-24M
$-5M
$-5M
$586M
$-85M
$-13M
$-31M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$19M
$32M
$32M
$19M
$24M
$30M
$23M
$9M
$8M
$18M
$12M
$2M
$4M
$5M
$8M
$1M
$3M
$10M
$13M
$7M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$225M
$93M
$314M
$-84M
$145M
$38M
$277M
$97M
$75M
$12M
$193M
$52M
$-99M
$7M
$850M
$34M
$-9M
$20M
$250M
$32M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$200M
$227M
$318M
$123M
$189M
$195M
—
$187M
$224M
$322M
$139M
$159M
$187M
$310M
$203M
$-517M
$275M
$561M
$344M
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$-57M
$-52M
$-57M
$-53M
$-47M
$-39M
$-83M
$-41M
$-23M
$-22M
$-31M
$-17M
$-18M
$-68M
$62M
$-11M
$-54M
$-39M
$39M
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

—
—
—
-50%
50%
-45%
-100%
-75%
-67%
-67%
—
0.0%
-150%
50%
-400%
-200%
—
-133%
—
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

—
—
—
-63%
1.5%
-31%
—
-141%
-76%
-53%
—
—
-13%
-94%
-679%
1,020%
-181%
850%
—
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
—
—
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-50%
-33%
-67%
-33%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
50%
50%
200%
350%
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
—
—
—
-100%
—
-350%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
—
—
—
26%
-6.3%
-28%
-53%
-67%
-40%
-48%
-78%
-50%
-72%
-33%
-50%
-25%
100%
63%
600%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
—
—
—
-36%
-59%
-12%
—
-48%
-68%
-30%
-46%
-232%
-42%
340%
-35%
—
186%
-71%
-5.9%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
—
—
—
-5.5%
-14%
—
52%
19%
65%
—
-15%
-17%
-3.7%
46%
-425%
47%
81%
69%
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-37%
—
04 · compare level, then change

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest CAPEX among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $37 million. Signet Jewelers Limited is next at $25 million. The RealReal, Inc. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 3.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Tapestry, Inc. reports $37 million of CAPEX; The RealReal, Inc. has the highest covered intensity at 3.7%. Coverage is only 9 of 9 companies and 157 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.

LeaderTapestry, Inc. · $37 million
Gap48% versus #2 · Signet Jewelers Limited
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/9 companies · 157 observations

Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.

This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Tapestry, Inc. TPR$37M
2Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$25M
3Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$19M
4The RealReal, Inc. REAL$7M
5Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$1M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1The RealReal, Inc. REAL3.7%
2Capri Holdings Limited CPRI1.9%
3Tapestry, Inc. TPR1.9%
4Signet Jewelers Limited SIG1.6%
5Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT1.0%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
9/9 level · 9/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyCAPEXCAPEX intensityReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$37M1.9%Mar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$25M1.6%Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$19M1.9%Mar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$7M3.7%Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$1M0.2%Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$1M0.7%Jun 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$1M1.0%Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$1M1.0%Mar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$0M0.0%Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

CAPEX · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$2M
$1M
$1M
$3M
$2M
$3M
$4M
$5M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$25M
$37M
—
$46M
$36M
$50M
—
$58M
$50M
$49M
—
$16M
$20M
$22M
—
$13M
$13M
$19M
—
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

$3M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
$6M
—
$9M
—
$15M
—
$29M
—
$13M
—
$6M
—
$7M
—
$3M
—
$0M
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$0M
$1M
$1M
$10M
$5M
$7M
$7M
$4M
$3M
$1M
$5M
$2M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$2M
$1M
$4M
$1M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$1M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$21M
$18M
$33M
$21M
$37M
$36M
$45M
$27M
$28M
$34M
$50M
$23M
$28M
$63M
$11M
$37M
$24M
$33M
$60M
$25M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$47M
$33M
$38M
$3M
$19M
$27M
—
$41M
$35M
$23M
$19M
$46M
$26M
$31M
$31M
$35M
$32M
$44M
$37M
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$10M
$7M
$5M
$4M
$7M
$6M
$12M
$8M
$6M
$4M
$2M
$3M
$4M
$5M
$5M
$8M
$2M
$4M
$7M
—

CAPEX intensity · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

2.1%
0.8%
1.0%
2.8%
1.8%
2.5%
4.1%
4.5%
1.8%
0.8%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.7%
1.1%
0.9%
0.9%
0.8%
1.0%
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

1.9%
2.3%
—
3.1%
2.6%
3.5%
—
4.3%
4.1%
3.4%
—
1.9%
2.3%
2.1%
—
1.6%
1.5%
1.9%
—
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

7.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
2.2%
4.3%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
3.1%
—
4.5%
—
6.8%
—
14%
—
6.1%
—
3.5%
—
4.4%
—
2.3%
—
0.0%
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

0.0%
0.5%
0.6%
5.7%
2.8%
3.7%
3.5%
2.0%
1.6%
0.5%
2.1%
0.9%
0.5%
0.0%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.6%
0.2%
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

0.6%
0.9%
1.0%
0.6%
1.1%
0.9%
1.1%
1.4%
1.3%
1.1%
1.2%
1.5%
1.3%
1.1%
1.1%
1.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
0.7%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
1.1%
2.1%
2.3%
1.7%
1.6%
1.7%
2.4%
1.6%
1.5%
1.9%
4.7%
0.4%
2.4%
1.6%
2.4%
2.6%
1.6%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

2.9%
2.2%
1.8%
0.2%
1.2%
1.8%
—
2.7%
2.2%
1.1%
1.3%
2.9%
1.7%
1.4%
2.0%
2.0%
1.9%
1.8%
1.9%
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

8.4%
4.8%
3.4%
2.6%
4.9%
3.8%
8.5%
6.1%
4.5%
2.8%
1.4%
2.1%
2.7%
3.0%
3.1%
4.8%
1.1%
2.1%
3.7%
—
Annual capital allocation · 6-year view
9/9 capacity base · 9/9 OCF · 9/9 CAPEX · 9/9 FCF

Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.

Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history

Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
$15M
$15M
$15M
$18M
$23M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$23M
$39M
$92M
$89M
$257M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
$88M
$100M
$102M
$106M
$85M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
$2.2B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.8B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
$235M
$241M
$190M
$170M
$161M

Operating cash flow · fiscal-year history

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
$3M
$10M
$6M
$10M
$3M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$-17M
$55M
$-55M
$10M
$-31M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
$131M
$54M
$77M
$-2M
$58M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
$1.3B
$853M
$1.3B
$1.2B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
$-142M
$-92M
$-61M
$27M
$37M

CAPEX · reported cash flow · fiscal-year history

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
$3M
$0M
$2M
$3M
$1M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$3M
$12M
$23M
$12M
$4M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
$6M
$7M
$8M
$8M
$5M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
$116M
$94M
$109M
$123M
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
$37M
$23M
$29M
$14M
$19M

Free cash flow · fiscal-year history

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
$0M
$10M
$4M
$7M
$1M

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$-20M
$43M
$-78M
$-2M
$-35M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
$125M
$47M
$69M
$-9M
$53M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
$1.2B
$759M
$1.1B
$1.1B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
$-180M
$-114M
$-90M
$13M
$18M
05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Envela Corporation has the lowest Gross debt among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at $20 million. Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. is next at $39 million. Movado Group, Inc. has the lowest Net debt at $151 million net cash, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Gross debt series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Movado Group, Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $151 million net cash and gross debt of $74 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderEnvela Corporation · $20 million
Gap48.7% versus #2 · Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 150 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Envela Corporation ELA$20M
2Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$39M
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV$74M
4LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$192M
5The RealReal, Inc. REAL$465M
Net debtlowest net debt
1Movado Group, Inc. MOV$-151M
2LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$-119M
3Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$-20M
4Envela Corporation ELA$-19M
5The RealReal, Inc. REAL$341M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
8/9 level · 8/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$3.9B$2.9BMar 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$1.4B$1.3BMar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG$1.2B$621MJun 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$465M$341MMar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$192M$-119MMar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV$74M$-151MJun 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$39M$-20MMar 2026
Envela Corporation ELA$20M$-19MMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$65M
$66M
$87M
$89M
$90M
$95M
$101M
—
$102M
$100M
$101M
$102M
$101M
$98M
$99M
$77M
$40M
$38M
$39M
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$3.1B
$2.9B
—
$3.0B
$3.3B
$3.4B
—
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.5B
$3.1B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.9B
$1.3B
$1.4B
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

$21M
$26M
$24M
$23M
$23M
$22M
$21M
$21M
$20M
$19M
$19M
$18M
$18M
$18M
$18M
$18M
$23M
$20M
$20M
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$23M
$22M
$22M
$22M
$45M
$45M
$62M
$58M
$72M
$55M
$78M
$50M
$74M
$88M
$70M
$219M
$214M
$190M
$192M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$79M
$77M
$76M
$87M
$84M
$82M
$89M
$84M
$81M
$93M
$92M
$98M
$95M
$98M
$95M
$92M
$88M
$83M
$79M
$74M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.0B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$3.4B
$3.4B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.2B
—
$3.3B
$3.3B
$9.3B
$9.3B
$8.8B
$8.8B
$4.1B
$4.1B
$3.9B
$4.2B
$3.9B
$3.9B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$505M
$510M
$605M
$601M
$599M
$596M
$589M
$584M
$582M
$577M
$556M
$553M
$548M
$547M
$504M
$473M
$468M
$463M
$465M
—

Net debt · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

$-96M
$-107M
$-78M
$-67M
$-63M
$-60M
$-45M
—
$-45M
$-56M
$-46M
$-50M
$-52M
$-64M
$-48M
$-57M
$-33M
$-41M
$-20M
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

$2.9B
$2.7B
—
$2.9B
$3.1B
$3.2B
—
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.5B
$3.4B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$2.8B
$2.4B
$2.6B
$2.8B
$1.2B
$1.3B
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

$13M
$16M
$13M
$9M
$8M
$5M
$1M
$3M
$3M
$1M
$-1M
$1M
$0M
$-3M
$-3M
$-5M
$-1M
$2M
$-19M
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

$-33M
$-58M
$-72M
$-92M
$-43M
$-7M
$49M
$28M
$65M
$49M
$67M
$35M
$65M
$74M
$56M
$-385M
$-247M
$-229M
$-119M
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

$-121M
$-125M
$-201M
$-138M
$-119M
$-105M
$-163M
$-114M
$-138M
$-108M
$-170M
$-127M
$-103M
$-84M
$-114M
$-111M
$-92M
$-101M
$-152M
$-151M

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

$-52M
$-71M
$34M
$454M
$502M
$1.0B
$163M
$667M
$622M
$626M
$-135M
$490M
$641M
$1.2B
$576M
$917M
$897M
$917M
$342M
$621M

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

$1.4B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.7B
—
$2.6B
$2.6B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$2.8B
$3.5B
$2.9B
$2.9B
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

$60M
$92M
$244M
$285M
$299M
$302M
$342M
$395M
$411M
$401M
$390M
$402M
$395M
$375M
$364M
$379M
$360M
$312M
$341M
—
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Envela Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 14.6%. Tapestry, Inc. is next at 8%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +9.9 percentage points. 9 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Envela Corporation leads ROCE at 14.6%, 6.6 percentage points above Tapestry, Inc.. Envela Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +9.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderEnvela Corporation · 14.6%
Gap82.5% versus #2 · Tapestry, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/9 companies · 166 observations

Investor read: Envela Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Envela Corporation ELA15%
2Tapestry, Inc. TPR8.0%
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV1.1%
4Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.9%
5Capri Holdings Limited CPRI-0.9%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Envela Corporation ELA+9.9 pp
2Tapestry, Inc. TPR+5.2 pp
3The RealReal, Inc. REAL+4.9 pp
4Movado Group, Inc. MOV+1.1 pp
5Capri Holdings Limited CPRI+0.4 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
9/9 level · 9/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Envela Corporation ELA15%+9.9 ppMar 2026
Tapestry, Inc. TPR8.0%+5.2 ppMar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV1.1%+1.1 ppJun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.9%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI-0.9%+0.4 ppMar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL-1.5%+4.9 ppMar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE-3.2%−2.0 ppMar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT-6.2%−4.4 ppMar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV-144%−127.0 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

12%
15%
7.9%
6.7%
4.3%
3.9%
-0.1%
1.6%
1.1%
0.6%
0.4%
1.1%
-0.5%
1.2%
-1.8%
-0.7%
-0.4%
0.0%
-6.2%
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

3.2%
5.5%
—
2.0%
3.8%
4.2%
—
-0.7%
1.3%
2.1%
0.7%
0.2%
-0.1%
0.5%
-1.3%
0.4%
-0.3%
1.4%
-0.9%
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

7.2%
6.7%
6.5%
8.6%
6.8%
6.6%
5.4%
3.5%
3.2%
2.5%
3.6%
2.9%
3.1%
2.9%
4.7%
4.8%
5.8%
11%
15%
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

0.0%
0.0%
-15%
-15%
-17%
-17%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-6.9%
-7.2%
-7.2%
-17%
-17%
-17%
-17%
-144%
-144%
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

-1.0%
2.5%
-0.5%
0.3%
-0.2%
0.8%
-1.4%
-0.6%
-2.8%
-1.0%
-0.4%
-0.3%
-6.3%
-0.5%
-1.2%
59%
-8.6%
-1.1%
-3.2%
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
7.1%
6.4%
4.3%
5.2%
6.3%
4.2%
1.8%
1.6%
3.3%
2.1%
0.3%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.6%
1.9%
2.2%
1.1%

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
2.3%
9.3%
0.0%
4.3%
1.1%
8.3%
2.4%
2.1%
0.3%
9.0%
1.1%
-2.4%
0.2%
15%
1.2%
0.1%
0.6%
8.0%
0.9%

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
4.7%
7.3%
2.8%
3.9%
4.2%
—
4.0%
4.7%
4.9%
2.2%
2.7%
2.8%
5.5%
2.8%
-7.0%
4.0%
14%
8.0%
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

-9.3%
-9.0%
-9.1%
-9.2%
-8.7%
-7.8%
-19%
-11%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-7.7%
-6.4%
-2.4%
-6.4%
-5.7%
-4.7%
3.9%
-1.5%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

—
—
—
—
−7.5 pp
−11.2 pp
−8.0 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.2 pp
−3.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.2 pp
−4.4 pp
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

—
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
−1.3 pp
—
−2.7 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.1 pp
—
+0.9 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.4 pp
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.1 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.7 pp
+7.7 pp
+9.9 pp
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

—
—
—
—
−16.7 pp
−16.7 pp
+8.3 pp
+8.3 pp
+9.8 pp
+9.8 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−9.8 pp
−9.8 pp
−9.7 pp
−9.7 pp
−127.0 pp
−127.0 pp
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
—
—
+0.8 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+59.4 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.0 pp
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
—
—
—
—
−0.8 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.5 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.1 pp

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
—
—
—
—
−1.2 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.4 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+6.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−7.2 pp
−0.3 pp

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
—
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
—
−1.3 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−9.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+8.4 pp
+5.2 pp
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−10.2 pp
−1.5 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.5 pp
+13.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+3.9 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+6.3 pp
+4.9 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 0.04×. Movado Group, Inc. is next at 0.45×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 1.2×. 3 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.04×, 91.1% below Movado Group, Inc.. Only 3 of 9 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderSignet Jewelers Limited · 0.04×
Gap91.1% versus #2 · Movado Group, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/9 companies · 9 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.0
2Movado Group, Inc. MOV0.5
3Envela Corporation ELA0.5
P/Elowest P/E
1Signet Jewelers Limited SIG1.2
2LuxExperience B.V. LUXE1.9
3Capri Holdings Limited CPRI15.1
4Movado Group, Inc. MOV19.5
5Envela Corporation ELA20.6
Valuation · company comparison
3/9 level · 7/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Envela Corporation ELA0.520.6Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV0.519.5Jun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.01.2Jun 2026
Tapestry, Inc. TPR—44.5Mar 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI—15.2Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE—1.9Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT—70.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Envela Corporation · ELA

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
2.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.3
0.5
—
—
—
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
0.5
—

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0
0.1
0.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

1,945.7
90.3
514.6
27.9
27.3
28.7
30.1
35.3
36.9
93.0
49.8
37.0
71.3
70.0
—
—
—
—
—
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

19.6
17.1
—
9.5
7.7
6.8
—
10.2
10.3
28.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15.2
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

12.6
11.0
11.7
15.5
11.0
9.1
11.4
15.0
11.0
18.0
19.3
18.7
22.8
27.6
22.3
18.6
19.5
23.9
20.6
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.2
1.9
1.8
1.9
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
8.7
9.7
8.4
7.6
7.4
9.0
6.9
9.4
11.5
15.1
16.4
19.3
21.0
23.6
17.8
20.4
18.8
19.5
19.5

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.1
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
2.3
8.5
9.0
—
6.7
2.5
3.0
1.3
1.2

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
13.0
13.7
11.7
9.7
9.0
—
11.7
11.0
9.3
12.6
12.2
13.9
19.1
18.5
106.2
97.4
54.3
44.5
—
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

LuxExperience B.V. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 9 Luxury Goods companies compared here, at 1.56×. Signet Jewelers Limited is next at 1.82×. Signet Jewelers Limited has the lowest P/BV at 0.18×, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 9 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: LuxExperience B.V. leads ev/ebitda at 1.56×; Signet Jewelers Limited leads p/bv at 0.18×.

LeaderLuxExperience B.V. · 1.56×
Gap14.3% versus #2 · Signet Jewelers Limited
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage8/9 companies · 118 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1LuxExperience B.V. LUXE1.6
2Signet Jewelers Limited SIG1.8
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV9.8
4Capri Holdings Limited CPRI14.0
5Envela Corporation ELA14.7
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Signet Jewelers Limited SIG0.2
2LuxExperience B.V. LUXE0.8
3Movado Group, Inc. MOV1.2
4Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT1.9
5Envela Corporation ELA5.7
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
8/9 level · 7/9 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
The RealReal, Inc. REAL74.4-3.0Mar 2026
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT72.91.9Mar 2026
Tapestry, Inc. TPR27.941.2Mar 2026
Envela Corporation ELA14.75.7Mar 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI14.024.9Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOV9.81.2Jun 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIG1.80.2Jun 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE1.60.8Mar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV—-0.8Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

2.2
3.5
2.5
1.6
2.4
2.8
4.0
2.8
5.6
8.7
8.0
6.9
9.4
6.8
13.6
20.8
21.1
72.9
—
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

15.8
14.0
—
9.3
8.2
7.4
—
10.3
10.8
20.7
26.2
18.1
28.8
31.5
23.6
43.8
53.4
49.9
14.0
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

13.5
12.1
12.1
15.0
9.9
9.5
11.1
14.3
10.6
12.9
12.9
12.9
15.4
19.0
15.0
12.8
14.1
17.5
14.7
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

—
—
139.3
59.2
67.7
44.6
47.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.0
—
—
1.6
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
5.5
5.0
4.8
4.4
4.4
5.0
3.9
5.3
6.6
7.6
8.0
9.8
9.7
10.6
7.2
8.8
8.8
9.0
9.8

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
0.9
1.0
1.6
1.7
2.4
1.5
1.9
2.1
2.1
1.2
1.7
2.3
3.1
3.2
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.8

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
9.5
9.2
8.1
7.1
7.2
—
9.5
8.8
7.5
9.4
8.3
9.3
11.9
12.1
32.7
36.3
31.6
27.9
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
240.3
74.4
—

P/BV · reported quarter history

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. · BRLT

18.1
20.7
11.9
5.7
6.5
4.4
4.0
—
3.1
3.7
2.9
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.5
1.3
2.6
2.2
1.9
—

Capri Holdings Limited · CPRI

3.0
3.3
—
2.9
2.4
2.4
—
3.0
2.3
3.0
3.3
2.5
3.1
2.3
6.5
-123.1
-32.0
28.4
24.9
—

Envela Corporation · ELA

4.5
4.0
4.1
5.6
3.6
3.3
3.8
4.2
2.7
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.8
3.5
2.9
2.8
3.3
5.2
5.7
—

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited · LANV

8.2
8.2
—
—
18.2
3.8
2.7
1.9
3.0
1.3
1.0
1.8
-41.0
-61.2
-3.7
-2.4
-0.8
-0.8
—
—

LuxExperience B.V. · LUXE

5.0
3.8
2.2
1.9
2.3
1.6
1.2
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.7
1.4
1.4
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
—

Movado Group, Inc. · MOV

—
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.2

Signet Jewelers Limited · SIG

—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2

Tapestry, Inc. · TPR

—
3.3
3.7
3.6
3.3
3.0
—
4.4
4.3
3.2
3.9
3.4
3.8
10.2
9.8
21.1
56.2
48.3
41.2
—

The RealReal, Inc. · REAL

11.0
14.8
-9.9
-2.2
-1.0
-0.7
-0.5
-0.8
-0.8
-0.7
-1.3
-1.0
-1.0
-3.0
-1.8
-1.6
-3.2
-4.5
-3.0
—
09 · let price answer last

Market action

Envela Corporation has the strongest one-year price move in Luxury Goods at +289.6%. Movado Group, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +42.9%. 4 of 9 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Luxury Goods comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 9 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 9 companies in the canonical Luxury Goods membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentals
Tapestry, Inc. TPR$30.5B$1512026-07-28Mar 2026
Signet Jewelers Limited SIGAHEAD$3.9B$98.02026-07-28Jun 2026
Capri Holdings Limited CPRI$1.9B$16.42026-07-28Mar 2026
The RealReal, Inc. REAL$1.4B$11.92026-07-28Mar 2026
LuxExperience B.V. LUXE$1.2B$8.52026-07-28Mar 2026
Movado Group, Inc. MOVAHEAD26/26 WEEKS$842M$38.12026-07-28Jun 2026
Envela Corporation ELAAHEAD24/26 WEEKS$555M$21.42026-07-28Mar 2026
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited LANV$147M$1.32026-07-28Dec 2025
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. BRLT$112M$1.12026-07-28Mar 2026
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 9 Luxury Goods companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Luxury Goods company comparison FAQs

These 18 answers restate the Luxury Goods comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 9 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Which Luxury Goods company is the biggest?

Tapestry, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $7,851 million, ahead of Signet Jewelers Limited at $6,826 million. That covers 8 of 9 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Luxury Goods company is growing fastest?

LuxExperience B.V. has the fastest revenue growth at 100% year on year, across 8 of 9 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Luxury Goods company has the best profit margins?

Tapestry, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 22.3%, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. The RealReal, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Luxury Goods company makes the most profit?

Tapestry, Inc. earns the most, at $663 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 8 of 9 comparable companies. Envela Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Luxury Goods company earns the highest return on capital?

Envela Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 14.6%, across 9 of 9 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Luxury Goods stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Signet Jewelers Limited screens cheapest at 0.04×. Only 3 of 9 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Luxury Goods company has the strongest balance sheet?

Envela Corporation carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $20 million, from 8 of 9 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Luxury Goods company is investing most in new capacity?

Tapestry, Inc. reports the largest capital spending at $37 million, across 9 of 9 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.

Is the Luxury Goods sector beating the market?

Luxury Goods has outperformed S&P 500 by 31.9% over the last 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 9 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Luxury Goods stock has the strongest price momentum?

Movado Group, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Luxury Goods company scores highest for research priority?

Envela Corporation scores 79.3 out of 100 with 76% evidence confidence, from 30.3 points on growth and earnings, 18.6 on capital efficiency, 14.5 on valuation and 15.9 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Luxury Goods companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 9 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Luxury Goods sector?

The 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page carry $40,484 million of combined market value. Tapestry, Inc. is the largest at $30,489 million, about 75% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.

What is the Luxury Goods sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 9 Luxury Goods companies on this page is 19.5×, measured on the 7 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.

How is the Luxury Goods sector performing?

4 of the 9 covered Luxury Goods companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 31.9% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.

How many Luxury Goods stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 9 listed Luxury Goods companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI