# Alien Worlds (TLM) — crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin

> Alien Worlds trades at $0.0018 with a market capitalisation of $18.7M (rank 856). Over 90 days it is +16% against Bitcoin and sits above its 200-day average. Gaming as a theme is -8.2% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Price readings run through 2026-07-31.

## Agent research brief

- What this coin is: Alien Worlds (TLM), a Gaming token of $18.7M at market-cap rank 856. On-chain activity is sourced from protocol.
- What the tape says: +16% versus Bitcoin over 90 days; above its 200-day average. Gaming as a theme is -8.2% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.
- What the evidence supports: 59.5/100 inside Gaming on 55% evidence (10% of it native activity). Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.
- What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Alien Worlds does publish total value locked.

Theme: Gaming (/mla/crypto/sector/gaming). Price 2026-07-31; market-cap snapshot 2026-07-04.

## Price, returns and risk

Alien Worlds is -61.3% over one year, -2.3% over 90 days and +19.9% over 30 days. Annualised 30-day volatility is 280%. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 60%. It trades above its 200-day average, which is falling.

- Price: $0.0018
- Market cap: $18.7M (rank 856)
- Returns: 7d -0.5%; 30d +20%; 90d -2.3%; 180d -1.9%; 1y -61%
- RS versus Bitcoin, 90d: +16%
- 30-day volatility: 280% annualised; deepest 90-day fall 60%
- 200-day average: $0.0017, trading above it

## Protocol economics

Alien Worlds publishes 1 of the six network-economics series this site tracks: total value locked. Total value locked at the latest complete quarter is $37.6K. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token. Readings run to the Q2 2026 quarter.

- Total value locked: latest quarter $37.6K; change -77%; covered 8/20 quarters

## Research score

Alien Worlds: 59.5/100 — Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete; 27.9 + 12.5 + 10.0 + 9.1 = 59.5; evidence 55%; native evidence 10%; rank 3 of 36 rated Gaming coins
Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.
This weakens if: The read weakens if 90-day RS versus BTC falls below zero with two weekly closes below the 200-DMA, or native activity contracts for two complete calendar quarters.

No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built.

## Gaming scorecard

Alien Worlds is one of 43 Gaming coins here, 36 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Alien Worlds ranks 3 of those 36 on 55% evidence. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked.

- 1. Capybobo (PYBOBO): score 61.8; evidence 43%; Illiquid · research only
- 2. GoMining Token (GOMINING): score 61.7; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 3. Alien Worlds (TLM) [this coin]: score 59.5; evidence 55%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 4. Rollbit Coin (RLB): score 57.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 5. Metaplex (MPLX): score 56.9; evidence 86%; Illiquid · research only
- 6. CROSS (CROSS): score 56.5; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 7. B3 (Base) (B3): score 55.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 8. Hamster Kombat (HMSTR): score 54.3; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 9. Nexpace (NXPC): score 52.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 10. DEAPCOIN (DEP): score 52.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 11. Gama Token (GAMA): score 52.1; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 12. Incrypt (INC): score 51.6; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 13. Decentraland (MANA): score 50.7; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 14. Four (FORM): score 48.4; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 15. GMT (GMT): score 48.1; evidence 12%; Illiquid · research only
- 16. SuperVerse (SUPER): score 47.5; evidence 17%; Illiquid · research only
- 17. Smooth Love Potion (SLP): score 45.8; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 18. ApeCoin (APE): score 45.7; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 19. Axie Infinity (AXS): score 45.1; evidence 86%; Mixed · market gate closed
- 20. WEMIX (WEMIX): score 44.9; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 21. Hunt (HUNT): score 44.6; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 22. SKALE (SKL): score 42.7; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 23. The Sandbox (SAND): score 42.6; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 24. Adshares (ADS): score 41.6; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 25. Hive (HIVE): score 40.2; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 26. Catizen (CATI): score 39.8; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 27. Unipoly (UNP): score 38.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 28. GALA (GALA): score 38.1; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 29. Big Time (BIGTIME): score 36.2; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 30. Somnia (SOMI): score 35.7; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 31. WAX (WAXP): score 35.5; evidence 55%; Illiquid · research only
- 32. Enjin Coin (ENJ): score 35.4; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 33. Yield Guild Games (YGG): score 34.5; evidence 50%; Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete
- 34. BORA (BORA): score 33.7; evidence 50%; Illiquid · research only
- 35. Beam (BEAM): score 27.4; evidence 65%; Illiquid · research only
- 36. Illuvium (ILV): score 25.9; evidence 86%; Illiquid · research only

## Limitations

- Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
- Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag.
- No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all.
- Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
- The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal.

## FAQs

### What is Alien Worlds (TLM)?

Alien Worlds is a Gaming cryptocurrency tracked here by price, market capitalisation and strength against Bitcoin, with on-chain activity from protocol. It is one of 43 Gaming coins on this site. Readings are as of 2026-07-31.

### What is the market cap of Alien Worlds?

Alien Worlds's market capitalisation is $18.7M, ranking it 856 in the top-1,000 crypto universe. That figure is a dated snapshot from 2026-07-04, refreshed separately from the daily price series, so it can lag the price shown above.

### Is Alien Worlds beating Bitcoin?

Alien Worlds is +16% against Bitcoin over 90 days, and its own theme, Gaming, is -8.2% over 13 weeks. It trades above its 200-day average as of 2026-07-31.

### Does Alien Worlds have a P/E ratio?

No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead.

### What is Alien Worlds's research score?

59.5/100 within Gaming, ranked 3 of 36 rated Gaming coins, on 55% evidence: 27.9 + 12.5 + 10.0 + 9.1 = 59.5. It is labelled “Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete”. The score ranks research attention inside one theme, never portfolio action.

### How much Alien Worlds history does this page show?

Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Alien Worlds actually publishes. Here that is total value locked.

### Does Alien Worlds generate total value locked?

Alien Worlds's latest quarter total value locked is $37.6K, down 77.1% on the year-earlier period. Network activity is not token-holder earnings: whether it accrues to the token depends on the protocol's own burn, buyback and distribution rules.