Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. trades at $3.8, between stages. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of $2 to $4. On relative strength it has no relative-strength read yet.

Today the stock is between stages. At $3.8 it trades near its long-run average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range ($2–$4).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved +1% while the S&P 500 moved +8% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: no trailing-13-week read yet — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: how the P/E reads against its own history.

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. A P/E returns here the first period the bottom line turns positive.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Consulting Services.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +18.8% year on year. The last full year, FY26, came in at $0.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.3 B. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +18.8% year on year. The last full year, FY26, came in at $0.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.3 B. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY26 revenue came in at $0.6 B (−7.4% on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +18.8% year on year.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 555.3% this quarter (+636.6 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.'s operating margin is 555.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +636.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +649.5 percentage points. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −94.2% to 231.7%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.'s operating margin is 555.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +636.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +649.5 percentage points. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −94.2% to 231.7%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 555.3%, +636.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −94.2%–231.7%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +649.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.9 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit null in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. earned $2.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. Full-year FY26 profit was $1.5 B. That is 571.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.7 B.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. earned $2.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. Full-year FY26 profit was $1.5 B. That is 571.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.7 B.

Mar 26 profit was $2.2 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed $1.5 B (null).

🚨 Read this profit with care: at $2.2 B it is larger than the whole quarter's revenue of $0.4 B — no operating business earns more than it sells, so this is a one-off item (a debt-to-equity conversion, a tax write-back or an asset sale), not money the business earned. The underlying operations are running at 555.3% operating margin; the year-on-year jump and any P/E built on this number are artefacts of the one-off, not a real earnings turn.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow?

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $−0.3 B of operating cash against $−0.5 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $−0.3 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $−0.3 B against reported profit of $−0.5 B, leaving free cash of $−0.3 B after $0.0 B of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: $0.0 B of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY26 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROE is null%.

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. earns a ROE of −248% in FY26. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 236.5% net margin on 0.72× asset turns.

FY26 ROE is −248%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 236.5% net margin × 0.72× asset turns × −1.47× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −250.3% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is not in our numbers.

Dividend

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 8 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 8 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

→ No payout to follow. The cash question becomes what the business does with what it earns instead.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

A borrowings history is not in our numbers for this stock.

A borrowings history is not in our numbers for this stock, so this section says that plainly rather than working around it.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register.

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Robot Consulting Co., Ltd., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 0.1 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.: the Z-score reads −3.06. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of −3.06 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads −3.06.

Frequently asked questions