Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd trades at ₹500, in a confirmed uptrend and 21 weeks into that stage. That is −4.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 26% of a 52-week range of ₹464 to ₹598. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (10 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 21 of stage 2. At ₹500 it trades −4.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 26% of its 52-week range (₹464–₹598).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +5,197% while the NIFTY 500 moved +272% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (10 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-05) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 68th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd trades at 16.1× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 8.9×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 16.1× is mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile), against a long-run median of 8.9× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +58.0% against a +12.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +50.5%/yr price move, ~+23.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+26.8 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +42.5%/yr price move, ~+23.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+19.2 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: revenue growth has eased from +43.0% at its peak to +22.6% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 17.4%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

54.0/100 — rank 5 of 6 in Mining/Minerals - Iron Ore · 89% evidence confidence

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd scores 54.0 out of 100 against the 6 companies it is compared with in Mining/Minerals - Iron Ore, ranking 5. Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.2% and the one-year return is 12.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 24.5 + 13.9 + 13.7 + 1.9 = 54. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd reported ₹1,254 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.2% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 14.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹5,690 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹5,691 Cr.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd reported ₹1,254 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.2% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 14.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹5,690 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹5,691 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹5,690 Cr (+22.6% on the year), capping 10 years at 14.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹1,254 Cr, +1.2% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +26.5% growth against the decade's 14.4% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +22.6% over the last 4 quarters against +21.3%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +58.3% vs +45.7%/yr — accelerating.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 28.0% this quarter (+6.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd's operating margin is 28.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0% to 35.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd's operating margin is 28.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0% to 35.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 28.0%, +6.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0%–35.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +5.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +7.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +55.0% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd earned ₹155 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +55.0% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹1,109 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 56.0%. That is 12.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹100 Cr.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd earned ₹155 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +55.0% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹1,109 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 56.0%. That is 12.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹100 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹155 Cr, +55.0% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹1,109 Cr (+58.0%), and the 10-year compound rate is 56.0%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +1.2% and the margin +6.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +58.1% vs revenue +26.5%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 144% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 144% of Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹1,735 Cr of operating cash against ₹1,109 Cr of profit. After ₹447 Cr of capital spending, ₹1,288 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹1,735 Cr against reported profit of ₹1,109 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹1,288 Cr after ₹447 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 144% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 144%: the cash cycle tightened 17 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 5.4× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹4,328 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 96 days in FY26, down from 113 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹4,328 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹5,690 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹15.6 Cr, so roughly ₹1,497 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 18 days, inventory at 99 days — roughly 3.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 96 days, tighter than FY21's 113.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 99 days to sell; customers pay about 18 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 22 days — netting out to the 96-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹5,690 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹15.6 Cr — so the 96-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,497 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹4,328 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹795 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹463 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 17% and the ROIC − WACC spread is +2.0 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd earns a ROCE of 17% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 6% in FY16. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +2.0 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 19.5% net margin on 0.50× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 17%, recovered from a FY16 trough of 6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 19.5% net margin × 0.50× asset turns × 1.54× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 15.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 14.0% − 12.0% = a +2.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.36.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd carries total debt of ₹2,632 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹7,476 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.35. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.52 in FY22 to 0.35 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹2,632 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹7,476 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.35. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.52 (FY22) to 0.35 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions added 1.0 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions added 1.0 points of Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 3.5% of the company. Promoters moved +0.5 points over the same window, to 73.2%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +1.0 points over 8 quarters to 3.5%; Promoters: +0.5 points over 8 quarters to 73.2%; Domestic institutions: −0.3 points over 8 quarters to 3.5%.

Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (+1.0 points), alongside promoters (+0.5 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions