Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-28
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Copper Stocks

Copper: Hudbay Minerals Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest current growth.

The industry itself · before any single company

How has Copper moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 65% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 48% on average over the last four reported quarters.

ASLEEP · 1y +70.2%Price and the fundamentals both up1 of 6 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 4/6 >200d (+0) · 1/6 lead (+1) · EPS 6/6↑

100200500202620252024202320222021 452348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 57.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · down 53.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 43.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 20.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 0.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 0.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · up 7.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 15.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 23.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 86, against 100 at the start · up 127.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two86 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
100200500202620252024202320222021 452348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 80, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 69, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 57.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 39, against 100 at the start · down 53.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 43.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 20.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · down 0.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 13.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · up 0.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 21, against 100 at the start · up 7.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 15.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 48, against 100 at the start · up 23.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 75, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 86, against 100 at the start · up 127.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two86No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Copper, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy NarrowHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together1 of 6 stocks moving
Fresh1 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +1 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 1/2+1
Mid 0/20
Small 0/20

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Copper outperforming S&P 500?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 55.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 6.6%. 4 of 6 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Trekor Metals Limited is the strongest against the sector itself at +11.8%.

-6.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+55.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
4/6Stocks leading S&P 500
4/6Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 55.4% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 4 of 6 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 6 beat the sector itself. Hudbay Minerals Inc. leads with revenue of $2,373 million, based on 4 of 6 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Is the Copper sector outperforming S&P 500?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 55.4% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 4 of 6 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 6 beat the sector itself.

Which Copper company is largest by revenue?

Hudbay Minerals Inc. leads with revenue of $2,373 million, based on 4 of 6 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Copper company is growing fastest?

Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 88.6%, across 4 of 6 comparable companies.

Which Copper company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Southern Copper Corporation ranks first at 64/100 with 58.7% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Copper company reports the most CAPEX?

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reports the largest latest CAPEX at $1,104 million, with 6 of 6 companies comparable.

Which Copper company has the least gross debt?

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the lowest comparable gross debt at $35 million. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. has the highest at $10,359 million.

Which Copper company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.18, among 1 of 6 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Copper comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
6
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$254.3B
Southern Copper Corporation
Revenue growing
3/4
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
4/6
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Southern Copper Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 58.7% evidence confidence.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

64.0/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 59% evidence

Exact sum: 21.5 + 15.6 + 9.7 + 17.2 = 64

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

21.5/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.1 pp

45% evidence

15.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 13% · debt/equity 0.67×

80% evidence

9.7/20Valuation

P/E 25.8× · PEG —

15% evidence

17.2/20Relative strength

RS sector 9.4% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 102.6%

100% evidence

2. Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

58.3/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 82% evidence

Exact sum: 23.8 + 11.9 + 15.9 + 6.7 = 58.3

Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -2.7% and the one-year return is 90.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.

23.8/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 88.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.6 pp

83% evidence

11.9/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 5.6% · debt/equity 0.55×

80% evidence

15.9/20Valuation

P/E 9.5× · PEG 0.18

65% evidence

6.7/20Relative strength

RS sector -2.7% · RS bench -4.3% · 1Y 90.9%

100% evidence

3. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

54.9/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 59% evidence

Exact sum: 17.7 + 11.7 + 9.1 + 16.4 = 54.9

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

17.7/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.6 pp

45% evidence

11.7/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 3.9% · debt/equity 0.32×

80% evidence

9.1/20Valuation

P/E 31× · PEG —

15% evidence

16.4/20Relative strength

RS sector 7% · RS bench 6.7% · 1Y 54%

100% evidence

4. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

52.4/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 56% evidence

Exact sum: 20 + 17.9 + 11.5 + 3 = 52.4

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

20.0/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change 414.4 pp

62% evidence

17.9/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 21% · debt/equity 0.06×

68% evidence

11.5/20Valuation

P/E 6.1× · PEG —

15% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -34.6% · RS bench -34.6% · 1Y -5.3%

70% evidence

5. Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

52.3/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 72% evidence

Exact sum: 21.2 + 13.5 + 10.3 + 7.3 = 52.3

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

21.2/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 13.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9.1 pp

83% evidence

13.5/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 5.6% · debt/equity 0.27×

80% evidence

10.3/20Valuation

P/E 12.6× · PEG —

15% evidence

7.3/20Relative strength

RS sector 3.1% · RS bench 1.1% · 1Y 140.4%

100% evidence

6. Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

49.7/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 65% evidence

Exact sum: 21.1 + 5.1 + 8.5 + 15 = 49.7

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

21.1/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 28.3% · PAT — · OPM change 10.2 pp

62% evidence

5.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 3.7% · debt/equity 0.95×

80% evidence

8.5/20Valuation

P/E 180.2× · PEG —

15% evidence

15.0/20Relative strength

RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 8.9% · 1Y 123.4%

100% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Hudbay Minerals Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $2,373 million. Ero Copper Corp. is next at $924 million. Ero Copper Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at 88.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Hudbay Minerals Inc. is the scale leader at $2,373 million, 156.8% ahead of Ero Copper Corp.. Ero Copper Corp.'s growth is 88.6% from a $924 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderHudbay Minerals Inc. · $2,373 million
Gap156.8% versus #2 · Ero Copper Corp.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/6 companies · 114 observations

Investor read: Hudbay Minerals Inc. is the scale benchmark; Ero Copper Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Hudbay Minerals Inc.'s growth falls below Ero Copper Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$2.4B
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO$924M
3Trekor Metals Limited TGB$771M
4Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$4M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Ero Copper Corp. ERO89%
2Trekor Metals Limited TGB28%
3Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM13%
4Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE0.0%
Revenue · company comparison
4/6 level · 4/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$6.2B8.8%Jun 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$4.3B36%Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$757M27%Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$263M110%Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$237M71%Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$1M0.0%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$112M
$135M
$109M
$115M
$86M
$117M
$101M
$105M
$105M
$116M
$106M
$117M
$125M
$123M
$125M
$164M
$177M
$320M
$263M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$6.1B
$6.2B
$6.6B
$5.4B
$5.0B
$5.8B
$5.4B
$5.7B
$5.8B
$5.9B
$6.3B
$6.6B
$6.8B
$5.7B
$5.7B
$7.6B
$7.0B
$5.6B
$6.2B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$359M
$425M
$379M
$415M
$346M
$321M
$295M
$312M
$480M
$602M
$525M
$426M
$486M
$585M
$595M
$536M
$347M
$733M
$757M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$1M
$1M
$7M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$2M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$2.7B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.3B
$2.6B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$2.8B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.4B
$3.9B
$4.3B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$133M
$103M
$118M
$83M
$90M
$101M
$116M
$112M
$144M
$154M
$147M
$138M
$156M
$168M
$139M
$116M
$174M
$244M
$237M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

-5.0%
-23%
-13%
-7.3%
-8.7%
22%
-0.9%
5.0%
11%
19%
6.0%
18%
40%
42%
160%
110%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

-5.8%
-18%
-6.6%
-18%
5.9%
16%
2.6%
17%
15%
17%
-3.1%
-9.4%
14%
2.7%
-1.5%
8.8%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

2.7%
-3.6%
-24%
-22%
-25%
39%
88%
78%
37%
1.3%
-2.8%
13%
26%
-29%
25%
27%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-100%
0.0%
-100%
-86%
-100%
-100%
0.0%
-50%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

-20%
-20%
-0.1%
1.1%
-0.3%
16%
-19%
-6.9%
36%
17%
21%
20%
-2.2%
15%
39%
36%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

-25%
-32%
-1.9%
-1.7%
35%
60%
52%
27%
23%
8.3%
9.1%
-5.4%
-16%
12%
45%
71%
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Southern Copper Corporation has the highest OPM among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 58.3%. Hudbay Minerals Inc. is next at 40.3%. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest Margin change at +414.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Southern Copper Corporation leads opm at 58.3%; Ivanhoe Electric Inc. leads margin change at +414.4 percentage points.

LeaderSouthern Copper Corporation · 58.3%
Gap44.7% versus #2 · Hudbay Minerals Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/6 companies · 96 observations

Investor read: Southern Copper Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Southern Copper Corporation SCCO58%
2Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM40%
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO35%
4Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX34%
5Trekor Metals Limited TGB33%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE+414.4 pp
2Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX+11.6 pp
3Trekor Metals Limited TGB+10.2 pp
4Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM+9.1 pp
5Southern Copper Corporation SCCO+9.1 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
5/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO58%+9.1 ppJun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM40%+9.1 ppMar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO35%+0.6 ppMar 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX34%+11.6 ppJun 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB33%+10.2 ppMar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE-255%+414.4 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

51%
53%
44%
35%
8.1%
30%
23%
20%
21%
25%
12%
13%
29%
37%
34%
29%
22%
44%
35%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

41%
37%
43%
32%
19%
27%
30%
25%
26%
29%
26%
31%
29%
22%
23%
32%
28%
14%
34%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-33%
9.1%
33%
11%
5.9%
7.0%
18%
-0.1%
24%
22%
21%
11%
22%
24%
31%
29%
97%
33%
40%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-255%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

56%
54%
53%
35%
37%
49%
49%
39%
43%
38%
46%
52%
50%
47%
49%
52%
52%
55%
58%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

46%
51%
28%
-46%
-16%
40%
22%
3.2%
35%
35%
14%
37%
14%
1.0%
23%
1.3%
26%
51%
33%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

−24.1 pp
−43.2 pp
−23.1 pp
−21.2 pp
−15.4 pp
+13.1 pp
−4.5 pp
−10.3 pp
−7.4 pp
+7.4 pp
+11.9 pp
+22.0 pp
+16.8 pp
−7.1 pp
+7.2 pp
+0.6 pp

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

−3.9 pp
−21.3 pp
−10.8 pp
−12.8 pp
−7.5 pp
+6.4 pp
+2.6 pp
−3.8 pp
+6.3 pp
+2.9 pp
−7.5 pp
−3.2 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−7.3 pp
+11.6 pp

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

−3.4 pp
+38.7 pp
−2.1 pp
−15.4 pp
−11.2 pp
+18.1 pp
+14.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+10.6 pp
−2.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+9.9 pp
+18.0 pp
+74.9 pp
+9.5 pp
+9.1 pp

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

−12,202.1 pp
−1,774.5 pp
−12,238.4 pp
−5,428.7 pp
+9,357.1 pp
−16,121.9 pp
+13,415.2 pp
−10,117.1 pp
−5,417.2 pp
+13,419.8 pp
+610.6 pp
+12,126.3 pp
+6,862.4 pp
+1,905.5 pp
−2,221.5 pp
+414.4 pp

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

−22.8 pp
−19.7 pp
−5.6 pp
−4.7 pp
+4.1 pp
+6.2 pp
−10.8 pp
−2.7 pp
+12.4 pp
+6.8 pp
+9.2 pp
+3.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.9 pp
+7.5 pp
+9.1 pp

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

−74.4 pp
−62.7 pp
−11.4 pp
−5.3 pp
+49.1 pp
+51.5 pp
−4.8 pp
−8.3 pp
+33.4 pp
−21.1 pp
−33.8 pp
+8.8 pp
−35.3 pp
+11.9 pp
+49.6 pp
+10.2 pp
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Hudbay Minerals Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $657 million. Ero Copper Corp. is next at $296 million. Ero Copper Corp. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Hudbay Minerals Inc. leads with $657 million of TTM profit, 122% above Ero Copper Corp.. Ero Copper Corp. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (1380% uncapped) growth from a $296 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderHudbay Minerals Inc. · $657 million
Gap122% versus #2 · Ero Copper Corp.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/6 companies · 114 observations

Investor read: Hudbay Minerals Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$657M
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO$296M
3Trekor Metals Limited TGB$15M
4Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$-34M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Ero Copper Corp. ERO100%
2Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM100%
Net profit · company comparison
4/6 level · 2/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$1.6B67%Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$1.4B75%Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$192M94%Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$109M35%Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$42M-300%Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$17M-253%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$26M
$60M
$52M
$24M
$4M
$22M
$25M
$30M
$3M
$37M
$-7M
$-53M
$41M
$-49M
$81M
$71M
$37M
$79M
$109M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$1.7B
$1.4B
$1.9B
$1.0B
$560M
$977M
$1.0B
$731M
$964M
$1.0B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$721M
$793M
$1.5B
$1.2B
$565M
$1.4B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$-170M
$-10M
$64M
$32M
$-8M
$-17M
$5M
$-15M
$45M
$33M
$19M
$-20M
$50M
$19M
$99M
$115M
$222M
$128M
$192M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$-18M
$-26M
$-15M
$-54M
$-40M
$-40M
$-36M
$-38M
$-78M
$-47M
$-56M
$-47M
$-43M
$17M
$-31M
$-24M
$-18M
$-34M
$42M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$871M
$836M
$788M
$434M
$521M
$905M
$816M
$550M
$622M
$447M
$739M
$954M
$900M
$796M
$949M
$977M
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.6B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$22M
$12M
$5M
$-5M
$-24M
$-2M
$34M
$10M
$1M
$38M
$19M
$-11M
$0M
$-21M
$-29M
$22M
$-28M
$4M
$17M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

-71%
-85%
-63%
-52%
25%
-25%
68%
-128%
-277%
1,267%
-232%
-9.8%
35%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

-22%
-68%
-28%
-45%
-30%
72%
3.1%
11%
75%
28%
-28%
-32%
21%
0.9%
-22%
75%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-92%
-147%
280%
11%
-42%
421%
344%
574%
94%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-300%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

-54%
-40%
8.3%
3.6%
27%
19%
-51%
-9.4%
73%
45%
78%
28%
2.4%
23%
65%
67%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

-138%
-209%
-117%
580%
-44%
-210%
-100%
-155%
-253%
04 · compare level, then change

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. has the highest CAPEX among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $1,104 million. Southern Copper Corporation is next at $423 million. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest CAPEX intensity at 100%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reports $1,104 million of CAPEX; Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest covered intensity at 100%. Coverage is only 6 of 6 companies and 116 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.

LeaderFreeport-McMoRan Inc. · $1,104 million
Gap161% versus #2 · Southern Copper Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 116 observations

Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.

This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$1.1B
2Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$423M
3Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$140M
4Trekor Metals Limited TGB$87M
5Ero Copper Corp. ERO$61M
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE100%
2Trekor Metals Limited TGB37%
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO23%
4Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM19%
5Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX16%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyCAPEXCAPEX intensityReported
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$1.1B16%Jun 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$423M10%Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$140M19%Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$87M37%Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$61M23%Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$1M100%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

CAPEX · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$62M
$58M
$55M
$58M
$95M
$87M
$86M
$127M
$121M
$126M
$108M
$75M
$78M
$77M
$60M
$71M
$77M
$75M
$61M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$541M
$771M
$723M
$863M
$836M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.1B
$1.0B
$973M
$1.1B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$87M
$103M
$52M
$79M
$90M
$89M
$65M
$66M
$69M
$81M
$62M
$90M
$98M
$97M
$91M
$122M
$110M
$143M
$140M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$1M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$8M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$2M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$1M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$243M
$197M
$205M
$225M
$228M
$291M
$238M
$253M
$263M
$255M
$214M
$332M
$246M
$235M
$318M
$236M
$349M
$423M
$442M
$423M

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$35M
$35M
$43M
$51M
$46M
$42M
$35M
$46M
$33M
$59M
$53M
$72M
$78M
$115M
$132M
$127M
$84M
$84M
$87M

CAPEX intensity · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

55%
43%
51%
50%
111%
74%
85%
121%
115%
109%
102%
64%
62%
63%
48%
43%
44%
23%
23%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

8.9%
13%
11%
16%
17%
18%
21%
20%
20%
23%
20%
17%
18%
22%
21%
17%
15%
18%
16%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

24%
24%
14%
19%
26%
28%
22%
21%
14%
14%
12%
21%
20%
17%
15%
23%
32%
20%
19%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

100%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
200%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
100%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

9.1%
7.0%
7.4%
9.8%
11%
10%
8.5%
11%
11%
11%
8.2%
11%
8.4%
8.4%
10%
7.7%
10%
11%
10%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

26%
34%
36%
61%
51%
42%
30%
41%
23%
38%
36%
52%
50%
69%
95%
110%
48%
34%
37%
Annual capital allocation · 5-year view
6/6 capacity base · 6/6 OCF · 6/6 CAPEX · 6/6 FCF

Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.

Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history

Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$477M
$771M
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.6B

Operating cash flow · fiscal-year history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$365M
$143M
$163M
$145M
$395M

CAPEX · reported cash flow · fiscal-year history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$182M
$296M
$461M
$338M
$282M

Free cash flow · fiscal-year history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$183M
$-152M
$-298M
$-192M
$113M
05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the lowest Gross debt among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at $35 million. Ero Copper Corp. is next at $603 million. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at $257 million net cash. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with $257 million net cash and gross debt of $35 million. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderIvanhoe Electric Inc. · $35 million
Gap94.2% versus #2 · Ero Copper Corp.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 116 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$35M
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO$603M
3Trekor Metals Limited TGB$774M
4Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$1.1B
5Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$8.5B
Net debtlowest net debt
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$-257M
2Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$61M
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO$512M
4Trekor Metals Limited TGB$605M
5Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$1.2B
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX$10.4B$6.3BJun 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$8.5B$1.2BJun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$1.1B$61MMar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$774M$605MMar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$603M$512MMar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$35M$-257MMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$61M
$66M
$419M
$427M
$418M
$429M
$423M
$442M
$432M
$446M
$486M
$545M
$559M
$620M
$665M
$653M
$638M
$632M
$603M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$9.7B
$9.5B
$9.6B
$11.1B
$10.7B
$10.6B
$9.6B
$9.5B
$9.4B
$9.4B
$9.4B
$9.4B
$9.7B
$9.6B
$9.4B
$9.3B
$9.3B
$10.4B
$10.4B
$10.4B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$79M
$79M
$26M
$26M
$27M
$27M
$28M
$111M
$114M
$79M
$81M
$84M
$85M
$70M
$71M
$73M
$74M
$36M
$35M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$7.5B
$7.5B
$7.4B
$7.4B
$7.4B
$7.1B
$7.1B
$7.1B
$7.0B
$7.0B
$7.0B
$7.0B
$7.0B
$7.0B
$8.0B
$7.4B
$7.4B
$1.6B
$7.4B
$8.5B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$540M
$532M
$520M
$532M
$563M
$587M
$609M
$602M
$639M
$638M
$653M
$754M
$742M
$797M
$793M
$838M
$882M
$760M
$774M

Net debt · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

$-58M
$-64M
$-46M
$-3M
$58M
$112M
$186M
$262M
$344M
$334M
$434M
$500M
$539M
$570M
$584M
$585M
$572M
$527M
$512M

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

$2.0B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$2.1B
$2.5B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$3.7B
$4.7B
$4.2B
$4.2B
$4.7B
$5.7B
$5.0B
$4.8B
$5.0B
$6.6B
$6.7B
$6.3B

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

$954M
$987M
$1.0B
$994M
$963M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$718M
$694M
$600M
$601M
$511M
$497M
$496M
$61M

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

$29M
$29M
$-198M
$-198M
$-151M
$-113M
$-79M
$47M
$-135M
$-126M
$-98M
$-50M
$-2M
$25M
$-30M
$-16M
$1M
$-140M
$-257M

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

$4.3B
$4.0B
$4.2B
$5.1B
$5.2B
$4.8B
$4.6B
$4.9B
$4.8B
$5.3B
$5.4B
$4.8B
$4.0B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.4B
$2.9B
$-3.3B
$2.1B
$1.2B

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

$301M
$295M
$307M
$356M
$421M
$466M
$507M
$516M
$557M
$542M
$495M
$555M
$533M
$624M
$672M
$716M
$791M
$572M
$605M
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 21%. Southern Copper Corporation is next at 13%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +27.8 percentage points. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Ivanhoe Electric Inc. leads ROCE at 21%, 8 percentage points above Southern Copper Corporation. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +27.8 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderIvanhoe Electric Inc. · 21%
Gap61.5% versus #2 · Southern Copper Corporation
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 116 observations

Investor read: Ivanhoe Electric Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE21%
2Southern Copper Corporation SCCO13%
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO5.6%
4Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM5.6%
5Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX3.9%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE+27.8 pp
2Southern Copper Corporation SCCO+3.7 pp
3Ero Copper Corp. ERO+2.5 pp
4Trekor Metals Limited TGB+2.0 pp
5Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM+1.8 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE21%+27.8 ppMar 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO13%+3.7 ppJun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM5.6%+1.8 ppMar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO5.6%+2.5 ppMar 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX3.9%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB3.7%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

14%
15%
6.4%
5.2%
0.9%
4.2%
2.1%
1.9%
2.1%
2.4%
1.1%
1.2%
2.9%
3.5%
3.1%
3.4%
2.6%
9.7%
5.6%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

6.2%
5.7%
6.9%
4.1%
2.3%
3.5%
3.6%
3.1%
3.3%
3.8%
3.5%
4.3%
4.0%
2.6%
2.7%
4.9%
3.9%
1.6%
4.1%
3.9%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

-2.8%
0.9%
3.1%
1.1%
0.5%
0.6%
1.3%
0.0%
2.7%
3.0%
2.6%
0.9%
2.2%
2.8%
3.8%
3.2%
6.8%
4.9%
5.6%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

-16%
-20%
-11%
-19%
-22%
-25%
-15%
-17%
-13%
-14%
-18%
-16%
-10%
-7.5%
-6.8%
-6.8%
-7.2%
-9.7%
21%

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

9.6%
9.7%
9.2%
5.1%
4.9%
8.5%
8.4%
5.7%
6.8%
5.5%
7.5%
10%
9.1%
8.2%
9.2%
9.3%
10%
14%
13%
13%

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

6.6%
5.5%
3.2%
-3.6%
-1.4%
3.5%
2.2%
0.3%
4.1%
4.1%
1.4%
3.3%
1.4%
0.1%
1.7%
0.1%
2.3%
5.8%
3.7%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

−12.7 pp
−10.4 pp
−4.3 pp
−3.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+2.5 pp

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

−3.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.0 pp

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

+3.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.1 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.8 pp

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

−5.2 pp
−4.8 pp
−3.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+8.9 pp
+10.8 pp
−3.4 pp
+1.2 pp
+2.2 pp
+6.2 pp
+11.2 pp
+8.8 pp
+3.2 pp
−2.2 pp
+27.8 pp

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

−4.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.9 pp
−3.0 pp
−0.9 pp
+4.4 pp
+2.3 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+5.4 pp
+3.9 pp
+3.7 pp

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

−8.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.9 pp
+5.5 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.0 pp
−2.7 pp
−4.0 pp
+0.3 pp
−3.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+5.7 pp
+2.0 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 0.18×. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. has the lowest P/E at 6.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ero Copper Corp. has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.18×. Only 1 of 6 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderEro Copper Corp. · 0.18×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/6 companies · 12 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Ero Copper Corp. ERO0.2
P/Elowest P/E
1Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE6.1
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO9.5
3Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM12.6
4Southern Copper Corporation SCCO25.8
5Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX31.0
Valuation · company comparison
1/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO0.825.8Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX0.631.0Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM12.6Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO9.5Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB180.2Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE6.1Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

4.4
2.0
0.6

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

2.1
4.1
2.2
0.5
0.4
0.7
1.1
1.1
0.8

P/E · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

8.0
6.9
6.1
4.8
7.3
12.5
22.1
23.5
20.3
16.1
29.7
130.9
71.2
12.3
15.2
11.2
9.5

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

12.4
14.4
14.4
8.9
10.4
15.9
22.9
27.6
25.2
33.3
41.6
36.8
36.4
29.3
31.3
32.8
27.6
33.4
31.3
31.0

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

13.4
18.7
87.3
97.2
25.0
29.2
36.2
36.8
40.7
19.4
14.6
13.1
13.8
12.6

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

4.9
4.3
6.4
5.8
8.0
6.1

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

14.3
14.1
17.1
13.2
13.5
17.2
23.1
20.8
20.9
26.4
34.3
29.9
29.3
20.7
20.5
22.4
25.8
27.2
28.8
25.8

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

21.6
20.0
15.2
11.8
47.5
12.1
6.6
12.5
20.9
21.4
180.2
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

Hudbay Minerals Inc. has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 6 Copper companies compared here, at 6.01×. Ero Copper Corp. is next at 7.24×. The same company also holds the lowest P/BV, at 2.35×. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its EV/EBITDA series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Hudbay Minerals Inc. leads both ev/ebitda at 6.01× and p/bv at 2.35×.

LeaderHudbay Minerals Inc. · 6.01×
Gap17% versus #2 · Ero Copper Corp.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 98 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM6.0
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO7.2
3Trekor Metals Limited TGB10.8
4Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX12.0
5Southern Copper Corporation SCCO14.9
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM2.4
2Ero Copper Corp. ERO2.5
3Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE3.5
4Trekor Metals Limited TGB4.0
5Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX4.5
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE123.63.5Mar 2026
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO14.911.5Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCX12.04.5Jun 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB10.84.0Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO7.22.5Mar 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM6.02.4Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

5.2
4.1
4.3
2.8
4.8
7.3
10.8
14.1
11.2
11.0
13.8
15.8
15.4
10.0
8.3
9.1
9.9
9.0
7.2

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

6.1
6.9
7.1
4.6
5.1
7.3
9.2
9.4
8.4
9.2
9.7
9.4
9.1
7.9
8.2
8.6
7.9
10.4
10.7
12.0

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

7.3
7.6
6.7
4.7
3.5
4.2
5.1
7.3
5.6
4.6
4.6
5.2
5.4
4.7
4.1
4.7
5.3
6.2
6.0

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

123.6

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

8.5
7.5
9.0
7.1
7.4
9.9
12.4
11.6
11.4
14.3
18.1
16.0
16.1
11.3
11.6
12.6
14.4
14.4
16.4
14.9

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

5.6
4.7
4.7
4.5
9.6
14.4
18.2
10.1
6.0
5.7
7.1
6.6
7.3
8.0
8.6
13.1
14.4
10.9
10.8

P/BV · reported quarter history

Ero Copper Corp. · ERO

4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
2.1
2.4
2.8
2.9
2.5
2.0
2.6
3.4
3.2
2.4
1.8
2.1
2.4
3.2
2.5

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · FCX

3.6
4.4
4.9
2.8
2.6
3.5
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.7
4.0
4.0
4.1
3.1
3.1
3.4
3.0
3.9
4.3
4.5

Hudbay Minerals Inc. · HBM

1.1
1.3
1.3
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.1
1.5
2.0
2.4
2.4

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. · IE

2.9
3.1
5.5
6.4
7.6
3.6
2.8
3.6
3.9
4.1
3.4
2.5
4.1
6.0
5.6
3.5

Southern Copper Corporation · SCCO

5.4
5.9
7.2
5.1
4.6
5.8
7.3
7.0
7.5
8.9
10.9
9.9
10.3
7.5
7.8
8.2
9.4
10.6
12.1
11.5

Trekor Metals Limited · TGB

2.0
2.1
2.3
1.1
1.3
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.8
2.1
2.1
1.7
2.0
2.4
3.4
3.6
4.0
09 · let price answer last

Market action

Hudbay Minerals Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Copper at +140.4%. Trekor Metals Limited leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +8.9%. 4 of 6 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Copper comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 6 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 6 companies in the canonical Copper membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentals
Southern Copper Corporation SCCO$149.3B$1792026-07-28Jun 2026
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. FCXAHEAD$88.6B$61.62026-07-28Jun 2026
Hudbay Minerals Inc. HBM$9.7B$21.82026-07-28Mar 2026
Ero Copper Corp. ERO$2.7B$25.62026-07-28Mar 2026
Trekor Metals Limited TGB$2.5B$6.92026-07-28Mar 2026
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. IE$1.4B$9.12026-07-28Mar 2026
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 6 Copper companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Copper company comparison FAQs

These 18 answers restate the Copper comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 6 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Which Copper company is the biggest?

Hudbay Minerals Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $2,373 million, ahead of Ero Copper Corp. at $924 million. That covers 4 of 6 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Copper company is growing fastest?

Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest revenue growth at 88.6% year on year, across 4 of 6 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Copper company has the best profit margins?

Southern Copper Corporation has the highest operating margin at 58.3%, from 5 of 6 comparable companies. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +414.4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Copper company makes the most profit?

Hudbay Minerals Inc. earns the most, at $657 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 4 of 6 comparable companies. Ero Copper Corp. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Copper company earns the highest return on capital?

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 21%, across 6 of 6 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Copper stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Ero Copper Corp. screens cheapest at 0.18×. Only 1 of 6 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Copper company has the strongest balance sheet?

Ivanhoe Electric Inc. carries the lowest comparable gross debt at $35 million, from 6 of 6 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Copper company is investing most in new capacity?

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reports the largest capital spending at $1,104 million, across 6 of 6 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.

Is the Copper sector beating the market?

Copper has outperformed S&P 500 by 55.4% over the last 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 6 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Copper stock has the strongest price momentum?

Trekor Metals Limited has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Copper company scores highest for research priority?

Southern Copper Corporation scores 64 out of 100 with 58.7% evidence confidence, from 21.5 points on growth and earnings, 15.6 on capital efficiency, 9.7 on valuation and 17.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Copper companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 6 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 5 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Copper sector?

The 6 Copper companies on this page carry $254,251 million of combined market value. Southern Copper Corporation is the largest at $149,311 million, about 59% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.

What is the Copper sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 6 Copper companies on this page is 25.8×, measured on the 6 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.

How is the Copper sector performing?

4 of the 6 covered Copper companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 55.4% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.

How many Copper stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 6 listed Copper companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI