# Ethereum Name Service (ENS) — crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin

> Ethereum Name Service trades at $4.24 with a market capitalisation of $176.7M (rank 184). Over 90 days it is -10.5% against Bitcoin and sits below its 200-day average. NFT as a theme is -27.7% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Price readings run through 2026-07-31.

## Agent research brief

- What this coin is: Ethereum Name Service (ENS), a NFT token of $176.7M at market-cap rank 184. On-chain activity is sourced from protocol.
- What the tape says: -10.5% versus Bitcoin over 90 days; below its 200-day average. NFT as a theme is -27.7% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.
- What the evidence supports: 50.7/100 inside NFT on 70% evidence (40% of it native activity). Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.
- What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Ethereum Name Service does publish network fees, protocol revenue.

Theme: NFT (/mla/crypto/sector/nft). Price 2026-07-31; market-cap snapshot 2026-07-04.

## Price, returns and risk

Ethereum Name Service is -84.2% over one year, -30.6% over 90 days and +3.6% over 30 days. Annualised 30-day volatility is 54%. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 45%. It trades below its 200-day average, which is falling.

- Price: $4.24
- Market cap: $176.7M (rank 184)
- Returns: 7d -2.3%; 30d +3.6%; 90d -31%; 180d -37%; 1y -84%
- RS versus Bitcoin, 90d: -11%
- 30-day volatility: 54% annualised; deepest 90-day fall 45%
- 200-day average: $5.96, trading below it

## Protocol economics

Ethereum Name Service publishes 2 of the six network-economics series this site tracks: network fees, protocol revenue. Network fees over the last four complete quarters is $5.7M. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token. Readings run to the Q2 2026 quarter.

- Network fees: trailing four quarters $5.7M; change +9.0%; covered 20/20 quarters
- Protocol revenue: trailing four quarters $5.7M; change +9.0%; covered 20/20 quarters

## Research score

Ethereum Name Service: 50.7/100 — Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete; 17.3 + 15.1 + 10.0 + 8.3 = 50.7; evidence 70%; native evidence 40%; rank 1 of 6 rated NFT coins
Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.
This weakens if: The read weakens if 90-day RS versus BTC falls below zero with two weekly closes below the 200-DMA, or native activity contracts for two complete calendar quarters.

No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built.

## NFT scorecard

Ethereum Name Service is one of 9 NFT coins here, 6 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Ethereum Name Service ranks 1 of those 6 on 70% evidence. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked.

- 1. Ethereum Name Service (ENS) [this coin]: score 50.7; evidence 70%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 2. Magic Eden (ME): score 47; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 3. SWFTCOIN (SWFTC): score 45.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 4. GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) (GAL): score 44.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 5. Audius (AUDIO): score 41; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 6. Chiliz (CHZ): score 32.3; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete

## Limitations

- Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
- Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag.
- No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all.
- Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
- The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal.

## FAQs

### What is Ethereum Name Service (ENS)?

Ethereum Name Service is a NFT cryptocurrency tracked here by price, market capitalisation and strength against Bitcoin, with on-chain activity from protocol. It is one of 9 NFT coins on this site. Readings are as of 2026-07-31.

### What is the market cap of Ethereum Name Service?

Ethereum Name Service's market capitalisation is $176.7M, ranking it 184 in the top-1,000 crypto universe. That figure is a dated snapshot from 2026-07-04, refreshed separately from the daily price series, so it can lag the price shown above.

### Is Ethereum Name Service beating Bitcoin?

Ethereum Name Service is -10.5% against Bitcoin over 90 days, and its own theme, NFT, is -27.7% over 13 weeks. It trades below its 200-day average as of 2026-07-31.

### Does Ethereum Name Service have a P/E ratio?

No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead.

### What is Ethereum Name Service's research score?

50.7/100 within NFT, ranked 1 of 6 rated NFT coins, on 70% evidence: 17.3 + 15.1 + 10.0 + 8.3 = 50.7. It is labelled “Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete”. The score ranks research attention inside one theme, never portfolio action.

### How much Ethereum Name Service history does this page show?

Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Ethereum Name Service actually publishes. Here that is network fees, protocol revenue.

### Does Ethereum Name Service generate network fees?

Ethereum Name Service's trailing twelve-month network fees is $5.7M, up 9% on the year-earlier period. Network activity is not token-holder earnings: whether it accrues to the token depends on the protocol's own burn, buyback and distribution rules.