Satia Industries Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Satia Industries Ltd trades at ₹60.1, in a downtrend and 96 weeks into that stage. That is −8.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 22% of a 52-week range of ₹54 to ₹84. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (15 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 96 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹60.1 it trades −8.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 22% of its 52-week range (₹54–₹84).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +2,143% while the NIFTY 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (15 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-08) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 90th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Satia Industries Ltd trades at 14.8× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (90th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 7.6×, measured across 10.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 14.8× is at the pricey end of its own range (90th percentile), against a long-run median of 7.6× measured over 10.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −65.5% against a −33.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −10.8%/yr price move, ~−3.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−7.1 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +36.5%/yr price move, ~+7.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+28.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Satia Industries Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −1.8% latest (single-quarter readings) against +1.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 4.0%. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

27.5/100 — rank 9 of 10 in Paper · 83% evidence confidence

Satia Industries Ltd scores 27.5 out of 100 against the 10 companies it is compared with in Paper, ranking 9. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 4.8 + 7 + 9.7 + 6 = 27.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Satia Industries Ltd reported ₹390 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.8% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 12.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,452 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,452 Cr.

Satia Industries Ltd reported ₹390 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.8% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 12.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,452 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,452 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,452 Cr (−3.5% on the year), capping 10 years at 12.9% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹390 Cr, −1.8% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −4.0% growth against the decade's 12.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −4.0% over the last 4 quarters against −8.1%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit −65.5% vs −56.0%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 4.3% this quarter (−11.2 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Satia Industries Ltd's operating margin is 4.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, −11.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0% to 24.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

Satia Industries Ltd's operating margin is 4.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, −11.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0% to 24.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 4.3%, −11.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0%–24.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −11.2 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.4 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −83.6% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Satia Industries Ltd earned ₹5.8 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −83.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 12.2%. That is 1.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹35.4 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Satia Industries Ltd earned ₹5.8 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −83.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 12.2%. That is 1.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹35.4 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹5.8 Cr, −83.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹41.0 Cr (−65.5%), and the 10-year compound rate is 12.2%.

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −1.8% and the margin −11.2 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −94.8% vs revenue −4.0%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 237% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 237% of Satia Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹233 Cr of operating cash against ₹41.0 Cr of profit. After ₹236 Cr of capital spending, ₹−3.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹233 Cr against reported profit of ₹41.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−3.0 Cr after ₹236 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 237% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 237%: the cash cycle tightened 37 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a 86-day cycle and ₹552 Cr of building.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Satia Industries Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 86 days in FY26, down from 123 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹552 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,452 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹4.0 Cr, so roughly ₹342 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 32 days, inventory at 85 days — roughly 2.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 86 days, tighter than FY21's 123.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 85 days to sell; customers pay about 32 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 31 days — netting out to the 86-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,452 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹4.0 Cr — so the 86-day loop keeps roughly ₹342 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹552 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹447 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹257 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 4% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −12.6 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Satia Industries Ltd earns a ROCE of 4% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −12.6 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 2.8% net margin on 0.93× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 4%.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 2.8% net margin × 0.93× asset turns × 1.43× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.7% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −0.6% − 12.0% = a −12.6 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.29.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Satia Industries Ltd carries ₹313 Cr of borrowings against ₹1,088 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹345 Cr to ₹313 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹552 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹313 Cr against equity of ₹1,088 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹345 Cr to ₹313 Cr while capital spending ran ₹552 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions cut 2.3 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 2.3 points of Satia Industries Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 0.5% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +0.1 points over the same window, to 0.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −2.3 points over 8 quarters to 0.5%; Domestic institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 52.5%.

🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−2.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Satia Industries Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions