Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-29
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV Stocks in India

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV: Tata Motors Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest current growth.

Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV Index — Constituents & Performance

The Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies below are the listed Indian Auto & Auto Ancl - CV universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading.

The sector itself · before any single company

How has Auto & Auto Ancl - CV moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 24% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 6 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 6w✓Price up, without the fundamentals confirming3 of 6 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑6w · 3/6 >200d (−1) · 3/6 lead (+2) · EPS 5/5↑

200500202620252024202320222021 547336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100151Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 135, against 100 at the start · up 58.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 37.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 130, against 100 at the start · up 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 123, against 100 at the start · down 16.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · down 11.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · down 6.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 3.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 122, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 13.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two145 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200500202620252024202320222021 547336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100151Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 135, against 100 at the start · up 58.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 37.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 130, against 100 at the start · up 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 123, against 100 at the start · down 16.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · down 11.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · down 6.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 3.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 122, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 13.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two145No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Auto & Auto Ancl - CV, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy Broad, early and backedHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 6 stocks moving
Fresh2 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +7 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 0/20
Mid 2/2+1
Small 1/2+1

Participation is spreading downward — the mid and small companies added more this month than the large ones did.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Auto & Auto Ancl - CV outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week comparison of Auto & Auto Ancl - CV against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 4 of 6 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. GNA Axles Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +34.9%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
4/6Stocks leading NIFTY 500
3/6Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 22.2 as of 2026-07-19 · LEADERS · rising.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 4 of 6 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Tata Motors Ltd leads with revenue of ₹83,854 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 41.8%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.

Is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 4 of 6 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is largest by revenue?

Tata Motors Ltd leads with revenue of ₹83,854 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is growing fastest?

Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 41.8%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd ranks first at 70/100 with 95.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the least gross debt?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹12 crore. Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest at ₹63,936 crore.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.86, among 3 of 7 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
7
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹2.7 L Cr
Tata Motors Ltd
Revenue growing
5/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
4/6
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 95.6% evidence confidence.
Automotive Axles Ltd looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
GNA Axles Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

70.0/100 · Favorable setup · 96% evidence

Exact sum: 25.7 + 20.6 + 15.8 + 7.9 = 70

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

25.7/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 15.1% · PAT 28.3% · OPM change 3 pp

88% evidence

20.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 27.5% · debt/equity 0.01×

100% evidence

15.8/20Valuation

P/E 22.2× · PEG 0.86

100% evidence

7.9/20Relative strength

RS sector -2.9% · RS bench 11.2% · 1Y 39.3%

100% evidence

2. Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

62.9/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 79% evidence

Exact sum: 27.3 + 12 + 6.8 + 16.8 = 62.9

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

27.3/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 41.8% · PAT 91% · OPM change 2 pp

83% evidence

12.0/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 13.9% · debt/equity 1.11×

80% evidence

6.8/20Valuation

P/E 63.5× · PEG —

50% evidence

16.8/20Relative strength

RS sector 4.3% · RS bench 19.9% · 1Y 42.2%

100% evidence

3. GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

57.9/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 100% evidence

Exact sum: 14.8 + 15.1 + 8 + 20 = 57.9

Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 54.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.

14.8/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 8% · PAT 29.4% · OPM change 0 pp

100% evidence

15.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 14.3% · debt/equity 0.22×

100% evidence

8.0/20Valuation

P/E 16.5× · PEG 1.7

100% evidence

20.0/20Relative strength

RS sector 34.9% · RS bench 54.1% · 1Y 67.5%

100% evidence

4. Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

46.8/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 90% evidence

Exact sum: 10.1 + 17.1 + 13.2 + 6.4 = 46.8

Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.

10.1/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 4.8% · PAT 5.8% · OPM change 1 pp

88% evidence

17.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 21.6% · debt/equity 0.01×

100% evidence

13.2/20Valuation

P/E 16.1× · PEG 1.98

100% evidence

6.4/20Relative strength

RS sector -17.6% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 1.3%

70% evidence

5. Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

45.7/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 73% evidence

Exact sum: 14.9 + 9.7 + 9.4 + 11.7 = 45.7

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

14.9/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 16.1% · PAT 10% · OPM change -1 pp

83% evidence

9.7/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 13.6% · debt/equity 4.49×

80% evidence

9.4/20Valuation

P/E 24.4× · PEG —

50% evidence

11.7/20Relative strength

RS sector 5.6% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 27%

70% evidence

6. Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

54.0/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 31% evidence

Exact sum: 18.5 + 16.4 + 9.1 + 10 = 54

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

18.5/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp

24% evidence

16.4/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 35.9% · debt/equity 0.44×

80% evidence

9.1/20Valuation

P/E 37.8× · PEG —

15% evidence

10.0/20Relative strength

RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —

0% evidence

7. Premier Ltd · PREMIER

37.2/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 36% evidence

Exact sum: 19.1 + 5.1 + 10 + 3 = 37.2

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

19.1/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT 15.9% · OPM change —

18% evidence

5.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -43.5% · debt/equity 2.04×

63% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E — · PEG —

0% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -23% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y -27%

70% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Tata Motors Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at ₹83,854 crore. Ashok Leyland Ltd is next at ₹56,362 crore. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 41.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 7 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tata Motors Ltd is the scale leader at ₹83,854 crore, 48.8% ahead of Ashok Leyland Ltd. Craftsman Automation Ltd's growth is 41.8% from a ₹8,069 crore base, with 14 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTata Motors Ltd · ₹83,854 crore
Gap48.8% versus #2 · Ashok Leyland Ltd
Persistence3/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 107 observations

Investor read: Tata Motors Ltd is the scale benchmark; Craftsman Automation Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Tata Motors Ltd's growth falls below Craftsman Automation Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹83.9K Cr
2Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹56.4K Cr
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹8.1K Cr
4Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹2.6K Cr
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹2.2K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN42%
2Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY16%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO15%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA8.0%
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES4.8%
Revenue · company comparison
7/7 level · 5/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹26.1K Cr19%Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹17.2K Cr17%Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹2.2K Cr27%Mar 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹840 Cr32%Mar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹664 Cr19%Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹470 Cr37%Jun 2026
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹0 Cr—Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
₹8.3K Cr
₹10.4K Cr
₹13.2K Cr
₹9.7K Cr
₹11.4K Cr
₹11.1K Cr
₹13.5K Cr
₹10.7K Cr
₹11.1K Cr
₹12.0K Cr
₹14.7K Cr
₹11.7K Cr
₹12.6K Cr
₹14.8K Cr
₹17.2K Cr
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹309 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹552 Cr
₹500 Cr
₹475 Cr
₹656 Cr
₹693 Cr
₹532 Cr
₹584 Cr
₹541 Cr
₹572 Cr
₹492 Cr
₹495 Cr
₹531 Cr
₹560 Cr
₹489 Cr
₹462 Cr
₹562 Cr
₹664 Cr
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
₹749 Cr
₹980 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹2.0K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹340 Cr
₹301 Cr
₹281 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹420 Cr
₹404 Cr
₹384 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹404 Cr
₹357 Cr
₹371 Cr
₹400 Cr
₹388 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹378 Cr
₹344 Cr
₹348 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹411 Cr
₹470 Cr

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹352 Cr
₹445 Cr
₹626 Cr
₹548 Cr
₹553 Cr
₹591 Cr
₹634 Cr
₹575 Cr
₹607 Cr
₹604 Cr
₹640 Cr
₹557 Cr
₹513 Cr
₹562 Cr
₹638 Cr
₹573 Cr
₹531 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹840 Cr
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
—
—
—
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹17.5K Cr
₹18.8K Cr
₹21.9K Cr
₹17.3K Cr
₹18.6K Cr
₹21.8K Cr
₹26.1K Cr
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38%
6.7%
2.6%
11%
-2.5%
8.1%
8.5%
9.2%
13%
24%
17%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
96%
54%
75%
26%
6.4%
23%
-18%
-17%
-7.5%
-15%
-1.9%
-2.1%
-0.6%
-6.7%
5.8%
19%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
51%
13%
11%
3.0%
39%
58%
55%
65%
31%
27%
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
14%
24%
34%
37%
-0.3%
-3.8%
-12%
-3.4%
7.0%
-4.0%
5.0%
1.9%
-14%
-10%
0.0%
8.7%
37%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
86%
57%
33%
1.3%
4.9%
9.8%
2.2%
1.0%
-3.1%
-15%
-7.0%
-0.3%
2.9%
3.5%
19%
32%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.0%
16%
19%
—
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest OPM among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 19%. Craftsman Automation Ltd is next at 16%. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the highest Margin change at +3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Ashok Leyland Ltd leads opm at 19%; Jamna Auto Industries Ltd leads margin change at +3 percentage points.

LeaderAshok Leyland Ltd · 19%
Gap18.8% versus #2 · Craftsman Automation Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/7 companies · 103 observations

Investor read: Ashok Leyland Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY19%
2Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN16%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO16%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA15%
5Tata Motors Ltd TMCV13%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO+3.0 pp
2Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN+2.0 pp
3Tata Motors Ltd TMCV+2.0 pp
4Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES+1.0 pp
5GNA Axles Ltd GNA0.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
6/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY19%−1.0 ppMar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN16%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO16%+3.0 ppMar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA15%0.0 ppJun 2026
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV13%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES12%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

10%
9.9%
12%
9.1%
6.0%
13%
15%
16%
16%
18%
19%
17%
18%
19%
20%
19%
19%
19%
19%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

7.2%
9.3%
11%
10%
11%
12%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
10%
10%
11%
11%
10%
10%
11%
12%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

25%
23%
24%
24%
22%
21%
19%
21%
20%
19%
19%
17%
16%
13%
14%
15%
15%
15%
16%
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

14%
13%
13%
13%
14%
16%
15%
16%
14%
13%
10%
14%
14%
14%
13%
15%
18%
18%
14%
15%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

13%
13%
14%
11%
10%
11%
13%
13%
13%
14%
14%
13%
13%
14%
13%
13%
13%
17%
16%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
11%
11%
12%
11%
12%
13%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

−4.7 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.9 pp
−4.4 pp
+3.1 pp
+3.0 pp
+6.9 pp
+10.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

+1.6 pp
−0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+4.2 pp
+3.5 pp
+2.7 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

−2.2 pp
−5.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−4.6 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

−4.5 pp
−4.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−3.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+3.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

+3.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
—
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at ₹3,721 crore. Tata Motors Ltd is next at ₹3,028 crore. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 91%, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Ashok Leyland Ltd leads with ₹3,721 crore of TTM profit, 22.9% above Tata Motors Ltd. Craftsman Automation Ltd shows 91% growth from a ₹384 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderAshok Leyland Ltd · ₹3,721 crore
Gap22.9% versus #2 · Tata Motors Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 107 observations

Investor read: Ashok Leyland Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹3.7K Cr
2Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹3.0K Cr
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹384 Cr
4Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹231 Cr
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹165 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN91%
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA29%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY10.0%
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES5.8%
Net profit · company comparison
7/7 level · 5/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹1.8K Cr34%Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹1.4K Cr11%Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹116 Cr73%Mar 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹87 Cr74%Mar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹54 Cr17%Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹38 Cr65%Jun 2026
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹-2 Cr—Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
₹199 Cr
₹351 Cr
₹803 Cr
₹584 Cr
₹569 Cr
₹609 Cr
₹934 Cr
₹551 Cr
₹767 Cr
₹820 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹658 Cr
₹820 Cr
₹862 Cr
₹1.4K Cr
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹10 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹45 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹54 Cr
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
₹52 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹104 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹91 Cr
₹107 Cr
₹116 Cr
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹25 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹38 Cr

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹27 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹87 Cr
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
—
—
—
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹-2 Cr
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹498 Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹-867 Cr
₹705 Cr
₹1.8K Cr
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
186%
74%
16%
-5.7%
35%
35%
33%
19%
6.9%
5.1%
11%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
400%
200%
155%
31%
27%
50%
-24%
-14%
-11%
-20%
2.6%
4.6%
5.9%
0.0%
-2.5%
17%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56%
-11%
-27%
-40%
-84%
-5.6%
19%
47%
723%
73%
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
-6.9%
32%
112%
89%
22%
-15%
-39%
-50%
-15%
3.6%
14%
47%
-18%
6.9%
28%
24%
65%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
95%
37%
11%
-8.8%
24%
35%
34%
5.8%
0.0%
-20%
-20%
-9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
32%
74%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-274%
-48%
34%
—
04 · not available

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

No company in this Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison reports capital expenditure on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 7 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.

Withheld from this comparison: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashok Leyland Ltd (ASHOKLEY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 17% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Craftsman Automation Ltd (CRAFTSMAN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 12% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at ₹12 crore. Automotive Axles Ltd is next at ₹14 crore. Automotive Axles Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹385 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Automotive Axles Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹385 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹14 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderJamna Auto Industries Ltd · ₹12 crore
Gap14.3% versus #2 · Automotive Axles Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 76 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹12 Cr
2Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹14 Cr
3Premier Ltd PREMIER · older report₹176 Cr
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹218 Cr
5Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹3.6K Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹-385 Cr
2Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹41 Cr
3GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹180 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
7/7 level · 3/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹63.9K Cr—Mar 2026
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹5.6K Cr—Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹3.6K Cr—Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹218 Cr₹180 CrJun 2026
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹176 Cr—Dec 2025
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹14 Cr₹-385 CrMar 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹12 Cr₹41 CrMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
₹24.1K Cr
—
—
—
₹31.2K Cr
—
—
—
₹40.8K Cr
—
—
—
₹50.0K Cr
—
₹54.5K Cr
—
₹63.9K Cr
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹26 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹14 Cr
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
₹800 Cr
—
—
—
₹1.2K Cr
—
—
—
₹1.8K Cr
—
—
—
₹2.4K Cr
—
₹3.3K Cr
—
₹3.6K Cr
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹233 Cr
₹233 Cr
₹222 Cr
₹222 Cr
₹210 Cr
₹210 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹216 Cr
₹216 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹253 Cr
₹253 Cr
₹259 Cr
₹259 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹228 Cr
₹218 Cr
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹69 Cr
₹69 Cr
₹293 Cr
₹293 Cr
₹219 Cr
₹219 Cr
₹358 Cr
₹358 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹151 Cr
₹12 Cr
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
₹181 Cr
—
—
—
₹180 Cr
—
—
—
₹178 Cr
—
—
—
₹177 Cr
—
₹176 Cr
—
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹9.9K Cr
—
—
—
₹5.6K Cr
—

Net debt · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹-52 Cr
₹-52 Cr
₹-74 Cr
₹-74 Cr
₹-56 Cr
₹-56 Cr
₹-79 Cr
₹-79 Cr
₹-90 Cr
₹-90 Cr
₹-282 Cr
₹-282 Cr
₹-45 Cr
₹-45 Cr
₹-360 Cr
₹-360 Cr
₹-163 Cr
₹-163 Cr
₹-385 Cr
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹202 Cr
₹202 Cr
₹217 Cr
₹217 Cr
₹173 Cr
₹173 Cr
₹176 Cr
₹176 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹180 Cr
₹180 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹180 Cr
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹-70 Cr
₹-70 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹168 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹-22 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹219 Cr
₹219 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹169 Cr
₹218 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹41 Cr
—
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Tata Motors Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 35.9%. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd is next at 27.5%. Premier Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +56.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Tata Motors Ltd leads ROCE at 35.9%, 8.4 percentage points above Jamna Auto Industries Ltd. Premier Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +56.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderTata Motors Ltd · 35.9%
Gap30.5% versus #2 · Jamna Auto Industries Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage7/7 companies · 46 observations

Investor read: Tata Motors Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Tata Motors Ltd TMCV36%
2Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%
3Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES22%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA14%
5Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN14%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Premier Ltd PREMIER · older report+56.4 pp
2Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO+3.2 pp
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN+2.0 pp
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY0.0 pp
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES−0.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
7/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

Withheld from this chart: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashok Leyland Ltd (ASHOKLEY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 17% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Craftsman Automation Ltd (CRAFTSMAN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 12% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%+3.2 ppMar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES18%−0.7 ppMar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA14%−0.9 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

12%
—
15%
—
23%
—
28%
—
29%
31%
23%
26%
20%
24%
19%
23%
18%
22%
18%
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

24%
—
20%
—
19%
—
25%
—
23%
23%
18%
18%
15%
17%
15%
17%
14%
17%
14%
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

26%
—
26%
—
30%
—
28%
32%
29%
34%
30%
33%
28%
29%
25%
26%
24%
28%
28%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
—
+10.5 pp
—
+12.3 pp
—
+6.5 pp
—
−4.1 pp
—
−9.2 pp
−7.1 pp
−4.7 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−0.7 pp
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
—
−4.8 pp
—
+4.8 pp
—
+3.6 pp
—
−6.9 pp
—
−7.6 pp
−5.8 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
—
+4.3 pp
—
+1.6 pp
—
−0.8 pp
—
+2.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.4 pp
−5.3 pp
−6.6 pp
−4.0 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.2 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 0.86×. GNA Axles Ltd is next at 1.7×. Automotive Axles Ltd has the lowest P/E at 16.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.86×, 49.4% below GNA Axles Ltd. Only 3 of 7 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderJamna Auto Industries Ltd · 0.86×
Gap49.4% versus #2 · GNA Axles Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/7 companies · 22 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO0.9
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA1.7
3Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES2.0
P/Elowest P/E
1Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES16.1
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA16.5
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO22.2
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY24.4
5Tata Motors Ltd TMCV37.8
Valuation · company comparison
3/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

Withheld from this chart: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES2.014.5Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA1.716.1Jun 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO0.923.1Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY—26.6Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN—47.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
0.9
0.8
—
—
—
0.8
—
0.4
0.3
1.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.0
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
1.4
0.3
—
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
1.6
—
0.6
0.7
—
1.2
4.4
2.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
55.2
41.2
30.0
25.1
21.3
28.1
28.2
25.1
21.5
23.7
26.1
30.7
26.6
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

36.0
42.8
37.8
32.0
29.7
25.1
23.8
20.7
19.7
17.6
15.4
18.2
17.8
17.8
15.8
17.7
16.8
17.4
14.5
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

46.1
28.6
27.9
28.6
29.9
35.5
31.0
34.3
36.8
38.3
28.5
38.5
48.8
48.2
57.0
61.7
70.0
67.6
47.0
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

18.4
14.4
11.1
12.6
15.9
15.1
14.8
13.1
14.9
14.6
13.9
16.9
20.1
18.3
14.9
13.2
13.1
12.9
14.6
16.1

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

34.3
33.2
30.1
31.4
28.6
24.7
23.0
24.2
26.4
23.5
26.0
24.0
23.4
19.6
16.3
21.0
22.9
28.0
23.1
—
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

GNA Axles Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 8.5×. Automotive Axles Ltd is next at 9.3×. The same company also holds the lowest P/BV, at 2.17×. 7 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: GNA Axles Ltd leads both ev/ebitda at 8.5× and p/bv at 2.17×.

LeaderGNA Axles Ltd · 8.5×
Gap8.6% versus #2 · Automotive Axles Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 98 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1GNA Axles Ltd GNA8.5
2Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES9.3
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO13.0
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY13.2
5Tata Motors Ltd TMCV14.7
P/BVlowest P/BV
1GNA Axles Ltd GNA2.2
2Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES2.5
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO4.6
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY6.2
5Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN6.8
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
7/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
Premier Ltd PREMIER510.40.0Dec 2025
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN16.85.5Mar 2026
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV14.714.2Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY13.27.6Mar 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO13.04.5Mar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES9.32.4Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA8.51.9Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

21.3
21.2
21.1
22.2
21.2
18.0
14.1
15.1
13.6
12.5
11.0
12.3
12.3
12.1
11.1
11.2
12.6
14.6
13.2
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

17.8
20.7
18.9
16.8
16.5
14.4
14.3
12.6
12.3
11.1
9.7
11.5
11.0
11.2
9.9
10.9
10.5
11.0
9.3
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

11.7
10.0
9.7
10.0
11.0
12.9
11.5
13.9
14.7
15.8
12.0
16.6
19.2
17.1
15.9
17.9
19.9
20.0
16.8
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

11.0
8.6
6.6
7.2
8.8
8.6
8.9
8.2
9.1
8.6
8.0
9.4
10.7
10.1
8.3
7.6
7.5
6.9
7.6
8.5

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

20.0
19.3
17.8
19.5
18.1
15.7
14.8
15.5
16.2
14.7
16.3
14.8
15.1
12.2
9.9
13.1
14.0
15.7
13.0
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
510.4
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14.7
—

P/BV · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

4.8
4.8
4.5
5.2
6.3
5.9
5.6
5.7
6.1
6.0
5.7
8.3
7.8
6.3
5.8
8.2
6.8
8.2
7.6
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

3.3
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.5
4.5
5.8
5.4
4.4
4.1
3.4
4.0
3.3
3.0
2.7
3.1
2.7
2.7
2.4
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

4.6
4.6
4.2
4.1
4.7
5.9
6.1
6.2
7.1
7.5
6.0
7.1
8.2
4.6
4.2
4.6
5.7
5.8
5.5
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

3.8
2.8
1.9
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.1
2.3
2.4
2.1
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.7
1.9

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

6.2
6.8
6.5
7.6
6.3
5.8
5.8
5.9
6.0
5.3
6.3
6.3
5.3
4.1
3.2
4.2
4.2
4.8
4.5
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14.2
—
09 · let price answer last

Market action

GNA Axles Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Auto & Auto Ancl - CV at +67.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +54.1%. 4 of 6 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 7 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 3 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
  • 3 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 7 companies in the canonical Auto & Auto Ancl - CV membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. 1 of these is no longer being priced, so its price and relative strength are frozen at the last traded week shown.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentalsSource standing
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹1.5 L Cr₹4062026-07-19Mar 2026Second feed withheld
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹88.7K Cr₹1512026-07-19Mar 2026Second feed withheld
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMANAHEAD24/26 WEEKS₹24.3K Cr₹9,2842026-07-19Mar 2026Second feed withheld
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTOAHEAD18/26 WEEKS₹5.3K Cr₹1332026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹2.7K Cr₹1,7992026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
GNA Axles Ltd GNAAHEAD20/26 WEEKS₹2.2K Cr₹5072026-07-19Jun 2026Cross-checked
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹8 Cr₹2.82026-03-29 · not currently pricedDec 2025Primary source only
How each company's sources stand: 3 of 7 companies have a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashok Leyland Ltd (ASHOKLEY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 17% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Craftsman Automation Ltd (CRAFTSMAN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 12% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing3 cross-checked · 1 unverified · 3 withheld, of 7 graded companies.

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.

Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company comparison FAQs

These 18 answers restate the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

What is the Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index?

The Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index tracks India's listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 7 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Jamna Auto Industries Ltd places first among 7 listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies, followed by Craftsman Automation Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 7 listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is the biggest?

Tata Motors Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹83,854 crore, ahead of Ashok Leyland Ltd at ₹56,362 crore. That covers 7 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is growing fastest?

Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 41.8% year on year, across 5 of 7 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the best profit margins?

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest operating margin at 19%, from 6 of 7 comparable companies. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company makes the most profit?

Ashok Leyland Ltd earns the most, at ₹3,721 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 7 of 7 comparable companies. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 91%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company earns the highest return on capital?

Tata Motors Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 35.9%, across 7 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Jamna Auto Industries Ltd screens cheapest at 0.86×. Only 3 of 7 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the strongest balance sheet?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹12 crore, from 7 of 7 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stock has the strongest price momentum?

GNA Axles Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company scores highest for research priority?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd scores 70 out of 100 with 95.6% evidence confidence, from 25.7 points on growth and earnings, 20.6 on capital efficiency, 15.8 on valuation and 7.9 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector?

The 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies on this page carry ₹2,72,801 crore of combined market value. Tata Motors Ltd is the largest at ₹1,49,573 crore, about 55% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.

What is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies on this page is 24.4×, measured on the 6 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.

How is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector performing?

4 of the 6 covered Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI