# Lisk (LSK) — crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin

> Lisk trades at $0.0726 with a market capitalisation of $21.2M (rank 810). Over 90 days it is -24.6% against Bitcoin and sits below its 200-day average. Layer 2 as a theme is -11.4% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Price readings run through 2026-07-31.

## Agent research brief

- What this coin is: Lisk (LSK), a Layer 2 token of $21.2M at market-cap rank 810. On-chain activity is sourced from chain + protocol + chain TVL.
- What the tape says: -24.6% versus Bitcoin over 90 days; below its 200-day average. Layer 2 as a theme is -11.4% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.
- What the evidence supports: 20.9/100 inside Layer 2 on 100% evidence (100% of it native activity). Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree.
- What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Lisk does publish network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked, active addresses, transactions.

Theme: Layer 2 (/mla/crypto/sector/layer-2). Price 2026-07-31; market-cap snapshot 2026-07-04.

## Price, returns and risk

Lisk is -82.8% over one year, -42.9% over 90 days and -15.8% over 30 days. Annualised 30-day volatility is 45%. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 50%. It trades below its 200-day average, which is falling.

- Price: $0.0726
- Market cap: $21.2M (rank 810)
- Returns: 7d -10%; 30d -16%; 90d -43%; 180d -50%; 1y -83%
- RS versus Bitcoin, 90d: -25%
- 30-day volatility: 45% annualised; deepest 90-day fall 50%
- 200-day average: $0.1219, trading below it

## Protocol economics

Lisk publishes 5 of the six network-economics series this site tracks: network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked, active addresses, transactions. Network fees over the last four complete quarters is $40.8K. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token. Readings run to the Q2 2026 quarter.

- Network fees: trailing four quarters $40.8K; change -90%; covered 9/20 quarters
- Protocol revenue: trailing four quarters $36.4K; change -84%; covered 9/20 quarters
- Total value locked: latest quarter $657.8K; change -96%; covered 9/20 quarters
- Active addresses: latest quarter 382; change -94%; covered 9/20 quarters
- Transactions: trailing four quarters 14,811,297; change -72%; covered 9/20 quarters

## Research score

Lisk: 20.9/100 — Illiquid · research only; 3.8 + 3.3 + 6.6 + 7.2 = 20.9; evidence 100%; native evidence 100%; rank 33 of 33 rated Layer 2 coins
Decision use: Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree.
This weakens if: The read weakens if 90-day RS versus BTC falls below zero with two weekly closes below the 200-DMA, or native activity contracts for two complete calendar quarters.

No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built.

## Layer 2 scorecard

Lisk is one of 48 Layer 2 coins here, 33 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Lisk ranks 33 of those 33 on 100% evidence. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked.

- 1. POL (ex-MATIC) (POL): score 69.5; evidence 62%; Illiquid · research only
- 2. COTI (COTI): score 64.1; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 3. Capx AI (CAPX): score 56.2; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 4. Prom (PROM): score 55.6; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 5. Celo (CELO): score 53.4; evidence 90%; Illiquid · research only
- 6. Aztec (AZTEC): score 52.2; evidence 43%; Illiquid · research only
- 7. Linea (LINEA): score 51.2; evidence 100%; Mixed · market gate closed
- 8. MegaETH (MEGA): score 49.9; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 9. Sophon (SOPH): score 48.5; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 10. AltLayer (ALT): score 48.2; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 11. Immutable (IMX): score 48; evidence 17%; Illiquid · research only
- 12. OpenLedger (OPEN): score 47.9; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 13. BSquared Network (B2): score 47.8; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 14. Stacks (STX): score 47.5; evidence 17%; Illiquid · research only
- 15. Treasure (MAGIC): score 47.3; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 16. Aevo (AEVO): score 46.6; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 17. Optimism (OP): score 45.7; evidence 100%; Mixed · market gate closed
- 18. Metal DAO (MTL): score 43.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 19. Mantle (MNT): score 41.7; evidence 64%; Illiquid · research only
- 20. Cartesi (CTSI): score 41.2; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 21. ZKsync (ZK): score 41.1; evidence 62%; Illiquid · research only
- 22. Loopring (LRC): score 40.7; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 23. PHALA (PHA): score 39.1; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 24. Status (SNT): score 37.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 25. Nervos Network (CKB): score 37.2; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 26. Lumia (LUMIA): score 36.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 27. Orderly (ORDER): score 36; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 28. Manta Network (MANTA): score 35.9; evidence 100%; Lagging · market gate closed
- 29. Merlin Chain (MERL): score 34.1; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 30. Taiko (TAIKO): score 33.1; evidence 94%; Lagging · market gate closed
- 31. Metis (METIS): score 31.5; evidence 84%; Illiquid · research only
- 32. Islamic Coin (ISLM): score 24.1; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 33. Lisk (LSK) [this coin]: score 20.9; evidence 100%; Illiquid · research only

## Limitations

- Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
- Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag.
- No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all.
- Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
- The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal.

## FAQs

### What is Lisk (LSK)?

Lisk is a Layer 2 cryptocurrency tracked here by price, market capitalisation and strength against Bitcoin, with on-chain activity from chain + protocol + chain TVL. It is one of 48 Layer 2 coins on this site. Readings are as of 2026-07-31.

### What is the market cap of Lisk?

Lisk's market capitalisation is $21.2M, ranking it 810 in the top-1,000 crypto universe. That figure is a dated snapshot from 2026-07-04, refreshed separately from the daily price series, so it can lag the price shown above.

### Is Lisk beating Bitcoin?

Lisk is -24.6% against Bitcoin over 90 days, and its own theme, Layer 2, is -11.4% over 13 weeks. It trades below its 200-day average as of 2026-07-31.

### Does Lisk have a P/E ratio?

No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead.

### What is Lisk's research score?

20.9/100 within Layer 2, ranked 33 of 33 rated Layer 2 coins, on 100% evidence: 3.8 + 3.3 + 6.6 + 7.2 = 20.9. It is labelled “Illiquid · research only”. The score ranks research attention inside one theme, never portfolio action.

### How much Lisk history does this page show?

Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Lisk actually publishes. Here that is network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked, active addresses, transactions.

### Does Lisk generate network fees?

Lisk's trailing twelve-month network fees is $40.8K, down 89.7% on the year-earlier period. Network activity is not token-holder earnings: whether it accrues to the token depends on the protocol's own burn, buyback and distribution rules.