Colab Platforms Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Colab Platforms Ltd trades at ₹173, in a confirmed uptrend and 66 weeks into that stage. That is +81.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 82% of a 52-week range of ₹28 to ₹205. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 66 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹173 it trades +81.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 82% of its 52-week range (₹28–₹205).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 6.2 years the stock moved +20,731% while the NIFTY 500 moved +128% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-01-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 88th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Colab Platforms Ltd trades at 730.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 84.9×, measured across 3.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 730.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile), against a long-run median of 84.9× measured over 3.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +55.6% against a +430.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +282.5%/yr price move, ~+38.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+243.8 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Colab Platforms Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE lifting at 17.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 9 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

64.2/100 — rank 2 of 6 in IT Enabled Services/Business Process Outsourcing · 51% evidence confidence

Colab Platforms Ltd scores 64.2 out of 100 against the 6 companies it is compared with in IT Enabled Services/Business Process Outsourcing, ranking 2. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 23.3 + 15.4 + 8.5 + 17 = 64.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Colab Platforms Ltd reported ₹45.5 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +95.9% year on year. That is the 7th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹70.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹128 Cr.

Colab Platforms Ltd reported ₹45.5 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +95.9% year on year. That is the 7th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹70.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹128 Cr.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹70.0 Cr (+3,400.0% on the year). The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹45.5 Cr, +95.9% year on year — the 7th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +162.5% over the last 4 quarters against +701.6%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit +130.0% vs +65.7%/yr — accelerating.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: −0.0% this quarter (−2.4 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Colab Platforms Ltd's operating margin is −0.0% in the Dec 25 quarter, −2.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −49.0% to 90.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Colab Platforms Ltd's operating margin is −0.0% in the Dec 25 quarter, −2.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −49.0% to 90.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −0.0%, −2.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −49.0%–90.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −2.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −2.9 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +20.7% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Colab Platforms Ltd earned ₹1.1 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +20.7% year on year. It is the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹3.0 Cr. That is 2.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹0.9 Cr.

Colab Platforms Ltd earned ₹1.1 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +20.7% year on year. It is the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹3.0 Cr. That is 2.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹0.9 Cr.

Dec 25 profit was ₹1.1 Cr, +20.7% year on year — the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹3.0 Cr (+50.0%).

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +95.9% and the margin −2.4 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +189.7% vs revenue +4,711.6%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: −150% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −150% of Colab Platforms Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹4.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹3.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹4.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹4.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹3.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹4.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −150% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at −150%: the cash cycle tightened 2,523 days between FY20 and FY25 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a 11-day cycle and ₹0.0 Cr of building.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Colab Platforms Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 11 days in FY25, down from 2,534 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹70.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr, so roughly ₹2.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY25: debtors at 11 days, inventory at 0 days — roughly 0.0 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 11 days, tighter than FY20's 2,534.

In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹70.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr — so the 11-day loop keeps roughly ₹2.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 17%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Colab Platforms Ltd earns a ROCE of 17% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −2% in FY20. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 4.3% net margin on 2.69× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 17%, recovered from a FY20 trough of −2% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 4.3% net margin × 2.69× asset turns × 1.08× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 12.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.00.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Colab Platforms Ltd carries ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹24.0 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹5.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY25: borrowings of ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹24.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹5.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register is quiet.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Colab Platforms Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Promoters moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 33.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 33.9%.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Colab Platforms Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions