# Songbird (SGB): crypto price, market cap and strength versus Bitcoin

> Songbird (SGB) closed at $0.0007548 on 3 November 2026, with a market capitalisation of $14.7M (rank 1002). On 30 October 2026 it was below its 200-day average of $0.00107, which is falling. Over 90 days it is 45.4 percentage points behind Bitcoin. Layer 1 as a theme is -1.3% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## What is Songbird (SGB)?

Songbird (SGB) is a crypto token that CoinGecko lists under smart contract platform. We place it in the Layer 1 theme, with 73 coins. Its highest daily close since 12 November 2021 was $0.5398 on 11 December 2021; its lowest was $0.0006507 on 8 April 2026.

## Agent research brief

- What this coin is: Songbird (SGB), a Layer 1 token of $14.7M at market-cap rank 1002. Recent on-chain figures are sourced from DefiLlama.
- What the tape says: 45.4 percentage points behind Bitcoin over 90 days; below its 200-day average. Layer 1 as a theme is -1.3% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks.
- What the evidence supports: Nothing is ranked for Songbird this week: No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.
- What is missing: There is no valuation band for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no PE-style range can be built. Songbird publishes no fee, revenue, TVL or user series at all.

Theme: Layer 1 (/crypto/sector/layer-1). Price 2026-11-03; market-cap snapshot 2026-11-03.

## Price, returns and risk

Songbird is -71.5% over one year, -22.1% over 90 days and -15.2% over 30 days. Annualised 30-day volatility is 125%. Its deepest fall from a high inside the last 90 days is 44%. It trades below its 200-day average, which is falling.

- Price: $0.0007548
- Market cap: $14.7M (rank 1002)
- Returns: 7d -11%; 30d -15%; 90d -22%; 180d -4.4%; 1y -72%
- Versus Bitcoin, 90d: −45.4 pts (percentage points: its return minus Bitcoin's)
- 30-day volatility: 125% annualised; deepest 90-day fall 44%
- 200-day average: $0.00107, trading below it

## Protocol economics

Songbird has no complete calendar-quarter series on file yet, so no quarterly chart is drawn. DefiLlama does publish recent daily figures for it, and the last 30 and 90 days are shown below with their end date. Network activity is evidence about the protocol, not earnings owed to the token.

## Research score

Songbird is NOT RATED this week. No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading.

No valuation band exists for any coin on this site: historical market capitalisation is not held, so no company-style valuation range can be built.

## Layer 1 scorecard

Songbird is one of 73 Layer 1 coins here, 64 of which carry enough evidence to be rated and ranked. Songbird is not among them this week, for the reason stated above. The table below is the theme's own scorecard, in its own order, with this coin marked.

- 1. Kava (KAVA): score 70.2; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 2. Bitcoin SV (BSV): score 65.7; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 3. Abey (ABEY): score 65.4; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 4. Bitcoin Cash (BCH): score 64.5; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 5. Sonic (S): score 63.8; evidence 59%; Thinly traded
- 6. APEX (AP3X): score 63.7; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 7. Avalanche (AVAX): score 62.9; evidence 86%; Better than most
- 8. Solana (SOL): score 62; evidence 86%; Better than most
- 9. VeThor (VTHO): score 61.9; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 10. Ethereum (ETH): score 59.7; evidence 79%; Mixed
- 11. Brevis (BREV): score 58.4; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 12. TRON (TRX): score 58.2; evidence 86%; Mixed
- 13. Celestia (TIA): score 58.2; evidence 70%; Price-led, little network data
- 14. Irys (IRYS): score 57.6; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 15. Space and Time (SXT): score 57.3; evidence 66%; Price-led, little network data
- 16. Bitcoin (BTC): score 57.1; evidence 70%; Price-led, little network data
- 17. Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL): score 56.7; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 18. Electroneum (ETN): score 56.6; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 19. ARK (ARK): score 56.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 20. Sui (SUI): score 55.8; evidence 43%; Price-led, little network data
- 21. OHO Blockchain (OHO): score 54.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 22. Ontology Gas (ONG): score 53.6; evidence 43%; Thinly traded
- 23. Aptos (APT): score 53.2; evidence 63%; Price-led, little network data
- 24. Cosmos Hub (ATOM): score 51.7; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 25. XRP (XRP): score 51.6; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 26. Vaulta (A): score 51; evidence 43%; Thinly traded
- 27. Kaia (KAIA): score 50.9; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 28. Polkadot (DOT): score 50; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 29. VeChain (VET): score 49.7; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 30. Ontology (ONT): score 49.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 31. Qtum (QTUM): score 49.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 32. Gas (GAS): score 48.9; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 33. Ozone Chain (OZO): score 48.2; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 34. Xertra (STRAX): score 48.2; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 35. Venom (VENOM): score 45.6; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 36. Ethereum Classic (ETC): score 45.5; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 37. Plasma (XPL): score 44.5; evidence 66%; Price-led, little network data
- 38. Ardor (ARDR): score 44.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 39. Worldcoin (WLD): score 44.2; evidence 100%; Behind most
- 40. Conflux (CFX): score 43.7; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 41. aelf (ELF): score 42.7; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 42. Flare (FLR): score 42.2; evidence 70%; Thinly traded
- 43. NEO (NEO): score 42.2; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 44. Kusama (KSM): score 41.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 45. Gravity (by Galxe) (G): score 41.2; evidence 56%; Thinly traded
- 46. Hedera (HBAR): score 40.2; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 47. Naoris Protocol (NAORIS): score 40; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 48. Waves (WAVES): score 39.1; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 49. Nesa (NES): score 39; evidence 43%; Price-led, little network data
- 50. KUB Coin (KUB): score 38.8; evidence 55%; Thinly traded
- 51. Cardano (ADA): score 37.6; evidence 76%; Behind most
- 52. Bityuan (BTY): score 37.1; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 53. Moonriver (MOVR): score 36.9; evidence 50%; Price-led, little network data
- 54. eCash (XEC): score 35.9; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 55. Gram (prev. Toncoin) (GRAM): score 35.6; evidence 86%; Behind most
- 56. QANplatform (QANX): score 35.5; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 57. EthereumPoW (ETHW): score 35.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 58. AtomOne (ATONE): score 34.8; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 59. DigiByte (DGB): score 33.3; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 60. XPR Network (XPR): score 32.8; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 61. Zilliqa (ZIL): score 31.2; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 62. Monad (MON): score 30.4; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 63. Constellation (DAG): score 29.7; evidence 50%; Thinly traded
- 64. Movement (MOVE): score 26.9; evidence 59%; Thinly traded
- , . Songbird (SGB) [this coin]: score not rated; evidence 0%; Not rated

## Limitations

- Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
- Market capitalisation is a dated snapshot, not a point-in-time historical supply series, so yields computed against it inherit that lag.
- No valuation band exists for any coin: historical market capitalisation is not held at all.
- Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
- The research score is relative to this coin's own theme only. It is not comparable across themes and is not an entry signal.

## FAQs

### What is Songbird (SGB)?

Songbird (SGB) is a crypto token that CoinGecko lists under smart contract platform. We place it in the Layer 1 theme, with 73 coins. Its highest daily close since 12 November 2021 was $0.5398 on 11 December 2021; its lowest was $0.0006507 on 8 April 2026.

### What is the market cap of Songbird?

Songbird's market capitalisation is $14.7M, ranking it 1002 in the top-1,000 crypto universe, read on 3 November 2026. It is refreshed separately from the daily price.

### Is Songbird beating Bitcoin?

Over 90 days Songbird is 45.4 percentage points behind Bitcoin: its own return minus Bitcoin's. Its theme, Layer 1, is -1.3% against Bitcoin over 13 weeks. Songbird trades below its 200-day average as of 3 November 2026.

### What is Songbird's highest price?

The highest daily close we hold for Songbird is $0.5398, on 11 December 2021, in records from 12 November 2021. The lowest is $0.0006507, on 8 April 2026. The close on 3 November 2026, $0.0007548, is 100% below that high.

### Does Songbird have a P/E ratio?

No. There is no company-style P/E or PEG for a crypto token, and no valuation band is shown on this page because the data to build one honestly does not exist: historical market capitalisation is not held, only a current snapshot. Where a protocol publishes fees or revenue, this page shows the yield against that dated snapshot instead.

### Why is Songbird not rated?

No traded volume is reported on most of the last 30 days, so it has no liquidity reading. It stays on the site with its price history visible, because a missing reading is not a middling reading and a made-up score would be worse than none.

### How much Songbird history does this page show?

Five years of weekly closes where they exist, plus 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity for the metrics Songbird actually publishes. No complete quarterly series is on file for this token yet; DefiLlama's last 30 and 90 days are shown instead.

### How much did Songbird earn in the last 30 days?

In the 30 days to 30 October 2026, DefiLlama shows $1.9K of fees for Songbird. Over 90 days: $6.4K of fees. Fees are what users paid; revenue is the part the protocol keeps.