FMCG - Personal Care: Hindustan Unilever Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Zydus Wellness Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty FMCG - Personal Care Index — Constituents & Performance
The FMCG - Personal Care companies below are the listed Indian FMCG - Personal Care universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty FMCG - Personal Care index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has FMCG - Personal Care moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 16% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat.
TURNING · ahead 1w~Price down, no fundamental support3 of 11 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
FMCG - Personal Care, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyNarrowHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 11 stocks moving
Fresh2 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +7 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large1/3+1
Mid0/40
Small2/4+1
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 11 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is FMCG - Personal Care outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of FMCG - Personal Care against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 3 of 12 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +47.5%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/12Stocks leading NIFTY 500
6/12Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 12.4 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 12 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Hindustan Unilever Ltd leads with revenue of ₹65,225 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Zydus Wellness Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 46.2%, across 12 of 12 comparable companies.
Is the FMCG - Personal Care sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 3 of 12 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company is largest by revenue?
Hindustan Unilever Ltd leads with revenue of ₹65,225 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company is growing fastest?
Zydus Wellness Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 46.2%, across 12 of 12 comparable companies.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd ranks first at 73.3/100 with 100% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company has the least gross debt?
Gillette India Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd has the highest at ₹4,421 crore.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Gillette India Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.27, among 10 of 12 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this FMCG - Personal Care comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
12
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹9.6 L Cr
Hindustan Unilever Ltd
Revenue growing
8/12
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/12
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 100% evidence confidence.
Zydus Wellness Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14.8/35Growth & earnings
Revenue -25.8% · PAT -16.1% · OPM change 0.3 pp
53% evidence
9.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 2.5% · debt/equity 0.06×
60% evidence
8.5/20Valuation
P/E 223× · PEG —
15% evidence
3.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -54.8% · RS bench -58.4% · 1Y -66.8%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Hindustan Unilever Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at ₹65,225 crore. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd is next at ₹15,385 crore. Zydus Wellness Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 46.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Hindustan Unilever Ltd is the scale leader at ₹65,225 crore, 324% ahead of Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. Zydus Wellness Ltd's growth is 46.2% from a ₹3,961 crore base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderHindustan Unilever Ltd · ₹65,225 crore
Gap324% versus #2 · Godrej Consumer Products Ltd
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 218 observations
Investor read: Hindustan Unilever Ltd is the scale benchmark; Zydus Wellness Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Hindustan Unilever Ltd's growth falls below Zydus Wellness Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Hindustan Unilever Ltd HINDUNILVR₹65.2K Cr
2Godrej Consumer Products Ltd GODREJCP₹15.4K Cr
3Marico Ltd MARICO₹13.6K Cr
4Dabur India Ltd DABUR₹13.2K Cr
5Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd COLPAL₹6.0K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Zydus Wellness Ltd ZYDUSWELL46%
2Marico Ltd MARICO26%
3Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON25%
4Godrej Consumer Products Ltd GODREJCP7.7%
5Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE7.6%
Revenue · company comparison
12/12 level · 12/12 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Gillette India Ltd has the highest OPM among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at 35%. Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd is next at 32%. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the highest Margin change at +9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Gillette India Ltd leads opm at 35%; Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd leads margin change at +9 percentage points.
LeaderGillette India Ltd · 35%
Gap9.4% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 228 observations
Investor read: Gillette India Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE35%
2Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd COLPAL32%
3Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON24%
4Hindustan Unilever Ltd HINDUNILVR23%
5Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH23%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON+9.0 pp
2Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE+6.0 pp
3Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH+2.0 pp
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at ₹15,059 crore. Dabur India Ltd is next at ₹1,869 crore. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 77%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Hindustan Unilever Ltd leads with ₹15,059 crore of TTM profit, 705.7% above Dabur India Ltd. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd shows 77% growth from a ₹223 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderHindustan Unilever Ltd · ₹15,059 crore
Gap705.7% versus #2 · Dabur India Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 218 observations
Investor read: Hindustan Unilever Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Hindustan Unilever Ltd HINDUNILVR₹15.1K Cr
2Dabur India Ltd DABUR₹1.9K Cr
3Godrej Consumer Products Ltd GODREJCP₹1.9K Cr
4Marico Ltd MARICO₹1.8K Cr
5Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd COLPAL₹1.3K Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON77%
2Hindustan Unilever Ltd HINDUNILVR41%
3Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE23%
4Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH19%
5Marico Ltd MARICO9.4%
Net profit · company comparison
12/12 level · 12/12 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
No company in this FMCG - Personal Care comparison reports capital expenditure on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 12 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Jun 2026.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
Withheld from this comparison: Marico Ltd (MARICO) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
05 · compare level, then change
Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom
Gillette India Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at ₹0 crore. Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd is next at ₹1 crore. Hindustan Unilever Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹5,515 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Hindustan Unilever Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹5,515 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹1,478 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderGillette India Ltd · ₹0 crore
Gap100% versus #2 · Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 193 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE₹0 Cr
2Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH₹1 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
12/12 level · 10/12 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at 157%. Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd is next at 108%. Gillette India Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +21.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd leads ROCE at 157%, 49 percentage points above Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. Gillette India Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +21.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderProcter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd · 157%
Gap45.4% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 151 observations
Investor read: Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH157%
2Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd COLPAL108%
3Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE91%
4Marico Ltd MARICO47%
5Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON30%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE+21.2 pp
2Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH+18.5 pp
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Marico Ltd (MARICO) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Gillette India Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at 1.27×. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd is next at 1.64×. Jyothy Labs Ltd has the lowest P/E at 19.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Gillette India Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 1.27×, 22.6% below Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd. Only 10 of 12 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderGillette India Ltd · 1.27×
Gap22.6% versus #2 · Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/12 companies · 85 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Gillette India Ltd GILLETTE1.3
2Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON1.6
3Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH1.7
4Zydus Wellness Ltd ZYDUSWELL1.8
5Emami Ltd EMAMILTD3.0
P/Elowest P/E
1Jyothy Labs Ltd JYOTHYLAB19.9
2Emami Ltd EMAMILTD22.7
3Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd BAJAJCON32.2
4Hindustan Unilever Ltd HINDUNILVR33.1
5Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH34.0
Valuation · company comparison
10/12 level · 12/12 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Jyothy Labs Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies compared here, at 13.6×. Emami Ltd is next at 15.8×. Zydus Wellness Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 3.08×, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Jyothy Labs Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 13.6×; Zydus Wellness Ltd leads p/bv at 3.08×.
LeaderJyothy Labs Ltd · 13.6×
Gap13.9% versus #2 · Emami Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 228 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Jyothy Labs Ltd JYOTHYLAB13.6
2Emami Ltd EMAMILTD15.8
3Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd PGHH23.9
4Dabur India Ltd DABUR25.2
5Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd COLPAL25.5
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Zydus Wellness Ltd ZYDUSWELL3.1
2Polo Queen Industrial and Fintech Ltd PQIF · older report3.3
3Jyothy Labs Ltd JYOTHYLAB3.6
4Emami Ltd EMAMILTD6.1
5Dabur India Ltd DABUR6.6
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
12/12 level · 12/12 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in FMCG - Personal Care at +118.6%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +44.2%. 3 of 12 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This FMCG - Personal Care comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 12 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 12 companies in the canonical FMCG - Personal Care membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. 1 of these is no longer being priced, so its price and relative strength are frozen at the last traded week shown.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
How each company's sources stand: 1 of 12 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Marico Ltd (MARICO) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
These 18 answers restate the FMCG - Personal Care comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 12 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty FMCG - Personal Care index?
The Nifty FMCG - Personal Care index tracks India's listed FMCG - Personal Care companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 12 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the FMCG - Personal Care sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best FMCG - Personal Care stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd places first among 12 listed FMCG - Personal Care companies, followed by Gillette India Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many FMCG - Personal Care stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 12 listed FMCG - Personal Care companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company is the biggest?
Hindustan Unilever Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹65,225 crore, ahead of Godrej Consumer Products Ltd at ₹15,385 crore. That covers 12 of 12 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company is growing fastest?
Zydus Wellness Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 46.2% year on year, across 12 of 12 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company has the best profit margins?
Gillette India Ltd has the highest operating margin at 35%, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company makes the most profit?
Hindustan Unilever Ltd earns the most, at ₹15,059 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 77%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company earns the highest return on capital?
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 157%, across 12 of 12 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which FMCG - Personal Care stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Gillette India Ltd screens cheapest at 1.27×. Only 10 of 12 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company has the strongest balance sheet?
Gillette India Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore, from 12 of 12 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which FMCG - Personal Care stock has the strongest price momentum?
Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which FMCG - Personal Care company scores highest for research priority?
Bajaj Consumer Care Ltd scores 73.3 out of 100 with 100% evidence confidence, from 32.3 points on growth and earnings, 17.3 on capital efficiency, 9.7 on valuation and 14 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many FMCG - Personal Care companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 12 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the FMCG - Personal Care sector?
The 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies on this page carry ₹9,60,784 crore of combined market value. Hindustan Unilever Ltd is the largest at ₹5,03,987 crore, about 52% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
What is the FMCG - Personal Care sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 12 FMCG - Personal Care companies on this page is 39.8×, measured on the 12 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.
How is the FMCG - Personal Care sector performing?
3 of the 12 covered FMCG - Personal Care companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.