Axentra Corp Limited

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Axentra Corp Limited trades at ₹317, in a confirmed uptrend and 50 weeks into that stage. That is +87.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 84% of a 52-week range of ₹20 to ₹372. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (9 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 50 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹317 it trades +87.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 84% of its 52-week range (₹20–₹372).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2.3 years the stock moved +4,932% while the NIFTY 500 moved +19% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-11) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 100th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Axentra Corp Limited trades at 600.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 14.6×, measured across 0.8 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 600.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 14.6× measured over 0.8 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −60.2% against a +337.7% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Axentra Corp Limited reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

48.2/100 — rank 4 of 5 in Construction - Factories/Offices/Commercial · 43% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Axentra Corp Limited scores 48.2 out of 100 against the 5 companies it is compared with in Construction - Factories/Offices/Commercial, ranking 4. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14.5 + 11.2 + 10 + 12.5 = 48.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Axentra Corp Limited reported ₹10.3 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹10.3 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹10.3 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

Axentra Corp Limited reported ₹10.3 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹10.3 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹10.3 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹10.3 Cr (+3,346.7% on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹10.3 Cr, null year on year.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 10.9% this quarter (null pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Axentra Corp Limited's operating margin is 10.9% in the Mar 26 quarter. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0% to 40.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Axentra Corp Limited's operating margin is 10.9% in the Mar 26 quarter. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0% to 40.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 10.9%, null pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0%–40.0%.

Why: the numbers show the operating margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit null in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Axentra Corp Limited earned ₹1.3 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹1.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 59.1%. That is 12.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.01 Cr. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Axentra Corp Limited earned ₹1.3 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹1.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 59.1%. That is 12.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.01 Cr. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹1.3 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹1.0 Cr (+2,500.0%), and the 10-year compound rate is 59.1%.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 50% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 50% of Axentra Corp Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹0.1 Cr of operating cash against ₹0.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹0.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹0.1 Cr against reported profit of ₹0.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹0.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 50% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at 50%: the cash cycle tightened 217 days between FY17 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a 367-day cycle and ₹0.0 Cr of building.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Axentra Corp Limited's cash conversion cycle runs 367 days in FY26, down from 584 days in FY17. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹10.3 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr, so roughly ₹10.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 367 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 367 days, tighter than FY17's 584.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹10.3 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr — so the 367-day loop keeps roughly ₹10.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹0.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 7%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Axentra Corp Limited earns a ROCE of 7% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −3,000% in FY18. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 10.1% net margin on 0.25× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 7%, recovered from a FY18 trough of −3,000% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 10.1% net margin × 0.25× asset turns × 1.32× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.03.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Axentra Corp Limited carries ₹1.1 Cr of borrowings against ₹31.3 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.03. Operating profit covers the interest bill 72×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹1.1 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹1.1 Cr against equity of ₹31.3 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.03. Operating profit covers the interest bill 72×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹1.1 Cr while capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions added 58.6 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions added 58.6 points of Axentra Corp Limited over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 58.6% of the company. Promoters moved −4.1 points over the same window, to 30.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +58.6 points over 8 quarters to 58.6%; Promoters: −4.1 points over 8 quarters to 30.5%.

Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (+58.6 points), absorbed on the other side by promoters (−4.1 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Axentra Corp Limited: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions