Is the Finance - AMC sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 2 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Finance - AMC: Tata Capital Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the fastest current growth.
The Finance - AMC companies below are the listed Indian Finance - AMC universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Finance - AMC index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 37% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat.
RS ↑1w · 4/7 >200d (+0) · 1/7 lead (−1) · EPS 4/6↑
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
The 52-week comparison of Finance - AMC against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 2 of 4 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +16.5%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
Sector metric: 10.3 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 2 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Tata Capital Ltd leads with income of ₹31,538 crore, based on 6 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the fastest current income growth at 23%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 2 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Tata Capital Ltd leads with income of ₹31,538 crore, based on 6 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the fastest current income growth at 23%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd ranks first at 62.5/100 with 66.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.23, among 6 of 7 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded.
62.5/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 67% evidence
Exact sum: 26 + 16.3 + 0.2 + 20 = 62.5
Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
Income 23% · PAT 21.3%
52% evidence
ROA — · ROE 34.5% · GNPA —
34% evidence
P/BV 15.23× · P/BV÷ROE 0.44
100% evidence
RS sector 16.5% · RS bench 26.2% · 1Y 41%
100% evidence
52.3/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 62% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 19.1 + 11.1 + 10 = 52.3
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Income 13% · PAT 9%
86% evidence
ROA 24.9% · ROE 30.3% · GNPA —
72% evidence
P/BV 6.95× · P/BV÷ROE 0.23
70% evidence
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
47.3/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 67% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 13.7 + 3.9 + 16.8 = 47.3
Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 26%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
Income 6.6% · PAT 3.7%
52% evidence
ROA — · ROE 25.2% · GNPA —
34% evidence
P/BV 7.26× · P/BV÷ROE 0.29
100% evidence
RS sector 16.5% · RS bench 26% · 1Y 33.1%
100% evidence
43.4/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 61% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 15.4 + 4.4 + 2.1 = 43.4
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Income 15.3% · PAT 13.2%
52% evidence
ROA — · ROE 32.9% · GNPA —
34% evidence
P/BV 11.66× · P/BV÷ROE 0.35
70% evidence
RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -5.1%
100% evidence
31.8/100 · Adverse evidence · 80% evidence
Exact sum: 3.6 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 3 = 31.8
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Income 1.6% · PAT -35.3%
81% evidence
ROA 9.4% · ROE 10.3% · GNPA —
68% evidence
P/BV 2.52× · P/BV÷ROE 0.24
100% evidence
RS sector -19% · RS bench -16.1% · 1Y -34.3%
70% evidence
50.3/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 1% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.8 + 10 + 10 = 50.3
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Income — · PAT —
0% evidence
ROA — · ROE — · GNPA —
6% evidence
P/BV — · P/BV÷ROE —
0% evidence
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
47.3/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 26% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 11.7 + 8.8 + 10 = 47.3
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Income — · PAT —
10% evidence
ROA — · ROE 12.4% · GNPA —
34% evidence
P/BV 3.17× · P/BV÷ROE 0.26
70% evidence
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
Tata Capital Ltd has the highest Income among the 7 Finance - AMC companies compared here, at ₹31,538 crore. HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd is next at ₹4,254 crore. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the highest Income growth at 23%, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Tata Capital Ltd is the scale leader at ₹31,538 crore, 641.4% ahead of HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd's growth is 23% from a ₹2,869 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Tata Capital Ltd is the scale benchmark; Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Tata Capital Ltd's growth falls below Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Income | Income growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Capital Ltd TATACAP | ₹8.2K Cr | 9.1% | Mar 2026 |
| ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd ICICIAMC | ₹2.9K Cr | 20% | Sep 2025 |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd HDFCAMC | ₹1.1K Cr | 14% | Jun 2026 |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd NAM-INDIA | ₹767 Cr | 26% | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | ₹584 Cr | 6.8% | Jun 2026 |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ABSLAMC | ₹463 Cr | 3.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | ₹145 Cr | 20% | Jun 2026 |
Tata Capital Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 7 Finance - AMC companies compared here, at ₹4,891 crore. HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd is next at ₹2,947 crore. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 21.3%, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Tata Capital Ltd leads with ₹4,891 crore of TTM profit, 66% above HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd shows 21.3% growth from a ₹1,638 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Tata Capital Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd ICICIAMC | ₹1.6K Cr | 22% | Sep 2025 |
| Tata Capital Ltd TATACAP | ₹1.5K Cr | 47% | Mar 2026 |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd HDFCAMC | ₹837 Cr | 12% | Jun 2026 |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd NAM-INDIA | ₹504 Cr | 27% | Jun 2026 |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ABSLAMC | ₹309 Cr | 12% | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | ₹294 Cr | 16% | Jun 2026 |
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | ₹76 Cr | 25% | Jun 2026 |
No company in this Finance - AMC comparison has a funding base figure that passes this section's guard, so the Deposits rank is empty. On Borrowings, Tata Capital Ltd is highest at ₹2,36,376 crore, across 6 of 7 companies with a usable reading.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable deposits leader.
Investor read: The current leader sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd (ICICIAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 50% on reported income across 1 comparable period, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Deposits | Borrowings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Capital Ltd TATACAP | — | ₹2.4 L Cr | Mar 2026 |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd HDFCAMC | — | ₹0 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd NAM-INDIA | — | ₹75 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ABSLAMC | — | ₹64 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | — | ₹141 Cr | Jun 2026 |
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | — | ₹18 Cr | Jun 2026 |
No consistent historical series is available for deposits.
Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd has the highest ROA among the 7 Finance - AMC companies compared here, at 24.9%. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd is next at 9.4%. The same company also holds the highest ROA change, at -3.4 percentage points. 2 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd leads both roa at 24.9% and roa change at -3.4 percentage points.
Investor read: Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd (ICICIAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 50% on reported income across 1 comparable period, so its derived ratios are withheld; Tata Capital Ltd (TATACAP) — its two data sources disagree by up to 34% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd (HDFCAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 27% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd (ABSLAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 26% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | ROA | ROA change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | 25% | −3.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | 9.4% | −5.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the highest ROE among the 7 Finance - AMC companies compared here, at 34.5%. HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd is next at 32.9%. Tata Capital Ltd has the highest ROE change at -1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd leads roe at 34.5%; Tata Capital Ltd leads roe change at -1 percentage points.
Investor read: Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd (ICICIAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 50% on reported income across 1 comparable period, so its derived ratios are withheld; Tata Capital Ltd (TATACAP) — its two data sources disagree by up to 34% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd (HDFCAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 27% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd (ABSLAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 26% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | ROE | ROE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | 23% | −5.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | 11% | −2.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
No company in this Finance - AMC comparison reports gross NPA on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 7 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Jun 2026.
Withheld from this comparison: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd (ICICIAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 50% on reported income across 1 comparable period, so its derived ratios are withheld; HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd (HDFCAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 27% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd (ABSLAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 26% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 7 Finance - AMC companies compared here, at 0.23×. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd is next at 0.24×. UTI Asset Management Company Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 2.52×, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.23×, 4.2% below UTI Asset Management Company Ltd. Only 6 of 7 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd (ICICIAMC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 50% on reported income across 1 comparable period, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | P/BV ÷ ROE | P/BV | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | 0.3 | 6.6 | Jun 2026 |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | 0.2 | 2.6 | Jun 2026 |
| Tata Capital Ltd TATACAP | — | 3.6 | Mar 2026 |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd HDFCAMC | — | 12.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd NAM-INDIA | — | 15.6 | Jun 2026 |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ABSLAMC | — | 8.8 | Jun 2026 |
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Finance - AMC at +41%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +26.2%. 2 of 4 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
This Finance - AMC comparison names 8 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 7 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 4 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
All 7 companies in the canonical Finance - AMC membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
| Company | Market value | Price | Priced to | Latest fundamentals | Source standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd ICICIAMC | ₹1.5 L Cr | ₹3,126 | 2026-07-19 | Sep 2025 | Second feed withheld |
| Tata Capital Ltd TATACAP | ₹1.5 L Cr | ₹342 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Second feed withheld |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd HDFCAMC | ₹1.1 L Cr | ₹2,506 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Second feed withheld |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd NAM-INDIAAHEAD25/26 WEEKS | ₹71.1K Cr | ₹1,112 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Primary source only |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd ABSLAMC25/26 WEEKS | ₹29.4K Cr | ₹1,017 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Second feed withheld |
| UTI Asset Management Company Ltd UTIAMC | ₹11.3K Cr | ₹881 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Cross-checked |
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd CRAMC | ₹5.2K Cr | ₹260 | 2026-07-19 | Jun 2026 | Cross-checked |
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Finance - AMC companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
These 16 answers restate the Finance - AMC comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
The Nifty Finance - AMC index tracks India's listed Finance - AMC companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 7 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Finance - AMC sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd places first among 7 listed Finance - AMC companies, followed by Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
This comparison covers 7 listed Finance - AMC companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Tata Capital Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of ₹31,538 crore, ahead of HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd at ₹4,254 crore. That covers 6 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the fastest income growth at 23% year on year, across 5 of 7 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Tata Capital Ltd earns the most, at ₹4,891 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 7 comparable companies. Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 21.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd leads on return on assets at 24.9%, across 2 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Ltd screens cheapest at 0.23×. Only 6 of 7 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd scores 62.5 out of 100 with 66.6% evidence confidence, from 26 points on growth and earnings, 16.3 on capital efficiency, 0.2 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
The 7 Finance - AMC companies on this page carry ₹5,24,110 crore of combined market value. ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd is the largest at ₹1,54,485 crore, about 29% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
The median price-to-book ratio across the 7 Finance - AMC companies on this page is 7.3×, measured on the 6 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.
2 of the 4 covered Finance - AMC companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.