Household & Personal Products: The Procter & Gamble Company owns the largest revenue base; Magnera Corporation has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Household & Personal Products moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 48% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 10% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 6 weeks running.
BREAKING OUT · ahead 6w~Price down, no fundamental support14 of 22 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months2 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
Household & Personal Products, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyBroadening down the ladderHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together14 of 22 stocks moving
Fresh5 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +1 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large2/5+1
Mid5/8+1
Small7/9+2
Participation is spreading downward — the mid and small companies added more this month than the large ones did.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 22 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Household & Personal Products outperforming S&P 500?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 5.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 13.9%. 11 of 20 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Acme United Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +24.5%.
+13.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-5.1%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
11/20Stocks leading S&P 500
8/20Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 5.1% over 52 weeks and 13.9% over 13 weeks. 11 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself. The Procter & Gamble Company leads with revenue of $86,718 million, based on 19 of 20 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Household & Personal Products sector outperforming S&P 500?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 5.1% over 52 weeks and 13.9% over 13 weeks. 11 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself.
Which Household & Personal Products company is largest by revenue?
The Procter & Gamble Company leads with revenue of $86,718 million, based on 19 of 20 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Household & Personal Products company is growing fastest?
Magnera Corporation has the fastest current revenue growth at 35.3%, across 19 of 20 comparable companies.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Helen of Troy Limited ranks first at 68.8/100 with 71.7% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Household & Personal Products company reports the most CAPEX?
The Procter & Gamble Company reports the largest latest CAPEX at $1,019 million, with 20 of 20 companies comparable.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the least gross debt?
The Honest Company, Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $3 million. The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest at $37,026 million.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Kenvue Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.38, among 12 of 20 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Household & Personal Products comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
20
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$725.9B
The Procter & Gamble Company
Revenue growing
11/19
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
11/20
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Helen of Troy Limited has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 71.7% evidence confidence.
Interparfums, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18.1/35Growth & earnings
Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change —
9% evidence
12.9/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 3.6% · debt/equity —
34% evidence
11.0/20Valuation
P/E 12.9× · PEG —
15% evidence
5.8/20Relative strength
RS sector -7.6% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y -1.7%
100% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest Revenue among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $86,718 million. Colgate-Palmolive Company is next at $20,795 million. Magnera Corporation has the highest Revenue growth at 35.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 19 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company is the scale leader at $86,718 million, 317% ahead of Colgate-Palmolive Company. Magnera Corporation's growth is 35.3% from a $3,266 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · $86,718 million
Gap317% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/20 companies · 366 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company is the scale benchmark; Magnera Corporation is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: The Procter & Gamble Company's growth falls below Magnera Corporation's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1The Procter & Gamble Company PG$86.7B
2Colgate-Palmolive Company CL$20.8B
3Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB$16.6B
4Kenvue Inc. KVUE$15.3B
5The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL$14.8B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Magnera Corporation MAGN35%
2e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF25%
3Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD5.1%
4Colgate-Palmolive Company CL4.3%
5Acme United Corporation ACU4.1%
Revenue · company comparison
19/20 level · 19/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Interparfums, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 21.5%. Helen of Troy Limited has the highest Margin change at +124.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 19 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Interparfums, Inc. leads opm at 21.5%; Helen of Troy Limited leads margin change at +124.5 percentage points.
LeaderInterparfums, Inc. · 21.5%
Gap0% versus #2 · The Procter & Gamble Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/20 companies · 358 observations
Investor read: Interparfums, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Interparfums, Inc. IPAR22%
2The Procter & Gamble Company PG22%
3Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD20%
4Kenvue Inc. KVUE20%
5Colgate-Palmolive Company CL18%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Helen of Troy Limited HELE+124.5 pp
2Kenvue Inc. KVUE+4.7 pp
3Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS+4.0 pp
4Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB+3.2 pp
5The Clorox Company CLX+2.7 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
19/20 level · 19/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest Net profit among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $16,689 million. Colgate-Palmolive Company is next at $2,215 million. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company leads with $16,689 million of TTM profit, 653.5% above Colgate-Palmolive Company. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (113.6% uncapped) growth from a $126 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · $16,689 million
Gap653.5% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/20 companies · 366 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1The Procter & Gamble Company PG$16.7B
2Colgate-Palmolive Company CL$2.2B
3Kenvue Inc. KVUE$1.6B
4Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB$1.5B
5The Clorox Company CLX$770M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB100%
2Kenvue Inc. KVUE54%
3Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD27%
4The Clorox Company CLX8.6%
5The Procter & Gamble Company PG7.1%
Net profit · company comparison
19/20 level · 12/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest CAPEX among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $1,019 million. Unilever PLC is next at $716 million. Kimberly-Clark Corporation has the highest CAPEX intensity at 10.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company reports $1,019 million of CAPEX; Kimberly-Clark Corporation has the highest covered intensity at 10.2%. Coverage is only 20 of 20 companies and 362 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · $1,019 million
Gap42.3% versus #2 · Unilever PLC
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/20 companies · 362 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1The Procter & Gamble Company PG$1.0B
2Unilever PLC UL · older report$716M
3Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB$424M
4Kenvue Inc. KVUE$139M
5Colgate-Palmolive Company CL$138M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB10%
2The Procter & Gamble Company PG4.8%
3Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS4.4%
4Acme United Corporation ACU3.8%
5Coty Inc. COTY3.6%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
20/20 level · 20/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
The Honest Company, Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $3 million. Acme United Corporation is next at $49 million. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at $87 million net cash. 19 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: The Honest Company, Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $87 million net cash and gross debt of $3 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderThe Honest Company, Inc. · $3 million
Gap93.9% versus #2 · Acme United Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/20 companies · 354 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1The Honest Company, Inc. HNST$3M
2Acme United Corporation ACU$49M
3Interparfums, Inc. IPAR$183M
4Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS$278M
5Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD$609M
Net debtlowest net debt
1The Honest Company, Inc. HNST$-87M
2Interparfums, Inc. IPAR$-54M
3Acme United Corporation ACU$45M
4Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS$78M
5Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD$313M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
19/20 level · 19/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Colgate-Palmolive Company has the highest ROCE among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 9.4%. The Clorox Company is next at 8.7%. Helen of Troy Limited has the highest ROCE change at +21.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Colgate-Palmolive Company leads ROCE at 9.4%, 0.7 percentage points above The Clorox Company. Helen of Troy Limited has the strongest latest improvement at +21.1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderColgate-Palmolive Company · 9.4%
Gap8% versus #2 · The Clorox Company
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/20 companies · 372 observations
Investor read: Colgate-Palmolive Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Colgate-Palmolive Company CL9.4%
2The Clorox Company CLX8.7%
3Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB7.7%
4Interparfums, Inc. IPAR6.3%
5The Procter & Gamble Company PG5.1%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Helen of Troy Limited HELE+21.1 pp
2The Clorox Company CLX+2.1 pp
3Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB+1.3 pp
4Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS+1.2 pp
5Kenvue Inc. KVUE+1.1 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
20/20 level · 20/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Kenvue Inc. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 0.38×. Helen of Troy Limited is next at 0.42×. Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 6.62×, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Kenvue Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.38×, 9.5% below Helen of Troy Limited. Only 12 of 20 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderKenvue Inc. · 0.38×
Gap9.5% versus #2 · Helen of Troy Limited
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/20 companies · 50 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Kenvue Inc. KVUE0.4
2Helen of Troy Limited HELE0.4
3Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD1.0
4The Clorox Company CLX1.6
5Interparfums, Inc. IPAR2.0
P/Elowest P/E
1Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS6.6
2Helen of Troy Limited HELE10.2
3Magnera Corporation MAGN12.2
4Unilever PLC UL · older report12.9
5Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB14.0
Valuation · company comparison
12/20 level · 20/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 3.31×. Magnera Corporation is next at 7.86×. Magnera Corporation has the lowest P/BV at 0.31×, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. leads ev/ebitda at 3.31×; Magnera Corporation leads p/bv at 0.31×.
LeaderNu Skin Enterprises, Inc. · 3.31×
Gap57.9% versus #2 · Magnera Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/20 companies · 328 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS3.3
2Magnera Corporation MAGN7.9
3Acme United Corporation ACU10.4
4Interparfums, Inc. IPAR10.5
5Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB11.2
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Magnera Corporation MAGN0.3
2Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS0.5
3Coty Inc. COTY0.6
4Newell Brands Inc. NWL0.6
5Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC0.7
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
20/20 level · 19/20 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Household & Personal Products at +72.3%. Acme United Corporation leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +29.5%. 11 of 20 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Household & Personal Products comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 20 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 20 companies in the canonical Household & Personal Products membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 20 Household & Personal Products companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Household & Personal Products company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the Household & Personal Products comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 20 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Household & Personal Products company is the biggest?
The Procter & Gamble Company is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $86,718 million, ahead of Colgate-Palmolive Company at $20,795 million. That covers 19 of 20 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Household & Personal Products company is growing fastest?
Magnera Corporation has the fastest revenue growth at 35.3% year on year, across 19 of 20 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the best profit margins?
Interparfums, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 21.5%, from 19 of 20 comparable companies. Helen of Troy Limited shows the biggest recent improvement, at +124.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Household & Personal Products company makes the most profit?
The Procter & Gamble Company earns the most, at $16,689 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 19 of 20 comparable companies. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Household & Personal Products company earns the highest return on capital?
Colgate-Palmolive Company leads on return on capital employed at 9.4%, across 20 of 20 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Household & Personal Products stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Kenvue Inc. screens cheapest at 0.38×. Only 12 of 20 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the strongest balance sheet?
The Honest Company, Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $3 million, from 19 of 20 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Household & Personal Products company is investing most in new capacity?
The Procter & Gamble Company reports the largest capital spending at $1,019 million, across 20 of 20 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Household & Personal Products sector beating the market?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 5.1% over the last 52 weeks and 13.9% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 11 of 20 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Household & Personal Products stock has the strongest price momentum?
Acme United Corporation has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Household & Personal Products company scores highest for research priority?
Helen of Troy Limited scores 68.8 out of 100 with 71.7% evidence confidence, from 24.1 points on growth and earnings, 12.7 on capital efficiency, 16 on valuation and 16 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Household & Personal Products companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 20 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 8 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Household & Personal Products sector?
The 20 Household & Personal Products companies on this page carry $725,946 million of combined market value. The Procter & Gamble Company is the largest at $346,682 million, about 48% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Household & Personal Products sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 20 Household & Personal Products companies on this page is 20.6×, measured on the 20 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Household & Personal Products sector performing?
11 of the 20 covered Household & Personal Products companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 5.1% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Household & Personal Products stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 20 listed Household & Personal Products companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.