Integrated Freight & Logistics: FedEx Corporation owns the largest revenue base; Cryoport, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Integrated Freight & Logistics moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 2% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 3% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 9 weeks running.
FADING · −1 in 4w~Moving with the index5 of 13 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Integrated Freight & Logistics, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyMixedHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together5 of 13 stocks moving
Fresh1 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +9 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large1/30
Mid1/50
Small3/5−1
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 13 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Integrated Freight & Logistics outperforming S&P 500?
Integrated Freight & Logistics has outperformed S&P 500 by 16.5% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 0.7%. 7 of 13 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Pitney Bowes Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +25.7%.
-0.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+16.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
7/13Stocks leading S&P 500
7/13Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Integrated Freight & Logistics has outperformed S&P 500 by 16.5% over 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks. 7 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself. FedEx Corporation leads with revenue of $94,720 million, based on 11 of 14 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Is the Integrated Freight & Logistics sector outperforming S&P 500?
Integrated Freight & Logistics has outperformed S&P 500 by 16.5% over 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks. 7 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company is largest by revenue?
FedEx Corporation leads with revenue of $94,720 million, based on 11 of 14 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company is growing fastest?
Cryoport, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 13.8%, across 10 of 14 comparable companies.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Pitney Bowes Inc. ranks first at 66/100 with 72% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company reports the most CAPEX?
FedEx Corporation reports the largest latest CAPEX at $1,474 million, with 14 of 14 companies comparable.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company has the least gross debt?
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $82 million. FedEx Corporation has the highest at $42,943 million.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Hub Group, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.21, among 7 of 14 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Integrated Freight & Logistics comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
14
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$274.3B
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Revenue growing
5/10
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
7/13
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Pitney Bowes Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 72% evidence confidence.
Hub Group, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.1% and the one-year return is 10.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.6 pp
39% evidence
16.9/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 18.3% · debt/equity 0.74×
80% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
FedEx Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at $94,720 million. United Parcel Service, Inc. is next at $88,317 million. Cryoport, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 13.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: FedEx Corporation is the scale leader at $94,720 million, 7.3% ahead of United Parcel Service, Inc.. Cryoport, Inc.'s growth is 13.8% from a $182 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderFedEx Corporation · $94,720 million
Gap7.3% versus #2 · United Parcel Service, Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/14 companies · 238 observations
Investor read: FedEx Corporation is the scale benchmark; Cryoport, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: FedEx Corporation's growth falls below Cryoport, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1FedEx Corporation FDX$94.7B
2United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS$88.3B
3C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. CHRW$16.2B
4GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO$13.5B
5Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD$11.2B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Cryoport, Inc. CYRX14%
2GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO10%
3FedEx Corporation FDX7.7%
4Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD1.1%
5Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT0.6%
Revenue · company comparison
11/14 level · 10/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Pitney Bowes Inc. has the highest OPM among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at 22.3%. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is next at 10.6%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +7.9 percentage points. 14 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pitney Bowes Inc. leads both opm at 22.3% and margin change at +7.9 percentage points.
LeaderPitney Bowes Inc. · 22.3%
Gap110.4% versus #2 · Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage14/14 companies · 238 observations
Investor read: Pitney Bowes Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI22%
2Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD11%
3J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. JBHT6.8%
4FedEx Corporation FDX6.2%
5FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. FDXF6.0%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI+7.9 pp
2GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO+3.1 pp
3Forward Air Corporation FWRD+2.7 pp
4Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT+1.5 pp
5Landstar System, Inc. LSTR+1.1 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
14/14 level · 14/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
United Parcel Service, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at $5,249 million. FedEx Corporation is next at $4,434 million. Pitney Bowes Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 57.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: United Parcel Service, Inc. leads with $5,249 million of TTM profit, 18.4% above FedEx Corporation. Pitney Bowes Inc. shows 57.5% growth from a $167 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderUnited Parcel Service, Inc. · $5,249 million
Gap18.4% versus #2 · FedEx Corporation
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/14 companies · 238 observations
Investor read: United Parcel Service, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS$5.2B
2FedEx Corporation FDX$4.4B
3Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD$838M
4C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. CHRW$598M
5Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI$167M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI58%
2C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. CHRW18%
3FedEx Corporation FDX8.4%
4Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD-0.8%
5Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report-3.7%
Net profit · company comparison
11/14 level · 8/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
FedEx Corporation has the highest CAPEX among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at $1,474 million. United Parcel Service, Inc. is next at $1,031 million. Cryoport, Inc. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 20.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 14 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: FedEx Corporation reports $1,474 million of CAPEX; Cryoport, Inc. has the highest covered intensity at 20.8%. Coverage is only 14 of 14 companies and 240 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderFedEx Corporation · $1,474 million
Gap43% versus #2 · United Parcel Service, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage14/14 companies · 240 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1FedEx Corporation FDX$1.5B
2United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS$1.0B
3FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. FDXF$152M
4J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. JBHT$110M
5GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO$65M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Cryoport, Inc. CYRX21%
2FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. FDXF7.6%
3FedEx Corporation FDX5.9%
4United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS4.9%
5J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. JBHT3.6%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
14/14 level · 14/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at $82 million. Radiant Logistics, Inc. is next at $84 million. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has the lowest Net debt at $752 million net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $752 million net cash and gross debt of $565 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderProficient Auto Logistics, Inc. · $82 million
Gap2.4% versus #2 · Radiant Logistics, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage14/14 companies · 242 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. PAL$82M
2Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT$84M
3Landstar System, Inc. LSTR$124M
4Cryoport, Inc. CYRX$230M
5Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report$499M
Net debtlowest net debt
1Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD$-752M
2Landstar System, Inc. LSTR$-287M
3Cryoport, Inc. CYRX$-174M
4Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT$44M
5Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. PAL$72M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
14/14 level · 14/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at 18.3%. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is next at 10.7%. Pitney Bowes Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +3.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. leads ROCE at 18.3%, 7.6 percentage points above Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. Pitney Bowes Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +3.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderFedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. · 18.3%
Gap71% versus #2 · Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage14/14 companies · 239 observations
Investor read: FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. FDXF18%
2Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD11%
3Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI6.8%
4C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. CHRW5.6%
5Landstar System, Inc. LSTR5.1%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI+3.5 pp
2Landstar System, Inc. LSTR+1.6 pp
3GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO+1.3 pp
4J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. JBHT+1.1 pp
5Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD+0.9 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
14/14 level · 14/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Hub Group, Inc. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at 0.21×. Radiant Logistics, Inc. is next at 0.72×. Cryoport, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 6.86×, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2025.
What the numbers say: Hub Group, Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.21×, 70.8% below Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Only 7 of 14 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderHub Group, Inc. · 0.21×
Gap70.8% versus #2 · Radiant Logistics, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/14 companies · 24 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report0.2
2Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT0.7
3Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. EXPD1.0
4United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS1.6
5C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. CHRW1.9
P/Elowest P/E
1Cryoport, Inc. CYRX6.9
2Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI10.7
3Forward Air Corporation FWRD14.6
4United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS15.9
5Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report19.9
Valuation · company comparison
7/14 level · 13/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Hub Group, Inc. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies compared here, at 7.6×. Pitney Bowes Inc. is next at 7.95×. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. has the lowest P/BV at 0.62×, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 14 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2025.
What the numbers say: Hub Group, Inc. leads ev/ebitda at 7.6×; Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. leads p/bv at 0.62×.
LeaderHub Group, Inc. · 7.6×
Gap4.4% versus #2 · Pitney Bowes Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/14 companies · 213 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report7.6
2Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI8.0
3United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS9.4
4Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT10.5
5FedEx Corporation FDX13.0
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. PAL0.6
2Cryoport, Inc. CYRX0.8
3Hub Group, Inc. HUBG · older report1.2
4Radiant Logistics, Inc. RLGT1.4
5GXO Logistics, Inc. GXO2.0
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
13/14 level · 12/14 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Cryoport, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Integrated Freight & Logistics at +108.7%. Pitney Bowes Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +33.5%. 7 of 13 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Integrated Freight & Logistics comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 14 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 14 companies in the canonical Integrated Freight & Logistics membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Integrated Freight & Logistics company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the Integrated Freight & Logistics comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 14 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company is the biggest?
FedEx Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $94,720 million, ahead of United Parcel Service, Inc. at $88,317 million. That covers 11 of 14 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company is growing fastest?
Cryoport, Inc. has the fastest revenue growth at 13.8% year on year, across 10 of 14 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company has the best profit margins?
Pitney Bowes Inc. has the highest operating margin at 22.3%, from 14 of 14 comparable companies. Pitney Bowes Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +7.9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company makes the most profit?
United Parcel Service, Inc. earns the most, at $5,249 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 11 of 14 comparable companies. Pitney Bowes Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 57.5%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company earns the highest return on capital?
FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 18.3%, across 14 of 14 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Hub Group, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.21×. Only 7 of 14 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company has the strongest balance sheet?
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $82 million, from 14 of 14 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company is investing most in new capacity?
FedEx Corporation reports the largest capital spending at $1,474 million, across 14 of 14 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Integrated Freight & Logistics sector beating the market?
Integrated Freight & Logistics has outperformed S&P 500 by 16.5% over the last 52 weeks and 0.7% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 7 of 13 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics stock has the strongest price momentum?
Pitney Bowes Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Integrated Freight & Logistics company scores highest for research priority?
Pitney Bowes Inc. scores 66 out of 100 with 72% evidence confidence, from 24.7 points on growth and earnings, 11 on capital efficiency, 11.3 on valuation and 19 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Integrated Freight & Logistics companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 14 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Integrated Freight & Logistics sector?
The 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies on this page carry $274,273 million of combined market value. United Parcel Service, Inc. is the largest at $89,701 million, about 33% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Integrated Freight & Logistics sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 14 Integrated Freight & Logistics companies on this page is 22.2×, measured on the 13 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Integrated Freight & Logistics sector performing?
7 of the 13 covered Integrated Freight & Logistics companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 16.5% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Integrated Freight & Logistics stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 14 listed Integrated Freight & Logistics companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.