# Aptos (APT) — crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin > Aptos trades at $0.568 with a market capitalisation of $521.6M (rank 103). Its 90-day reading against Bitcoin is unavailable, so relative strength is not called here. Layer 1 as a theme is -7.8% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Price readings run through 2026-07-31. ## Agent research brief - What this coin is: Aptos (APT), a Layer 1 token of $521.6M at market-cap rank 103. On-chain activity is sourced from protocol + chain TVL. - What the tape says: No 90-day Bitcoin-relative reading is available; no 200-day average on file. Layer 1 as a theme is -7.8% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. - What the evidence supports: 50.5/100 inside Layer 1 on 37% evidence (50% of it native activity). Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree. - What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Aptos does publish network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked. Theme: Layer 1 (/mla/crypto/sector/layer-1). Price 2026-07-31; market-cap snapshot 2026-07-04. ## Price, returns and risk Aptos's one-year return is withheld because the series is incomplete. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 42%. - Price: $0.5680 - Market cap: $521.6M (rank 103) - Returns: 7d —; 30d —; 90d —; 180d —; 1y — - RS versus Bitcoin, 90d: — - 30-day volatility: unavailable; deepest 90-day fall 42% - 200-day average: unavailable ## Protocol economics Aptos publishes 3 of the six network-economics series this site tracks: network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked. Network fees over the last four complete quarters is $1.4M. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token. Readings run to the Q2 2026 quarter. - Network fees: trailing four quarters $1.4M; change -5.0%; covered 15/20 quarters - Protocol revenue: trailing four quarters —; change —; covered 1/20 quarters - Total value locked: latest quarter $109.7M; change -89%; covered 15/20 quarters ## Research score Aptos: 50.5/100 — Illiquid · research only; 17.5 + 14.5 + 11.9 + 6.6 = 50.5; evidence 37%; native evidence 50%; rank 15 of 64 rated Layer 1 coins Decision use: Evidence is mixed. Keep normal research priority and wait for two pillars to agree. This weakens if: The read weakens if 90-day RS versus BTC falls below zero with two weekly closes below the 200-DMA, or native activity contracts for two complete calendar quarters. No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built. ## Layer 1 scorecard Aptos is one of 78 Layer 1 coins here, 64 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Aptos ranks 15 of those 64 on 37% evidence. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked. - 1. TRON (TRX): score 78; evidence 91%; Priority research · market gate closed - 2. DigiByte (DGB): score 61.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 3. XPR Network (XPR): score 60; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 4. Ethereum (ETH): score 57.6; evidence 84%; Mixed · market gate closed - 5. eCash (XEC): score 57.3; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 6. Ozone Chain (OZO): score 56.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 7. Nesa (NES): score 55.6; evidence 23%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 8. Gravity (by Galxe) (G): score 54.5; evidence 84%; Illiquid · research only - 9. Worldcoin (WLD): score 53.2; evidence 76%; Mixed · market gate closed - 10. Solana (SOL): score 53.1; evidence 91%; Mixed · market gate closed - 11. XRP (XRP): score 52.8; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 12. Sui (SUI): score 51.5; evidence 17%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 13. Bitcoin (BTC): score 50.6; evidence 75%; Mixed · market gate closed - 14. Constellation (DAG): score 50.6; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 15. Aptos (APT) [this coin]: score 50.5; evidence 37%; Illiquid · research only - 16. Bitcoin SV (BSV): score 50.3; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 17. Abey (ABEY): score 50.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 18. Avalanche (AVAX): score 49.8; evidence 91%; Mixed · market gate closed - 19. Ethereum Classic (ETC): score 49.7; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 20. Flare (FLR): score 49.3; evidence 65%; Illiquid · research only - 21. VeChain (VET): score 48.8; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 22. Plasma (XPL): score 48.8; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 23. Hedera (HBAR): score 48.7; evidence 65%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 24. Vaulta (A): score 48.5; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only - 25. aelf (ELF): score 48.3; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 26. Qtum (QTUM): score 46.8; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 27. Sonic (S): score 46.8; evidence 27%; Illiquid · research only - 28. Brevis (BREV): score 45.9; evidence 43%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 29. Ontology Gas (ONG): score 45.9; evidence 17%; Illiquid · research only - 30. Celestia (TIA): score 45.6; evidence 70%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 31. APEX (AP3X): score 45.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 32. QANplatform (QANX): score 45.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 33. Conflux (CFX): score 45.2; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 34. Venom (VENOM): score 43.3; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 35. EthereumPoW (ETHW): score 43.1; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 36. OHO Blockchain (OHO): score 43.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 37. Kava (KAVA): score 42.8; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 38. Electroneum (ETN): score 42.6; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 39. Polkadot (DOT): score 42.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 40. Movement (MOVE): score 41.9; evidence 33%; Illiquid · research only - 41. Bitcoin Cash (BCH): score 41.1; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 42. NEO (NEO): score 41.1; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 43. Space and Time (SXT): score 41; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 44. Cardano (ADA): score 40.9; evidence 81%; Lagging · market gate closed - 45. Monad (MON): score 40.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 46. KUB Coin (KUB): score 39.9; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 47. Cosmos Hub (ATOM): score 39.4; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 48. Kusama (KSM): score 39; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 49. Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL): score 38.8; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 50. Zilliqa (ZIL): score 38.2; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 51. Irys (IRYS): score 37.8; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 52. VeThor (VTHO): score 36.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 53. IOST (IOST): score 36.8; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete - 54. Gas (GAS): score 36.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 55. Xertra (STRAX): score 35.1; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 56. Moonriver (MOVR): score 34.7; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 57. Ontology (ONT): score 34.7; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 58. Kaia (KAIA): score 34.3; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 59. ARK (ARK): score 33.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 60. Ardor (ARDR): score 32.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 61. Bityuan (BTY): score 32.9; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 62. Waves (WAVES): score 32.6; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only - 63. Naoris Protocol (NAORIS): score 30.7; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only - 64. AtomOne (ATONE): score 27.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only ## Limitations - Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. - Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag. - No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all. - Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred. - The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal. ## FAQs ### What is Aptos (APT)? Aptos is a Layer 1 cryptocurrency tracked here by price, market capitalisation and strength against Bitcoin, with on-chain activity from protocol + chain TVL. It is one of 78 Layer 1 coins on this site. Readings are as of 2026-07-31. ### What is the market cap of Aptos? Aptos's market capitalisation is $521.6M, ranking it 103 in the top-1,000 crypto universe. That figure is a dated snapshot from 2026-07-04, refreshed separately from the daily price series, so it can lag the price shown above. ### Is Aptos beating Bitcoin? Aptos has no usable 90-day reading against Bitcoin at present, so this page does not call its relative strength. Layer 1 as a whole is -7.8% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. ### Does Aptos have a P/E ratio? No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead. ### What is Aptos's research score? 50.5/100 within Layer 1, ranked 15 of 64 rated Layer 1 coins, on 37% evidence: 17.5 + 14.5 + 11.9 + 6.6 = 50.5. It is labelled “Illiquid · research only”. The score ranks research attention inside one theme, never portfolio action. ### How much Aptos history does this page show? Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Aptos actually publishes. Here that is network fees, protocol revenue, total value locked. ### Does Aptos generate network fees? Aptos's trailing twelve-month network fees is $1.4M, down 5% on the year-earlier period. Network activity is not token-holder earnings: whether it accrues to the token depends on the protocol's own burn, buyback and distribution rules.