New age - Platform - E-Retail: Meesho Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.
Nifty New age - Platform - E-Retail Index — Constituents & Performance
The New age - Platform - E-Retail companies below are the listed Indian New age - Platform - E-Retail universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty New age - Platform - E-Retail index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has New age - Platform - E-Retail moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 4.8 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 1% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 111% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 26 weeks running.
LEADER · ahead 26w✓Moving with the index3 of 6 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months
New age - Platform - E-Retail, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyBroad but lateHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 6 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +11 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large1/20
Mid1/2−1
Small1/20
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is New age - Platform - E-Retail outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of New age - Platform - E-Retail against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 2 of 3 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Honasa Consumer Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +22.9%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
2/3Stocks leading NIFTY 500
2/3Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 25.5 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 2 of 3 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Meesho Ltd leads with revenue of ₹13,836 crore, based on 6 of 6 comparable companies through Jun 2026. Meesho Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 42.1%, across 6 of 6 comparable companies.
Is the New age - Platform - E-Retail sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 2 of 3 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company is largest by revenue?
Meesho Ltd leads with revenue of ₹13,836 crore, based on 6 of 6 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company is growing fastest?
Meesho Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 42.1%, across 6 of 6 comparable companies.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Honasa Consumer Ltd ranks first at 77.9/100 with 92.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company reports the most CAPEX?
Lenskart Solutions Ltd reports the largest latest CAPEX at ₹149 crore, with 3 of 6 companies comparable.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company has the least gross debt?
Meesho Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹63 crore. Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest at ₹3,097 crore.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Honasa Consumer Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.51, among 2 of 6 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this New age - Platform - E-Retail comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
6
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹3.1 L Cr
Lenskart Solutions Ltd
Revenue growing
6/6
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
2/3
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Honasa Consumer Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 92.6% evidence confidence.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12.5/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 11.6% · PAT 22.9% · OPM change 2 pp
62% evidence
8.1/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 0.6% · debt/equity 0.33×
80% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
0.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -39.6% · RS bench -26.9% · 1Y -43.8%
100% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Meesho Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at ₹13,836 crore. FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd is next at ₹10,022 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 42.1%. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Meesho Ltd is the scale leader at ₹13,836 crore, 38.1% ahead of FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. Meesho Ltd's growth is 42.1% from a ₹13,836 crore base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderMeesho Ltd · ₹13,836 crore
Gap38.1% versus #2 · FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd
Persistence5/5 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 67 observations
Investor read: Meesho Ltd is the scale benchmark; Meesho Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Meesho Ltd's growth falls below Meesho Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Meesho Ltd MEESHO₹13.8K Cr
2FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA₹10.0K Cr
3Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART₹8.8K Cr
4Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY₹8.5K Cr
5Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA₹2.4K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Meesho Ltd MEESHO42%
2GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG34%
3Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART33%
4FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA26%
5Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA16%
Revenue · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest OPM among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at 21%. Honasa Consumer Ltd is next at 12%. Honasa Consumer Ltd has the highest Margin change at +7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 8 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Lenskart Solutions Ltd leads opm at 21%; Honasa Consumer Ltd leads margin change at +7 percentage points.
LeaderLenskart Solutions Ltd · 21%
Gap75% versus #2 · Honasa Consumer Ltd
Persistence4/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 72 observations
Investor read: Lenskart Solutions Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART21%
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA12%
3GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG10%
4FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA8.0%
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY3.0%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA+7.0 pp
2Meesho Ltd MEESHO+5.0 pp
3GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG+4.0 pp
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART+4.0 pp
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY+2.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at ₹501 crore. FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd is next at ₹204 crore. Honasa Consumer Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Lenskart Solutions Ltd leads with ₹501 crore of TTM profit, 145.6% above FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. Honasa Consumer Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (176.4% uncapped) growth from a ₹199 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderLenskart Solutions Ltd · ₹501 crore
Gap145.6% versus #2 · FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd
Persistence2/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 67 observations
Investor read: Lenskart Solutions Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART₹501 Cr
2FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA₹204 Cr
3Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA₹199 Cr
4GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG₹133 Cr
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY₹-205 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA100%
2FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA100%
3GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG93%
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART69%
Net profit · company comparison
6/6 level · 4/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest CAPEX among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at ₹149 crore. Meesho Ltd is next at ₹9 crore. The same company also holds the highest CAPEX intensity, at 7.1%. 3 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Lenskart Solutions Ltd reports ₹149 crore of CAPEX; Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest covered intensity at 7.1%. Coverage is only 3 of 6 companies and 12 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderLenskart Solutions Ltd · ₹149 crore
Gap16.6× versus #2 · Meesho Ltd
Persistence4/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/6 companies · 12 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART₹149 Cr
2Meesho Ltd MEESHO₹9 Cr
3Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA₹3 Cr
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART7.1%
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA0.6%
3Meesho Ltd MEESHO0.3%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
3/6 level · 3/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd (NYKAA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 28% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Brainbees Solutions Ltd (FIRSTCRY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 48% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
Meesho Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at ₹63 crore. Honasa Consumer Ltd is next at ₹135 crore. The same company also holds the lowest Net debt, at ₹2,782 crore net cash. 6 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Meesho Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹2,782 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹63 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderMeesho Ltd · ₹63 crore
Gap53.3% versus #2 · Honasa Consumer Ltd
Persistence6/6 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 55 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Meesho Ltd MEESHO₹63 Cr
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA₹135 Cr
3GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG₹433 Cr
4FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA₹1.2K Cr
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY₹1.6K Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Meesho Ltd MEESHO₹-2.8K Cr
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA₹-331 Cr
3GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG₹327 Cr
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART₹1.2K Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
6/6 level · 4/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
GNG Electronics Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at 20.3%. Honasa Consumer Ltd is next at 19.2%. Honasa Consumer Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +10.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROCE series carries 6 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: GNG Electronics Ltd leads ROCE at 20.3%, 1.1 percentage points above Honasa Consumer Ltd. Honasa Consumer Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +10.8 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderGNG Electronics Ltd · 20.3%
Gap5.7% versus #2 · Honasa Consumer Ltd
Persistence0/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/6 companies · 30 observations
Investor read: GNG Electronics Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG20%
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA19%
3FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA17%
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART8.4%
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY0.6%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA+10.8 pp
2Meesho Ltd MEESHO+7.4 pp
3FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA+7.0 pp
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART+3.8 pp
5Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY+1.0 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
6/6 level · 6/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd (NYKAA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 28% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Brainbees Solutions Ltd (FIRSTCRY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 48% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Honasa Consumer Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at 1.51×. Lenskart Solutions Ltd is next at 4.47×. GNG Electronics Ltd has the lowest P/E at 49.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Honasa Consumer Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.51×, 66.2% below Lenskart Solutions Ltd. Only 2 of 6 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderHonasa Consumer Ltd · 1.51×
Gap66.2% versus #2 · Lenskart Solutions Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/6 companies · 2 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA1.5
2Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART4.5
P/Elowest P/E
1GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG49.4
2Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA71.8
3Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART192.0
4FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA442.0
Valuation · company comparison
2/6 level · 4/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Brainbees Solutions Ltd (FIRSTCRY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 48% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
GNG Electronics Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies compared here, at 24.4×. Brainbees Solutions Ltd is next at 30.8×. Brainbees Solutions Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 2.25×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 6 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: GNG Electronics Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 24.4×; Brainbees Solutions Ltd leads p/bv at 2.25×.
LeaderGNG Electronics Ltd · 24.4×
Gap20.8% versus #2 · Brainbees Solutions Ltd
Persistence0/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/6 companies · 39 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG24.4
2Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY30.8
3Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA35.5
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART70.1
5FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd NYKAA100.4
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Brainbees Solutions Ltd FIRSTCRY2.3
2GNG Electronics Ltd EBGNG8.6
3Honasa Consumer Ltd HONASA10.3
4Lenskart Solutions Ltd LENSKART11.1
5Meesho Ltd MEESHO19.3
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
5/6 level · 6/6 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
GNG Electronics Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in New age - Platform - E-Retail at +73.8%. Honasa Consumer Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +45.3%. 2 of 3 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This New age - Platform - E-Retail comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 6 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
2 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 6 companies in the canonical New age - Platform - E-Retail membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
How each company's sources stand: 2 of 6 companies have a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd (NYKAA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 28% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Brainbees Solutions Ltd (FIRSTCRY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 48% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
New age - Platform - E-Retail company comparison FAQs
These 18 answers restate the New age - Platform - E-Retail comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 6 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty New age - Platform - E-Retail index?
The Nifty New age - Platform - E-Retail index tracks India's listed New age - Platform - E-Retail companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 6 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the New age - Platform - E-Retail sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best New age - Platform - E-Retail stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Honasa Consumer Ltd places first among 6 listed New age - Platform - E-Retail companies, followed by FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many New age - Platform - E-Retail stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 6 listed New age - Platform - E-Retail companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company is the biggest?
Meesho Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹13,836 crore, ahead of FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd at ₹10,022 crore. That covers 6 of 6 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company is growing fastest?
Meesho Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 42.1% year on year, across 6 of 6 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company has the best profit margins?
Lenskart Solutions Ltd has the highest operating margin at 21%, from 6 of 6 comparable companies. Honasa Consumer Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +7 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company makes the most profit?
Lenskart Solutions Ltd earns the most, at ₹501 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 6 comparable companies. Honasa Consumer Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company earns the highest return on capital?
GNG Electronics Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 20.3%, across 6 of 6 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Honasa Consumer Ltd screens cheapest at 1.51×. Only 2 of 6 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company has the strongest balance sheet?
Meesho Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹63 crore, from 6 of 6 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company is investing most in new capacity?
Lenskart Solutions Ltd reports the largest capital spending at ₹149 crore, across 3 of 6 companies. Spending consumes cash before it earns anything, so treat the ranking as a diligence queue: check commissioning, utilisation and the return earned on the completed assets before reading spend as value creation.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail stock has the strongest price momentum?
Honasa Consumer Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which New age - Platform - E-Retail company scores highest for research priority?
Honasa Consumer Ltd scores 77.9 out of 100 with 92.6% evidence confidence, from 27.8 points on growth and earnings, 17.4 on capital efficiency, 12.7 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many New age - Platform - E-Retail companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 6 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 9 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the New age - Platform - E-Retail sector?
The 6 New age - Platform - E-Retail companies on this page carry ₹3,06,751 crore of combined market value. Lenskart Solutions Ltd is the largest at ₹96,655 crore, about 32% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
How is the New age - Platform - E-Retail sector performing?
2 of the 3 covered New age - Platform - E-Retail companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.