Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-29
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-29

Karman Holdings Inc.

KRMN
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense

Karman Holdings Inc. is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 10th percentile of its own 2-year range — the business is moving before the market.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 33% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is building a base (5 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 10th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 33% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Price
$49.5
−1.8% 1Y
P/E
220.2×
10th pctile
of its own 2-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.1 B
+50.0% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$0.0 B
Operating margin
13.3%
+3.3 pp YoY
ROE
8%
FY25
ROIC
5.7%
Cash conversion
33%
of profit, last 2 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Karman Holdings Inc. trades at $49.5, building a base and 5 weeks into that stage. That is −34.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 6% of a 52-week range of $46 to $109. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (17 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is building a base — week 5 of stage 1. At $49.5 it trades −34.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 6% of its 52-week range ($46–$109).

Jul 26: $49.5 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
−34.0% versus the 200-day line, week 5 of stage 1
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$115$91.6$68.2$44.9$21.5$$50$75Feb 25Jun 25Nov 25Mar 26Jul 26
$115$91.6$68.2$44.9$21.5$$50$75Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (77 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Feb 25Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.5 years the stock moved +55% while the S&P 500 moved +22% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-02) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 10th percentile of its own range.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Karman Holdings Inc. trades at 220.2× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 10% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 818.1×, measured across 1.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 220.2× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 10% of the time, against a long-run median of 818.1× measured over 1.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 220.2× vs a 818.1× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 1.5-year window; loss-period spikes above 1,580× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 10% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
1,690.7×$0.251,290.6×$0.19890.5×$0.12490.4×$0.0690.4×$0.00×$215.39×$0Feb 25Jun 25Nov 25Mar 26Jul 26
1,690.7×$0.251,290.6×$0.19890.5×$0.12490.4×$0.0690.4×$0.00×$215.39×$0Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
P/E
220.2×
10th percentile of 2y
PEG
4.33
derived from 3-year earnings growth

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +62.5% against a −1.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Karman Holdings Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 7 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueEPS
53%326%42%233%31%140%20%47%9.5%−46%%%50%300%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
53%326%42%233%31%140%20%47%9.5%−46%%%50%300%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
9.6%8.9%8.2%7.5%6.8%%7.6%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
9.6%8.9%8.2%7.5%6.8%%7.6%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 7.6% · span 7.0%–9.4%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Growth, year by year: revenue +34.3% in FY25, profit +100.0% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
35%175%32%145%28%115%24%84%21%54%%%34.3%100%FY22FY23FY25
35%175%32%145%28%115%24%84%21%54%%%34.3%100%FY22FY23FY25
TTM growth by quarter Trailing-twelve-month growth versus the year-ago TTM, per quarter, %: revenue (left axis); profit and EPS (right axis). Spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue TTM YoYEPS TTM YoY
42%326%38%233%34%140%29%47%25%−46%%%40.5%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
42%326%38%233%34%140%29%47%25%−46%%%40.5%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+34.3%+26.9%
Profit+100.0%
EPS+62.5%
Stock price−1.8%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+50.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
26.9%
long-run compound pace

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Karman Holdings Inc. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Aerospace & Defense.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Karman Holdings Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. That is the 6th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 3 years it has compounded at 26.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.5 B.

Karman Holdings Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. That is the 6th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 3 years it has compounded at 26.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.5 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.5 B (+34.3% on the year), capping 3 years at 26.9% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.1 B, +50.0% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $0.5 B (+34.3% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 4-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
26.9% a year over 3 years
RevenueYoY growth
0.535%0.432%0.328%0.124%0.021%$ B%$1B34.3%FY22FY23FY25
0.535%0.432%0.328%0.124%0.021%$ B%$1B34.3%FY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.1 B (+50.0% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
6th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.1653%0.1242%0.0831%0.0420%0.009.5%$ B%$0B50%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
0.1653%0.1242%0.0831%0.0420%0.009.5%$ B%$0B50%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +40.3% growth against the decade's 26.9% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 13.3% this quarter (+3.3 pp YoY).

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Karman Holdings Inc.'s operating margin is 13.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +3.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.7% to 17.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Karman Holdings Inc.'s operating margin is 13.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +3.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.7% to 17.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 13.3%, +3.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.7%–17.9%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +3.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY25: 14.9% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 4-year window.
within a 8.7–17.9% band over 4 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
19%10%16%6.8%13%3.5%11%0.2%8.0%−3.1%%%14.9%−2.2%FY22FY23FY25
19%10%16%6.8%13%3.5%11%0.2%8.0%−3.1%%%14.9%−2.2%FY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: 13.3% operating margin (+3.3 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
23%5.1%20%2.2%16%−0.6%13%−3.4%9.0%−6.3%%%13.3%3.3%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
23%5.1%20%2.2%16%−0.6%13%−3.4%9.0%−6.3%%%13.3%3.3%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit null in the latest quarter.

07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Karman Holdings Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 6.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.

Karman Holdings Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 6.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.

Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (+100.0%).

FY25 profit $0.0 B (+100.0% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 4-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.022101.2%0.014100.6%0.005100.0%−0.00499.4%−0.01298.8%$ B%$0B100%FY22FY23FY25
0.022101.2%0.014100.6%0.005100.0%−0.00499.4%−0.01298.8%$ B%$0B100%FY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BDec 23Dec 24Mar 26
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BDec 23Dec 24Mar 26

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 33% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 2 fiscal years 33% of Karman Holdings Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was $−0.0 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $−0.0 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 33% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $−0.0 B vs profit $0.0 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 4-year window, annual resolution.
33% of 2-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.040.020.00−0.03−0.05$ B$0B$0B$0BFY22FY23FY25
0.040.020.00−0.03−0.05$ B$0B$0B$0BFY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.0 B = 0% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 10 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.03124%0.0237%0.01−50%−0.01−137%−0.02−224%$ B%$0B0%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
0.03124%0.0237%0.01−50%−0.01−137%−0.02−224%$ B%$0B0%Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26

🚨 Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: $0.0 B of building over 3 years.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Karman Holdings Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.0 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.0220.0160.0110.0050.000$ B$0BFY22FY23FY25
0.0220.0160.0110.0050.000$ B$0BFY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 9 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.0220.020.0160.010.011−0.010.005−0.030.000−0.04$ B$ B$0B$0BMar 24Mar 25Mar 26
0.0220.020.0160.010.011−0.010.005−0.030.000−0.04$ B$ B$0B$0BMar 24Mar 25Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROE is 8%.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Karman Holdings Inc. earns a ROE of 5% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −6% in FY22. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 4.3% net margin on 0.43× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 5%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 4.3% net margin × 0.43× asset turns × 2.89× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 5.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

FY25: ROE 5% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 4-year window, dips included.
the climb back from FY22's −6%
ROEROIC (annual)
33%23%13%2.0%−8.5%%5.3%5%FY22FY23FY25
33%23%13%2.0%−8.5%%5.3%5%FY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC 7.1% (TTM) Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %. Last 11 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)
19%13%7.3%1.5%−4.4%%7.1%2.1%Sep 22Dec 24Mar 26
19%13%7.3%1.5%−4.4%%7.1%2.1%Sep 22Dec 24Mar 26

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 2.14.

11 · Dividend

Dividend

Karman Holdings Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 10 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Karman Holdings Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 10 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

→ No payout to follow. The cash question becomes what the business does with what it earns instead.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Karman Holdings Inc. carries total debt of $0.9 B against shareholder equity of $0.4 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 2.12. On the annual view that ratio went from 2.22 in FY22 to 1.55 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $0.9 B against shareholder equity of $0.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 2.12. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 2.22 (FY22) to 1.55 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $0.6 B at 1.55× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 4-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
0.62.3×0.52.1×0.31.9×0.21.7×0.01.5×$ B×$1B1.55×FY22FY23FY25
0.62.3×0.52.1×0.31.9×0.21.7×0.01.5×$ B×$1B1.55×FY22FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $0.9 B, debt-to-equity 2.12 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 11 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
0.92.4×0.72.1×0.51.8×0.21.4×0.01.1×$ B×$1B2.12×Sep 22Dec 24Mar 26
0.92.4×0.72.1×0.51.8×0.21.4×0.01.1×$ B×$1B2.12×Sep 22Dec 24Mar 26

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: short interest is 10.9% of the float.

13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

10.9% of Karman Holdings Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 10.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.3 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
10.9%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
3.3
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Karman Holdings Inc.: the Z-score reads 5.97. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 5.97 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 5.97.

Related companies · same industry · Aerospace & Defense Every company is compared on the shape of its own curves, not static ratios. The Revenue, EPS and ROCE columns each draw that company's last 12 quarters as a mini line of the ACTUAL level (trailing-twelve-month revenue and EPS, and the ROCE itself) — so a line that climbs is a business getting bigger, a line that sinks is one shrinking. The colour tracks the same line: green when it is rising or steadily healthy, amber when it is rolling over from a high (still elevated but turning down), red when it is falling, grey when flat or stuck. Colour and direction always agree — a green line never points down. The ROCE curve is the return on capital (annual readings for peers, so a slightly coarser line than the quarterly one at the top of this page). The Stage column then runs the same 12-quarter trajectory classifier used at the top of the page on each company and names where it sits. What lands a company in each bucket: CONSISTENT — growth stays positive across the window and returns are healthy (ROCE ≥ 15%, or ROE ≥ 12% for lenders); IMPROVING — profit or EPS fell into real decline, bottomed a few quarters back, and has climbed back to positive and held there; TURNING AROUND — the same kind of trough but more recent, with the latest quarters just lifting off it (an early, unconfirmed turn); TOPPING OUT — growth is still positive but decelerating hard from its own peak while returns have stopped rising; DETERIORATING — two or more growth curves are shrinking (latest below zero) and staying there, not one soft quarter; MIXED — the curves genuinely disagree, or no clean majority, so no single word fits; NO READ — fewer than eight usable quarters. It is a like-for-like read of every company against its own past, not a ranking against the group.
CompanyP/EMkt capRevenueEPSROCEStage
Karman Holdings Inc. this page220.2×$7BNo read
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.$1.5T
GE Aerospace42.9×$377BMixed
RTX Corporation38.5×$295BImproving
The Boeing Company78.8×$175BNo read
Lockheed Martin Corporation21.4×$134BTurning around
Howmet Aerospace Inc.66.4×$114BConsistent
General Dynamics Corporation24.7×$106BConsistent
Northrop Grumman Corporation17.4×$78BMixed
TransDigm Group Incorporated40.8×$73BMixed
Honeywell Aerospace Inc.26.9×$68B
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.33.1×$57BMixed
HEICO Corporation64.9×$51BConsistent
Axon Enterprise, Inc.220.2×$44BMixed
HEICO Corporation53.6×$42BConsistent
Elbit Systems Ltd.66.2×$39BImproving
Rocket Lab Corporation$38BNo read
Curtiss-Wright Corporation53.4×$27BConsistent
Woodward, Inc.49.2×$24BConsistent
FTAI Aviation Ltd.42.3×$22BMixed
Textron Inc.17.0×$16BTurning around
BWX Technologies, Inc.45.2×$16BConsistent
Moog Inc.46.8×$13BMixed
Leonardo DRS, Inc.46.0×$13BMixed
Embraer S.A.37.2×$12BMixed
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.19.5×$12BImproving
StandardAero, Inc.34.3×$10BNo read
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.283.4×$9BNo read
CAE Inc.37.9×$8BDeteriorating
Hexcel Corporation73.1×$8BMixed
AeroVironment, Inc.$8BNo read
Planet Labs PBC$7BNo read
Loar Holdings Inc.100.8×$7BNo read
DPC Holdings PLC$7B
Mercury Systems, Inc.$6BNo read
VSE Corporation92.2×$6BTurning around
AAR Corp.29.0×$6BTurning around
MDA Space Ltd.64.4×$5BMixed
BETA Technologies, Inc.$4BNo read
Archer Aviation Inc.$4B
12 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s stock price today?

Karman Holdings Inc. trades at $49.5, −1.8% over the past year. The company is valued at $7.0 B. The stock sits at 6% of its 52-week range of $46–$109, −34.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 5 weeks in. — as of 29 July 2026.

What were Karman Holdings Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

Karman Holdings Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $0.06. The operating margin was 13.3%, 3.3 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s revenue?

Karman Holdings Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.5 B (+34.3%). Over the last 3 years revenue compounded at 26.9% a year. — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s profit?

Karman Holdings Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran 13.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s market cap?

Karman Holdings Inc.'s market capitalisation is $7.0 B at a stock price of $49.5. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Karman Holdings Inc. trades at a P/E of 220.2×, at the 10th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 818.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 29 July 2026.

Does Karman Holdings Inc. pay a dividend?

No — Karman Holdings Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 10 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 29 July 2026.

Is Karman Holdings Inc. overvalued?

On its own history, Karman Holdings Inc. looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 220.2× has been cheaper only 10% of the time in 2 years (long-run median 818.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 29 July 2026.

How is Karman Holdings Inc. performing?

Karman Holdings Inc. is building a base, 5 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 17 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 29 July 2026.

Is Karman Holdings Inc. in an uptrend?

No — the price is building a base (week 5 of stage 1), trading −34.0% versus its 200-day average and at 6% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 29 July 2026.

Is Karman Holdings Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Karman Holdings Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-02), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.5 years the stock moved +55% against the S&P 500's +22% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 29 July 2026.

Will Karman Holdings Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Karman Holdings Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $49.5, the price is building a base 5 weeks in. Its P/E of 220.2× sits at the 10th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 29 July 2026.

Is the market betting against Karman Holdings Inc.?

Yes — short interest is 10.9% of Karman Holdings Inc.'s tradable float, about 3.3 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 29 July 2026.

Does Karman Holdings Inc. have too much debt?

It carries real leverage — Karman Holdings Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 2.14. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s capex?

Karman Holdings Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 29 July 2026.

What is Karman Holdings Inc.'s cash flow?

Karman Holdings Inc. generated $−0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 29 July 2026.

Is Karman Holdings Inc.'s profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 2 fiscal years, 33% of Karman Holdings Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $−0.0 B against reported profit of $0.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 29 July 2026.

How financially safe is Karman Holdings Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 5.97 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 29 July 2026.

Where is Karman Holdings Inc. in its business cycle?

Karman Holdings Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 14.9%, against a 4-year band of 8.7%–17.9%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 13.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 29 July 2026.

What could break the Karman Holdings Inc. story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 33% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 29 July 2026.

Is Karman Holdings Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Karman Holdings Inc. is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 10th percentile of its own 2-year range — the business is moving before the market. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 29 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI