Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-24
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-24

Siemens Ltd

SIEMENS
Capital Goods - Electric General

Siemens Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved +2.1 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (14 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 66th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −36.4% year on year, and 20% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Stage
Mixed
partial read
Price
₹3,659
+17.0% 1Y
P/E
46.8×
66th pctile
of its own 10-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹4,618 Cr
+14.6% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
₹370 Cr
−36.4% YoY
Operating margin
10.0%
−1.0 pp YoY
ROCE
21%
Mar 26
Cash conversion
20%
of profit, last 3 FY
Withheld from this page: Part of this page is deliberately not drawn: its two data sources disagree by up to 38% on reported income across 13 comparable periods, so nothing from the second source is placed here — the PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, the quarterly return curves, the annual return-on-invested-capital overlay, the total-debt and debt-to-equity series and the F-score, the Z-score and the return-on-invested-capital reading are absent for that reason. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data. The quarterly history also begins where the primary source begins: 6 earlier quarters the second source carries are not spliced in front of it. Extending a reported profit series is stricter than showing a ratio chart — it needs a source that has been checked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Siemens Ltd trades at ₹3,659, in a confirmed uptrend and 14 weeks into that stage. That is +7.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 80% of a 52-week range of ₹2,900 to ₹3,844. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 14 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹3,659 it trades +7.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 80% of its 52-week range (₹2,900–₹3,844).

Jul 26: ₹3,659 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+7.5% versus the 200-day line, week 14 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S4S2₹4,734₹3,965₹3,196₹2,427₹1,658₹3,659₹3,403Jul 23Apr 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S4S4S2₹4,734₹3,965₹3,196₹2,427₹1,658₹3,659₹3,403Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (548 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +511% while the NIFTY 500 moved +272% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 66th percentile of its own range.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Siemens Ltd trades at 46.8× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (66th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 42.3×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 46.8× is mid-range by its own standards (66th percentile), against a long-run median of 42.3× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 46.8× vs a 42.3× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 10.4-year window; loss-period spikes above 80× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (66th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
84.6×₹85.166.9×₹63.949.3×₹42.631.7×₹21.314.0×₹0.0×46.80×₹79Mar 16Oct 18Jun 21Feb 24Jul 26
84.6×₹85.166.9×₹63.949.3×₹42.631.7×₹21.314.0×₹0.0×46.80×₹79Mar 16Jun 21Jul 26
P/E
46.8×
66th percentile of 10y

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +30.8% against a +17.0% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +25.9%/yr price move, ~+24.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+1.9 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +17.2%/yr price move, ~+16.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+0.8 pp from the multiple (roughly flat). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 38% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Siemens Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 16.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfitEPS
19%80%7.4%44%−3.9%7.6%−15%−29%−26%−65%%%14.6%−36.4%−40.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
19%80%7.4%44%−3.9%7.6%−15%−29%−26%−65%%%14.6%−36.4%−40.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
21%20%19%17%16%%16%FY22FY23FY25
21%20%19%17%16%%16%FY22FY23FY25
Revenue growth
Flat
latest +14.6% · span −23.3% to +15.5%
Profit growth
Flat
latest −36.4% · span −54.8% to +54.8%
ROCE
Steady high
latest 16.0% · span 16.0%–21.0%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Growth, year by year: revenue +45.4% in Mar 26, profit +30.8% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
51%165%31%104%11%44%−9.4%−17%−30%−78%%%45.4%30.8%FY16FY21Mar 26
51%165%31%104%11%44%−9.4%−17%−30%−78%%%45.4%30.8%FY16FY21Mar 26
TTM growth by quarter Trailing-twelve-month growth versus the year-ago TTM, per quarter, %: revenue (left axis); profit and EPS (right axis). The acceleration read compares the last 4 quarters (+13.4%) with the last 8 annualized (−2.3%).
revenue accelerating, profit rolling over
Revenue TTM YoYProfit TTM YoYEPS TTM YoY
16%48%6.7%24%−2.5%0.0%−12%−23%−21%−47%%%13.4%−40.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
16%48%6.7%24%−2.5%0.0%−12%−23%−21%−47%%%13.4%−40.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+45.4%+8.3%+13.5%+8.7%
Profit+30.8%+12.0%+20.4%−0.6%
EPS+30.8%+12.0%+20.4%−0.6%
Share price+17.0%+20.0%+25.9%+17.2%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+14.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
−36.4%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
8.7%
long-run compound pace

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

48.1/100 — rank 11 of 19 in Capital Goods - Electric General · 79% evidence confidence

Siemens Ltd scores 48.1 out of 100 against the 19 companies it is compared with in Capital Goods - Electric General, ranking 11. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.1 + 18.7 + 7.2 + 6.1 = 48.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Siemens Ltd reported ₹4,618 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +14.6% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.7% a year. The last full year, Mar 26, came in at ₹24,846 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹17,696 Cr.

Siemens Ltd reported ₹4,618 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +14.6% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.7% a year. The last full year, Mar 26, came in at ₹24,846 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹17,696 Cr.

Mar 26 revenue came in at ₹24,846 Cr (+45.4% on the year), capping 10 years at 8.7% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹4,618 Cr, +14.6% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Mar 26 revenue ₹24,846 Cr (+45.4% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
8.7% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
26.8k51%20.1k31%13.4k11%6.7k−9.4%0−30%₹ Cr%₹24,84645.4%FY16FY21Mar 26
26.8k51%20.1k31%13.4k11%6.7k−9.4%0−30%₹ Cr%₹24,84645.4%FY16FY21Mar 26
Mar 26: ₹4,618 Cr (+14.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
6.3k19%4.7k7.4%3.1k−3.9%1.6k−15%0−26%₹ Cr%₹4,61814.6%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
6.3k19%4.7k7.4%3.1k−3.9%1.6k−15%0−26%₹ Cr%₹4,61814.6%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +13.5% growth against the decade's 8.7% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +13.4% over the last 4 quarters against −2.3%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit −40.3% vs −18.4%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 10.0% this quarter (−1.0 pp YoY).

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Siemens Ltd's operating margin is 10.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0% to 14.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Siemens Ltd's operating margin is 10.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0% to 14.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 10.0%, −1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0%–14.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −1.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −4.6 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Mar 26: 11.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a 1.0–14.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
15%8.8%11%5.9%7.5%3.0%3.7%0.0%0.0%−2.8%%%11%−1%FY14FY20Mar 26
15%8.8%11%5.9%7.5%3.0%3.7%0.0%0.0%−2.8%%%11%−1%FY14FY20Mar 26
Mar 26: 10.0% operating margin (−1.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
15%2.5%14%0.7%13%−1.0%11%−2.7%9.6%−4.5%%%10%−1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
15%2.5%14%0.7%13%−1.0%11%−2.7%9.6%−4.5%%%10%−1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −36.4% in the latest quarter.

07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Siemens Ltd earned ₹370 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −36.4% year on year. Full-year Mar 26 profit was ₹2,754 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −0.6%. That is 8.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹582 Cr.

Siemens Ltd earned ₹370 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −36.4% year on year. Full-year Mar 26 profit was ₹2,754 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −0.6%. That is 8.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹582 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹370 Cr, −36.4% year on year. On the full year, Mar 26 printed ₹2,754 Cr (+30.8%), and the 10-year compound rate is −0.6%.

Mar 26 profit ₹2,754 Cr (+30.8% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−0.6% a year over 10 years
Net profitYoY growth
3.1k165%2.4k104%1.6k44%787−17%0−78%₹ Cr%₹2,75430.8%FY16FY21Mar 26
3.1k165%2.4k104%1.6k44%787−17%0−78%₹ Cr%₹2,75430.8%FY16FY21Mar 26
Mar 26: ₹370 Cr (−36.4% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
89780%67344%4497.6%224−29%0−65%₹ Cr%₹370−36.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
89780%67344%4497.6%224−29%0−65%₹ Cr%₹370−36.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +14.6% and the margin −1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −39.9% vs revenue +13.5%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 20% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 20% of Siemens Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In Mar 26 that was ₹−535 Cr of operating cash against ₹2,754 Cr of profit. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

Mar 26: operating cash of ₹−535 Cr against reported profit of ₹2,754 Cr. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 20% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Mar 26: CFO ₹−535 Cr vs profit ₹2,754 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution.
20% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
3.2k2.1k1.0k−91−1.2k₹ Cr₹−535₹2,754₹466FY16FY21Mar 26
3.2k2.1k1.0k−91−1.2k₹ Cr₹−535₹2,754₹466FY16FY21Mar 26
Mar 26: CFO = −19% of profit (three-year rate 20%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
143%100%56%13%−31%%−19%FY16FY21Mar 26
143%100%56%13%−31%%−19%FY16FY21Mar 26

🚨 Why conversion sits at 20%: the cash cycle stretched 31 days between FY21 and Mar 26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 31 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: the 23-day cycle, in money terms.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Siemens Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 23 days in Mar 26, up from −8 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹532 Cr over the last 3 years. At Mar 26 sales of ₹24,846 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹68.1 Cr, so roughly ₹1,566 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

Mar 26: debtors at 57 days, inventory at 60 days — roughly 2.0 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 23 days, looser than FY21's −8.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 60 days to sell; customers pay about 57 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 94 days — netting out to the 23-day cycle.

In money terms: at Mar 26 sales of ₹24,846 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹68.1 Cr — so the 23-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,566 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

Mar 26: a 23-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
+31 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
27419110824−59days23d60d57d94dFY14FY17FY20FY23Mar 26
27419110824−59days23d60d57d94dFY14FY20Mar 26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹532 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹844 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹206 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY25: capex ₹−91.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹206 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
2.5k1.8k1.1k414−283₹ Cr₹−91₹206FY15FY17FY20FY22FY25
2.5k1.8k1.1k414−283₹ Cr₹−91₹206FY15FY20FY25

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 21%.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Siemens Ltd earns a ROCE of 21% in Mar 26. That is up from a trough of 11% in FY20. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 11.1% net margin on 1.17× asset turns.

Mar 26 ROCE is 21%, recovered from a FY20 trough of 11% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (Mar 26): 11.1% net margin × 1.17× asset turns × 1.53× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

Mar 26: ROCE 21% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 12-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY20's 11%
ROCEWACC
22%19%16%13%10%%21%FY15FY17FY20FY23Mar 26
22%19%16%13%10%%21%FY15FY20Mar 26

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 38% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.02.

11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Siemens Ltd carries ₹307 Cr of borrowings against ₹13,840 Cr of equity in Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.02. Operating profit covers the interest bill 83×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹4.0 Cr to ₹307 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹532 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

Mar 26: borrowings of ₹307 Cr against equity of ₹13,840 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.02. Operating profit covers the interest bill 83×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹4.0 Cr to ₹307 Cr while capital spending ran ₹532 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

Mar 26: borrowings ₹307 Cr at 0.02× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 13-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
the debt trajectory
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
3320.022×2490.016×1660.010×830.004×0−0.002×₹ Cr×₹3070.02×FY14FY17FY20FY23Mar 26
3320.022×2490.016×1660.010×830.004×0−0.002×₹ Cr×₹3070.02×FY14FY20Mar 26

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 38% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions cut 2.1 points over 8 quarters.

12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 2.1 points of Siemens Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 6.5% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +2.1 points over the same window, to 9.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −2.1 points over 8 quarters to 6.5%; Domestic institutions: +2.1 points over 8 quarters to 9.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 75.0%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −2.1 points against domestic institutions +2.1 points over 8 quarters, with promoters holding steady — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
80%61%41%21%1.3%%75%6.8%8.6%9.6%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
80%61%41%21%1.3%%75%6.8%8.6%9.6%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Foreign institutions cut 2.1 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
80%61%41%21%1.0%%75%6.5%9.1%9.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
80%61%41%21%1.0%%75%6.5%9.1%9.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Siemens Ltd: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute.

Related companies · same sector · Capital Goods - Electric General Every company is compared on the shape of its own curves, not static ratios. The Revenue, EPS and ROCE columns each draw that company's last 12 quarters as a mini line of the ACTUAL level (trailing-twelve-month revenue and EPS, and the ROCE itself) — so a line that climbs is a business getting bigger, a line that sinks is one shrinking. The colour tracks the same line: green when it is rising or steadily healthy, amber when it is rolling over from a high (still elevated but turning down), red when it is falling, grey when flat or stuck. Colour and direction always agree — a green line never points down. The ROCE curve is the return on capital (annual readings for peers, so a slightly coarser line than the quarterly one at the top of this page). The Stage column then runs the same 12-quarter trajectory classifier used at the top of the page on each company and names where it sits. What lands a company in each bucket: CONSISTENT — growth stays positive across the window and returns are healthy (ROCE ≥ 15%, or ROE ≥ 12% for lenders); IMPROVING — profit or EPS fell into real decline, bottomed a few quarters back, and has climbed back to positive and held there; TURNING AROUND — the same kind of trough but more recent, with the latest quarters just lifting off it (an early, unconfirmed turn); TOPPING OUT — growth is still positive but decelerating hard from its own peak while returns have stopped rising; DETERIORATING — two or more growth curves are shrinking (latest below zero) and staying there, not one soft quarter; MIXED — the curves genuinely disagree, or no clean majority, so no single word fits; NO READ — fewer than eight usable quarters. It is a like-for-like read of every company against its own past, not a ranking against the group.
CompanyP/EMkt capRevenueEPSROCEStage
Siemens Ltd this page46.8×₹1.3L CrMixed
V-Guard Industries Ltd39.5×₹12,705 CrTurning around
Spectrum Electrical Industries Ltd80.7×₹3,585 CrNo read
Ravindra Energy Ltd42.2×₹3,404 CrNo read
Insolation Energy Ltd13.9×₹2,783 CrImproving
Insolation Energy Ltd12.4×₹2,482 Cr
Rishabh Instruments Ltd29.5×₹2,406 CrImproving
Modern Insulators Ltd29.1×₹2,324 CrConsistent
Exicom Tele-Systems Ltd₹2,229 CrNo read
Servotech Renewable Power System Ltd57.7×₹2,160 CrMixed
HPL Electric & Power Ltd22.6×₹2,144 CrMixed
Alpex Solar Ltd10.6×₹2,136 CrNo read
Honda India Power Products Ltd29.5×₹2,118 CrMixed
IKIO Technologies Ltd38.2×₹1,583 CrTurning around
Igarashi Motors India Ltd118.0×₹1,436 CrMixed
Modern Insulators Ltd16.7×₹1,122 CrImproving
Modern Insulators Ltd17.5×₹1,122 CrImproving
Salzer Electronics Ltd19.2×₹1,018 CrMixed
Swelect Energy Systems Ltd19.6×₹930 CrTurning around
Modison Ltd11.4×₹897 CrImproving
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd95.1×₹829 CrTurning around
Focus Lighting & Fixtures Ltd96.1×₹487 CrTurning around
12 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Siemens Ltd's share price today?

Siemens Ltd trades at ₹3,659, +17.0% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,31,401 Cr. The stock sits at 80% of its 52-week range of ₹2,900–₹3,844, +7.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 14 weeks in. — as of 24 July 2026.

What were Siemens Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Siemens Ltd reported revenue of ₹4,618 Cr and net profit of ₹370 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 14.6% and profit fell 36.4% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹10.39. The operating margin was 10.0%, 1.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's revenue?

Siemens Ltd reported revenue of ₹4,618 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +14.6% year on year. For the full Mar 26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹24,846 Cr (+45.4%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 8.7% a year. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's profit?

Siemens Ltd earned ₹370 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −36.4% year on year. Full-year Mar 26 profit was ₹2,754 Cr. The operating margin ran 10.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's market cap?

Siemens Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,31,401 Cr at a share price of ₹3,659. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's P/E ratio?

Siemens Ltd trades at a P/E of 46.8×, at the 66th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 42.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 24 July 2026.

Does Siemens Ltd pay a dividend?

Yes — Siemens Ltd's dividend payout was 23% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 12 of its last 13 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Siemens Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 46.8× sits at the 66th percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 42.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd growing?

Not right now — Siemens Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue +14.6% year on year, profit −36.4%, and the margin −1.0 pp at 10.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 8.7% (revenue) and −0.6% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 24 July 2026.

How is Siemens Ltd performing?

Siemens Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 14 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 14.6% and profit fell 36.4% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 24 July 2026.

What stage is Siemens Ltd in?

Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 16.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +14.6% latest, profit growth −36.4% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 14 of stage 2), trading +7.5% versus its 200-day average and at 80% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Siemens Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +511% against the NIFTY 500's +272% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 24 July 2026.

Will Siemens Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Siemens Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹3,659, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 14 weeks in. Its P/E of 46.8× sits at the 66th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 24 July 2026.

Who owns Siemens Ltd?

Promoters hold 75.0% of Siemens Ltd, foreign institutions 6.5%, domestic institutions 9.1% and the public 9.4% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 2.1 points over 8 quarters. — as of 24 July 2026.

Does Siemens Ltd have too much debt?

No — Siemens Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.02, and operating profit covers the interest bill 83×. Mar 26 borrowings were ₹307 Cr against equity of ₹13,840 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's capex?

Siemens Ltd spent ₹532 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was ₹−91.0 Cr, with ₹206 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is Siemens Ltd's cash flow?

Siemens Ltd generated ₹−535 Cr of operating cash flow in Mar 26. Reported profit that year was ₹2,754 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 20% of Siemens Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In Mar 26, operating cash was ₹−535 Cr against reported profit of ₹2,754 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 24 July 2026.

Where is Siemens Ltd in its business cycle?

Siemens Ltd's Mar 26 operating margin was 11.0%, against a 13-year band of 1.0%–14.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 10.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 24 July 2026.

What could break the Siemens Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved +2.1 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 24 July 2026.

Is Siemens Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Siemens Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 24 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI