Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. trades at $10.1, between stages. That is −18.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 2% of a 52-week range of $10 to $15. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (47 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $10.1 it trades −18.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 2% of its 52-week range ($10–$15).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −37% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (47 weeks and counting) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/BV sits at the 8th percentile of its own range.

Valuation For a bank we price the book, not the earnings: P/BV is what the market pays for each $1 of the bank's net worth. A bank below 1× book is priced below the value of what it owns, net of what it owes.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. trades at 0.6× P/BV, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 8% of the time. Its long-run median P/BV is 0.8×, measured across 1.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/BV of 0.6× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 8% of the time, against a long-run median of 0.8× measured over 1.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

The honest context for that discount: a bank earning about 5% on its equity is worth less per dollar of book, and the market has priced that in rather than overlooked it. The discount closes only if the returns themselves improve.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year book value grew while the price moved −35.4% — price and book moved together, holding the multiple in its range.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the book-value line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from +0.0% at the trough to +21.1% off a 4-quarter-old trough, ROE holding at 6.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Asset Management.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue For a bank, revenue is everything the franchise earns — interest on the loan book plus fees from its businesses.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. reported $0.2 B of income in the Mar 26 quarter, +69.2% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 33.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.9 B.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. reported $0.2 B of income in the Mar 26 quarter, +69.2% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 33.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.9 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.8 B (+67.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 33.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.2 B, +69.2% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +82.3% growth against the decade's 33.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +82.0% over the last 4 quarters against +36.3%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +21.1% vs +10.0%/yr — accelerating.

→ Revenue grew — did the net margin hold as it scaled? Next: 77.3% this quarter (+0.4 pp YoY).

Net margin Net margin — what the bank keeps of every $100 of revenue after every cost, provision and tax. With big fee businesses in the mix, it is the cleanest margin we can read for this bank.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.'s net margin is 77.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 57.7% to 75.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.'s net margin is 77.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 57.7% to 75.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's net margin is 77.3%, +0.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 57.7%–75.5%.

Why: the numbers show the net margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

→ The net margin held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +70.0% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. earned $0.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +70.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.5 B. The 4-year compound rate is 35.8%. That is 77.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. earned $0.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +70.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.5 B. The 4-year compound rate is 35.8%. That is 77.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B.

Mar 26 profit was $0.2 B, +70.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.5 B (+37.8%), and the 4-year compound rate is 35.8%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +69.2% and the margin +0.4 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +18.6% vs revenue +82.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit is up — how clean is the loan book behind it? Next: we hold no quarterly loan-book numbers — the section says so plainly.

Asset quality — the ladder Gross NPA is the slice of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what remains after the money already set aside against those loans. Falling is healing; rising is damage arriving.

Loan-book quality history is not available for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp., so this section names the gap rather than estimating a ratio. No gross or net non-performing-asset series is filed in a form this page can read, and none is inferred from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections above carry the evidence this business does report.

We do not hold quarterly loan-book quality numbers for this bank, so this section states that plainly rather than working around it.

Why: loan-book quality is the engine room of a bank, and its drivers — slippages, recoveries, provisioning — sit below what we hold for this name; the sections around it carry the reads we can stand behind.

→ Behind the profits — is the book itself still growing? Next: revenue grew +67.3% in FY25.

The loan book We read the loan book through revenue — when the book and the businesses grow, revenue grows with them. It is a rough proxy, and we say so: rate moves and fee swings can shift it a few points in any one year.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.'s revenue grew +67.3% in FY25 to $0.8 B, so the book is growing. The latest quarter ran +69.2% year on year. The net margin on that income is 77.3%, +0.4 percentage points against a year ago.

FY25 revenue was $0.8 B, +67.3% on the year, and the latest quarter ran +69.2% year on year. The net margin on that revenue is 77.3% this quarter (+0.4 pp YoY) — growth with a widening margin on it.

The synthesis: a lender compounds when the book grows while the margin holds and the loan book stays clean — with quarterly loan-quality numbers missing here, revenue growth and margin are the two we watch.

→ Does all of this actually earn its keep on equity? Next: ROE is 5%.

Returns on equity and assets Two numbers rate a bank: ROE — what it earns on shareholder money — and ROA — what it earns on everything it deploys. ROE above ~13–15% earns its keep; below that, growth builds book slowly.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. earns a return on equity of 6% in FY25. Its trough over the ladder below was 4% in FY21. On the asset side every $100 of the balance sheet earned about $4.29, which is the return before leverage is applied.

FY25 ROE came in at 6%, recovered from a FY21 trough of 4%. On assets, the latest reading is about 4.29% — every $100 the bank deploys earns roughly $4.29 a year. That return is below the bar a bank must clear to compound book value quickly — which is also the honest reason the stock trades where it does.

Why ROE moved: profit compounded 35.8% a year over 4 years while the equity base grew more slowly — earnings recovering faster than book value builds is what lifts ROE off a trough.

→ Who owns this bank, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register.

Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. paid $1.79 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 17.6% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.40 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $10.1 that is a trailing yield of 17.78%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. paid $1.79 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 17.6% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.40 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $10.1 that is a trailing yield of 17.78%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. paid $1.79 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.40 for Mar 26. That is up 17.6% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $10.1 the trailing twelve months work out to 17.78% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.

→ A payout is cash leaving the business. Next: what the balance sheet looks like behind it.

Debt

For a bank, borrowings are raw material, not a warning sign — solvency is read through the returns and the loan book. A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits, so the debt-to-equity lens that works everywhere else misleads on a lender and is not applied here.

A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits; a bank’s borrowings are its inventory — money taken in to be lent out. The debt lens that works everywhere else misleads here, so this page does not apply it. The solvency questions for a bank — is the loan book sound, is the equity earning — are read through the loan-book and returns sections above.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register.

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.1 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre. The Z-score was built for manufacturers and is not applied to banks and lenders, so solvency here is read from the capital and asset-quality lines instead.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre.

Frequently asked questions