Onward Technologies Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Onward Technologies Ltd trades at ₹286, in a downtrend and 42 weeks into that stage. That is +2.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 49% of a 52-week range of ₹225 to ₹348. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 42 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹286 it trades +2.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 49% of its 52-week range (₹225–₹348).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +311% while the NIFTY 500 moved +274% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Onward Technologies Ltd trades at 14.4× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 19% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 27.1×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 14.4× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 19% of the time, against a long-run median of 27.1× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +63.1% against a −21.7% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +2.1%/yr price move, ~+15.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−12.9 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +14.8%/yr price move, ~+30.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−15.8 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Onward Technologies Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +66.7% at its peak to +30.3% but is still expanding, ROCE lifting at 23.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

57.8/100 — rank 2 of 7 in IT - ER&D · 74% evidence confidence

Onward Technologies Ltd scores 57.8 out of 100 against the 7 companies it is compared with in IT - ER&D, ranking 2. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.9 + 13.4 + 11.5 + 11 = 57.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Onward Technologies Ltd reported ₹149 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +12.0% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 10.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹544 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹560 Cr.

Onward Technologies Ltd reported ₹149 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +12.0% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 10.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹544 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹560 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹544 Cr (+10.8% on the year), capping 10 years at 10.6% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹149 Cr, +12.0% year on year — the 8th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +10.7% growth against the decade's 10.6% — the current year is running in line with its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +10.7% over the last 4 quarters against +9.2%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +30.3% vs +17.8%/yr — accelerating.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 12.0% this quarter (−1.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Onward Technologies Ltd's operating margin is 12.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 5.0% to 13.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Onward Technologies Ltd's operating margin is 12.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 5.0% to 13.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 12.0%, −1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 5.0%–13.0%, and FY26's 13.0% is the top of that band — a record year.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −0.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −15.4% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Onward Technologies Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −15.4% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹44.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 30.8%. That is 7.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹13.0 Cr.

Onward Technologies Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −15.4% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹44.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 30.8%. That is 7.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹13.0 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹11.0 Cr, −15.4% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹44.0 Cr (+63.0%), and the 10-year compound rate is 30.8%.

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +12.0% and the margin −1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +62.8% vs revenue +10.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 151% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 151% of Onward Technologies Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹65.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹44.0 Cr of profit. After ₹38.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹27.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹65.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹44.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹27.0 Cr after ₹38.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 151% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 151%: the cash cycle stretched 19 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 1.8× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹77.0 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Onward Technologies Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 81 days in FY26, up from 62 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹77.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹544 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.5 Cr, so roughly ₹121 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 81 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 81 days, looser than FY21's 62.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹544 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.5 Cr — so the 81-day loop keeps roughly ₹121 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹77.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹42.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 23% and the ROIC − WACC spread is +11.5 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Onward Technologies Ltd earns a ROCE of 23% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 10% in FY14. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +11.5 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 8.1% net margin on 1.48× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 23%, recovered from a FY14 trough of 10% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 8.1% net margin × 1.48× asset turns × 1.45× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 17.4% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 23.5% − 12.0% = a +11.5 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.16.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Onward Technologies Ltd carries total debt of ₹40.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹254 Cr as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.16 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.12 in FY22 to 0.16 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Jun 26: total debt of ₹40.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹254 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.16. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.12 (FY22) to 0.16 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions added 7.7 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions added 7.7 points of Onward Technologies Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 9.3% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −5.8 points over the same window, to 1.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +7.7 points over 8 quarters to 9.3%; Domestic institutions: −5.8 points over 8 quarters to 1.8%; Promoters: +1.9 points over 8 quarters to 40.0%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions +7.7 points against domestic institutions −5.8 points over 8 quarters, with promoters +1.9 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Onward Technologies Ltd: the Z-score reads 6.54. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 6.54 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 6.54.

Frequently asked questions