Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances: Whirlpool Corporation owns the largest revenue base; XMax Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 28% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 14% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 8 weeks running.
FADING · −3 in 4w~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming11 of 17 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyBroad but lateHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together11 of 17 stocks moving
Fresh1 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +3 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large2/4−1
Mid4/6−1
Small5/7−1
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 17 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances outperforming S&P 500?
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 13.1%. 12 of 20 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Lifetime Brands, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +44.9%.
+13.1%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+10.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
12/20Stocks leading S&P 500
8/20Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over 52 weeks and 13.1% over 13 weeks. 12 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself. Whirlpool Corporation leads with revenue of $15,177 million, based on 18 of 21 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Is the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances sector outperforming S&P 500?
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over 52 weeks and 13.1% over 13 weeks. 12 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company is largest by revenue?
Whirlpool Corporation leads with revenue of $15,177 million, based on 18 of 21 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company is growing fastest?
XMax Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 54.5%, across 18 of 21 comparable companies.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
SharkNinja, Inc. ranks first at 72.5/100 with 82% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company reports the most CAPEX?
Whirlpool Corporation reports the largest latest CAPEX at $225 million, with 21 of 21 companies comparable.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company has the least gross debt?
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $0 million. Whirlpool Corporation has the highest at $7,104 million.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.26, among 6 of 21 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
21
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$67.4B
SharkNinja, Inc.
Revenue growing
10/18
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
12/20
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
SharkNinja, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 82% evidence confidence.
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -25.7% and the one-year return is -0.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -51.1% and the one-year return is -53.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue -1.1% · PAT -102% · OPM change -8.6 pp
83% evidence
8.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -0.7% · debt/equity 0.97×
80% evidence
9.0/20Valuation
P/E 53.7× · PEG —
15% evidence
3.5/20Relative strength
RS sector -28.6% · RS bench -21.6% · 1Y -18.4%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Whirlpool Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at $15,177 million. Somnigroup International Inc. is next at $7,674 million. XMax Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 54.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. 18 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Whirlpool Corporation is the scale leader at $15,177 million, 97.8% ahead of Somnigroup International Inc.. XMax Inc.'s growth is 54.5% from a $17 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderWhirlpool Corporation · $15,177 million
Gap97.8% versus #2 · Somnigroup International Inc.
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/21 companies · 383 observations
Investor read: Whirlpool Corporation is the scale benchmark; XMax Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Whirlpool Corporation's growth falls below XMax Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Whirlpool Corporation WHR$15.2B
2Somnigroup International Inc. SGI$7.7B
3SharkNinja, Inc. SN$6.6B
4Leggett & Platt, Incorporated LEG$4.0B
5MillerKnoll, Inc. MLKN$3.8B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1XMax Inc. XMAX55%
2Somnigroup International Inc. SGI44%
3Kewaunee Scientific Corporation KEQU17%
4SharkNinja, Inc. SN16%
5Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. ALH14%
Revenue · company comparison
18/21 level · 18/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. has the highest OPM among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at 19.6%. SharkNinja, Inc. is next at 11.6%. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +11.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 21 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. leads opm at 19.6%; Flexsteel Industries, Inc. leads margin change at +11.5 percentage points.
LeaderAlliance Laundry Holdings Inc. · 19.6%
Gap69% versus #2 · SharkNinja, Inc.
Persistence3/5 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/21 companies · 383 observations
Investor read: Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. ALH20%
2SharkNinja, Inc. SN12%
3Somnigroup International Inc. SGI10%
4Interface, Inc. TILE9.8%
5Kewaunee Scientific Corporation KEQU7.3%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS+11.5 pp
2Somnigroup International Inc. SGI+9.6 pp
3Whirlpool Corporation WHR+4.1 pp
4Hooker Furnishings Corporation HOFT+3.0 pp
5Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company HBB+2.4 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
21/21 level · 21/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
SharkNinja, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at $705 million. Somnigroup International Inc. is next at $523 million. Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: SharkNinja, Inc. leads with $705 million of TTM profit, 34.8% above Somnigroup International Inc.. Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (200% uncapped) growth from a $6 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderSharkNinja, Inc. · $705 million
Gap34.8% versus #2 · Somnigroup International Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/21 companies · 383 observations
Investor read: SharkNinja, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Whirlpool Corporation has the highest CAPEX among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at $225 million. Mohawk Industries, Inc. is next at $102 million. The same company also holds the highest CAPEX intensity, at 6.9%. 21 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Whirlpool Corporation reports $225 million of CAPEX; Whirlpool Corporation has the highest covered intensity at 6.9%. Coverage is only 21 of 21 companies and 365 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderWhirlpool Corporation · $225 million
Gap120.6% versus #2 · Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/21 companies · 365 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Whirlpool Corporation WHR$225M
2Mohawk Industries, Inc. MHK$102M
3Somnigroup International Inc. SGI$61M
4MillerKnoll, Inc. MLKN$39M
5HNI Corporation HNI$34M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Whirlpool Corporation WHR6.9%
2MillerKnoll, Inc. MLKN3.9%
3Mohawk Industries, Inc. MHK3.7%
4The Lovesac Company LOVE3.6%
5La-Z-Boy Incorporated LZB3.5%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
21/21 level · 21/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at $0 million. XMax Inc. is next at $6 million. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at $152 million net cash. 21 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $152 million net cash and gross debt of $0 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderAlliance Laundry Holdings Inc. · $0 million
Gap100% versus #2 · XMax Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/21 companies · 386 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. ALH$0M
2XMax Inc. XMAX$6M
3Hooker Furnishings Corporation HOFT$24M
4Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS$54M
5Kewaunee Scientific Corporation KEQU$57M
Net debtlowest net debt
1Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. ALH$-152M
2XMax Inc. XMAX$-4M
3Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS$-3M
4Hooker Furnishings Corporation HOFT$13M
5Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. ETD$15M
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
21/21 level · 21/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
SharkNinja, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at 5%. Kewaunee Scientific Corporation is next at 3.9%. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 21 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: SharkNinja, Inc. leads ROCE at 5%, 1.1 percentage points above Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderSharkNinja, Inc. · 5%
Gap28.2% versus #2 · Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/21 companies · 374 observations
Investor read: SharkNinja, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1SharkNinja, Inc. SN5.0%
2Kewaunee Scientific Corporation KEQU3.9%
3Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS3.7%
4Interface, Inc. TILE3.3%
5Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. ALH3.1%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS+6.0 pp
2XMax Inc. XMAX+2.1 pp
3Whirlpool Corporation WHR+1.8 pp
4Somnigroup International Inc. SGI+1.7 pp
5Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company HBB+1.0 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
21/21 level · 21/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at 0.26×. Leggett & Platt, Incorporated has the lowest P/E at 6.14×, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.26×, 0% below Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company. Only 6 of 21 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderEthan Allen Interiors Inc. · 0.26×
Gap0% versus #2 · Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/21 companies · 19 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. ETD0.3
2Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company HBB0.3
3SharkNinja, Inc. SN0.4
4Somnigroup International Inc. SGI0.5
5Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS0.7
P/Elowest P/E
1Leggett & Platt, Incorporated LEG6.1
2Flexsteel Industries, Inc. FLXS8.1
3Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company HBB9.1
4Kewaunee Scientific Corporation KEQU11.5
5Interface, Inc. TILE11.7
Valuation · company comparison
6/21 level · 19/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies compared here, at 5.41×. Leggett & Platt, Incorporated is next at 5.43×. Traeger, Inc. has the lowest P/BV at 0.46×, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. leads ev/ebitda at 5.41×; Traeger, Inc. leads p/bv at 0.46×.
LeaderFlexsteel Industries, Inc. · 5.41×
Gap0.4% versus #2 · Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/21 companies · 302 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
20/21 level · 20/21 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 21 companies with a series here. The remaining 9 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
XMax Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances at +258.7%. Lifetime Brands, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +59.2%. 12 of 20 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 21 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 21 companies in the canonical Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 21 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company is the biggest?
Whirlpool Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $15,177 million, ahead of Somnigroup International Inc. at $7,674 million. That covers 18 of 21 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company is growing fastest?
XMax Inc. has the fastest revenue growth at 54.5% year on year, across 18 of 21 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company has the best profit margins?
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. has the highest operating margin at 19.6%, from 21 of 21 comparable companies. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +11.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company makes the most profit?
SharkNinja, Inc. earns the most, at $705 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 18 of 21 comparable companies. Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company earns the highest return on capital?
SharkNinja, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 5%, across 21 of 21 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. screens cheapest at 0.26×. Only 6 of 21 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company has the strongest balance sheet?
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $0 million, from 21 of 21 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company is investing most in new capacity?
Whirlpool Corporation reports the largest capital spending at $225 million, across 21 of 21 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Is the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances sector beating the market?
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances has outperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over the last 52 weeks and 13.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 12 of 20 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances stock has the strongest price momentum?
Lifetime Brands, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances company scores highest for research priority?
SharkNinja, Inc. scores 72.5 out of 100 with 82% evidence confidence, from 22.8 points on growth and earnings, 17.5 on capital efficiency, 13.2 on valuation and 19 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 21 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances sector?
The 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies on this page carry $67,427 million of combined market value. SharkNinja, Inc. is the largest at $22,621 million, about 34% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 21 Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies on this page is 18.3×, measured on the 19 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances sector performing?
12 of the 20 covered Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 10.2% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 21 listed Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.