Steel - Tubes/Pipes: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty Steel - Tubes/Pipes Index — Constituents & Performance
The Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies below are the listed Indian Steel - Tubes/Pipes universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Steel - Tubes/Pipes index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has Steel - Tubes/Pipes moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 2% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 2% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 17 weeks running.
FADING · −5 in 4w~Moving with the index4 of 14 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months
Steel - Tubes/Pipes, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyNarrowHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together4 of 14 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +9 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large0/3−1
Mid3/5−2
Small1/6−2
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 14 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Steel - Tubes/Pipes outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of Steel - Tubes/Pipes against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 9 of 15 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. DEE Development Engineers Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +82.1%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
9/15Stocks leading NIFTY 500
5/14Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 37.9 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 9 of 15 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. APL Apollo Tubes Ltd leads with revenue of ₹22,627 crore, based on 15 of 15 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 60.4%, across 15 of 15 comparable companies.
Is the Steel - Tubes/Pipes sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 9 of 15 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company is largest by revenue?
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd leads with revenue of ₹22,627 crore, based on 15 of 15 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company is growing fastest?
Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 60.4%, across 15 of 15 comparable companies.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd ranks first at 67.6/100 with 72.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company reports the most CAPEX?
DEE Development Engineers Ltd reports the largest latest CAPEX at ₹45 crore, with 5 of 15 companies comparable.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company has the least gross debt?
Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore. Goodluck India Ltd has the highest at ₹1,119 crore.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Man Industries (India) Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.2, among 7 of 15 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Steel - Tubes/Pipes comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
15
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹95.6K Cr
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd
Revenue growing
14/15
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
9/15
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 72.6% evidence confidence.
Maharashtra Seamless Ltd looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Venus Pipes & Tubes Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -16.1% and the one-year return is 7.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 7.3% · PAT -49.3% · OPM change -2.4 pp
83% evidence
6.5/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 5.6% · debt/equity 0.27×
95% evidence
8.3/20Valuation
P/E 55.4× · PEG —
50% evidence
3.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -48.6% · RS bench -45.8% · 1Y -63.5%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at ₹22,627 crore. Surya Roshni Ltd is next at ₹7,540 crore. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 60.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd is the scale leader at ₹22,627 crore, 200.1% ahead of Surya Roshni Ltd. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd's growth is 60.4% from a ₹2,413 crore base, with 8 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderAPL Apollo Tubes Ltd · ₹22,627 crore
Gap200.1% versus #2 · Surya Roshni Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 229 observations
Investor read: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd is the scale benchmark; Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd's growth falls below Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd has the highest OPM among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at 41.3%. DEE Development Engineers Ltd is next at 18%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +4.3 percentage points. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd leads both opm at 41.3% and margin change at +4.3 percentage points.
LeaderGandhi Special Tubes Ltd · 41.3%
Gap129.4% versus #2 · DEE Development Engineers Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 260 observations
Investor read: Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified41%
2DEE Development Engineers Ltd DEEDEV18%
3Maharashtra Seamless Ltd MAHSEAMLES18%
4Venus Pipes & Tubes Ltd VENUSPIPES16%
5Scoda Tubes Ltd SCODATUBES⚠ unverified14%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified+4.3 pp
2JTL Industries Ltd JTLIND+4.0 pp
3Welspun Specialty Solutions Ltd WELSPLSOL+3.3 pp
4Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd SAMBHV+3.0 pp
5Goodluck India Ltd GOODLUCK+2.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
15/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at ₹1,203 crore. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd is next at ₹701 crore. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd leads with ₹1,203 crore of TTM profit, 71.6% above Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (195.8% uncapped) growth from a ₹142 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderAPL Apollo Tubes Ltd · ₹1,203 crore
Gap71.6% versus #2 · Maharashtra Seamless Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 229 observations
Investor read: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
DEE Development Engineers Ltd has the highest CAPEX among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at ₹45 crore. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd is next at ₹33 crore. The same company also holds the highest CAPEX intensity, at 18.5%. 5 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: DEE Development Engineers Ltd reports ₹45 crore of CAPEX; DEE Development Engineers Ltd has the highest covered intensity at 18.5%. Coverage is only 5 of 15 companies and 11 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderDEE Development Engineers Ltd · ₹45 crore
Gap36.4% versus #2 · Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd
Persistence2/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/15 companies · 11 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Maharashtra Seamless Ltd (MAHSEAMLES) — its two data sources disagree by up to 29% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at ₹0 crore. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd is next at ₹13 crore. APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹388 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹388 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹498 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderGandhi Special Tubes Ltd · ₹0 crore
Gap100% versus #2 · Maharashtra Seamless Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 243 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified₹0 Cr
5Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified₹-11 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
15/15 level · 14/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at 31.6%. Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd is next at 28.4%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +6 percentage points. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd leads ROCE at 31.6%, 3.2 percentage points above Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd. APL Apollo Tubes Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderAPL Apollo Tubes Ltd · 31.6%
Gap11.3% versus #2 · Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 189 observations
Investor read: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1APL Apollo Tubes Ltd APLAPOLLO32%
2Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified28%
3Venus Pipes & Tubes Ltd VENUSPIPES23%
4Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd SAMBHV19%
5Scoda Tubes Ltd SCODATUBES⚠ unverified17%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1APL Apollo Tubes Ltd APLAPOLLO+6.0 pp
2DEE Development Engineers Ltd DEEDEV+4.7 pp
3Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd SAMBHV+4.6 pp
4Goodluck India Ltd GOODLUCK+0.9 pp
5Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified+0.8 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
15/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Maharashtra Seamless Ltd (MAHSEAMLES) — its two data sources disagree by up to 29% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Man Industries (India) Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at 0.2×. Goodluck India Ltd is next at 0.51×. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd has the lowest P/E at 10.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Man Industries (India) Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.2×, 60.8% below Goodluck India Ltd. Only 7 of 15 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderMan Industries (India) Ltd · 0.2×
Gap60.8% versus #2 · Goodluck India Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/15 companies · 47 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
4Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd GANDHITUBE⚠ unverified18.2
5Hi-Tech Pipes Ltd HITECH⚠ unverified22.6
Valuation · company comparison
7/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Man Industries (India) Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies compared here, at 5.7×. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd is next at 6.3×. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 1.12×, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 15 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Man Industries (India) Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 5.7×; Maharashtra Seamless Ltd leads p/bv at 1.12×.
LeaderMan Industries (India) Ltd · 5.7×
Gap9.5% versus #2 · Maharashtra Seamless Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage15/15 companies · 234 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
15/15 level · 15/15 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 15 companies with a series here. The remaining 3 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
DEE Development Engineers Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Steel - Tubes/Pipes at +126.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +100.3%. 9 of 15 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Steel - Tubes/Pipes comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 15 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 5 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
5 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 15 companies in the canonical Steel - Tubes/Pipes membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
How each company's sources stand: 5 of 15 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear. 1 of 15 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Maharashtra Seamless Ltd (MAHSEAMLES) — its two data sources disagree by up to 29% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
These 18 answers restate the Steel - Tubes/Pipes comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 15 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty Steel - Tubes/Pipes index?
The Nifty Steel - Tubes/Pipes index tracks India's listed Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 15 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Steel - Tubes/Pipes sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Steel - Tubes/Pipes stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd places first among 15 listed Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies, followed by DEE Development Engineers Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Steel - Tubes/Pipes stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 15 listed Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company is the biggest?
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹22,627 crore, ahead of Surya Roshni Ltd at ₹7,540 crore. That covers 15 of 15 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company is growing fastest?
Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 60.4% year on year, across 15 of 15 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company has the best profit margins?
Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd has the highest operating margin at 41.3%, from 15 of 15 comparable companies. Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4.3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company makes the most profit?
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd earns the most, at ₹1,203 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 15 of 15 comparable companies. Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 195.8%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company earns the highest return on capital?
APL Apollo Tubes Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 31.6%, across 15 of 15 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Man Industries (India) Ltd screens cheapest at 0.2×. Only 7 of 15 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company has the strongest balance sheet?
Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore, from 15 of 15 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes stock has the strongest price momentum?
DEE Development Engineers Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Steel - Tubes/Pipes company scores highest for research priority?
Sambhv Steel Tubes Ltd scores 67.6 out of 100 with 72.6% evidence confidence, from 30.6 points on growth and earnings, 17 on capital efficiency, 10 on valuation and 10 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 15 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Steel - Tubes/Pipes sector?
The 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies on this page carry ₹95,634 crore of combined market value. APL Apollo Tubes Ltd is the largest at ₹50,612 crore, about 53% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
What is the Steel - Tubes/Pipes sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 15 Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies on this page is 23.6×, measured on the 15 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.
How is the Steel - Tubes/Pipes sector performing?
9 of the 15 covered Steel - Tubes/Pipes companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.