Is the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products Stocks in India
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products: Apcotex Industries Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products Index — Constituents & Performance
The Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies below are the listed Indian Rubber Processing/Rubber Products universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has Rubber Processing/Rubber Products moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 4% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 12% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 22 weeks running.
LEADER · ahead 22w⚠Moving with the index3 of 4 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months
RS ↑22w · 4/4 >200d (+0) · 3/4 lead (+0) · EPS 1/3↑
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Strength anatomy
Broad but lateHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 4 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +8 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large
1/10
Mid
2/20
Small
0/10
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 4 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Rubber Processing/Rubber Products outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of Rubber Processing/Rubber Products against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 3 of 4 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Apcotex Industries Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +7.2%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/4Stocks leading NIFTY 500
2/4Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 28.1 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Apcotex Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹1,442 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 14.4%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is largest by revenue?
Apcotex Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹1,442 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is growing fastest?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 14.4%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Apcotex Industries Ltd ranks first at 72.2/100 with 79.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the least gross debt?
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹24 crore. GRP Ltd has the highest at ₹208 crore.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.34, among 1 of 4 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
4
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹8.4K Cr
Apcotex Industries Ltd
Revenue growing
3/4
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/4
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.8% evidence confidence.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
1. Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND
72.2/100 · Favorable setup · 80% evidence
Exact sum: 26.9 + 20.9 + 7 + 17.4 = 72.2
Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
26.9/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 3.6% · PAT 83.6% · OPM change 2.7 pp
83% evidence
20.9/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 19.8% · debt/equity 0.15×
95% evidence
7.0/20Valuation
P/E 77.6× · PEG —
35% evidence
17.4/20Relative strength
RS sector 7.2% · RS bench 28% · 1Y 34.5%
100% evidence
2. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR
71.6/100 · Favorable setup · 84% evidence
Exact sum: 26.6 + 19.4 + 9 + 16.6 = 71.6
Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
26.6/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 14.4% · PAT 43.2% · OPM change 6 pp
95% evidence
19.4/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 22.3% · debt/equity 0.43×
95% evidence
9.0/20Valuation
P/E 32.1× · PEG —
35% evidence
16.6/20Relative strength
RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 21.3% · 1Y 0%
100% evidence
3. Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
51.4/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 93% evidence
Exact sum: 4.8 + 23.5 + 12.8 + 10.3 = 51.4
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4.8/35Growth & earnings
Revenue -1.7% · PAT -5.3% · OPM change -3 pp
88% evidence
23.5/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 21.7% · debt/equity 0.03×
100% evidence
12.8/20Valuation
P/E 22.6× · PEG 0.34
85% evidence
10.3/20Relative strength
RS sector -0.3% · RS bench 19.7% · 1Y 17.2%
100% evidence
4. GRP Ltd · GRPLTD
34.4/100 · Adverse evidence · 71% evidence
Exact sum: 10.9 + 8.1 + 10 + 5.4 = 34.4
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10.9/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 3.7% · PAT -79.8% · OPM change 2.8 pp
95% evidence
8.1/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 6.9% · debt/equity 1.17×
95% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E 156× · PEG —
0% evidence
5.4/20Relative strength
RS sector -3.1% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y -23.7%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at ₹1,442 crore. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at ₹583 crore. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 14.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Apcotex Industries Ltd is the scale leader at ₹1,442 crore, 147.3% ahead of Pix Transmission Ltd. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd's growth is 14.4% from a ₹572 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderApcotex Industries Ltd · ₹1,442 crore
Gap147.3% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 68 observations
Investor read: Apcotex Industries Ltd is the scale benchmark; Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Apcotex Industries Ltd's growth falls below Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified₹1.4K Cr
2Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS₹583 Cr
3Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified₹572 Cr
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified₹568 Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified14%
2GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified3.7%
3Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified3.6%
4Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS-1.7%
Revenue · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | ₹398 Cr | 14% | Mar 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | ₹171 Cr | 4.9% | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹157 Cr | 27% | Jun 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | ₹156 Cr | 20% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹243 Cr
₹251 Cr
₹277 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹234 Cr
₹256 Cr
₹278 Cr
₹279 Cr
₹257 Cr
₹311 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹351 Cr
₹355 Cr
₹349 Cr
₹376 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹331 Cr
₹398 Cr
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹114 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹138 Cr
₹126 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹124 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹145 Cr
₹157 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹122 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹120 Cr
₹119 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹134 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹124 Cr
₹128 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹140 Cr
₹163 Cr
₹122 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹151 Cr
₹171 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹75 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹93 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹136 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹123 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹120 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹157 Cr
₹156 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
65%
16%
-6.8%
-7.6%
-9.2%
-1.4%
9.8%
21%
21%
26%
38%
12%
12%
-4.0%
-6.8%
14%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-4.0%
44%
27%
15%
21%
16%
-1.9%
0.5%
1.9%
-9.9%
27%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
17%
-2.5%
-1.8%
22%
-6.7%
4.2%
14%
-3.7%
16%
29%
9.4%
26%
-6.2%
-13%
7.9%
4.9%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
24%
51%
70%
48%
32%
17%
-4.4%
1.7%
13%
22%
20%
02 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest OPM among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 22%. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at 18%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +6 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads both opm at 22% and margin change at +6 percentage points.
LeaderTinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · 22%
Gap22.2% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations
Investor read: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified22%
2Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS18%
3Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified11%
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified11%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified+6.0 pp
2GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified+2.8 pp
3Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified+2.7 pp
4Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS−3.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | 22% | +6.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 18% | −3.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | 11% | +2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | 11% | +2.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
12%
12%
15%
15%
15%
12%
12%
6.5%
8.5%
6.7%
7.6%
6.5%
4.8%
4.6%
8.1%
7.3%
8.5%
9.4%
11%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
5.4%
6.0%
7.2%
4.9%
5.1%
6.0%
6.1%
6.6%
9.7%
9.5%
16%
10%
7.4%
9.6%
20%
8.0%
8.0%
8.0%
6.2%
11%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
27%
26%
22%
21%
20%
20%
24%
23%
25%
25%
24%
27%
32%
24%
21%
23%
25%
29%
18%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
18%
13%
15%
14%
14%
11%
10%
15%
16%
17%
20%
18%
16%
12%
14%
16%
18%
16%
18%
22%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
+3.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−8.1 pp
−6.1 pp
−4.8 pp
−4.2 pp
0.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+3.7 pp
+4.8 pp
+2.7 pp
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
−1.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+4.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+10.4 pp
+3.6 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+4.0 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.6 pp
−14.3 pp
+2.8 pp
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
−4.8 pp
−1.4 pp
−6.6 pp
−5.7 pp
−7.1 pp
−5.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.1 pp
+4.9 pp
+5.0 pp
0.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+7.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+5.0 pp
−3.0 pp
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
+4.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−3.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−2.5 pp
−5.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+6.0 pp
+10.0 pp
+3.0 pp
0.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+6.0 pp
03 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Pix Transmission Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at ₹107 crore. Apcotex Industries Ltd is next at ₹101 crore. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 83.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd leads with ₹107 crore of TTM profit, 5.9% above Apcotex Industries Ltd. Apcotex Industries Ltd shows 83.6% growth from a ₹101 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · ₹107 crore
Gap5.9% versus #2 · Apcotex Industries Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 68 observations
Investor read: Pix Transmission Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS₹107 Cr
2Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified₹101 Cr
3Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified₹63 Cr
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified₹6 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified84%
2Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified43%
3Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS-5.3%
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified-80%
Net profit · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | ₹35 Cr | 106% | Mar 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | ₹21 Cr | 75% | Jun 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | ₹20 Cr | -13% | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹4 Cr | 140% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹22 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹35 Cr
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹4 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹4 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹20 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹20 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
₹5 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹21 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
55%
41%
-17%
-26%
-65%
-52%
-45%
-35%
25%
-27%
9.1%
13%
27%
127%
83%
106%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.1%
324%
122%
-46%
1.6%
67%
-60%
-22%
-81%
-107%
140%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
13%
-20%
-29%
27%
-11%
31%
83%
26%
69%
95%
0.0%
-4.2%
3.7%
-41%
59%
-13%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
100%
129%
129%
50%
-20%
-25%
-25%
0.0%
63%
42%
75%
04 · not available
Capacity Spending & Returns On It
No company in this Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison reports capital expenditure on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 4 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Jun 2026.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
05 · compare level, then change
Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at ₹24 crore. Apcotex Industries Ltd is next at ₹96 crore. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at ₹281 crore net cash. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹281 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹24 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · ₹24 crore
Gap75% versus #2 · Apcotex Industries Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS₹24 Cr
2Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified₹96 Cr
3Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified₹129 Cr
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified₹208 Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS₹-281 Cr
2Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified₹42 Cr
3Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified₹125 Cr
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified₹194 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Gross debt | Net debt | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹208 Cr | ₹194 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | ₹129 Cr | ₹125 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | ₹96 Cr | ₹42 Cr | Mar 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | ₹24 Cr | ₹-281 Cr | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Gross debt · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹36 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹142 Cr
₹142 Cr
₹152 Cr
₹152 Cr
₹190 Cr
₹190 Cr
₹188 Cr
₹188 Cr
₹214 Cr
₹214 Cr
₹189 Cr
₹189 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹96 Cr
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
₹80 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹101 Cr
₹101 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹89 Cr
₹89 Cr
₹95 Cr
₹95 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹147 Cr
₹147 Cr
₹204 Cr
₹204 Cr
₹208 Cr
₹208 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹105 Cr
₹105 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹72 Cr
₹68 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹24 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
₹54 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹104 Cr
₹105 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹129 Cr
Net debt · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹122 Cr
₹122 Cr
₹156 Cr
₹156 Cr
₹150 Cr
₹150 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹140 Cr
₹140 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹42 Cr
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
₹67 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹79 Cr
₹79 Cr
₹111 Cr
₹111 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹144 Cr
₹144 Cr
₹180 Cr
₹180 Cr
₹194 Cr
₹194 Cr
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
₹67 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹88 Cr
₹88 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹-45 Cr
₹-45 Cr
₹-81 Cr
₹-81 Cr
₹-138 Cr
₹-138 Cr
₹-159 Cr
₹-159 Cr
₹-227 Cr
₹-227 Cr
₹-281 Cr
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
₹53 Cr
₹53 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹127 Cr
₹127 Cr
₹95 Cr
₹95 Cr
₹125 Cr
₹125 Cr
06 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 22.3%. Pix Transmission Ltd is next at 21.7%. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads ROCE at 22.3%, 0.6 percentage points above Pix Transmission Ltd. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderTinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · 22.3%
Gap2.8% versus #2 · Pix Transmission Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 57 observations
Investor read: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified22%
2Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS22%
3Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified20%
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified6.9%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified+6.0 pp
2Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified−0.6 pp
3Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS−4.2 pp
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified−11.6 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | 31% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | 19% | +6.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 17% | −4.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | 11% | −11.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
27%
—
29%
—
28%
—
23%
—
16%
—
13%
—
12%
—
13%
—
15%
—
19%
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
5.6%
—
2.8%
—
3.4%
—
4.5%
—
7.9%
14%
17%
22%
18%
21%
19%
22%
16%
19%
9.1%
11%
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
25%
—
21%
—
18%
—
14%
—
15%
22%
19%
24%
21%
27%
21%
25%
17%
22%
17%
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
20%
—
25%
—
26%
—
23%
—
25%
38%
31%
47%
36%
46%
26%
32%
20%
28%
23%
31%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
—
−5.8 pp
—
−12.8 pp
—
−10.3 pp
—
−3.5 pp
—
+0.2 pp
—
+3.1 pp
—
+6.0 pp
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
−2.2 pp
—
+1.7 pp
—
+4.5 pp
—
+12.2 pp
—
+10.1 pp
+7.7 pp
+2.7 pp
+0.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−10.3 pp
−11.6 pp
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
—
−7.2 pp
—
−6.6 pp
—
−2.7 pp
—
+4.5 pp
—
+6.1 pp
+4.9 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−5.0 pp
−4.2 pp
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
+5.9 pp
—
−1.7 pp
—
−0.7 pp
—
+8.1 pp
—
+11.1 pp
+8.1 pp
−4.8 pp
−15.1 pp
−16.5 pp
−18.0 pp
−3.5 pp
−0.6 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 0.34×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 22.6×. 1 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its Guarded PEG series carries 4 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.34×. Only 1 of 4 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · 0.34×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/4 companies · 4 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS0.3
P/Elowest P/E
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS22.6
2Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified32.1
3Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified77.6
4GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified156.0
Valuation · company comparison
1/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Guarded PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 0.3 | 18.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | — | 45.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | — | 31.5 | Jun 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | — | 40.1 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Guarded PEG · reported quarter history
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
—
—
—
2.3
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.3
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
55.8
49.6
51.1
83.1
77.9
64.4
67.3
73.4
70.4
70.4
60.5
60.1
59.7
51.4
46.1
54.4
54.3
51.5
45.8
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
19.1
14.9
22.0
30.1
31.8
26.3
26.2
34.9
35.3
47.6
62.9
69.7
64.5
67.7
60.0
48.8
41.0
32.8
38.5
40.1
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
14.2
15.1
15.1
16.2
17.1
17.6
16.9
19.4
25.7
26.2
23.5
22.7
22.5
28.9
19.4
19.2
17.3
20.1
18.1
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
11.7
14.4
18.2
15.9
23.2
21.1
14.8
20.7
33.6
37.2
38.1
83.8
52.2
43.6
30.5
32.9
36.1
31.7
20.9
31.5
08 · compare level, then change
Enterprise Value & Book Value
Pix Transmission Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies compared here, at 11.2×. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd is next at 18.8×. The same company also holds the lowest P/BV, at 3.46×. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pix Transmission Ltd leads both ev/ebitda at 11.2× and p/bv at 3.46×.
LeaderPix Transmission Ltd · 11.2×
Gap40.4% versus #2 · Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS11.2
2Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified18.8
3GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified26.9
4Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified36.6
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS3.5
2GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified6.0
3Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified6.6
4Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified14.7
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | EV/EBITDA | P/BV | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified | 36.6 | 8.7 | Mar 2026 |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | 26.9 | 5.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBR⚠ unverified | 18.8 | 5.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANS | 11.2 | 3.1 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
44.7
39.8
40.9
66.4
62.2
51.5
53.9
58.7
56.3
56.3
48.4
48.1
47.8
41.1
36.9
43.5
43.5
41.3
36.6
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
7.1
7.8
10.0
9.5
12.3
10.8
12.7
17.1
17.4
21.4
26.3
34.3
31.5
31.3
27.0
23.1
19.2
16.1
17.5
26.9
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
8.8
9.5
9.4
9.6
10.0
10.0
9.7
10.8
14.3
14.7
13.6
13.7
13.8
18.3
12.1
12.0
10.8
12.0
11.2
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
5.3
6.3
7.9
8.3
11.8
10.9
8.6
11.9
18.6
21.7
23.3
51.9
33.5
28.4
19.6
21.0
22.4
18.8
12.9
18.8
P/BV · reported quarter history
Apcotex Industries Ltd · APCOTEXIND⚠ unverified
10.6
9.4
9.7
15.8
14.8
12.2
12.8
13.9
13.4
13.4
11.5
11.4
11.3
9.8
8.8
10.3
10.3
9.8
8.7
—
GRP Ltd · GRPLTD⚠ unverified
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.9
2.6
3.6
3.5
4.2
5.7
11.6
10.4
10.1
8.9
8.7
6.0
5.0
5.3
5.3
Pix Transmission Ltd · PIXTRANS
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.7
3.1
3.0
2.8
3.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.5
4.3
6.0
4.0
4.4
3.3
3.0
3.1
—
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd · TINNARUBR⚠ unverified
1.1
2.0
3.1
3.5
5.3
4.8
3.8
5.8
8.0
9.2
11.3
32.2
20.3
15.4
10.4
12.7
8.9
5.3
3.8
5.5
09 · let price answer last
Market action
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Rubber Processing/Rubber Products at +34.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +28%. 3 of 4 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 4 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 3 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 3 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure, Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 4 companies in the canonical Rubber Processing/Rubber Products membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
| Company | Market value | Price | Priced to | Latest fundamentals | Source standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apcotex Industries Ltd APCOTEXINDAHEAD22/26 WEEKS⚠ unverified | ₹2.9K Cr | ₹561 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Includes unverified figures |
| Pix Transmission Ltd PIXTRANSAHEAD24/26 WEEKS | ₹2.4K Cr | ₹1,766 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Cross-checked |
| Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd TINNARUBRAHEAD⚠ unverified | ₹2.0K Cr | ₹1,099 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Includes unverified figures |
| GRP Ltd GRPLTD⚠ unverified | ₹1.1K Cr | ₹2,008 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Includes unverified figures |
How each company's sources stand: 3 of 4 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 3 unverified · 0 withheld, of 4 graded companies.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers
Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company comparison FAQs
These 17 answers restate the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 4 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index?
The Nifty Rubber Processing/Rubber Products index tracks India's listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 4 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Apcotex Industries Ltd places first among 4 listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies, followed by Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 4 listed Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is the biggest?
Apcotex Industries Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹1,442 crore, ahead of Pix Transmission Ltd at ₹583 crore. That covers 4 of 4 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company is growing fastest?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 14.4% year on year, across 4 of 4 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the best profit margins?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd has the highest operating margin at 22%, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company makes the most profit?
Pix Transmission Ltd earns the most, at ₹107 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Apcotex Industries Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 83.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company earns the highest return on capital?
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 22.3%, across 4 of 4 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Pix Transmission Ltd screens cheapest at 0.34×. Only 1 of 4 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company has the strongest balance sheet?
Pix Transmission Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹24 crore, from 4 of 4 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products stock has the strongest price momentum?
Apcotex Industries Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Rubber Processing/Rubber Products company scores highest for research priority?
Apcotex Industries Ltd scores 72.2 out of 100 with 79.8% evidence confidence, from 26.9 points on growth and earnings, 20.9 on capital efficiency, 7 on valuation and 17.4 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 4 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector?
The 4 Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies on this page carry ₹8,367 crore of combined market value. Apcotex Industries Ltd is the largest at ₹2,909 crore, about 35% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
How is the Rubber Processing/Rubber Products sector performing?
3 of the 4 covered Rubber Processing/Rubber Products companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.