Kiri Industries Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Kiri Industries Ltd trades at ₹398, in a downtrend and 24 weeks into that stage. That is −12.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 18% of a 52-week range of ₹351 to ₹616. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (7 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 24 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹398 it trades −12.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 18% of its 52-week range (₹351–₹616).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +333% while the NIFTY 500 moved +274% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-17) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 95th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Kiri Industries Ltd trades at 22.7× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 5.7×, measured across 10.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 22.7× is at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile), against a long-run median of 5.7× measured over 10.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +1,848.9% against a −31.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −7.7%/yr price move, ~−21.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+13.3 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +1.3%/yr price move, ~−13.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+15.0 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 331% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Kiri Industries Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

36.9/100 — rank 9 of 10 in Dyes & Pigments · 62% evidence confidence

Kiri Industries Ltd scores 36.9 out of 100 against the 10 companies it is compared with in Dyes & Pigments, ranking 9. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 11.9 + 9.9 + 10 + 5.1 = 36.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Kiri Industries Ltd reported ₹250 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.0% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −2.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹840 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹839 Cr.

Kiri Industries Ltd reported ₹250 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.0% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −2.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹840 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹839 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹840 Cr (+13.5% on the year), capping 10 years at −2.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹250 Cr, +22.0% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +13.2% growth against the decade's −2.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +13.4% over the last 4 quarters against −2.7%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +2,008.7% vs +528.3%/yr — accelerating.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: −57.0% this quarter (−55.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Kiri Industries Ltd's operating margin is −57.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −55.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −26.0% to 17.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

Kiri Industries Ltd's operating margin is −57.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −55.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −26.0% to 17.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −57.0%, −55.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −26.0%–17.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −54.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −12.8 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit null in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Kiri Industries Ltd earned ₹514 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹5,567 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 39.7%. That is 205.6% of the quarter's revenue.

Kiri Industries Ltd earned ₹514 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹5,567 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 39.7%. That is 205.6% of the quarter's revenue.

Mar 26 profit was ₹514 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹5,567 Cr (+2,000.8%), and the 10-year compound rate is 39.7%.

🚨 Read this profit with care: at ₹514 Cr it is larger than the whole quarter's revenue of ₹250 Cr — no operating business earns more than it sells, so this is a one-off item (a debt-to-equity conversion, a tax write-back or an asset sale), not money the business earned. The underlying operations are running at −57.0% operating margin; the year-on-year jump and any P/E built on this number are artefacts of the one-off, not a real earnings turn.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 70% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 70% of Kiri Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 that was ₹4,555 Cr of operating cash against ₹5,567 Cr of profit. After ₹287 Cr of capital spending, ₹4,268 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹4,555 Cr against reported profit of ₹5,567 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹4,268 Cr after ₹287 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 70% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 70%: the cash cycle tightened 134 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 4.7× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹668 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Kiri Industries Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −62 days in FY26, down from 72 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹668 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹840 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹2.3 Cr, so roughly ₹−143 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 45 days, inventory at 94 days — roughly 3.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −62 days, tighter than FY21's 72.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 94 days to sell; customers pay about 45 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 201 days — netting out to the −62-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹840 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹2.3 Cr — so the −62-day loop keeps roughly ₹−143 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹668 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹141 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹42.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is −2%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Kiri Industries Ltd earns a ROCE of −2% in FY26. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 662.7% net margin on 0.12× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is −2%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 662.7% net margin × 0.12× asset turns × 1.09× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 86.7% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 331% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.01.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Kiri Industries Ltd carries ₹42.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹6,436 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.01. Operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹152 Cr to ₹42.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹668 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹42.0 Cr against equity of ₹6,436 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.01. Operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹152 Cr to ₹42.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹668 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 331% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions cut 16.6 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 16.6 points of Kiri Industries Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 16.8% of the company. Promoters moved +15.0 points over the same window, to 41.7%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −16.6 points over 8 quarters to 16.8%; Promoters: +15.0 points over 8 quarters to 41.7%; Domestic institutions: +0.2 points over 8 quarters to 1.3%.

🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−16.6 points), absorbed on the other side by promoters (+15.0 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Kiri Industries Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions