Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-29
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Packaging - BOPP Stocks in India

Packaging - BOPP: Uflex Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest current growth.

Nifty Packaging - BOPP Index — Constituents & Performance

The Packaging - BOPP companies below are the listed Indian Packaging - BOPP universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Packaging - BOPP index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

The sector itself · before any single company

How has Packaging - BOPP moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 3% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 17% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 6 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 6w~Moving with the index3 of 5 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more

RS ↑6w · 4/5 >200d (+1) · 3/5 lead (+0) · EPS 3/5↑

200202620252024202320222021 249336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100131Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 37, against 100 at the start · down 88.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 71, against 100 at the start · up 39.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 39.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · up 157.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 41.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two102 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200202620252024202320222021 249336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100131Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Sep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 37, against 100 at the start · down 88.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 71, against 100 at the start · up 39.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 39.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · up 200.0% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · up 157.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 63.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 41.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two102No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
Packaging - BOPP, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy Broad but lateHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 5 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score −1 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 1/10
Mid 1/20
Small 1/20

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 5 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Packaging - BOPP outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week comparison of Packaging - BOPP against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 3 of 5 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Jindal Poly Films Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +67.5%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/5Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/5Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 19.9 as of 2026-07-19 · NARROWING · rising.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 5 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Uflex Ltd leads with revenue of ₹15,401 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 25.7%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.

Is the Packaging - BOPP sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 5 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is largest by revenue?

Uflex Ltd leads with revenue of ₹15,401 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is growing fastest?

Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 25.7%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd ranks first at 66.9/100 with 71% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the least gross debt?

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹79 crore. Uflex Ltd has the highest at ₹10,152 crore.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Uflex Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.69, among 1 of 5 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Packaging - BOPP comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
5
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹12.8K Cr
Polyplex Corporation Ltd
Revenue growing
4/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/5
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 71% evidence confidence.
Jindal Poly Films Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

66.9/100 · Favorable setup · 71% evidence

Exact sum: 30.6 + 18.1 + 10 + 8.2 = 66.9

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

30.6/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 5.5% · PAT 66% · OPM change 4 pp

95% evidence

18.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 10.7% · debt/equity 0.09×

95% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E 8.5× · PEG —

0% evidence

8.2/20Relative strength

RS sector -8% · RS bench -5.8% · 1Y -28%

70% evidence

2. Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST

57.5/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 78% evidence

Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.3 + 8.1 + 7.8 = 57.5

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

26.3/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 25.7% · PAT 17.2% · OPM change 3 pp

95% evidence

15.3/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 11.2% · debt/equity 1.04×

95% evidence

8.1/20Valuation

P/E 14.4× · PEG —

35% evidence

7.8/20Relative strength

RS sector -17.5% · RS bench 6% · 1Y -26.6%

70% evidence

3. Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

46.0/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 84% evidence

Exact sum: 20.5 + 7.5 + 15 + 3 = 46

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

20.5/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 2.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp

100% evidence

7.5/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 7% · debt/equity 1.25×

100% evidence

15.0/20Valuation

P/E 10.4× · PEG 0.69

50% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -23.6% · RS bench -9.5% · 1Y -27.3%

70% evidence

4. Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

43.0/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 59% evidence

Exact sum: 13 + 9.1 + 10 + 10.9 = 43

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

13.0/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 2.9% · PAT -80% · OPM change 1 pp

71% evidence

9.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 1% · debt/equity 0.22×

80% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E 78.8× · PEG —

0% evidence

10.9/20Relative strength

RS sector -13.7% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y -5.1%

70% evidence

5. Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

33.5/100 · Adverse evidence · 70% evidence

Exact sum: 2.4 + 4.9 + 10 + 16.2 = 33.5

Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 7.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.

2.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue -32.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change -27 pp

88% evidence

4.9/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 5.4% · debt/equity 0.84×

100% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E — · PEG —

0% evidence

16.2/20Relative strength

RS sector 67.5% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 6.3%

70% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Uflex Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at ₹15,401 crore. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is next at ₹7,086 crore. Cosmo First Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 25.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd is the scale leader at ₹15,401 crore, 117.3% ahead of Polyplex Corporation Ltd. Cosmo First Ltd's growth is 25.7% from a ₹3,639 crore base, with 14 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderUflex Ltd · ₹15,401 crore
Gap117.3% versus #2 · Polyplex Corporation Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 81 observations

Investor read: Uflex Ltd is the scale benchmark; Cosmo First Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Uflex Ltd's growth falls below Cosmo First Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹15.4K Cr
2Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹7.1K Cr
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹3.6K Cr
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹3.1K Cr
5Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹704 Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified26%
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY5.6%
3Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX2.9%
4Uflex Ltd UFLEX2.4%
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-33%
Revenue · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹4.1K Cr6.4%Mar 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹1.9K Cr7.5%Mar 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹1.0K Cr37%Mar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹372 Cr-69%Dec 2025
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹168 Cr7.0%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

₹730 Cr
₹715 Cr
₹658 Cr
₹664 Cr
₹625 Cr
₹641 Cr
₹690 Cr
₹759 Cr
₹701 Cr
₹746 Cr
₹800 Cr
₹919 Cr
₹899 Cr
₹1.0K Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

₹1.3K Cr
₹1.5K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹887 Cr
₹810 Cr
₹832 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹984 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹914 Cr
₹410 Cr
₹372 Cr

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

₹160 Cr
₹149 Cr
₹156 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹154 Cr
₹153 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹173 Cr
₹157 Cr
₹197 Cr
₹172 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹168 Cr

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

₹1.9K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.5K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.9K Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹2.8K Cr
₹3.0K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹4.0K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.3K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.7K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.9K Cr
₹3.8K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹4.1K Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

-14%
-10%
4.9%
14%
12%
16%
16%
21%
28%
37%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

50%
19%
-2.9%
-35%
-53%
-48%
-27%
11%
33%
48%
9.8%
21%
32%
-26%
-64%
-69%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

-3.8%
2.7%
7.7%
23%
12%
2.6%
17%
1.8%
-3.5%
7.0%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

-20%
0.7%
8.0%
11%
15%
3.6%
3.1%
3.2%
-2.3%
7.5%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

47%
27%
0.3%
-15%
-19%
-12%
-5.0%
1.4%
12%
14%
13%
11%
6.8%
-0.0%
-3.3%
6.4%
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the highest OPM among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 19%. Uflex Ltd is next at 14%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +4 percentage points. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Nahar Polyfilms Ltd leads both opm at 19% and margin change at +4 percentage points.

LeaderNahar Polyfilms Ltd · 19%
Gap35.7% versus #2 · Uflex Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 99 observations

Investor read: Nahar Polyfilms Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY19%
2Uflex Ltd UFLEX14%
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified12%
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX5.0%
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-21%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY+4.0 pp
2Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified+3.0 pp
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX+3.0 pp
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX+1.0 pp
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY−27.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY19%+4.0 ppMar 2026
Uflex Ltd UFLEX14%+3.0 ppMar 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified12%+3.0 ppMar 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX5.0%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-21%−27.0 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

19%
19%
19%
18%
17%
15%
9.0%
9.0%
5.0%
9.0%
7.0%
7.0%
10%
11%
9.0%
9.0%
11%
11%
8.0%
12%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

24%
22%
23%
26%
23%
3.1%
-9.0%
3.0%
2.0%
2.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
3.0%
6.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
3.0%
-21%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

20%
21%
25%
29%
19%
8.2%
7.0%
8.0%
2.0%
12%
0.0%
1.0%
9.0%
13%
9.0%
15%
14%
16%
12%
19%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

19%
17%
20%
20%
18%
12%
6.0%
3.0%
4.0%
8.0%
3.0%
6.0%
10%
11%
7.0%
4.0%
0.0%
6.0%
6.0%
5.0%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

18%
14%
18%
17%
18%
11%
8.0%
11%
9.0%
11%
10%
11%
11%
10%
12%
11%
12%
10%
12%
14%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

+1.0 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−4.5 pp
−10.2 pp
−8.7 pp
−12.0 pp
−5.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.0 pp

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

−3.4 pp
−9.1 pp
−5.3 pp
+5.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−18.9 pp
−32.1 pp
−23.3 pp
−21.4 pp
−1.1 pp
+6.0 pp
−4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+9.0 pp
+5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−27.0 pp

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

−2.3 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.7 pp
+7.7 pp
−0.8 pp
−12.7 pp
−18.3 pp
−20.6 pp
−17.2 pp
+3.8 pp
−7.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+7.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+9.0 pp
+14.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

−7.9 pp
+1.9 pp
−6.7 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.3 pp
−5.1 pp
−13.9 pp
−17.1 pp
−13.7 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+6.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−10.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

−2.8 pp
−7.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−3.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.8 pp
−9.6 pp
−5.8 pp
−8.6 pp
+0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Uflex Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at ₹317 crore. Cosmo First Ltd is next at ₹157 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd leads with ₹317 crore of TTM profit, 101.9% above Cosmo First Ltd. Uflex Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (121.7% uncapped) growth from a ₹317 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderUflex Ltd · ₹317 crore
Gap101.9% versus #2 · Cosmo First Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 81 observations

Investor read: Uflex Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹317 Cr
2Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹157 Cr
3Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹78 Cr
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹42 Cr
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹-253 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX100%
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY66%
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified17%
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-80%
Net profit · company comparison
5/5 level · 4/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹196 Cr16%Mar 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹38 Cr-71%Mar 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹37 Cr37%Mar 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹20 Cr43%Mar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹-97 Cr-2,525%Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

₹46 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹37 Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

₹232 Cr
₹254 Cr
₹218 Cr
₹492 Cr
₹315 Cr
₹485 Cr
₹-97 Cr
₹-385 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹-19 Cr
₹-19 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹117 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-179 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹-13 Cr
₹-97 Cr

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

₹1 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹-5 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹20 Cr

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

₹84 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹-10 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹164 Cr
₹105 Cr
₹-9 Cr
₹-60 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹38 Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹264 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹313 Cr
₹350 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹-85 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹-416 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹-67 Cr
₹-271 Cr
₹-98 Cr
₹-65 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹196 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

-76%
-53%
121%
109%
173%
80%
39%
2.2%
0.0%
37%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

114%
36%
91%
-145%
-178%
-69%
-98%
71%
875%
-79%
-111%
-2,525%

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

-600%
-75%
42%
1,300%
125%
24%
138%
43%

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

-80%
55%
242%
518%
-129%
-162%
-79%
-71%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

42%
12%
-127%
-100%
-211%
-67%
-203%
-74%
16%
04 · not available

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

No company in this Packaging - BOPP comparison reports capital expenditure on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 5 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Mar 2026.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.

Withheld from this comparison: Polyplex Corporation Ltd (POLYPLEX) — its two data sources disagree by up to 207% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at ₹79 crore. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is next at ₹935 crore. Jindal Poly Films Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹25 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Jindal Poly Films Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹25 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹3,444 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderNahar Polyfilms Ltd · ₹79 crore
Gap91.6% versus #2 · Polyplex Corporation Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage5/5 companies · 71 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹79 Cr
2Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹935 Cr
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹1.7K Cr
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹3.4K Cr
5Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹10.2K Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹-25 Cr
2Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹1.3K Cr
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹9.1K Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
5/5 level · 3/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX₹10.2K Cr₹9.1K CrMar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹3.4K Cr₹-25 CrDec 2025
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified₹1.7K Cr₹1.3K CrMar 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX₹935 CrMar 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY₹79 CrMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

₹760 Cr
₹857 Cr
₹857 Cr
₹818 Cr
₹818 Cr
₹864 Cr
₹864 Cr
₹932 Cr
₹932 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.7K Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

₹764 Cr
₹897 Cr
₹897 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹4.3K Cr
₹4.3K Cr
₹4.1K Cr
₹4.1K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹4.5K Cr
₹4.5K Cr
₹4.3K Cr
₹4.3K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹3.4K Cr
₹3.4K Cr

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

₹173 Cr
₹163 Cr
₹126 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹79 Cr

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

₹946 Cr
₹799 Cr
₹748 Cr
₹882 Cr
₹968 Cr
₹935 Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹3.6K Cr
₹4.1K Cr
₹4.1K Cr
₹4.8K Cr
₹4.8K Cr
₹5.4K Cr
₹5.4K Cr
₹5.7K Cr
₹5.7K Cr
₹6.4K Cr
₹6.4K Cr
₹6.9K Cr
₹6.9K Cr
₹7.2K Cr
₹7.2K Cr
₹8.4K Cr
₹8.4K Cr
₹9.3K Cr
₹9.3K Cr
₹10.2K Cr

Net debt · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

₹449 Cr
₹407 Cr
₹407 Cr
₹324 Cr
₹324 Cr
₹395 Cr
₹395 Cr
₹489 Cr
₹489 Cr
₹550 Cr
₹550 Cr
₹641 Cr
₹641 Cr
₹767 Cr
₹767 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.3K Cr

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

₹129 Cr
₹490 Cr
₹490 Cr
₹682 Cr
₹709 Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹802 Cr
₹709 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹436 Cr
₹394 Cr
₹-25 Cr
₹-25 Cr

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

₹3.0K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹3.5K Cr
₹4.2K Cr
₹4.2K Cr
₹4.6K Cr
₹4.6K Cr
₹4.6K Cr
₹4.6K Cr
₹5.0K Cr
₹5.0K Cr
₹5.8K Cr
₹5.9K Cr
₹6.1K Cr
₹6.1K Cr
₹7.2K Cr
₹7.2K Cr
₹8.2K Cr
₹8.2K Cr
₹9.1K Cr
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Cosmo First Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 11.2%. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd is next at 10.7%. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Cosmo First Ltd leads ROCE at 11.2%, 0.5 percentage points above Nahar Polyfilms Ltd. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderCosmo First Ltd · 11.2%
Gap4.7% versus #2 · Nahar Polyfilms Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 44 observations

Investor read: Cosmo First Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified11%
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY11%
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX7.0%
4Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY5.4%
5Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX1.0%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY+5.0 pp
2Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified+1.3 pp
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX−1.0 pp
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX−6.0 pp
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY−7.4 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

Withheld from this chart: Polyplex Corporation Ltd (POLYPLEX) — its two data sources disagree by up to 207% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified7.8%+1.3 ppMar 2026
Uflex Ltd UFLEX7.3%−1.0 ppMar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY-0.5%−7.4 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

27%
27%
24%
15%
6.3%
8.0%
3.9%
8.4%
5.5%
10%
6.5%
11%
7.0%
11%
7.8%

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

23%
25%
13%
3.2%
-1.5%
2.7%
-1.7%
4.3%
-0.8%
6.9%
0.5%
3.6%
0.0%
-0.5%

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

14%
16%
16%
12%
7.4%
2.2%
6.6%
2.6%
7.4%
3.8%
8.3%
9.2%
7.8%
8.5%
7.3%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

−2.7 pp
−12.5 pp
−17.8 pp
−10.6 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.3 pp

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

−10.9 pp
−21.6 pp
−14.0 pp
−4.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+4.2 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
−7.4 pp

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

+2.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−8.9 pp
−5.1 pp
0.0 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+6.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+4.7 pp
−1.0 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Uflex Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 0.69×. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the lowest P/E at 8.54×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its Guarded PEG series carries 6 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Uflex Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.69×. Only 1 of 5 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderUflex Ltd · 0.69×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/5 companies · 9 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX0.7
P/Elowest P/E
1Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY8.5
2Uflex Ltd UFLEX10.4
3Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified14.4
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX78.8
Valuation · company comparison
1/5 level · 4/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Uflex Ltd UFLEX0.711.3Mar 2026
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY0.124.4Dec 2025
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX11.7Mar 2026
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified10.7Mar 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY7.5Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

0.1
0.1
0.1

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.7

P/E · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

7.0
10.0
7.9
8.5
6.6
5.9
5.5
5.0
7.8
11.2
14.4
16.7
33.2
25.4
24.1
13.3
22.4
15.3
12.0
10.7

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

4.7
4.8
5.1
5.3
3.8
3.3
2.4
1.9
14.3
14.0
42.2
70.5
24.6
18.1
16.1
28.7
24.4

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

6.1
8.9
9.2
16.8
8.1
8.0
6.9
7.9
14.0
37.1
36.0
50.3
53.5
37.8
31.1
14.2
18.1
12.4
9.7
7.5

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

8.2
12.0
12.7
13.4
12.3
9.7
7.5
6.8
11.8
23.0
46.4
64.9
67.1
38.2
26.6
18.1
18.4
15.9
12.2
11.7

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

5.0
4.3
4.3
4.2
3.6
4.3
3.2
2.6
5.1
25.2
23.9
45.7
22.1
24.6
13.5
16.5
17.0
15.2
11.3
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

Polyplex Corporation Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 5 Packaging - BOPP companies compared here, at 3.2×. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd is next at 5×. Uflex Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 0.42×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Polyplex Corporation Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 3.2×; Uflex Ltd leads p/bv at 0.42×.

LeaderPolyplex Corporation Ltd · 3.2×
Gap36% versus #2 · Nahar Polyfilms Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 99 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX3.2
2Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY5.0
3Uflex Ltd UFLEX5.9
4Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified7.4
5Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY9.0
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Uflex Ltd UFLEX0.4
2Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY0.7
3Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY0.8
4Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX0.8
5Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified1.4
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY9.00.5Dec 2025
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified7.41.0Mar 2026
Uflex Ltd UFLEX5.90.3Mar 2026
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLY5.00.6Mar 2026
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEX3.20.6Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

5.5
7.1
6.2
6.6
5.5
5.1
4.8
4.4
6.0
7.9
9.1
9.0
11.7
10.8
11.5
8.0
11.0
9.2
8.2
7.4

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

4.0
3.6
3.8
4.0
2.8
4.4
4.5
3.8
5.7
9.6
12.2
9.1
14.8
16.8
12.4
11.2
11.3
11.2
9.0

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

5.4
8.5
9.8
16.3
6.9
6.6
5.6
5.9
9.0
15.4
13.8
14.6
22.7
17.2
14.8
8.5
10.5
7.3
6.0
5.0

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

3.1
4.5
4.7
5.1
4.7
3.9
3.0
2.7
4.0
5.1
6.0
4.8
7.0
6.8
6.1
4.7
4.7
4.4
3.3
3.2

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

4.1
3.8
3.9
3.7
3.3
3.9
3.4
3.0
3.8
5.5
6.2
5.4
5.5
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.8
6.0
6.4
5.9

P/BV · reported quarter history

Cosmo First Ltd · COSMOFIRST⚠ unverified

2.4
3.2
2.6
3.1
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.8
1.1
2.2
1.5
1.1
1.0

Jindal Poly Films Ltd · JINDALPOLY

2.0
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.6
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd · NAHARPOLY

1.0
1.1
0.9
1.8
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6

Polyplex Corporation Ltd · POLYPLEX

1.4
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.3
1.8
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.6

Uflex Ltd · UFLEX

0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.3
09 · let price answer last

Market action

Jindal Poly Films Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Packaging - BOPP at +6.3%. Polyplex Corporation Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +14.9%. 3 of 5 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Packaging - BOPP comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 5 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 draws at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company draws at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; it is marked unverified wherever that figure appears.
  • 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure, Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 5 companies in the canonical Packaging - BOPP membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentalsSource standing
Polyplex Corporation Ltd POLYPLEXAHEAD22/26 WEEKS₹3.5K Cr₹1,1292026-07-19Mar 2026Second feed withheld
Uflex Ltd UFLEXAHEAD₹3.5K Cr₹4782026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Jindal Poly Films Ltd JINDALPOLY₹2.8K Cr₹6372026-07-19Dec 2025Cross-checked
Cosmo First Ltd COSMOFIRSTAHEAD20/26 WEEKS⚠ unverified₹2.3K Cr₹8812026-07-19Mar 2026Includes unverified figures
Nahar Polyfilms Ltd NAHARPOLYLAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP₹673 Cr₹2742026-07-19Mar 2026Primary source only
How each company's sources stand: 1 of 5 companies draws at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear. 1 of 5 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Polyplex Corporation Ltd (POLYPLEX) — its two data sources disagree by up to 207% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 5 Packaging - BOPP companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Mar 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Mar 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing2 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 1 withheld, of 5 graded companies.

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.

Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Packaging - BOPP company comparison FAQs

These 17 answers restate the Packaging - BOPP comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 5 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Mar 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

What is the Nifty Packaging - BOPP index?

The Nifty Packaging - BOPP index tracks India's listed Packaging - BOPP companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 5 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Packaging - BOPP sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026.

Which are the best Packaging - BOPP stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Nahar Polyfilms Ltd places first among 5 listed Packaging - BOPP companies, followed by Cosmo First Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Packaging - BOPP stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 5 listed Packaging - BOPP companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is the biggest?

Uflex Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹15,401 crore, ahead of Polyplex Corporation Ltd at ₹7,086 crore. That covers 5 of 5 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Packaging - BOPP company is growing fastest?

Cosmo First Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 25.7% year on year, across 5 of 5 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the best profit margins?

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd has the highest operating margin at 19%, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Nahar Polyfilms Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Packaging - BOPP company makes the most profit?

Uflex Ltd earns the most, at ₹317 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Uflex Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Packaging - BOPP company earns the highest return on capital?

Cosmo First Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 11.2%, across 5 of 5 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Packaging - BOPP stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Uflex Ltd screens cheapest at 0.69×. Only 1 of 5 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Packaging - BOPP company has the strongest balance sheet?

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹79 crore, from 5 of 5 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Packaging - BOPP stock has the strongest price momentum?

Polyplex Corporation Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Packaging - BOPP company scores highest for research priority?

Nahar Polyfilms Ltd scores 66.9 out of 100 with 71% evidence confidence, from 30.6 points on growth and earnings, 18.1 on capital efficiency, 10 on valuation and 8.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Packaging - BOPP companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 5 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Packaging - BOPP sector?

The 5 Packaging - BOPP companies on this page carry ₹12,776 crore of combined market value. Polyplex Corporation Ltd is the largest at ₹3,544 crore, about 28% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.

How is the Packaging - BOPP sector performing?

3 of the 5 covered Packaging - BOPP companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI