Insurance Brokers: Aon plc owns the largest revenue base; Ethos Technologies Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Insurance Brokers moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 54% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 6 weeks running.
BREAKING OUT · ahead 6w⚠Price down, no fundamental support11 of 15 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Insurance Brokers, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyMixedHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together11 of 15 stocks moving
Fresh6 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +4 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large3/3+3
Mid5/6+3
Small3/6−1
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 15 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Insurance Brokers outperforming S&P 500?
Insurance Brokers has underperformed S&P 500 by 27.8% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 20.2%. 4 of 13 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +10.5%.
+20.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-27.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
4/13Stocks leading S&P 500
5/13Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Insurance Brokers has underperformed S&P 500 by 27.8% over 52 weeks and 20.2% over 13 weeks. 4 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 13 beat the sector itself. Aon plc leads with income of $17,486 million, based on 12 of 15 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Insurance Brokers sector outperforming S&P 500?
Insurance Brokers has underperformed S&P 500 by 27.8% over 52 weeks and 20.2% over 13 weeks. 4 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 13 beat the sector itself.
Which Insurance Brokers company is largest by income?
Aon plc leads with income of $17,486 million, based on 12 of 15 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Insurance Brokers company is growing fastest?
Ethos Technologies Inc. has the fastest current income growth at 67%, across 12 of 15 comparable companies.
Which Insurance Brokers company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
TWFG, Inc. ranks first at 63.5/100 with 70% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Insurance Brokers company has the lowest comparable P/BV-to-ROE?
SelectQuote, Inc. has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.03, among 10 of 15 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Insurance Brokers comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
15
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$329.1B
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Revenue growing
11/12
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
4/13
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
TWFG, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 70% evidence confidence.
The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -45.3% and the one-year return is -58.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12.6/35Growth & earnings
Income 67% · PAT -305.8%
71% evidence
4.8/25Capital efficiency
ROA -30.8% · ROE -42.6% · GNPA —
68% evidence
9.8/20Valuation
P/BV 1.59× · P/BV÷ROE —
10% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Income Scale & Growth Durability
Aon plc has the highest Income among the 15 Insurance Brokers companies compared here, at $17,486 million. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is next at $14,973 million. Ethos Technologies Inc. has the highest Income growth at 67%, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Aon plc is the scale leader at $17,486 million, 16.8% ahead of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Ethos Technologies Inc.'s growth is 67% from a $486 million base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderAon plc · $17,486 million
Gap16.8% versus #2 · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/15 companies · 249 observations
Investor read: Aon plc is the scale benchmark; Ethos Technologies Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Aon plc's growth falls below Ethos Technologies Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
For lenders, reported income is used instead of industrial-company sales. Growth is compared year-on-year.
Incomelargest
1Aon plc AON$17.5B
2Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. AJG$15.0B
3Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW$9.9B
4Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO$6.3B
5Erie Indemnity Company ERIE$4.1B
Income growthfastest growers
1Ethos Technologies Inc. LIFE67%
2Accelerant Holdings ARX54%
3Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO29%
4TWFG, Inc. TWFG26%
5Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. AJG25%
Income · company comparison
12/15 level · 12/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Aon plc has the highest Net profit among the 15 Insurance Brokers companies compared here, at $4,007 million. Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company is next at $1,677 million. SelectQuote, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Aon plc leads with $4,007 million of TTM profit, 138.9% above Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company. SelectQuote, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (2966.7% uncapped) growth from a $92 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderAon plc · $4,007 million
Gap138.9% versus #2 · Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/15 companies · 249 observations
Investor read: Aon plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is ranked only where the comparison base is economically meaningful. Loss-to-profit flips are shown but do not win the growth table.
Net profitlargest
1Aon plc AON$4.0B
2Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW$1.7B
3Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. AJG$1.6B
4Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO$1.2B
5Erie Indemnity Company ERIE$571M
Profit growthfastest growers
1SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT100%
2TWFG, Inc. TWFG66%
3Aon plc AON54%
4Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO11%
5CorVel Corporation CRVL9.1%
Net profit · company comparison
12/15 level · 10/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
No company in this Insurance Brokers comparison has a funding base figure that passes this section's guard, so the Deposits rank is empty. On Borrowings, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is highest at $22,382 million, across 14 of 15 companies with a usable reading.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable deposits leader.
LeaderNo comparable leader
GapNot enough peers
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage0/15 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: The current leader sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
For banks, debt is operating funding rather than industrial leverage. Deposits and borrowings are therefore shown as funding-base levels; asset quality, funding cost and liquidity determine whether that funding is attractive.
Depositslargest deposit bases
—Not enough comparable data—
Borrowingslargest borrowings
1Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MRSH$22.4B
2Aon plc AON$15.3B
3Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. AJG$13.4B
4Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO$8.1B
5Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW$6.9B
Funding base · company comparison
0/15 level · 14/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
No consistent historical series is available for deposits.
Borrowings · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. has the highest ROA among the 15 Insurance Brokers companies compared here, at 35.4%. CorVel Corporation is next at 5.2%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has the highest ROA change at +1.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. leads roa at 35.4%; Goosehead Insurance, Inc. leads roa change at +1.8 percentage points.
LeaderNeptune Insurance Holdings Inc. · 35.4%
Gap580.8% versus #2 · CorVel Corporation
Persistence0/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 252 observations
Investor read: Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
ROA is the cleanest first comparison for lenders because the balance sheet is the operating asset.
ROAhighest
1Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. NP35%
2CorVel Corporation CRVL5.2%
3Goosehead Insurance, Inc. GSHD5.1%
4Erie Indemnity Company ERIE4.2%
5TWFG, Inc. TWFG3.2%
ROA changefastest improvers
1Goosehead Insurance, Inc. GSHD+1.8 pp
2SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT+1.2 pp
3TWFG, Inc. TWFG+1.0 pp
4Aon plc AON+0.2 pp
5Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW+0.1 pp
Return on assets · company comparison
15/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Aon plc has the highest ROE among the 15 Insurance Brokers companies compared here, at 14.4%. CorVel Corporation is next at 8.7%. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. has the highest ROE change at +16 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Aon plc leads roe at 14.4%; Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. leads roe change at +16 percentage points.
LeaderAon plc · 14.4%
Gap65.5% versus #2 · CorVel Corporation
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 252 observations
Investor read: Aon plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
ROE shows the return to shareholders, but should be read with asset quality and leverage.
ROEhighest
1Aon plc AON14%
2CorVel Corporation CRVL8.7%
3Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MRSH8.2%
4Erie Indemnity Company ERIE6.8%
5SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT6.6%
ROE changefastest improvers
1Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. NP+16.0 pp
2Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW+1.0 pp
3SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT+0.8 pp
4TWFG, Inc. TWFG+0.6 pp
5Goosehead Insurance, Inc. GSHD+0.3 pp
Return on equity · company comparison
15/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
No company in this Insurance Brokers comparison reports gross NPA on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 15 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Jun 2026.
Lower gross NPA is better. Improvement means the ratio is falling, so ranks are intentionally inverted.
07 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
SelectQuote, Inc. has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 15 Insurance Brokers companies compared here, at 0.03×. Brown & Brown, Inc. is next at 0.39×. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. has the lowest P/BV at -19.6×, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: SelectQuote, Inc. has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.03×, 92.3% below Brown & Brown, Inc.. Only 10 of 15 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderSelectQuote, Inc. · 0.03×
Gap92.3% versus #2 · Brown & Brown, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/15 companies · 163 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Banks are compared on P/BV and P/BV÷ROE, not PEG. Lower is better only if asset quality and return durability hold; cheap book value with weakening NPAs is not automatically attractive.
P/BV ÷ ROElowest return-adjusted price
1SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT0.0
2Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO0.4
3Aon plc AON0.5
4Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MRSH0.6
5Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. AJG0.7
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. NP-19.6
2Goosehead Insurance, Inc. GSHD-10.3
3SelectQuote, Inc. SLQT0.2
4Ethos Technologies Inc. LIFE1.6
5Brown & Brown, Inc. BRO1.7
Valuation · company comparison
10/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Crawford & Company has the strongest one-year price move in Insurance Brokers at +20.9%. The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +7.1%. 4 of 13 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Insurance Brokers comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 15 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 of the 7 ranked sections have fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROE can be manufactured with leverage. Read it beside ROA and asset quality.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
Banks and lenders are not forced through operating-margin or ROCE comparisons; missing lender-specific fields remain visibly missing.
Thin comparisons: Funding base, Asset quality have fewer than three usable current readings.
09 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 15 companies in the canonical Insurance Brokers membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 15 Insurance Brokers companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
These 15 answers restate the Insurance Brokers comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 15 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Insurance Brokers company is the biggest?
Aon plc is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of $17,486 million, ahead of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. at $14,973 million. That covers 12 of 15 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Insurance Brokers company is growing fastest?
Ethos Technologies Inc. has the fastest income growth at 67% year on year, across 12 of 15 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Insurance Brokers company makes the most profit?
Aon plc earns the most, at $4,007 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 12 of 15 comparable companies. SelectQuote, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Insurance Brokers company earns the highest return on capital?
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. leads on return on assets at 35.4%, across 15 of 15 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Insurance Brokers stock is the cheapest?
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — SelectQuote, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.03×. Only 10 of 15 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Insurance Brokers sector beating the market?
Insurance Brokers has underperformed S&P 500 by 27.8% over the last 52 weeks and 20.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 13 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Insurance Brokers stock has the strongest price momentum?
The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Insurance Brokers company scores highest for research priority?
TWFG, Inc. scores 63.5 out of 100 with 70% evidence confidence, from 26.6 points on growth and earnings, 15.4 on capital efficiency, 5.3 on valuation and 16.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Insurance Brokers companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 15 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Insurance Brokers sector?
The 15 Insurance Brokers companies on this page carry $329,090 million of combined market value. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is the largest at $91,715 million, about 28% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Insurance Brokers sector's P/B ratio?
The median price-to-book ratio across the 15 Insurance Brokers companies on this page is 3.4×, measured on the 13 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Insurance Brokers sector performing?
4 of the 13 covered Insurance Brokers companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 27.8% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Insurance Brokers stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 15 listed Insurance Brokers companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.