# Illuvium (ILV) — crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin

> Illuvium trades at $2.84 with a market capitalisation of $26.5M (rank 702). Over 90 days it is -20.4% against Bitcoin and sits below its 200-day average. Gaming as a theme is -8.2% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Price readings run through 2026-07-31.

## Agent research brief

- What this coin is: Illuvium (ILV), a Gaming token of $26.5M at market-cap rank 702. On-chain activity is sourced from protocol.
- What the tape says: -20.4% versus Bitcoin over 90 days; below its 200-day average. Gaming as a theme is -8.2% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.
- What the evidence supports: 26.4/100 inside Gaming on 86% evidence (72% of it native activity). Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree.
- What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Illuvium does publish network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked.

Theme: Gaming (/mla/crypto/sector/gaming). Price 2026-07-31; market-cap snapshot 2026-07-04.

## Price, returns and risk

Illuvium is -78.2% over one year, -40.5% over 90 days and -5.1% over 30 days. Annualised 30-day volatility is 47%. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 47%. It trades below its 200-day average, which is falling.

- Price: $2.84
- Market cap: $26.5M (rank 702)
- Returns: 7d -1.1%; 30d -5.1%; 90d -41%; 180d -33%; 1y -78%
- RS versus Bitcoin, 90d: -20%
- 30-day volatility: 47% annualised; deepest 90-day fall 47%
- 200-day average: $3.98, trading below it

## Protocol economics

Illuvium publishes 3 of the six network-economics series this site tracks: network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked. Network fees over the last four complete quarters is $110.7K. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token. Readings run to the Q2 2026 quarter.

- Network fees: trailing four quarters $110.7K; change -89%; covered 8/20 quarters
- Protocol revenue: trailing four quarters $110.7K; change -89%; covered 8/20 quarters
- Total value locked: latest quarter $0; change —; covered 20/20 quarters

## Research score

Illuvium: 26.4/100 — Illiquid · research only; 7.4 + 7.0 + 5.7 + 6.3 = 26.4; evidence 86%; native evidence 72%; rank 36 of 36 rated Gaming coins
Decision use: Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree.
This weakens if: The read weakens if 90-day RS versus BTC falls below zero with two weekly closes below the 200-DMA, or native activity contracts for two complete calendar quarters.

No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built.

## Gaming scorecard

Illuvium is one of 43 Gaming coins here, 36 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Illuvium ranks 36 of those 36 on 86% evidence. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked.

- 1. Capybobo (PYBOBO): score 62; evidence 43%; Illiquid · research only
- 2. GoMining Token (GOMINING): score 61.7; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 3. Alien Worlds (TLM): score 59.8; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 4. Metaplex (MPLX): score 57.2; evidence 86%; Illiquid · research only
- 5. Rollbit Coin (RLB): score 57.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 6. CROSS (CROSS): score 56.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 7. B3 (Base) (B3): score 55.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 8. Hamster Kombat (HMSTR): score 54.4; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 9. Incrypt (INC): score 52.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 10. Gama Token (GAMA): score 52.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 11. DEAPCOIN (DEP): score 52.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 12. Nexpace (NXPC): score 52.1; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 13. Decentraland (MANA): score 50.6; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 14. Four (FORM): score 48.4; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 15. GMT (GMT): score 48.1; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 16. SuperVerse (SUPER): score 47.5; evidence 17%; Illiquid · research only
- 17. Smooth Love Potion (SLP): score 46.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 18. ApeCoin (APE): score 45.7; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 19. Axie Infinity (AXS): score 45.1; evidence 86%; Mixed · market gate closed
- 20. WEMIX (WEMIX): score 44.8; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 21. Hunt (HUNT): score 44.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 22. SKALE (SKL): score 42.8; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 23. The Sandbox (SAND): score 42.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 24. Adshares (ADS): score 41.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 25. Hive (HIVE): score 40.7; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 26. Catizen (CATI): score 40.2; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 27. Unipoly (UNP): score 38.7; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 28. GALA (GALA): score 38.1; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 29. Big Time (BIGTIME): score 36.1; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 30. WAX (WAXP): score 36; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 31. Somnia (SOMI): score 35.9; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 32. Enjin Coin (ENJ): score 35.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 33. Yield Guild Games (YGG): score 34.6; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 34. BORA (BORA): score 33.7; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 35. Beam (BEAM): score 27.4; evidence 65%; Illiquid · research only
- 36. Illuvium (ILV) [this coin]: score 26.4; evidence 86%; Illiquid · research only

## Limitations

- Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
- Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag.
- No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all.
- Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
- The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal.

## FAQs

### What is Illuvium (ILV)?

Illuvium is a Gaming cryptocurrency tracked here by price, market capitalisation and strength against Bitcoin, with on-chain activity from protocol. It is one of 43 Gaming coins on this site. Readings are as of 2026-07-31.

### What is the market cap of Illuvium?

Illuvium's market capitalisation is $26.5M, ranking it 702 in the top-1,000 crypto universe. That figure is a dated snapshot from 2026-07-04, refreshed separately from the daily price series, so it can lag the price shown above.

### Is Illuvium beating Bitcoin?

Illuvium is -20.4% against Bitcoin over 90 days, and its own theme, Gaming, is -8.2% over 13 weeks. It trades below its 200-day average as of 2026-07-31.

### Does Illuvium have a P/E ratio?

No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead.

### What is Illuvium's research score?

26.4/100 within Gaming, ranked 36 of 36 rated Gaming coins, on 86% evidence: 7.4 + 7.0 + 5.7 + 6.3 = 26.4. It is labelled “Illiquid · research only”. The score ranks research attention inside one theme, never portfolio action.

### How much Illuvium history does this page show?

Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Illuvium actually publishes. Here that is network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked.

### Does Illuvium generate network fees?

Illuvium's trailing twelve-month network fees is $110.7K, down 88.7% on the year-earlier period. Network activity is not token-holder earnings: whether it accrues to the token depends on the protocol's own burn, buyback and distribution rules.